Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
LA. CONSUMERS'LEAGUE, INC. v. La. Public Serv.
green
2 sentences1979What is significant for the present case is that the decision of this Court rested upon the implicit assumption that the Commission was bound by its own rules: “The ultimate issue to be decided in this case is the validity of the amendment to Rule 10 for, if this rule was improperly amended, the former version of Rule 10 remained in effect and granted to the League an unconditional right to intervene in the rate proceedings.” 351 So.2d 128, 131 . 1979Holding that the procedures used in the amendment of the rule in question had not been "reasonable" this Court set aside judgment of the District Court in favor of the Commission and directed the Commission to permit the intervention of the plaintiffs with the status accorded by the former version of the rule. *1195 What is significant for the present case is that the decision of this Court rested upon the implicit assumption that the Commission was bound by its own rules: "The ultimate issue to be decided in this case is the validity of the amendment to Rule 10 for, if this rule was improperl | 2 | 1979–1979 |
Louisiana State Bar Association v. Edwins
green
2 sentences2009Respondent argued that the controlling rule of law at the time of his alleged misconduct was that set forth in Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Edwins, 329 So.2d 437 (La. 1976), which he claimed did not require written documentation of the client’s living expenses prior to the advancement of living expenses by the attorney. 2009Respondent argued that the controlling rule of law at the time of his alleged misconduct was that set forth in Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Edwins, 329 So.2d 437 (La. 1976), which he claimed did not require written documentation of the client's living expenses prior to the advancement of living expenses by the attorney. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Cormier v. Sinegal
green
1 sentence2007No pedestrian shall suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle which is so close that it is impossible for the driver to yield. [3] A similar version of this test was enunciated by Judge Tate in Cormier v. Sinegal, 180 So.2d 567 (La.App. 3 Cir.1965): In evaluating whether the child's conduct constitutes contributory negligence, the child is required to exercise only the care expected of his age, intelligence, and experience under the particular circumstances presented to him; in this respect, the obviousness or not of the danger to one of the chil | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Ruff
green
1 sentence2002That is a quote from State versus Ruff, R-U-F-F-, 504 So.2d 72 at page 78 [(La.App. 2 Cir.1987)]. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.