5 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Padgettgreen1 sentence2026A mistrial is reserved for unique circumstances in which the prejudice is so great that a trial cannot continue fairly for both parties. “[T]he power to grant a mistrial ought to be used sparingly and only with the utmost caution, under urgent circumstances, and for very plain and obvious causes.” Commonwealth v. Padgett, 563 S.W.3d 639, 646 (Ky. 2018) (alteration in original) (quoting Cardine v. Commonwealth, 283 S.W.3d 641, 647 (Ky. 2009)). | 1 | 1 |
Cardine v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2026A mistrial is reserved for unique circumstances in which the prejudice is so great that a trial cannot continue fairly for both parties. “[T]he power to grant a mistrial ought to be used sparingly and only with the utmost caution, under urgent circumstances, and for very plain and obvious causes.” Commonwealth v. Padgett, 563 S.W.3d 639, 646 (Ky. 2018) (alteration in original) (quoting Cardine v. Commonwealth, 283 S.W.3d 641, 647 (Ky. 2009)). | 1 | 1 |
Drury v. Spaldinggreen1 sentence2025See Drury v. Spalding, 812 S.W.2d 713, 717 (Ky. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
Clephas v. Garlock, Inc.green1 sentence2025Clephas v. Garlock, Inc., 168 S.W.3d 389, 395 (Ky. App. 2004). | 1 | 1 |
Bowling v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2014However, the disclosure requirement applies only to "those cases in which the government possesses information that the defense does not." Bowling v. Commonwealth, 80 S.W.3d 405, 410 (Ky. 2002). 2014Further, "Brady applies only to the discovery, after trial, of information which had been known to the prosecution but unknown to the defense."' Id., (quoting Agurs, 427 U.S. at 103 ) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
East Brooks Books, Inc. v. City Of Memphisgreen2 sentences2010But see East Brooks Books, Inc. v. City of Memphis, 48 F.3d 220, 226 (6th Cir.1995) (disclosure requirement for any shareholder held to be im-permissibly broad). 2010But see East Brooks Books, Inc. v. City of Memphis, 48 F.3d 220, 226 (6th Cir.1995) (disclosure requirement for any shareholder held to be impermissibly broad). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Agurs
green
1 sentence2014Further, "Brady applies only to the discovery, after trial, of information which had been known to the prosecution but unknown to the defense."' Id., (quoting Agurs, 427 U.S. at 103 ) (emphasis added). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis
green
2 sentences2010In Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis, 936 F.Supp. 1479 (E.D.Wis.1996), a disclosure requirement for ten percent or more shareholders in adult oriented businesses was held to be constitutional, and in Dumas v. City of Dallas, 648 F.Supp. 1061 (N.D.Tex.1986), reversed in part on other grounds sub nom. 2010In Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis, 936 F.Supp. 1479 (E.D.Wis.1996), a disclosure requirement for ten percent or more shareholders in adult oriented businesses was held to be constitutional, and in Dumas v. City of Dallas, 648 F.Supp. 1061 (N.D.Tex.1986), reversed in part on other grounds sub nom. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas
green
2 sentences2010FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 493 U.S. 215 , 110 S.Ct. 596 , 107 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990), a disclosure requirement for twenty percent or more shareholders was upheld. 2010FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 493 U.S. 215 , 110 S.Ct. 596 , 107 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990), a disclosure requirement for twenty percent or more shareholders was upheld. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Dumas v. City of Dallas
green
2 sentences2010In Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis, 936 F.Supp. 1479 (E.D.Wis.1996), a disclosure requirement for ten percent or more shareholders in adult oriented businesses was held to be constitutional, and in Dumas v. City of Dallas, 648 F.Supp. 1061 (N.D.Tex.1986), reversed in part on other grounds sub nom. 2010In Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis, 936 F.Supp. 1479 (E.D.Wis.1996), a disclosure requirement for ten percent or more shareholders in adult oriented businesses was held to be constitutional, and in Dumas v. City of Dallas, 648 F.Supp. 1061 (N.D.Tex.1986), reversed in part on other grounds sub nom. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Buckley v. Valeo
green
2 sentences2010Id. 2010Id. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Envy Ltd. v. City of Louisville
green
2 sentences2010Id. 2010Id. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Chenault v. Chenault
green
2 sentences1995A better approach would be to borrow from our decision in Chenault v. Chenault, Ky., 799 S.W.2d 575 (1990), which dealt with the precision required for tracing non-marital assets upon dissolution of a marriage. 1995A better approach would be to borrow from our decision in Chenault v. Chenault, Ky., 799 S.W.2d 575 (1990), which dealt with the precision required for tracing non-marital assets upon dissolution of a marriage. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.