Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Delaware opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sturgis v. Bayside Health Ass'n Charteredgreen2 sentences2018Ruth addressed each of the Dauberz‘ factors of reliability: (1) whether a theory or technique has been tested; (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) whether a technique had a high known or potential rate of error and whether there are standards controlling its operation; and (4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within a relevant scientific community.20 20 Sturgis v. Baysl'a'e Health Ass ’n Chartered, 942 A.2d 579, 584 (Del. 2007). 8 As to the first three factors, Ruth testified that there are peer-reviewed publications that tested EDR sy 2018Ruth addressed each of the Daubert factors of reliability: (1) whether a theory or technique has been tested; (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) whether a technique had a high known or potential rate of error and whether there are standards controlling its operation; and (4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within a relevant scientific community.20 20 Sturgis v. Bayside Health Ass ’n Chartered, 942 A.2d 579, 584 (Del. 2007). 8 As to the first three factors, Ruth testified that there are peer-reviewed publications that tested EDR syste | 2 | 2 |
In Re Steinergreen2 sentences2009In re Steiner, 817 A.2d 793, 796 (Del. 2003). 1. 2007In re Steiner, 817 A.2d 793, 796 (Del.2003). 1. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA Lit.green1 sentence2025The SAC is silent on the first three factors, but it can be reasonably inferred that the parties negotiated, entered, and performed the Agreement in Texas. 101 The subject matter of the Agreement—equity in the Transferred Entities—was held by the Selling Defendants in Texas and relates to international entities.102 Finally, while the entity-parties are Delaware corporations, both the Individuals and Selling Defendants are located in Texas.103 As it at this point, at very least, reasonably 99 In re Enron Corp. Secs., 235 F.Supp.2d 549 691-92 (S.D. | 1 | 1 |
Otto v. Alpergreen1 sentence1982Cf. Otto v. Alper, supra, at 955. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.