search warrant requirement (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

search warrant requirement in Louisiana

54 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (12)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Wilsongreen
la · 1985 · cited in 4 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1987–2011
2 sentences

2011State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503, 517 (La.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985); State v. Burns, 44,937, p. 12 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/2/10), 32 So.3d 261, 270 (citing LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 228; United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800 , 94 S.Ct. 1234 , 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974); Wilson, supra; State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93 (La.1984)).

2006In State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503, 517 (La.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985), this court held "the right of the police to conduct a personal effects inventory search at the time of an arrested person's booking is a recognized exception to the search warrant requirement." This right to seize items after lawful arrest and during booking is not completely unfettered, as the item seized must be contraband, an instrumentality of the crime, a fruit of the crime, or evidence of a crime.

24
State v. Duperongreen
lactapp · 1984 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1985–1990
2 sentences

1990App. 5 Cir.1987) we discussed both the Terry stop and plain view doctrine: In discussing the ‘plain view’ doctrine in State v. Duperon, 448 So.2d 720, 723 (La.App. 5th Cir.1984), this court stated: The plain view doctrine is an exception to the search warrant requirement in that when there is no intrusion into a protected area, there is no ‘search’ for purposes of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.

1985The rule is set forth in State v. Duperon, 448 So.2d 720, 723 (La.App. 5th Cir.1984), as follows: “The plain view doctrine is an exception to the search warrant requirement in that when there is no intrusion into a protected' area, there is no ‘search’ for purposes of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.

23
Schneckloth v. Bustamontegreen
scotus · 1973 · cited in 6 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1976–2011
2 sentences

2011Schneckloth v. Bustamante, 412 U.S. 218, 219 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273, p. 6 (La.5/14/04), 876 So.2d 39, 42 .

2011Schneckloth v. Bustamante, 412 U.S. 218, 219 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273, p. 6 (La.5/14/04), 876 So.2d 39, 42 .

16
Ybarra v. Illinoisgreen
scotus · 1980 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1995–2013
2 sentences

2013See, Ybarra, 444 U.S. at 92 , 100 S.Ct. at 342 (hold ing that the issuance of a search warrant for a bar and the bartender working there did not extend to the search/pat-down of a patron of the bar in the absence of any indication that the bar was frequented by drug users or that patrons were seen using drugs in the bar, or reasonable belief that the patron was involved in criminal activity or armed and dangerous). .

2013See, Ybarra, 444 U.S. at 92 , 100 S.Ct. at 342 (hold ing that the issuance of a search warrant for a bar and the bartender working there did not extend to the search/pat-down of a patron of the bar in the absence of any indication that the bar was frequented by drug users or that patrons were seen using drugs in the bar, or reasonable belief that the patron was involved in criminal activity or armed and dangerous). .

13
State v. Browngreen
la · 1979 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1979–2012
2 sentences

2012It is well established “[w]hen an officer inadvertently observes evidence of a crime from a vantage point that does not intrude upon a protected area or when that protected area is entered with prior justification, there is no violation of the search warrant rule because there has been no ‘search’....” State v. Brown, 370 So.2d 525 (La.1979).

1984The testimony of both officers established that their only purpose for approaching the premises was to further investigate the complaint of the unidentified citizen-informant who had advised them that she had seen the occupants of the camper "shooting up." The plain view rule is set forth in State v. Brown, 370 So.2d 525, 527 (La. 1979) as follows: "[w]hen an officer inadvertently observes evidence of a crime from a vantage point that does not intrude upon a protected area or when that protected area is entered with prior justification, there is no violation of the search warrant rule because

13
Coolidge v. New Hampshiregreen
scotus · 1971 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1974–2012
2 sentences

1993For a detailed description of the search warrant requirement and the "plain view" exception thereto, see State v. Neyrey, 383 So.2d 1222 (La.1979); State v. Huston, 445 So.2d 67 (La.App.2d Cir.1984); Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971).

1993For a detailed description of the search warrant requirement and the "plain view" exception thereto, see State v. Neyrey, 383 So.2d 1222 (La.1979); State v. Huston, 445 So.2d 67 (La.App.2d Cir.1984); Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971).

13
State v. Guidengreen
la · 1981 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2001–2008
2 sentences

2008State v. Narcisse, 01-49 at 6, 791 So.2d at 153, citing State v. Guiden, 399 So.2d 194 (La.1981), cert denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982).

2006State v. Guiden, 399 So.2d 194, 199 (La.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982).

13
State v. Banksgreen
la · 1978 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1979–1990
2 sentences

1990State v. Banks, 363 So.2d 491 (La.1978); State v. Junegain, 478 So.2d 542 (La.App. 4th Cir.1985).

