Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
24 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1880–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
TransUnion LLC v. Ramirezgreen1 sentence2025Cf. TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413, 441 (2021) (“the risk of future harm on its own does not support Article III standing for the plaintiffs’ damages claim” (emphasis added)). 8 Howland’s allegations of injury concerned more than a mere procedural violation of a statute and—as discussed above—asserted an injury that was actual and concrete. | 1 | 1 |
Holm v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.green1 sentence2024See Holm, 514 S.W.3d at 600 (internal citation omitted) (observing that dilatory conduct might rise to the level of waiver of rights other than the right to a jury trial). | 1 | 1 |
Mt. Hawley Insurance Co. v. Casson Duncan Construction, Inc.green1 sentence2024Co. v. Casson Duncan Constr., Inc., 409 P.3d 619, 621-22 (Colo. App. 2016) (finding under an effectively identical supplementary payments provision that insurer was obligated for costs even though the policy did not cover the underlying damages claim); Pac. | 1 | 1 |
English v. Empire Dist. Elec. Co., Inc.green1 sentence2023See English, 220 S.W.3d at 857 ; SKMDV Holdings, Inc., 494 S.W.3d at 546 . | 1 | 1 |
Crede v. City of Oak Grovegreen1 sentence2017A damages claim “ ‘based on inverse condemnation [does] not pass to subsequent grantees of the land.’ ” Id. (quoting Crede v. City of Oak Grove, 979 S.W.2d 529, 534 (Mo. App. W.D. 1998)). | 1 | 1 |
Byrom v. Little Blue Valley Sewer Districtgreen1 sentence2017The District cites Byrom v. Little Blue Valley Sewer District, 16 S.W.3d 573, 577-78 (Mo. banc 2000), Rader Family Ltd. | 1 | 1 |
Vilsick v. Fibreboard Corp.green1 sentence2016“A party has a continuing duty to monitor a case from the filing of the case until final judgment.” Vilsick v. Fibreboard Corp., 861 S.W.2d 659, 664 (Mo. App. E.D. 1993). | 1 | 1 |
Kenny S. Thomas v. Grant Thornton LLPgreen1 sentence2016“Where, as here, both parties introduce evidence beyond the pleadings, a motion to dismiss is converted to a motion for summary judgment, and the parties are charged with knowledge that the motion was so converted.” Thomas v. Grant Thornton LLP, 478 S.W.3d 440, 444 (Mo.App.W.D. 2015). | 1 | 1 |
Trinity Products, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross v. Burgess Steel, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant/crossgreen1 sentence2010“When the damages for a claim of breach of contract are fixed or readily ascertainable and a sufficient demand is made, Missouri law compels the award of prejudgment interest.” Trinity Products, Inc. v. Burgess Steel L.L.C., 486 F.3d 325, 335 (8th Cir.2007). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. New Plaza Pontiac Co.green1 sentence2007S.D.1985). “[W]hile the principles of joint and several liability and imputation of conduct may apply to an actual damages claim, such principles are not to be applied to a punitive damages claim when the evidence shows differing degrees of culpability and/or ability to pay.” Brown v. New Plaza Pontiac Co., 719 S.W.2d 468, 473 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Carlson v. K-Mart Corp.green2 sentences2003Similarly, in Carlson v. K-Mart Corp., 979 S.W.2d 145, 147-48 (Mo. banc 1998), the Supreme Court reversed the trial court’s judgment when conflicting causation standards were used in the verdict director and the damages instruction. 2003The Supreme Court noted that “the phrase ‘direct result’ is sufficiently inconsistent with ‘directly caused or contributed to cause’ to produce potentially inconsistent results where the phrases are used in different instructions.” Id. at 148 . | 1 | 1 |
Ol v. Rlgreen1 sentence2002See O.L. v. R.L., 62 S.W.3d 469, 473 (Mo.App.2001). | 1 | 1 |
Aiple v. South Side National Bank in St. Louisgreen2 sentences2001See also Aiple v. South Side Nat'l Bank, 442 S.W.2d 145, 151-52 (Mo.App.1969). 2001See also Aiple v. South Side Nat’l Bank, 442 S.W.2d 145, 151-52 (Mo.App.1969). | 1 | 1 |
Fordyce v. Montgomerygreen1 sentence1986As the Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, stated in Fordyce v. Montgomery, 424 S.W.2d 746, 750-51 (Mo.App.1968), wherein an assault committed by one defendant was imputed to a second defendant: It would be highly artificial and unrealistic, however, to resolve the merits of this appeal simply by saying that the malice of one codefendant must be imputed to the other. | 1 | 1 |
Wilt v. Waterfieldgreen1 sentence1984Id., 296 [13]. | 1 | 1 |
Jurgeson v. Rominegreen1 sentence1977Jurgeson v. Romine, 442 S.W.2d 176, 178 [4, 5] (Mo.App. 1969). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brancato v. Wholesale Tool Co., Inc.
