Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pietrzakgreen2 sentences2017See, e.g., State v. Pietrzak, 41 P.3d 1240, 1245 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002) (explaining that the corpus delecti rule serves as both a rule of evidence and a means to challenge the evidence “to protect a defendant from the possibility of an unjust conviction based upon a false confession” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); see also Bregar, 2017-NMCA- 028, ¶¶ 45-49 (addressing the corpus delicti argument in the context of the sufficiency challenge). 2017See, e.g., State v. Pietrzak, 41 P.3d 1240 , 1245 9 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002) (explaining that the corpus delecti rule serves as both a rule 10 of evidence and a means to challenge the evidence “to protect a defendant from the 11 possibility of an unjust conviction based upon a false confession” (internal quotation 12 marks and citation omitted)); see also Bregar, 2017-NMCA-028 , ¶¶ 45-49 13 (addressing the corpus delicti argument in the context of the sufficiency challenge). 14 In response to our request, Defendant contends that there was no proof independent 15 of his statements that would corro | 2 | 2 |
Gaines v. Village of Wyominggreen2 sentences1979That the only way to abate the nuisance might incidentally be through the use of its police officers or other employees does not make the breach of duty essentially a failure to exercise a governmental function [ 194 A. at 568-69 .] A similar case which followed Stevens , is Gaines v. Village of Wyoming, 147 Ohio St. 491 , 72 N.E.2d 369, 372-3 (1947) in which the court said: A municipality, which by overt acts not only permits and encourages but also provides the means for the violation of law by invitees upon public grounds owned by it within the municipality, may be held liable for the creat 1979That the only way to abate the nuisance might incidentally be through the use of its police officers or other employees does not make the breach of duty essentially a failure to exercise a governmental function [ 194 A. at 568-69 .] A similar case which followed Stevens , is Gaines v. Village of Wyoming, 147 Ohio St. 491 , 72 N.E.2d 369, 372-3 (1947) in which the court said: A municipality, which by overt acts not only permits and encourages but also provides the means for the violation of law by invitees upon public grounds owned by it within the municipality, may be held liable for the creat | 2 | 2 |
State v. Bregargreen1 sentence2017See, e.g., State v. Pietrzak, 41 P.3d 1240 , 1245 9 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002) (explaining that the corpus delecti rule serves as both a rule 10 of evidence and a means to challenge the evidence “to protect a defendant from the 11 possibility of an unjust conviction based upon a false confession” (internal quotation 12 marks and citation omitted)); see also Bregar, 2017-NMCA-028 , ¶¶ 45-49 13 (addressing the corpus delicti argument in the context of the sufficiency challenge). 14 In response to our request, Defendant contends that there was no proof independent 15 of his statements that would corro | 1 | 1 |
In Re Sealed Casegreen1 sentence2007See In re EchoStar Commc’ns Corp., 448 F.3d 1294, 1300 (Fed.Cir.2006) (“We review the district court’s determination as to the scope of the waiver for an abuse of discretion.”); see also In re Sealed Case, 29 F.3d 715, 719 (D.C.Cir.1994) (explaining that because delineation of a waiver’s scope “depend[s] heavily on the factual context in which the privilege is asserted,” such determinations are entitled to deferential review (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); 2 Paul R. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Echostar Communications Corporationgreen1 sentence2007See In re EchoStar Commc’ns Corp., 448 F.3d 1294, 1300 (Fed.Cir.2006) (“We review the district court’s determination as to the scope of the waiver for an abuse of discretion.”); see also In re Sealed Case, 29 F.3d 715, 719 (D.C.Cir.1994) (explaining that because delineation of a waiver’s scope “depend[s] heavily on the factual context in which the privilege is asserted,” such determinations are entitled to deferential review (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); 2 Paul R. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stevens Et Ux. v. Pittsburgh
green
2 sentences1979That the only way to abate the nuisance might incidentally be through the use of its police officers or other employees does not make the breach of duty essentially a failure to exercise a governmental function [ 194 A. at 568-69 .] A similar case which followed Stevens , is Gaines v. Village of Wyoming, 147 Ohio St. 491 , 72 N.E.2d 369, 372-3 (1947) in which the court said: A municipality, which by overt acts not only permits and encourages but also provides the means for the violation of law by invitees upon public grounds owned by it within the municipality, may be held liable for the creat 1979That the only way to abate the nuisance might incidentally be through the use of its police officers or other employees does not make the breach of duty essentially a failure to exercise a governmental function [ 194 A. at 568-69 .] A similar case which followed Stevens, is Gaines v. Village of Wyoming, 147 Ohio St. 491 , 72 N.E.2d 369, 372-3 (1947) in which the court said: A municipality, which by overt acts not only permits and encourages but also provides the means for the violation of law by invitees upon public grounds owned by it within the municipality, may be held liable for the creati | 2 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Orona
green
2 sentences2010In Orona , the district court's order prohibiting defense access to witnesses was held to be an impediment to the defendant's right to due process, and the Supreme Court held that "there was unquestionably a suppression of the means by which the defense could obtain evidence." Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 2010In Orona, the district court’s order prohibiting defense access to witnesses was held to be an impediment to the defendant’s right to due process, and the Supreme Court held that “there was unquestionably a suppression of the means by which the defense could obtain evidence.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Clifton Gregory v. United States
green
1 sentence1979The defense could not know what the eye witnesses to the events in suit were to testify to or how firm they were in their testimony unless defense counsel was provided a fair opportunity for interview. 125 U.S.App.D.C. at 144 . 369 F.2d at 189 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.