1979See e. g., State v. Banks, 363 So.2d 491 (La.1978); State v. Schmidt, 359 So.2d 133 (La.1978); State v. Parker, 355 So.2d 900 (La.1978). *1189 The plain view rule is set forth in State v. Brown, 370 So.2d 525 (La. 1979), as follows: "When an officer inadvertently observes evidence of a crime from a vantage point that does not intrude upon a protected area or when that protected area is entered with prior justification, there is no violation of the search warrant rule because there has been no `search'...." Insofar as the seizure of the preludin and its paraphernalia is concerned, the officers

12
Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert Bernardgreen
scotus · 2016 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
11
State v. Martingreen
la · 1992 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
11
State v. Burnsgreen
lactapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
11
State v. Lewisgreen
la · 1979 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1981–1981
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (65)

CaseCitedYears
Chambers v. Maroney green
scotus · 1970
2 sentences

1992Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); State v. Chaney, 423 So.2d 1092 (La.1983); State v. Cohen, 549 So.2d 884 (La.App. 2d Cir.1989), writ denied, 559 So.2d 135 (La.1990).

1992Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); State v. Chaney, 423 So.2d 1092 (La.1983); State v. Cohen, 549 So.2d 884 (La.App. 2d Cir.1989), writ denied, 559 So.2d 135 (La.1990).

51984–1992
United States v. Edwards green
scotus · 1974
2 sentences

2011State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503, 517 (La.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985); State v. Burns, 44,937, p. 12 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/2/10), 32 So.3d 261, 270 (citing LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 228; United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800 , 94 S.Ct. 1234 , 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974); Wilson, supra; State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93 (La.1984)).

2011State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503, 517 (La.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985); State v. Burns, 44,937, p. 12 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/2/10), 32 So.3d 261, 270 (citing LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 228; United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800 , 94 S.Ct. 1234 , 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974); Wilson, supra; State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93 (La.1984)).

31984–2011
Sangemino v. United States green
scotus · 1982
2 sentences

2008State v. Narcisse, 01-49 at 6, 791 So.2d at 153, citing State v. Guiden, 399 So.2d 194 (La.1981), cert denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982).

2006State v. Guiden, 399 So.2d 194, 199 (La.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982).

32001–2008
Dickinson v. Pensacola Aeromotive Corp. green
scotus · 1982
2 sentences

2008State v. Narcisse, 01-49 at 6, 791 So.2d at 153, citing State v. Guiden, 399 So.2d 194 (La.1981), cert denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982).

2006State v. Guiden, 399 So.2d 194, 199 (La.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982).

32001–2008
Engelstad v. Swenson green
scotus · 1982
2 sentences

2008State v. Narcisse, 01-49 at 6, 791 So.2d at 153, citing State v. Guiden, 399 So.2d 194 (La.1981), cert denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982).

2006State v. Guiden, 399 So.2d 194, 199 (La.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982).

32001–2008
Terry v. Ohio green
scotus · 1968
2 sentences

1995In Minnesota v. Dickerson, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 2130 , 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993), a cocaine possession case, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a limited "plain feel" exception to the search warrant requirement, holding that police may seize non-threatening contraband detected by touch during a protective *872 pat-down search so long as the search remains within the bounds marked by Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

1995In Minnesota v. Dickerson, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 2130 , 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993), a cocaine possession case, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a limited "plain feel" exception to the search warrant requirement, holding that police may seize non-threatening contraband detected by touch during a protective *872 pat-down search so long as the search remains within the bounds marked by Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

31984–1995
State v. Jewell green
la · 1976
2 sentences

1986State v. Jewell, supra. The inventory search is a narrow exception to the requirement of a search warrant and the requirement of probable cause.

1983State v. Jewell, supra. The inventory search is a narrow exception to the requirement of a search warrant and the requirement of probable cause.

31983–1986
State v. Parker green
la · 1978
2 sentences

1986State v. Bourg, 332 So.2d 235 (La.1976); State v. Thomas, 310 So.2d 517 (La.1975); State v. Terracina, 309 So.2d 271 (La.1975).” State v. Parker, supra. The fundamental question is whether there is an intrusion into an area in which there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.