green
1 sentence2024See, e.g., Washington, 662 S.W.3d at 76 (finding an employer waived its right to a jury trial on damages by failing to appear at the damages hearing); Brancato v. Wholesale Tool Co., Inc., 950 S.W.2d 551 , 555–56 (noting but not deciding that the complaining party may have waived his right to a jury trial by affirmatively participating in a bench trial after failing to provide jury instructions). 14 We sympathize with the apparent frustration of the trial court with the Appellant’s delays 15 and noncompliance with court orders, and we further recognize our deference to a trial court’s inherent | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Howes v. Howes
green
1 sentence2023See English, 220 S.W.3d at 857 ; SKMDV Holdings, Inc., 494 S.W.3d at 546 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State Ex Rel. City of Blue Springs v. Nixon
green
1 sentence2017A damages claim “ ‘based on inverse condemnation [does] not pass to subsequent grantees of the land.’ ” Id. (quoting Crede v. City of Oak Grove, 979 S.W.2d 529, 534 (Mo. App. W.D. 1998)). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Akers v. City of Oak Grove
green
1 sentence2017After reviewing the case law, however, and guided by Akers v. City of Oak Grove, 246 S.W.3d 916 (Mo. banc 2008), the circuit court preceded the damages instruction with an “all-or-nothing” verdict director that gave the jury the option of finding either that the Hulls' had suffered no taking or that the District had totally and permanently taken the Hulls’ property. 8 The circuit court then read the follow ing damages instruction (Instruction No. 7): If you find in favor of Jim and Nancy Hull and Pleasant Hill Golf, Inc., then you must award Jim and Nancy Hull and Pleasant Hill Golf, Inc., suc | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State Ex Rel. Diehl v. O'MALLEY
green
1 sentence2016Diehl v. O’Malley, 95 S.W.3d 82 (Mo. banc 2003), this Court held that the trial court erred in not allowing the jury to determine the plaintiff’s damages in a claim brought under the Missouri Human Rights Act. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Luna v. Smith
green
1 sentence2014Luna, 861 S.W.2d at 779 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Turpin v. Anderson
green
1 sentence2010Anderson, 957 S.W.2d 421 .” Respondents’ counsel first stated that “[d]efendant would object to the — any allowance of interest to be determined, based upon the fact that a specific demand was not made, even in the plaintiff’s initial petition.” After Koppe’s attorney made a brief response, Respondents’ counsel added “[j]ust one other thing, Judge. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Leisse v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain Railroad
green
1 sentence1999Louis & Iron Mountain Railroad Co., 2 Mo.App. 105, 113-114 . *39 A separate action— such as filed by 66, Inc. here— is the only means for making a damages claim for abandonment of condemnation because the only damage issue recognized in a condemnation proceeding is the value of the real estate being taken. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Floyd v. Brenner
green
1 sentence1997Id. at 328 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Lane v. Cape Mutual Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence1997Id. at 645 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Sands v. R. G. McKelvey Building Co.
green
1 sentence1981The next point advanced by U.S. Gypsum is that the use of MAI 4.01 as the damages instruction was error, as was found in Sands v. McKelvey Building Co., 571 S.W.2d 726 (Mo.App.1978). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Boten v. Brecklein
green
1 sentence1979Boten v. Brecklein, 452 S.W.2d 86 (Mo.1970). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Girard v. St. Louis Car Wheel Co.
green
2 sentences1906Louis Car Wheel Company, 123 Mo. 358 , 27 S. W. 648 , as authority for the position that it is not necessary to return or offer to return what they had received on the contract as a condition precedent to their right to have the contract cancelled, and that they may allege the receipt of the money in their bill and consent that it may be set off against the amount of damages they claim to have sustained. 1906Louis Car Wheel Company, 123 Mo. 358 , 27 S. W. 648 , as authority for the position that it is not necessary to return or offer to return what they had received on the contract as a condition precedent to their right to have the contract cancelled, and that they may allege the receipt of the money in their bill and consent that it may be set off against the amount of damages they claim to have sustained. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
State ex rel. Bothrick v. Potter
neutral
1 sentence1880Coen', and shall further find that such representation of said Hewitt was false, and that the signature of said Coen was not genuine, but was forged; yet, if they further find from the evidence that said bond was afterward filed in the probate court of this county, and was regular and complete on its face, and that the officers of said court or the beneficiaries in said bond had no notice of said representation of said Hewitt, or the falseness of the signature of said Coen, then, and in that event, the jury are authorized to find for the plaintiff’ as against Fuson, and will assess the damages | 1 | 1880–1880 |
| State ex rel. Brown v. Baker neutral | 1 | 1880–1880 |
| State ex rel. Wight v. Modrel neutral | 1 | 1880–1880 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.