6 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gene Taylor & Sons Plumbing Co. Inc. v. Corondolet Real. Trustgreen1 sentence2001See Tenn. Code Ann. § 62-6-103 (c); Gene Taylor & Sons Plumbing Co. v. Corondolet Realty Trust, 611 S.W.2d 572, 577 (Tenn. 1981). | 1 | 1 |
Crocker v. Town of Manchestergreen1 sentence1988See, e.g., Crocker v. Town of Manchester, supra, 178 Tenn. at 70 , 156 Tenn. at 384; Memphis Street Ry. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Potter v. Tucker
green
2 sentences2005Id. 2005The harsh rule is applied “where the facts show the trespass to have been malicious, or with full knowledge of the title of the injured party, and in willful disregard of his rights.” Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences2004In 1964, we decided in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 95 ALR2d 1412, that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution placed limits on the application of the state law of defamation. 2004In 1964, we decided in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 95 ALR2d 1412, that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution placed limits on the application of the state law of defamation. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Tackett v. Mullins
green
1 sentence1982By analogy, the analysis of Corondolet was adopted by the Court in Tackett v. Mullins, 612 S.W.2d 909 (Tenn.1981), in the case of an unlicensed real estate broker. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Johnson v. Patterson
green
1 sentence1966It was error for the Chancellor to invoke the harsh rule of Johnson v. Patterson, 81 Tenn. 626 , as to the quantum of proof necessary to overcome the presumption of an advancement instead of a gift, when the modern tendency of the courts has been to ease the requirement of the amount of proof necessary for such purpose. 4. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.