9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1890–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carroll-Boone Water District v. M. & P. Equipment Co.green1 sentence2023Co., 661 S.W.2d 345, 351 (Ark. 1983) (noting “[s]trict liability is a harsh rule” and should not be applied “when blasting is conducted on the property damaged with the knowledge and consent of the owner”); cf. Guido v. N.Y. | 1 | 1 |
Faust v. Thomasgreen1 sentence2003Faust v. Thomas, 535 N.E.2d 164, 165 (Ind.Ct.App.1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Coleman v. MITNICK, ETC.
green
2 sentences1973In Coleman v. Mitnick (1964), 137 Ind. App. 125 , 202 N.E.2d 577 , one citizen caused the arrest of another for violation of a subsequently invalidated ordinance and liability was imposed for false imprisonment. 1973In Coleman v. Mitnick (1964), 137 Ind. App. 125 , 202 N.E.2d 577 , one citizen caused the arrest of another for violation of a subsequently invalidated ordinance and liability was imposed for false imprisonment. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
City of Pekin v. McMahon
green
1 sentence1953This court has examined many of the cases cited in appellant’s brief and finds that since the decision of the Plotzki case, supra, many courts have refused to adopt the more “liberal” view and have adopted the thinking of the court in the Plotzki case, supra, and City of Pekin v. McMahon (1895), 154 Ill. 141 , 39 N. E. 484 (See Torts — Application of Attractive Nuisance Doctrine to Ponds and Pools) 26 Notre Dame Lawyer, p. 154-156. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Brown v. Doak Co.
green
2 sentences1935The Supreme Court did not see fit to follow the recommendation of this court, See Brown v. Doak Co. (1922), 192 Ind. 113 , *569 135 N. E. 343 . 1935The Supreme Court did not see fit to follow the recommendation of this court, See Brown v. Doak Co. (1922), 192 Ind. 113 , *569 135 N. E. 343 . | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Zarecki v. Guarantee Realty Co.
neutral
2 sentences1928Eq. 489 , 89 A. 513 ; Bradshaw v. Provident Trust Co. (1916), 81 Or. 55 , 158 P. 274 ; Archer v. California Lumber Co. (1893), 24 Or. 341 , 33 P. 526 ; Albany City Sav. 1928It would be a harsh rule if a person applying to an insurance agent, who is supposed to know the legal value of the language used in such policies, which he is drawing up every day, and who is supposed to know exactly what is desired, if that agent fails to do that which was intended, it would be harsh to say that the instrument shall not be reformed, and that chancery shall not give relief." For other leading cases on this subject see Zarecki v. Guarantee Realty Co. (1914), 82 N.J. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Bradshaw v. Provident Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1928Eq. 489 , 89 A. 513 ; Bradshaw v. Provident Trust Co. (1916), 81 Or. 55 , 158 P. 274 ; Archer v. California Lumber Co. (1893), 24 Or. 341 , 33 P. 526 ; Albany City Sav. 1928Eq. 489 , 89 A. 513 ; Bradshaw v. Provident Trust Co. (1916), 81 Or. 55 , 158 P. 274 ; Archer v. California Lumber Co. (1893), 24 Or. 341 , 33 P. 526 ; Albany City Sav. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Archer v. California Lumber Co.
green
2 sentences1928Eq. 489 , 89 A. 513 ; Bradshaw v. Provident Trust Co. (1916), 81 Or. 55 , 158 P. 274 ; Archer v. California Lumber Co. (1893), 24 Or. 341 , 33 P. 526 ; Albany City Sav. 1928Eq. 489 , 89 A. 513 ; Bradshaw v. Provident Trust Co. (1916), 81 Or. 55 , 158 P. 274 ; Archer v. California Lumber Co. (1893), 24 Or. 341 , 33 P. 526 ; Albany City Sav. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Lee v. Hefley
neutral
1 sentence1921We therefore transfer this case to the Supreme Court for its consideration and respectfully recommend that the case of Lee v. Hefley, supra, be overruled. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Bennett v. Root Furniture Co.
green
2 sentences1915In the case of Bennett v. Root Furniture Co. (1911), 176 Ind. 606, 608 , 96 N. E. 708 , the court said: “Appellants have not set out in their brief any motion for a new trial or the substance thereof, nor any ground assigned therefor, as required by Eule 22 of this court. 1915In the case of Bennett v. Root Furniture Co. (1911), 176 Ind. 606, 608 , 96 N. E. 708 , the court said: “Appellants have not set out in their brief any motion for a new trial or the substance thereof, nor any ground assigned therefor, as required by Eule 22 of this court. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Haymond v. Saucer
green
1 sentence1890Haymond v. Saucer, 84 Ind. 3 . | 1 | 1890–1890 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.