term standard (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

term standard in Washington

9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1893–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Jacksongreen
wash · 1999 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016State v. Fuentes, 183 Wn.2d 149, 160 , 3 52 P.3d 152 (2015); accord State v. Jackson, 137 Wn.2d 712, 728-29 , 976 P.2d 1229 (1999).

11
State v. Jacksongreen
wash · 1999 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016State v. Fuentes, 183 Wn.2d 149, 160 , 3 52 P.3d 152 (2015); accord State v. Jackson, 137 Wn.2d 712, 728-29 , 976 P.2d 1229 (1999).

11
Delano v. Luedinghausgreen
wash · 1912 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1915–1915
2 sentences

1915See, also, Delano v. Lúedmghaus, 70 Wash. 573 , 127 Pac. 197 .

1915See, also, Delano v. Lúedmghaus, 70 Wash. 573 , 127 Pac. 197 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Bahl green
wash · 2008
2 sentences

2015State v. Bah!, 164 Wn.2d 739, 754 , 193 P.3d 678 (2008)~ Sandoz did not loiter. 8 "Loiter" means "to remain in or near a place in an idle or apparently idle manner." WEBSTER'S THIRD NEW INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY 1331 (2002).

2015State v. Bahl, 164 Wn.2d 739, 754 , 193 P.3d 678 (2008).

22015–2015
State v. Bahl green
wash · 2008
2 sentences

2015State v. Bah!, 164 Wn.2d 739, 754 , 193 P.3d 678 (2008)~ Sandoz did not loiter. 8 "Loiter" means "to remain in or near a place in an idle or apparently idle manner." WEBSTER'S THIRD NEW INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY 1331 (2002).

2015State v. Bahl, 164 Wn.2d 739, 754 , 193 P.3d 678 (2008).

22015–2015
Stockwell v. Couillard green
mass · 1880
2 sentences

1975Winthrop v. Fairbanks, 41 Me. 307 ; Whitaker v. Brown, 46 Pa. St. 197; Cowdrey v. Colburn, 7 Allen, 9 ; Stockwell v. Couillard, 129 Mass. 231 ; Martindale on Conveyancing, supra. Biles v. Tacoma, O. & G.

1893Winthrop v. Fairbanks, 41 Me. 307 ; Whitaker v. Brown, 46 Pa. St. 197; Cowdrey v. Colburn, 7 Allen, 9 ; Stockwell v. Couillard, 129 Mass. 231 ; Martindale on Conveyancing, supra. In the deed before us the language is “reserving and excepting therefrom,” etc. These words must be construed to mean either a reservation or an exception, for, strictly speaking, a thing cannot be both reserved and excepted at the same time.

21893–1975
Inhabitants of Winthrop v. Fairbanks green
me · 1856
2 sentences

1975Winthrop v. Fairbanks, 41 Me. 307 ; Whitaker v. Brown, 46 Pa. St. 197; Cowdrey v. Colburn, 7 Allen, 9 ; Stockwell v. Couillard, 129 Mass. 231 ; Martindale on Conveyancing, supra. Biles v. Tacoma, O. & G.

1893Winthrop v. Fairbanks, 41 Me. 307 ; Whitaker v. Brown, 46 Pa. St. 197; Cowdrey v. Colburn, 7 Allen, 9 ; Stockwell v. Couillard, 129 Mass. 231 ; Martindale on Conveyancing, supra. In the deed before us the language is “reserving and excepting therefrom,” etc. These words must be construed to mean either a reservation or an exception, for, strictly speaking, a thing cannot be both reserved and excepted at the same time.

21893–1975
State v. Watson green
wash · 2002
1 sentence

2017App. 419, 426 , 393 P.3d 859 (2017) (quoting State v. Watson, 146 Wn.2d 947, 954 , 51 P.3d 66 (2002)). 5 CR 60(b)(1) does not define “mistake.” If a court rule does not define a term, we determine the plain and ordinary meaning of the term from a standard dictionary.

12017–2017
State v. Watson green
wash · 2002
1 sentence

2017App. 419, 426 , 393 P.3d 859 (2017) (quoting State v. Watson, 146 Wn.2d 947, 954 , 51 P.3d 66 (2002)). 5 CR 60(b)(1) does not define “mistake.” If a court rule does not define a term, we determine the plain and ordinary meaning of the term from a standard dictionary.

12017–2017
In Re: Gretchen Ruff (fka Gretchen Worthley) v. William Worthley green
washctapp · 2017
1 sentence

2017App. 419, 426 , 393 P.3d 859 (2017) (quoting State v. Watson, 146 Wn.2d 947, 954 , 51 P.3d 66 (2002)). 5 CR 60(b)(1) does not define “mistake.” If a court rule does not define a term, we determine the plain and ordinary meaning of the term from a standard dictionary.

12017–2017
State v. Mankin green
washctapp · 2010
1 sentence

2017State v. Mankin, 158 Wn.

12017–2017
State v. Fuentes green
wash · 2015
1 sentence

2016State v. Fuentes, 183 Wn.2d 149, 160 , 3 52 P.3d 152 (2015); accord State v. Jackson, 137 Wn.2d 712, 728-29 , 976 P.2d 1229 (1999).

12016–2016
In Re the Marriage of Gimlett green
wash · 1981
2 sentences

2003“Where a statute fails to define a term there is a presumption that the legislature intended the term to mean what it meant at common law.” In re Marriage of Gimlet, 95 Wn.2d 699, 701 , 629 P.2d 450 (1981).

2003“Where a statute fails to define a term there is a presumption that the legislature intended the term to mean what it meant at common law.” In re Marriage of Gimlet, 95 Wn.2d 699, 701 , 629 P.2d 450 (1981).

12003–2003
Hearst Corp. v. Hoppe green
wash · 1978
2 sentences

1981Hearst Corp. v. Hoppe, 90 Wn.2d 123 , 580 P.2d 246 (1978). *702 Further, prior judicial use of a term will be considered since the legislature is presumed to know the decisions of this court.

1981Hearst Corp. v. Hoppe, 90 Wn.2d 123 , 580 P.2d 246 (1978). *702 Further, prior judicial use of a term will be considered since the legislature is presumed to know the decisions of this court.

11981–1981

Where else courts name it

CA 66 (1865–2026) NY 25 (1901–2025) IL 24 (1907–2026) MO 22 (1892–2022) TX 22 (1911–2024) WI 19 (1988–2026) CT 13 (1972–2015) MA 13 (1973–2018) OH 12 (1943–2025) WY 11 (1971–2023) PA 9 (1930–2015) WA 9 (1893–2017) FL 9 (1939–2017) MD 8 (1977–2024) KS 8 (1952–2022) GA 7 (1913–2007) IN 7 (1881–2005) OR 7 (1954–2016) KY 7 (1961–2023) NC 6 (1957–2023) NH 5 (2006–2016) MI 4 (1942–2010) ME 4 (1960–2025) NM 4 (1998–2020) DC 4 (2012–2024) IA 4 (1972–2000) AR 3 (1941–2002) NE 3 (1952–1992) OK 3 (1926–1938) HI 3 (1899–2016) WV 3 (1926–2012) MS 3 (1881–2020) NV 2 (2002–2002) AK 2 (1981–1989) LA 2 (1979–2011) TN 2 (1946–1979) ID 2 (1976–1991) CO 2 (2012–2016) AL 2 (1911–1990)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check