1979See e. g., State v. Banks, 363 So.2d 491 (La.1978); State v. Schmidt, 359 So.2d 133 (La.1978); State v. Parker, 355 So.2d 900 (La.1978). *1189 The plain view rule is set forth in State v. Brown, 370 So.2d 525 (La. 1979), as follows: "When an officer inadvertently observes evidence of a crime from a vantage point that does not intrude upon a protected area or when that protected area is entered with prior justification, there is no violation of the search warrant rule because there has been no `search'...." Insofar as the seizure of the preludin and its paraphernalia is concerned, the officers

31979–1986
State v. Carter green
la · 2012
2 sentences

2019App. 5 Cir. 8/30/11), 75 So.3d 1 , writ denied, 11-2060 (La. 2/10/12), 80 So.3d 469 (holding defendant waived the argument that evidence should be suppressed because the search exceeded the scope of the search warrant when the defense counsel never asked the trial judge to rule on the “constitutionally overbroad” issue asserted for the first time on appeal); State v. Brown, 434 So.2d 399 (La. 1983) (rejecting defendant’s alternative argument regarding the denial of his motion to suppress because he had not raised the issue at trial); State v. Johnson, 07-1040 (La.

2013State v. Montejo, 06-1807, p. 22 (La.5/11/10), 40 So.3d 952, 967 , cert. denied, Montejo v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 656 , 178 L.Ed.2d 513 (2010); See: LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 841(A) (“An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.”); State v. Simmons, 422 So.2d 138 (La.1982); State v. Harris, 414 So.2d 325 (La.1982); State v. Davis, 357 So.2d 1125 (La.1978); See also: State v. Carter, 10-973, p. 7-8 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/30/11), 75 So.3d 1 , writ denied, 2011-2060 (La.2/10/12), 80 So.3d 469 (holding defendant waived the argument tha

22013–2019
State v. Brown green
la · 1983
2 sentences

2019App. 5 Cir. 8/30/11), 75 So.3d 1 , writ denied, 11-2060 (La. 2/10/12), 80 So.3d 469 (holding defendant waived the argument that evidence should be suppressed because the search exceeded the scope of the search warrant when the defense counsel never asked the trial judge to rule on the “constitutionally overbroad” issue asserted for the first time on appeal); State v. Brown, 434 So.2d 399 (La. 1983) (rejecting defendant’s alternative argument regarding the denial of his motion to suppress because he had not raised the issue at trial); State v. Johnson, 07-1040 (La.

2013State v. Montejo, 06-1807, p. 22 (La.5/11/10), 40 So.3d 952, 967 , cert. denied, Montejo v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 656 , 178 L.Ed.2d 513 (2010); See: LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 841(A) (“An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.”); State v. Simmons, 422 So.2d 138 (La.1982); State v. Harris, 414 So.2d 325 (La.1982); State v. Davis, 357 So.2d 1125 (La.1978); See also: State v. Carter, 10-973, p. 7-8 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/30/11), 75 So.3d 1 , writ denied, 2011-2060 (La.2/10/12), 80 So.3d 469 (holding defendant waived the argument tha

22013–2019
State v. Johnson green
lactapp · 2008
2 sentences

2019App. 4 Cir. 9/10/08), 993 So.2d 326, 330-31 , writ denied, 08-2649 (La. 6/5/09), 9 So.3d 868 (“failure to raise a ground for suppressing an item of evidence in a properly filed motion to suppress waives such a basis for exclusion on appeal”); State v. Jackson, 04-1388 (La.

2013State v. Montejo, 06-1807, p. 22 (La.5/11/10), 40 So.3d 952, 967 , cert. denied, Montejo v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 656 , 178 L.Ed.2d 513 (2010); See: LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 841(A) (“An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.”); State v. Simmons, 422 So.2d 138 (La.1982); State v. Harris, 414 So.2d 325 (La.1982); State v. Davis, 357 So.2d 1125 (La.1978); See also: State v. Carter, 10-973, p. 7-8 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/30/11), 75 So.3d 1 , writ denied, 2011-2060 (La.2/10/12), 80 So.3d 469 (holding defendant waived the argument tha

22013–2019
State v. McGee green
la · 2009
2 sentences

2019App. 4 Cir. 9/10/08), 993 So.2d 326, 330-31 , writ denied, 08-2649 (La. 6/5/09), 9 So.3d 868 (“failure to raise a ground for suppressing an item of evidence in a properly filed motion to suppress waives such a basis for exclusion on appeal”); State v. Jackson, 04-1388 (La.

