U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 14— MISCELLANEOUS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— INDIAN SELF-DETERMINATION AND EDUCATION ASSISTANCE › Part Part A— Indian Self-Determination

25 U.S.C. § 450j

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 52 cases, 1987–2019 · leading case: Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 263 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (D.N.M. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 263 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (D.N.M. 2016). · cites it 11× “According to Sage Hospital, the subsequent ISDEAA *1093 subsection then mandates IHS to add CSC to the Secretarial amount as defined in 25 U.S.C. § 450j — 1(a)(1)—not just to the part of the federal program funded with appropriated funds.”
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Burwell, 170 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2016). · cites it 14× “” 25 U.S.C. § 450j(i )(2). The regulations, in turn, explain that there are “three options available” for section 105(Z) leases.”
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Shalala, 988 F. Supp. 1306 (D. Or. 1997). · cites it 14× “25 U.S.C. § 450j — 1(a)(2). In addition, a new provision conferred jurisdiction on the -federal district courts over any civil action or claim under the ISDEA.”
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar, 644 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2011). · cites it 6× “CSCs include “direct program expenses for the operation of the Federal program that is the subject of the contract,” 25 U.S.C. § 450j — 1 (a)(3)(A)(i), and “any additional administrative or other expense related to the overhead incurred by the tribal contractor in connection…”
Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United States, 577 F. Supp. 2d 382 (D.D.C. 2008). · cites it 4× “25 U.S.C. § 450j — 2 (emphasis added.) According to the defendants, this provision “state[s] unequivocally that the cost-shifting endorsed by the Tenth Circuit [in RNC ] was not permissible,” thereby ‘To-réelos [ing] any argument that the [Indian Self-Determination Act] has ever…”
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius, 72 F. Supp. 3d 227 (D.D.C. 2014). · cites it 6× “11, and requested that IHS enter into a new lease under the mandatory leasing provisions of 25 U.S.C. § 450j(Z )(1), see id. at Ex. C, Feb.”
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States, 190 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (E.D. Okla. 2001). · cites it 3× “25 U.S.C. § 450j — 1(b) provides: Notwithstanding any other provision in this subchapter, the provision of funds under this subchapter is subject to the availability of appropriations and the Secretary is not required to reduce funding for programs, projects, or activities…”
Arctic Slope Native Ass'n, Ltd. v. Sebelius, 699 F.3d 1289 (Fed. Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “25 U.S.C. § 450j — 1(a)(2): "There shall be added to the amount required by paragraph (1) contract support costs which shall consist of an amount for the reasonable costs for activities which must be carried on by a tribal organization as a contractor to ensure compliance with…”
Seneca Nation of Indians v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 945 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D.D.C. 2013). · cites it 3× “The language indicates and carries out the intent of Congress in enacting the ISDEAA, which states that funds “may, at the request of the tribal organization, be increased by the Secretary if necessary to carry out [the ISDEAA],” 25 U.S.C. § 450j — 1(b)(5), and that the…”
Samish Indian Nation v. United States, 419 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “§§ 450j — 1 (a)(1) (2000) (program money under self-determination contracts will be funded at level Department would have otherwise provided for specific program operation); 450j-l(b)(2)(A) (2000) (self-determination contract funding may be reduced where appropriations for…”
Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla & Cupeño Indians v. Jewell, 729 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “The Tribe’s only response to § 450f(a)(2)(D) is that the BIA misinterprets 25 U.S.C. § 450j—1(a)(1), which defines “applicable funding level.”
Arctic Slope Native Ass'n, Ltd. v. Sebelius, 629 F.3d 1296 (Fed. Cir. 2010). · cites it 3× “” 25 U.S.C. § 450j—1(b); Joint App. 133 (incorporating § 450j—1 (b) into the contract).”
Show all 52 citing cases →
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(Z) — 2 cases
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Burwell, 170 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2016). “” 25 U.S.C. § 450j(i )(2). The regulations, in turn, explain that there are “three options available” for section 105(Z) leases.”
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius, 72 F. Supp. 3d 227 (D.D.C. 2014). “11, and requested that IHS enter into a new lease under the mandatory leasing provisions of 25 U.S.C. § 450j(Z )(1), see id. at Ex. C, Feb.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(Z)(2) — 1 case
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Burwell, 170 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2016). “” 25 U.S.C. § 450j(i )(2). The regulations, in turn, explain that there are “three options available” for section 105(Z) leases.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(Z)(l) — 1 case
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius, 72 F. Supp. 3d 227 (D.D.C. 2014). “11, and requested that IHS enter into a new lease under the mandatory leasing provisions of 25 U.S.C. § 450j(Z )(1), see id. at Ex. C, Feb.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(a) — 3 cases
United States ex rel. Gen. Rock & Sand Corp. v. Chuska Dev. Corp., 55 F.3d 1491 (10th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Hacker, 883 F. Supp. 444 (D.S.D. 1994).
Faras v. Hodel, 845 F.2d 202 (9th Cir. 1988).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(b) — 3 cases
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Shalala, 988 F. Supp. 1306 (D. Or. 1997). “25 U.S.C. § 450j — 1(a)(2). In addition, a new provision conferred jurisdiction on the -federal district courts over any civil action or claim under the ISDEA.”
