damages claim in Wyoming

2024Horn, ¶¶ 12- 14, 165 P.3d at 73-74 (“characterization of the action as arising in contract or tort does not materially change the damages analysis”). 9 showing by a preponderance of the evidence that any judgment she would have obtained in the underlying action would have been collectible.

2018See id.

2011Cramer v. Powder River Coal, LLC, 2009 WY 45, ¶ 22 , 204 P.3d 974, 981 (Wyo.2009). [¶ 32] As the basis for his argument that he was improperly restricted from participating in the damages hearing, Mr. Wunsch asserts that Ms. Pickering was "permitted to testify at length as to her speculation that each of the [50 inactive] accounts had been replaced by Mr. Wunsch." In contrast, as he explains it, "Mr. Wunsch attempted to respond that he had not replaced those accounts and had, therefore, received no unreported income from them," but the district court "repeatedly sustained Ms. Pickering's objec

2011Cramer v. Powder River Coal, LLC, 2009 WY 45, ¶ 22 , 204 P.3d 974, 981 (Wyo.2009). [¶ 32] As the basis for his argument that he was improperly restricted from participating in the damages hearing, Mr. Wunsch asserts that Ms. Pickering was "permitted to testify at length as to her speculation that each of the [50 inactive] accounts had been replaced by Mr. Wunsch." In contrast, as he explains it, "Mr. Wunsch attempted to respond that he had not replaced those accounts and had, therefore, received no unreported income from them," but the district court "repeatedly sustained Ms. Pickering's objec

1995ANR Production is correct when it argues that, generally, true interest is recoverable by the prevailing party on only liquidated claims. “ ‘Prejudgment interest is recoverable in Wyoming on liquidated claims but not on unliquidated claims, with a liquidated claim being defined as one that is readily computable by basic mathematical calculation.’” Dunn v. Rescon Technology Corp., 884 P.2d 965, 968 (Wyo.1994) (quoting O’s Gold Seed Company v. United Agri-Products Financial Services, Inc., 761 P.2d 673, 677 (Wyo.1988)).

1995ANR Production is correct when it argues that, generally, true interest is recoverable by the prevailing party on only liquidated claims. “ ‘Prejudgment interest is recoverable in Wyoming on liquidated claims but not on unliquidated claims, with a liquidated claim being defined as one that is readily computable by basic mathematical calculation.’” Dunn v. Rescon Technology Corp., 884 P.2d 965, 968 (Wyo.1994) (quoting O’s Gold Seed Company v. United Agri-Products Financial Services, Inc., 761 P.2d 673, 677 (Wyo.1988)).