2013State v. Montejo, 06-1807, p. 22 (La.5/11/10), 40 So.3d 952, 967 , cert. denied, Montejo v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 656 , 178 L.Ed.2d 513 (2010); See: LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 841(A) (“An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.”); State v. Simmons, 422 So.2d 138 (La.1982); State v. Harris, 414 So.2d 325 (La.1982); State v. Davis, 357 So.2d 1125 (La.1978); See also: State v. Carter, 10-973, p. 7-8 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/30/11), 75 So.3d 1 , writ denied, 2011-2060 (La.2/10/12), 80 So.3d 469 (holding defendant waived the argument tha

22013–2019
State v. Carter green
lactapp · 2011
2 sentences

2019App. 5 Cir. 8/30/11), 75 So.3d 1 , writ denied, 11-2060 (La. 2/10/12), 80 So.3d 469 (holding defendant waived the argument that evidence should be suppressed because the search exceeded the scope of the search warrant when the defense counsel never asked the trial judge to rule on the “constitutionally overbroad” issue asserted for the first time on appeal); State v. Brown, 434 So.2d 399 (La. 1983) (rejecting defendant’s alternative argument regarding the denial of his motion to suppress because he had not raised the issue at trial); State v. Johnson, 07-1040 (La.

2013State v. Montejo, 06-1807, p. 22 (La.5/11/10), 40 So.3d 952, 967 , cert. denied, Montejo v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 656 , 178 L.Ed.2d 513 (2010); See: LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 841(A) (“An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.”); State v. Simmons, 422 So.2d 138 (La.1982); State v. Harris, 414 So.2d 325 (La.1982); State v. Davis, 357 So.2d 1125 (La.1978); See also: State v. Carter, 10-973, p. 7-8 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/30/11), 75 So.3d 1 , writ denied, 2011-2060 (La.2/10/12), 80 So.3d 469 (holding defendant waived the argument tha

22013–2019
State v. Nuccio green
la · 1984
2 sentences

2011State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503, 517 (La.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985); State v. Burns, 44,937, p. 12 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/2/10), 32 So.3d 261, 270 (citing LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 228; United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800 , 94 S.Ct. 1234 , 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974); Wilson, supra; State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93 (La.1984)).

2010LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 228; United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800 , 94 S.Ct. 1234 , 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974); State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503 (La.1985); State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93 (La.1984).

22010–2011
State v. Strange green
la · 2004
2 sentences

2011Schneckloth v. Bustamante, 412 U.S. 218, 219 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273, p. 6 (La.5/14/04), 876 So.2d 39, 42 .

2010Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273, p. 6 (La.5/14/04), 876 So.2d 39, 42 .

22010–2011
Saville v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. green
scotus · 1985
2 sentences

2011State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503, 517 (La.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985); State v. Burns, 44,937, p. 12 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/2/10), 32 So.3d 261, 270 (citing LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 228; United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800 , 94 S.Ct. 1234 , 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974); Wilson, supra; State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93 (La.1984)).

2006In State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503, 517 (La.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985), this court held "the right of the police to conduct a personal effects inventory search at the time of an arrested person's booking is a recognized exception to the search warrant requirement." This right to seize items after lawful arrest and during booking is not completely unfettered, as the item seized must be contraband, an instrumentality of the crime, a fruit of the crime, or evidence of a crime.

22006–2011
In re Tracey green
scotus · 1985
2 sentences

2011State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503, 517 (La.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985); State v. Burns, 44,937, p. 12 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/2/10), 32 So.3d 261, 270 (citing LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 228; United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800 , 94 S.Ct. 1234 , 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974); Wilson, supra; State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93 (La.1984)).

2006In State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503, 517 (La.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985), this court held "the right of the police to conduct a personal effects inventory search at the time of an arrested person's booking is a recognized exception to the search warrant requirement." This right to seize items after lawful arrest and during booking is not completely unfettered, as the item seized must be contraband, an instrumentality of the crime, a fruit of the crime, or evidence of a crime.

22006–2011
State v. Roof green
sc · 1917
2 sentences

2011State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503, 517 (La.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985); State v. Burns, 44,937, p. 12 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/2/10), 32 So.3d 261, 270 (citing LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 228; United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800 , 94 S.Ct. 1234 , 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974); Wilson, supra; State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93 (La.1984)).

2006In State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503, 517 (La.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985), this court held "the right of the police to conduct a personal effects inventory search at the time of an arrested person's booking is a recognized exception to the search warrant requirement." This right to seize items after lawful arrest and during booking is not completely unfettered, as the item seized must be contraband, an instrumentality of the crime, a fruit of the crime, or evidence of a crime.

22006–2011
State v. Chaney green
la · 1982
2 sentences

1992Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); State v. Chaney, 423 So.2d 1092 (La.1983); State v. Cohen, 549 So.2d 884 (La.App. 2d Cir.1989), writ denied, 559 So.2d 135 (La.1990).