Cherokee Nation v. Thompson, 311 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2002).
Authorization of Immigr. Emergency Fund Reimbursements (OLC 1995).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(c) — 5 cases
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 220 F. Supp. 3d 1190 (D.N.M. 2016).
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 100 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (D.N.M. 2015).
Cherokee Nation v. Thompson, 311 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2002).
Norton Sound Health Corp. v. Thompson, 55 F. App'x 835 (9th Cir. 2003).
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 256 F. Supp. 3d 1186 (D.N.M. 2015).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(c)(1) — 1 case
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar, 644 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2011). “CSCs include “direct program expenses for the operation of the Federal program that is the subject of the contract,” 25 U.S.C. § 450j — 1 (a)(3)(A)(i), and “any additional administrative or other expense related to the overhead incurred by the tribal contractor in connection…”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(c)(1)(B) — 1 case
Loren Shirk v. United States, 773 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2014).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(c)(l) — 5 cases
Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United States, 577 F. Supp. 2d 382 (D.D.C. 2008). “25 U.S.C. § 450j — 2 (emphasis added.) According to the defendants, this provision “state[s] unequivocally that the cost-shifting endorsed by the Tenth Circuit [in RNC ] was not permissible,” thereby ‘To-réelos [ing] any argument that the [Indian Self-Determination Act] has ever…”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 100 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (D.N.M. 2015).
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. Kempthorne, 496 F. Supp. 2d 1059 (D.S.D. 2007).
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Jewell, 167 F. Supp. 3d 1217 (D.N.M. 2016).
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 256 F. Supp. 3d 1186 (D.N.M. 2015).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(c)(l)(A) — 2 cases
Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United States, 577 F. Supp. 2d 382 (D.D.C. 2008). “25 U.S.C. § 450j — 2 (emphasis added.) According to the defendants, this provision “state[s] unequivocally that the cost-shifting endorsed by the Tenth Circuit [in RNC ] was not permissible,” thereby ‘To-réelos [ing] any argument that the [Indian Self-Determination Act] has ever…”
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States of Am., 841 F. Supp. 2d 99 (D.D.C. 2012).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(e)(0) — 1 case
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 256 F. Supp. 3d 1186 (D.N.M. 2015).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(f) — 2 cases
United States v. Hacker, 883 F. Supp. 444 (D.S.D. 1994).
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Chapa De Indian Health Prog., Inc., 316 F.3d 995 (9th Cir. 2003).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(f)(2) — 1 case
United States v. F. Butch Oseby (8th Cir. 1998).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(f)(3) — 2 cases
United States v. F. Butch Oseby, 148 F.3d 1016 (8th Cir. 1998).
United States v. F. Butch Oseby (8th Cir. 1998).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(h) — 1 case
Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. Tanner, 288 F. Supp. 2d 1133 (D. Mont. 2003).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(i) — 4 cases
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Burwell, 170 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2016). “” 25 U.S.C. § 450j(i )(2). The regulations, in turn, explain that there are “three options available” for section 105(Z) leases.”
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Shalala, 988 F. Supp. 1306 (D. Or. 1997). “25 U.S.C. § 450j — 1(a)(2). In addition, a new provision conferred jurisdiction on the -federal district courts over any civil action or claim under the ISDEA.”
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius, 72 F. Supp. 3d 227 (D.D.C. 2014). “11, and requested that IHS enter into a new lease under the mandatory leasing provisions of 25 U.S.C. § 450j(Z )(1), see id. at Ex. C, Feb.”
North Dakota Ex Rel. Olson v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Servs., 286 F. Supp. 2d 1080 (D.N.D. 2003).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(i)(1) — 1 case
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. Kempthorne, 630 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (E.D. Okla. 2009).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(i)(2) — 1 case
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Burwell, 170 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2016). “” 25 U.S.C. § 450j(i )(2). The regulations, in turn, explain that there are “three options available” for section 105(Z) leases.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(i)(l) — 2 cases
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius, 72 F. Supp. 3d 227 (D.D.C. 2014). “11, and requested that IHS enter into a new lease under the mandatory leasing provisions of 25 U.S.C. § 450j(Z )(1), see id. at Ex. C, Feb.”
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Shalala, 988 F. Supp. 1306 (D. Or. 1997). “25 U.S.C. § 450j — 1(a)(2). In addition, a new provision conferred jurisdiction on the -federal district courts over any civil action or claim under the ISDEA.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(j) — 1 case
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Shalala, 988 F. Supp. 1306 (D. Or. 1997). “25 U.S.C. § 450j — 1(a)(2). In addition, a new provision conferred jurisdiction on the -federal district courts over any civil action or claim under the ISDEA.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(l) — 3 cases
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Burwell, 170 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2016). “” 25 U.S.C. § 450j(i )(2). The regulations, in turn, explain that there are “three options available” for section 105(Z) leases.”
Ellenbecker v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Servs., 335 F. Supp. 2d 999 (D.S.D. 2003).
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius (D.D.C. 2014).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450j(l)(1) — 1 case
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius (D.D.C. 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.