combination factors (Hawaii) · Go Syfert
← Hawaii issues

combination factors in Hawaii

7 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Jong Suk Chonggreen
haw · 1970 · cited in 3 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 1973–2005
2 sentences

2001Moreover, “pi'obable cause is generally based upon a combination of factors, which together form a sort of mosaic, of which any one piece by itself often might not be enough to constitute probable cause, but *431 which, when viewed as a whole, does constitute probable cause.” State v. Chong, 52 Haw. 226, 231 , 473 P.2d 567, 571 (1970).

2001Moreover, “pi'obable cause is generally based upon a combination of factors, which together form a sort of mosaic, of which any one piece by itself often might not be enough to constitute probable cause, but *431 which, when viewed as a whole, does constitute probable cause.” State v. Chong, 52 Haw. 226, 231 , 473 P.2d 567, 571 (1970).

23
State v. Ferrergreen
hawapp · 2001 · cited in 2 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2025–2026
2 sentences

2026Probable cause "is generally based upon a combination of factors, which together form a sort of mosaic, of which any one piece by itself often might not be enough to constitute probable cause, but which, when viewed as a whole, does constitute probable cause." State v. Ferrer, 95 Hawai‘i 409, 430-31, 23 P.3d 744, 765-66 (App. 2001) (citation omitted). 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Here, the record reflects that Bates's SFST performance provided a relevant piece of the probable cause mosaic.

2026Probable cause "is generally based upon a combination of factors, which together form a sort of mosaic, of which any one piece by itself often might not be enough to constitute probable cause, but which, when viewed as a whole, does constitute probable cause." State v. Ferrer, 95 Hawai‘i 409, 430-31, 23 P.3d 744, 765-66 (App. 2001) (citation omitted). 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Here, the record reflects that Bates's SFST performance provided a relevant piece of the probable cause mosaic.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Scott green
calctapp · 1968
2 sentences

1973In State v. Chong, 52 Haw. 226, 231 , 473 P.2d 567, 571 (1970), we cited People v. Scott, 259 Cal. App.2d 268 , 66 Cal. Rptr. 257 (1968), with approval: [P]robable cause [to arrest] is generally based upon a combination of factors, which together form a sort of mosaic, of which any one piece by itself often might not be enough to constitute probable cause, but which, when viewed as a whole, does constitute probable cause.

1973In State v. Chong, 52 Haw. 226, 231 , 473 P.2d 567, 571 (1970), we cited People v. Scott, 259 Cal. App.2d 268 , 66 Cal. Rptr. 257 (1968), with approval: [P]robable cause [to arrest] is generally based upon a combination of factors, which together form a sort of mosaic, of which any one piece by itself often might not be enough to constitute probable cause, but which, when viewed as a whole, does constitute probable cause.

21970–1973
Davis v. Comed, Inc. green
ca6 · 1980
1 sentence

2001Among the elements which the courts have evaluated in considering whether the derivative plaintiff meets Rule 23.1’s representation requirements are: economic antagonisms between representative and class; the remedy sought by plaintiff in the derivative action; indications that the named plaintiff was not the driving force behind the litigation; plaintiffs unfamil *151 iarity with the litigation; other litigation pending between the plaintiff and defendants; the relative magnitude of plaintiffs personal interests as compared to his interest in the derivative action itself; plaintiffs vindictiv

12001–2001

Where else courts name it

CA 75 (1960–2026) PA 62 (1921–2024) NY 61 (1918–2024) LA 53 (1976–2024) MA 47 (1933–2025) IL 40 (1906–2023) NJ 37 (1956–2026) TX 33 (1965–2024) KS 32 (1984–2026) TN 25 (1989–2025) OH 23 (1981–2025) OR 23 (1962–2024) VA 23 (1988–2025) FL 21 (1971–2023) KY 21 (1999–2026) AL 21 (1986–2026) NC 21 (1985–2025) MO 20 (1981–2023) MD 20 (1965–2025) CO 16 (1984–2024) CT 14 (1942–2020) DC 14 (1977–2009) MS 13 (1987–2024) MI 12 (1971–2022) IA 12 (1939–2025) IN 12 (1977–2026) WA 11 (1932–2010) AZ 11 (1908–2017) WI 10 (1988–2022) DE 10 (1967–2024) UT 10 (1977–2024) ND 8 (1989–2023) WY 7 (1986–2026) SC 7 (1975–2025) NE 7 (1975–2017) NM 7 (1982–2016) HI 7 (1970–2026) MN 6 (1987–2017) GA 6 (1975–2016) RI 5 (1988–2007) VT 5 (1963–2020) NV 5 (1977–2020) SD 4 (1988–2014) WV 4 (1991–2007) OK 4 (2002–2026) MT 4 (1998–2020) AK 4 (1980–2017) ME 4 (2000–2026) AR 3 (1988–2003) ID 3 (1981–2007) NH 2 (1982–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check