1991Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); State v. Chaney, 423 So.2d 1092 (La.1983); State v. Cohen, 549 So.2d 884 (La.App. 2d Cir.1989), writ denied 559 So.2d 135 (La.1990).

21991–1992
State v. Ketchens neutral
la · 1990
2 sentences

1992Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); State v. Chaney, 423 So.2d 1092 (La.1983); State v. Cohen, 549 So.2d 884 (La.App. 2d Cir.1989), writ denied, 559 So.2d 135 (La.1990).

1991Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); State v. Chaney, 423 So.2d 1092 (La.1983); State v. Cohen, 549 So.2d 884 (La.App. 2d Cir.1989), writ denied 559 So.2d 135 (La.1990).

21991–1992
State v. Cohen green
lactapp · 1989
2 sentences

1992Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); State v. Chaney, 423 So.2d 1092 (La.1983); State v. Cohen, 549 So.2d 884 (La.App. 2d Cir.1989), writ denied, 559 So.2d 135 (La.1990).

1991Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); State v. Chaney, 423 So.2d 1092 (La.1983); State v. Cohen, 549 So.2d 884 (La.App. 2d Cir.1989), writ denied 559 So.2d 135 (La.1990).

21991–1992
State v. Terracina green
la · 1975
2 sentences

1986State v. Bourg, 332 So.2d 235 (La.1976); State v. Thomas, 310 So.2d 517 (La.1975); State v. Terracina, 309 So.2d 271 (La.1975).” State v. Parker, supra. The fundamental question is whether there is an intrusion into an area in which there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.

1978When an officer inadvertently observes evidence of a crime from a vantage point that does not intrude upon a protected area or when that protected area is entered with prior justification, there is no violation of the search warrant rule because there has been no "search." See also State v. Bourg, 332 So.2d 235 (La.1976); State v. Thomas, 310 So.2d 517 (La.1975); State v. Terracina, 309 So.2d 271 (La.1975).

21978–1986
State v. Thomas green
la · 1975
21978–1986
State v. Bourg green
la · 1976
21978–1986
State v. Ludwig green
la · 1982
21984–1984
State v. Montejo green
la · 2010
12013–2013
State v. Davis green
la · 1978
12013–2013
State v. Jackson green
la · 2006
12013–2013
State v. Simmons green
la · 1982
12013–2013
Hall v. Ward green
scotus · 2010
12013–2013
Johnson v. Johnson green
scotus · 2010
12013–2013
State v. Harris green
la · 1982
12013–2013
State v. Jackson green
lactapp · 2005
12013–2013
Nix v. Williams green
scotus · 1984
12001–2001
State v. Hathaway green
la · 1982
12001–2001
State v. Franklin green
la · 1997
12001–2001
State v. Bradford green
lactapp · 1998
11999–1999
Minnesota v. Dickerson green
scotus · 1993
11995–1995
State v. Neyrey green
la · 1980
11993–1993
State v. Huston green
lactapp · 1984
11993–1993

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 40:967 (10) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:438 (9) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 40:966 (9) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:64 (6) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:529.1 (6) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:30.1 (5) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:31 (4) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:24 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:27 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:30 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:42 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:451 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 122 (1981–2026) PA 90 (1981–2025) LA 54 (1974–2019) KS 47 (1985–2022) MI 41 (1922–2022) CA 37 (1962–2026) NY 35 (1972–2025) WA 34 (1973–2018) TX 33 (1981–2021) IL 31 (1970–2024) FL 29 (1978–2024) TN 25 (1975–2024) NJ 23 (1979–2026) MA 23 (1971–2025) IN 22 (1968–2020) GA 20 (2003–2023) IA 16 (1969–2026) MN 16 (1987–2024) MT 15 (1980–2025) ND 15 (1981–2019) OR 14 (1968–2022) NE 13 (1978–2023) VA 12 (1993–2023) AL 12 (1976–2012) WI 12 (1978–2021) AK 10 (1972–1996) MD 9 (1971–2015) CT 9 (1976–2020) MO 9 (1974–2017) AZ 9 (1978–2015) CO 8 (1980–2024) SC 7 (1983–2019) HI 7 (1980–2020) DC 7 (1977–2016) NC 7 (1976–2009) ID 7 (1979–2017) WV 6 (1922–2015) WY 6 (1982–2016) DE 6 (1973–2025) SD 5 (2003–2015) RI 5 (1989–2007) AR 5 (1967–2014) UT 5 (1987–2016) NV 4 (1975–2013) OK 4 (1927–1992) NM 4 (1997–2013) KY 4 (1988–2021) ME 3 (1981–2017) NH 3 (1983–2017) VT 2 (1991–2012) MS 2 (2003–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check