Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Mendez v. AMERICAN SUPPORTgreen2 sentences2007The first three factors are considered "Blakely-compliant," while the prior conviction factor is considered "Blakely-ex-empt." Lopez v. People, supra, 113 P.3d at 723 (citing State v. Aleman, 210 Ariz. 232 , 109 P.3d 571, 580 (Ariz.Ct.App.2005)). 2007The first three factors are considered "Blakely-compliant," while the prior conviction factor is considered "Blakely-ex-empt." Lopez v. People, supra, 113 P.3d at 723 (citing State v. Aleman, 210 Ariz. 232 , 109 P.3d 571, 580 (Ariz.Ct.App.2005)). | 2 | 2 |
Lopez v. Peoplegreen2 sentences2008The first three factors are considered "Blakely-compliant." The fourth is "Blakely exempt." Lopez v. People, 113 P.3d 713, 723 (Colo.2005). 2007The first three factors are considered "Blakely-compliant," while the prior conviction factor is considered "Blakely-ex-empt." Lopez v. People, supra, 113 P.3d at 723 (citing State v. Aleman, 210 Ariz. 232 , 109 P.3d 571, 580 (Ariz.Ct.App.2005)). | 1 | 3 |
People v. Pflugbeilgreen2 sentences1993See People v. Stevens, 761 P.2d 768, 775 (Colo.1988); People v. Lane, 196 Colo. 42, 48 , 581 P.2d 719, 723 (1978); People v. Pflugbeil, 834 P.2d 843, 847 (Colo. App.1992). 1993See People v. Stevens, 761 P.2d 768, 775 (Colo.1988); People v. Lane, 196 Colo. 42, 48 , 581 P.2d 719, 723 (1978); People v. Pflugbeil, 834 P.2d 843, 847 (Colo.App.1992). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Stevensgreen2 sentences1993See People v. Stevens, 761 P.2d 768, 775 (Colo.1988); People v. Lane, 196 Colo. 42, 48 , 581 P.2d 719, 723 (1978); People v. Pflugbeil, 834 P.2d 843, 847 (Colo. App.1992). 1993See People v. Stevens, 761 P.2d 768, 775 (Colo.1988); People v. Lane, 196 Colo. 42, 48 , 581 P.2d 719, 723 (1978); People v. Pflugbeil, 834 P.2d 843, 847 (Colo.App.1992). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Lanegreen2 sentences1993See People v. Stevens, 761 P.2d 768, 775 (Colo.1988); People v. Lane, 196 Colo. 42, 48 , 581 P.2d 719, 723 (1978); People v. Pflugbeil, 834 P.2d 843, 847 (Colo. App.1992). 1993See People v. Stevens, 761 P.2d 768, 775 (Colo.1988); People v. Lane, 196 Colo. 42, 48 , 581 P.2d 719, 723 (1978); People v. Pflugbeil, 834 P.2d 843, 847 (Colo. App.1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Whittiker
green
2 sentences2007People v. Whittiker, supra. In People v. Carmichael, supra, we employed the same test and reached the same conclusion: although the first three factors weighed in the defendant's favor, the claim failed because the defendant was unable to show that he had been prejudiced. 2007People v. Whittiker, supra. In People v. Carmichael, supra, we employed the same test and reached the same conclusion: although the first three factors weighed in the defendant's favor, the claim failed because the defendant was unable to show that he had been prejudiced. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
People v. Carmichael
green
2 sentences2007People v. Whittiker, supra. In People v. Carmichael, supra, we employed the same test and reached the same conclusion: although the first three factors weighed in the defendant's favor, the claim failed because the defendant was unable to show that he had been prejudiced. 2007People v. Whittiker, supra. In People v. Carmichael, supra, we employed the same test and reached the same conclusion: although the first three factors weighed in the defendant's favor, the claim failed because the defendant was unable to show that he had been prejudiced. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.