Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Virginia opinions name it 3 courts 1918–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ryland Group, Inc. v. Willsgreen2 sentences1998Virginia Code § 55-13.3 was enacted in 1982, and it “significantly modified the harsh rule against perpetuities ... .” Ryland Group v. Wills, 229 Va. 459, 436, n. 2 , 331 S.E.2d 399 (1985). 1998Virginia Code § 55-13.3 was enacted in 1982, and it “significantly modified the harsh rule against perpetuities ... .” Ryland Group v. Wills, 229 Va. 459, 436, n. 2 , 331 S.E.2d 399 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
Hurt v. Newcombgreen1 sentence1995The underlying policy for this harsh rule was expressed in Hurt v. Newcomb: “The litigant is not allowed to remain silent, to take his chances of a favorable verdict, and, afterward, to raise an objection when he receives an unfavorable decision.” 242 Va. 36, 39 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
United Virginia Bank v. Union Oil Co. of Californiagreen2 sentences1985This enactment into law of what has been characterized as the “wait and see” doctrine, see United Virginia Bank v. Union Oil, 214 Va. 48, 53 , 197 S.E.2d 174, 177 (1973), is not applicable in the present case which had been decided in the trial court when the new rule became effective. 1985This enactment into law of what has been characterized as the “wait and see” doctrine, see United Virginia Bank v. Union Oil, 214 Va. 48, 53 , 197 S.E.2d 174, 177 (1973), is not applicable in the present case which had been decided in the trial court when the new rule became effective. | 1 | 1 |
Fake v. Addicksgreen2 sentences1935See also, Fake v. Addicks (1890), 45 Minn. 37 , 47 N. W. 450 , 22 Am. 1935See also, Fake v. Addicks (1890), 45 Minn. 37 , 47 N. W. 450 , 22 Am. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bischoff v. Cheney
green
1 sentence1935Law 458, 55 Atl. 237, 238 , and in Bischoff v. Cheney (1914), 89 Conn. 1 , 92 Atl. 660 , 661, the harsh rule of May v. Burdett, supra, is expressly disapproved. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
De Gray v. Murray
green
1 sentence1935Law 458, 55 Atl. 237, 238 , and in Bischoff v. Cheney (1914), 89 Conn. 1 , 92 Atl. 660 , 661, the harsh rule of May v. Burdett, supra, is expressly disapproved. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Fisher v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
green
2 sentences1918Fishers v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co., 102 Va. 363 , 46 S. E. 381 . 1918Fishers v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co., 102 Va. 363 , 46 S. E. 381 . | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.