Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Nevada opinions name it 2 courts 1959–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Libby v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.green2 sentences2023Libby v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 130 Nev. 359, 361, 325 P.3d 1276, 1277 (2014). 2023Libby v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 130 Nev. 359, 361, 325 P.3d 1276, 1277 (2014). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pack v. LATOURETTE
green
2 sentences2017In particular, "there must be a preexisting legal relation between them, or some duty on the part of the primary tortfeasor to protect the secondary tortfeasor." Pack, 128 Nev. at 268 , 277 P.3d at 1249 . . . continued Estate's claim has expired, (2) claim preclusion prevents the subject children from bringing subsequent claims against Fisher, and (3) Discount Tire paid in excess of its equitable share pursuant to NRS 17.225(2). 2017In particular, "there must be a preexisting legal relation between them, or some duty on the part of the primary tortfeasor to protect the secondary tortfeasor." Pack, 128 Nev. at 268 , 277 P.3d at 1249 . . . continued Estate's claim has expired, (2) claim preclusion prevents the subject children from bringing subsequent claims against Fisher, and (3) Discount Tire paid in excess of its equitable share pursuant to NRS 17.225(2). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Lewis v. Neblett
green
1 sentence1970Since such property does not form a portion of the assets of the estate, its recovery in no wise diminishes the estate and a claim to it is not a claim against the property constituting the estate.” Accord, Lewis v. Neblett, 10 Cal.Rptr. 441 (Dist.Ct.App. 1961). | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Thompson v. Reno Savings Bank
neutral
1 sentence1959Thompson v. Crockett, 19 Nev. 242 , 9 P. 121 ; In Re Dabney’s Estate, 37 Cal.2d 672 , 234 P.2d 962 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Dabney v. Philleo
green
2 sentences1959Thompson v. Crockett, 19 Nev. 242 , 9 P. 121 ; In Re Dabney’s Estate, 37 Cal.2d 672 , 234 P.2d 962 . 1959Thompson v. Crockett, 19 Nev. 242 , 9 P. 121 ; In Re Dabney’s Estate, 37 Cal.2d 672 , 234 P.2d 962 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.