disclosure requirement (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

disclosure requirement in Indiana

10 Indiana opinions name it 3 courts 1978–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re Haileygreen
ind · 2003 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
1 sentence

2007See In re Hailey, 792 N.E.2d 851 (Ind.2003). [4] The Appendix supplied by ITLA includes an example of an agreement that meets this disclosure requirement: The Indiana Medical Malpractice Act ("Act") restricts the amount that can be recovered for a medical malpractice claim.

11
Unincorporated Operating Division of Indiana Newspapers, Inc. v. Trustees of Indiana Universitygreen
indctapp · 2003 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004Unincorporated Operating Div. of Ind. News papers, Inc. v. Trs. of Ind. Univ., 787 N.E.2d 893, 901 (Ind.Ct.App.2003), trans. denied.

2004Unincorporated Operating Div. of Ind. Newspapers, *733 Inc. v. Trs. of Ind. Univ., 787 N.E.2d 893, 901 (Ind.Ct.App.2003), trans. denied.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
William Groth v. Mike Pence, as Governor of the State of Indiana green
indctapp · 2017
1 sentence

2020Thus, we are not bound by the PAC’s opinion. 2 [19] Third, Fox 59 asserts several versions of its proposition that “[t]he public policy underlying APRA requires a liberal construction” of the disclosure requirement and “narrow construction of its exceptions.” Id.

12020–2020
Doe v. Methodist Hospital green
ind · 1997
2 sentences

2019Id. at 692-93 .

2019Id. at 692-93 .

12019–2019
Journal Gazette v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY green
indctapp · 1998
2 sentences

2003Additionally, miscellaneous documents ... that are all a part of the follow up of the Joseph and Dunn grievances, are also excluded from *913 the disclosure requirement as Purdue has shown that they are a part of the decision making process which follows employee grievances." Id. at 830 .

2003Additionally, miscellaneous documents ... that are all a part of the follow up of the Joseph and Dunn grievances, are also excluded from *913 the disclosure requirement as Purdue has shown that they are a part of the decision making process which follows employee grievances." Id. at 830 .

12003–2003
Miller v. Vanderburgh County green
indctapp · 1993
1 sentence

2000We note that both Oman and the driver of the other fire truck were tested as per this Ordinance. [24] In addition to the Skinner and Von Raab decisions, see Miller v. Vanderburgh County, 610 N.E.2d 858 (Ind.Ct.App.1993), transfer denied, where the Court of Appeals upheld, in dicta, the constitutionality of an administrative testing program similar to Michigan City's Ordinance. [25] Just as we find no violation of the ordinance's confidentiality provisions in the laboratory's disclosure of the test results to the prosecutor, we also find no violation of those provisions in the mere fact that th

12000–2000
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners green
indtc · 1988
1 sentence

1991Rather than a trap for the unwary, the court stated the full disclosure requirement was a "necessary procedure to insure fair and accurate administration of the property tax." Id. at 242 .

11991–1991
HOBBIEST FINANCEING CORP. v. Spivey green
gactapp · 1975
2 sentences

1983Piatchek v. Fairview Reliable Loan, Inc., (S.D.Ill.1979) 474 F.Supp. 622 ; Hobbiest Financing Corporation v. Spivey, (1975) 135 Ga.App. 353 , 217 S.E.2d 613 .

1983Piatchek v. Fairview Reliable Loan, Inc., (S.D.Ill.1979) 474 F.Supp. 622 ; Hobbiest Financing Corporation v. Spivey, (1975) 135 Ga.App. 353 , 217 S.E.2d 613 .

11983–1983
Piatchek v. Fairview Reliable Loan, Inc. green
ilsd · 1979
1 sentence

1983Piatchek v. Fairview Reliable Loan, Inc., (S.D.Ill.1979) 474 F.Supp. 622 ; Hobbiest Financing Corporation v. Spivey, (1975) 135 Ga.App. 353 , 217 S.E.2d 613 .

11983–1983
Dube v. State green
ind · 1971
2 sentences

1981EC 7-13, supra, see also, Watson v. State, (1973) 261 Ind. 97 , 300 N.E.2d 354 ; Dube v. State, (1971) 257 Ind. 398 , 275 N.E.2d 7 .

1981EC 7-13, supra, see also, Watson v. State, (1973) 261 Ind. 97 , 300 N.E.2d 354 ; Dube v. State, (1971) 257 Ind. 398 , 275 N.E.2d 7 .

11981–1981
Watson v. State green
ind · 1973
2 sentences

1981EC 7-13, supra, see also, Watson v. State, (1973) 261 Ind. 97 , 300 N.E.2d 354 ; Dube v. State, (1971) 257 Ind. 398 , 275 N.E.2d 7 .

1981EC 7-13, supra, see also, Watson v. State, (1973) 261 Ind. 97 , 300 N.E.2d 354 ; Dube v. State, (1971) 257 Ind. 398 , 275 N.E.2d 7 .

11981–1981
United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, United States of America v. William E. Turner green
cadc · 1971
2 sentences

1978Cir. 1971), 439 F.2d 642, 650 , “[T]he duty of disclosure affects not only the prosecutor, but the government as a whole, including the investigative agencies.” It was also stated in Bryant , that: Such suppression must be regulated if the disclosure requirement is to be a strong safeguard; if only the prosecutor were under the command of Brady , the right to a fair trial would depend on uncertain and uncontrolled decision of government investigators. 439 F.2d at 650 .

1978Cir. 1971), 439 F.2d 642, 650 , “[T]he duty of disclosure affects not only the prosecutor, but the government as a whole, including the investigative agencies.” It was also stated in Bryant , that: Such suppression must be regulated if the disclosure requirement is to be a strong safeguard; if only the prosecutor were under the command of Brady , the right to a fair trial would depend on uncertain and uncontrolled decision of government investigators. 439 F.2d at 650 .

11978–1978

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IN § Ind. Code § 5-14-3-1 (3) IN § Ind. Code § 5-14-3-2 (3) IN § Ind. Code § 5-14-3-9 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 120 (1960–2025) DE 74 (1980–2025) IL 58 (1955–2026) AZ 47 (1974–2026) NY 43 (1963–2026) TX 41 (1992–2025) PA 35 (1971–2026) MD 35 (1949–2022) CT 29 (1940–2021) NJ 29 (1971–2024) MA 26 (1975–2025) OH 26 (1989–2026) FL 20 (1974–2016) WA 20 (1992–2026) MI 18 (1928–2023) OR 16 (1984–2022) ND 15 (1981–2012) MO 14 (1975–2025) NM 13 (1986–2024) AR 11 (1988–2026) VA 11 (2004–2024) TN 10 (1992–2025) IN 10 (1978–2020) WI 10 (1980–2023) ID 10 (2002–2025) IA 9 (1988–2020) ME 9 (2001–2017) MS 9 (1989–2021) MN 8 (1976–2006) KS 8 (1973–2026) UT 8 (1989–2026) NC 8 (1986–2015) CO 7 (1985–2020) NV 7 (2012–2022) VT 7 (1992–2025) WV 6 (1914–2021) AL 6 (1973–2015) LA 5 (1989–2013) KY 5 (1995–2026) DC 5 (1980–2023) HI 5 (1995–2021) WY 4 (1988–2017) OK 4 (1983–2008) SC 3 (2006–2013) AK 3 (1996–2026) NE 3 (1981–1997) GA 2 (1981–1984) MT 2 (1997–2002) NH 2 (1995–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check