Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
25 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1989–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Schlater v. Hayniegreen2 sentences2005Schlater, 833 S.W.2d at 925 (citing 18 Am. 2002While each decision must rest on its specific facts, “[g]enerally no one factor is conclusive in determining whether or not to disregard a corporate entity; usually a combination of factors is present in a particular case and is relied upon to resolve the issue.” Schlater, 833 S.W.2d at 925 ; Emergicare Consultants, Inc., 2000 WL 1897350 , at *2; Lindsey, Bradley & Maloy, 2000 WL 1875882 , at *4. | 1 | 5 |
People v. Rodartegreen2 sentences2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o 2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o | 1 | 1 |
Tarry v. Stategreen2 sentences2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o 2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hamiltongreen1 sentence2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o | 1 | 1 |
State v. Griffingreen2 sentences2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o 2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen1 sentence2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o | 1 | 1 |
Hamill v. Stategreen1 sentence2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o | 1 | 1 |
Donna Zahorik, Judith Long Laws, Antonia Glasse and Charlotte Farris v. Cornell Universitygreen1 sentence2013In Dobbs-Weinstein v. Vanderbilt University, 185 F.3d 542 (6th Cir. 1999), a Sixth Circuit decision affirming a decision of the district court for the middle district of Tennessee, the court stated: We acknowledge that “tenure decisions in an academic setting involve a combination of factors which tend to set them apart from employment decisions generally.” Zahorik v. Cornell Univ., 729 F.2d 85, 92-93 (2d Cir. 1984) (providing reasons why tenure decisions are often difficult to place in a traditional employment framework: the lifetime nature of the contract, the fact that the decisions are oft | 1 | 1 |
State v. Westgreen1 sentence2001See West, 844 S.W.2d at 148 ("One who kills another in a passionate rage may dispose of the weapon when reason returns just as readily as the cool, dispassionate killer."). -20- While we acknowledge that one could infer premeditation from the combination of factors present, we cannot conclude that these factors collectively establish proof of premeditation beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Barbergreen1 sentence1989See State v. Barber, 753 S.W.2d 659 (Tenn.1988). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Oceanics Schools, Inc. v. Barbour
green
2 sentences2022Similar to Dorn, however, “no single factor among those listed is conclusive, nor is it required that all of these factors support piercing the corporate veil; typically, courts will rely on a combination of the factors in deciding the issue.” Rogers, 367 S.W.3d at 215 (citing Oceanics, 112 S.W.3d at 140 ). 2015Generally, no one factor is conclusive in determining whether to pierce the corporate veil; rather, courts will rely upon a combination of factors in deciding the issue.7 Id. (citing Barbour, 112 S.W.3d at 140 ). | 8 | 2008–2022 |
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Allen
green
2 sentences2018Id. 2015Generally, no one factor is conclusive in determining whether to pierce the corporate veil; rather, courts will rely upon a combination of factors in deciding the issue.7 Id. (citing Barbour, 112 S.W.3d at 140 ). | 3 | 2015–2018 |
State v. Sihapanya
green
2 sentences2025Sihapanya, 516 S.W.3d at 476 ; see State v. Ward, No. E2018-01781-CCA-R3-CD, 2019 WL 3244991 , at *9-10 (Tenn. Crim. 2024Id. | 2 | 2024–2025 |
Betty Saint Rogers v. Louisville Land Company
green
2 sentences2022Similar to Dorn, however, “no single factor among those listed is conclusive, nor is it required that all of these factors support piercing the corporate veil; typically, courts will rely on a combination of the factors in deciding the issue.” Rogers, 367 S.W.3d at 215 (citing Oceanics, 112 S.W.3d at 140 ). 2015Rogers, 367 S.W.3d at 215 . | 2 | 2015–2022 |
Pamperin v. Streamline Mfg., Inc.
green
2 sentences2013Pamperin, 276 S.W.3d at 438 (citing Oceanics Schools, 112 S.W.3d at 140 ). 2012Pamperin, 276 S.W.3d at 438 (citing Oceanics Schools, 112 S.W.3d at 140 ). | 2 | 2012–2013 |
Avery v. Georgia
green
2 sentences2010Id. 2010This combination of factors in the empaneling of the petit jury, as in the selection of the venire, raises the necessary inference of purposeful discrimination. -10- Id. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Lillard v. State
green
1 sentence2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Lomagro
green
2 sentences2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o 2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Herron v. State
green
2 sentences2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o 2017In Herron v. State, 111 N.M. 357 , 805 P.2d 624 (1991), after extensive research, the New Mexico high court formulated several factors that were of assistance in determining the validity of multiple convictions of rape: (1) temporal proximity of penetrations (the greater the interval between acts the greater the likelihood of separate offenses); (2) location of the victim during each penetration (movement or repositioning of the victim between penetrations tends to show separate offenses); (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of penetrations (serial penetrations of different o | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. King
green
1 sentence2017Again, “the abuse of discretion standard accompanied by a presumption of reasonableness applies to all sentencing decisions, including the grant or denial of judicial diversion.” King, 432 S.W.3d at 325 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Idit Dobbs-Weinstein, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee v. Vanderbilt University, Defendant-Appellee
green
2 sentences2013In Dobbs-Weinstein v. Vanderbilt University, 185 F.3d 542 (6th Cir. 1999), a Sixth Circuit decision affirming a decision of the district court for the middle district of Tennessee, the court stated: We acknowledge that “tenure decisions in an academic setting involve a combination of factors which tend to set them apart from employment decisions generally.” Zahorik v. Cornell Univ., 729 F.2d 85, 92-93 (2d Cir. 1984) (providing reasons why tenure decisions are often difficult to place in a traditional employment framework: the lifetime nature of the contract, the fact that the decisions are oft 2013Dobbs-Weinstein, 185 F.3d at 545 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Batson v. Kentucky
green
1 sentence2010“Once the defendant makes a prima facie showing, the burden shifts to the State to come forward with a neutral explanation for challenging black jurors . . . related to the particular case to be tried.” Batson, 476 U.S. at 97 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.