Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Journey v. Longgreen2 sentences2002See Journey, 585 So.2d at 1272 (stating that by default, a defendant admits all factual allegations of the complaint, except those relating to the amount of damages). 2002See Journey , 585 So.2d at 1272 (stating that by default, a defendant admits all factual allegations of the complaint, except those relating to the amount of damages). | 2 | 2 |
CENTURY 21 MASELLE AND ASSOC. v. Smithgreen1 sentence2022Indeed, in Century 21, 965 So. 2d at 1037 (¶9), the supreme court found that the defendants did not waive arbitration although they “simultaneously requested a jury trial and asserted a right to arbitration in their answers and affirmative defenses.” In the analogous situation before us, we likewise find that simultaneously filing a motion to compel arbitration and a complaint for damages does not “substantially invoke the judicial process,” particularly in light of the strong presumption against waiver, Ungarino & Maldonado LLC, 285 So. 3d at 727 (¶10), and in favor of arbitration. | 1 | 1 |
Rich by and Through Brown v. Nevelsgreen1 sentence2007See Nevels, 578 So. 2d at 617 . | 1 | 1 |
Langston v. Bigelowgreen1 sentence2003This Court conducts a de novo review of orders granting or denying summary judgment and looks at all the evidentiary matters before it—admissions in pleadings, answers to interrogatories, depositions, affidavits, etc. Langston v. Bigelow, 820 So.2d 752, 755 (¶ 4) (Miss.Ct. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wal-Mart Super Center v. Long
green
2 sentences2016Id. 2016Id. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
RE/Max Real Estate Partners v. Lindsley
green
2 sentences2006Id. at 711 . 2005Id. at 711 . | 2 | 2005–2006 |
The City Of New York v. Pullman Incorporated
green
2 sentences2003City of New York v. Pullman, 662 F.2d 910 (2nd Cir.1981), is most instructive for the present damages analysis. 2001City of New York v. Pullman, 662 F.2d 910 (2nd Cir. 1981), is most instructive for the present damages analysis. | 2 | 2001–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.