wrongful death claim (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

wrongful death claim in Washington

34 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2026 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (13)

CaseFollowedCited
Johnson v. Ottomeiergreen
wash · 1954 · cited in 6 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2015–2016
2 sentences

2015Id. at 579-80 . ¶23 Johnson , a more recent Washington Supreme Court decision, involves a limitation on a wrongful death claim in the context of a disability to bringing suit, rather than a limitation based on the decedent’s actions or inaction dur ing his lifetime. 45 Wn.2d at 421 .

2015Deggs argues that case stands for the proposition that a personal representative’s wrongful death claim can accrue and persist even without a viable underlying claim in the decedent at the time of death. ¶24 In Johnson , a husband murdered his wife, Anna, and then committed suicide. 45 Wn.2d at 420 .

46
Criscuola v. Andrewsgreen
wash · 1973 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016See Criscuola v. Andrews, 82 Wn.2d 68, 70-71 , 507 P.2d 149 (1973) (refusing to disallow overlapping survival and wrongful death actions, and instead avoiding double recovery by limiting lost income in survival action to net accumulations); WPI 31.01 cmt. at 336 (recognizing that same recovery may be allowed under survival and wrongful death statutes and “[c]are must be taken to avoid allowing a double recovery’’).

2016See Criscuola v. Andrews, 82 Wn.2d 68, 70-71 , 507 P.2d 149 (1973) (refusing to disallow overlapping survival and wrongful death actions, and instead avoiding double recovery by limiting lost income in survival action to net accumulations); WPI 31.01 cmt. at 336 (recognizing that same recovery may be allowed under survival and wrongful death statutes and “[c]are must be taken to avoid allowing a double recovery’’).

22
Tait v. Wahlgreen
washctapp · 1999 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016See Tait v. Wahl. 97 Wn.

2016See Tait v. Wahl. 97 Wn.

22
Aranda v. Cardenasgreen
arizctapp · 2007 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016Aranda. 159 P.3d at 212 .

2016See Aranda. 159 P.3d at 215 ("[The trial court] relied heavily on the absence of the types of proof acceptable in paternity actions in granting the defendants' motion and in so doing applied an incorrect standard in deciding the motion for summary judgment." (Emphasis added)).

22
Grant v. Fisher Flouring Mills Co.green
wash · 1935 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016See Grant, 181 Wash. at 580 .

2016Id. at 581-82 .

22
Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperativegreen
wash · 1983 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013The Herskovits plurality recognized a lost chance of survival as an "actionable injury"a under the wrongful death statute, actionable through a wrongful death claim based on medical negligence. 99 Wn.2d at 634 (Pearson, J., concurring).

2013The Herskovits plurality recognized a lost chance of survival as an “actionable injury” 8 under the wrongful death statute, actionable through a wrongful death claim based on medical negligence. 99 Wn.2d at 634 (Pearson, J., concurring).

22
State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.green
wash · 1976 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013See Ralph Williams', 87 Wn.2d at 315 .

2013See Ralph Williams’, 87 Wn.2d at 315 .

22
Beal v. City of Seattlegreen
wash · 1998 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2015–2017
2 sentences

2017Kommavongsa, 149 Wn.2d at 317 (substituting a motorist as the real party plaintiff in interest in legal malpractice action rather than the guardians ad litem for a motorist’s wife and daughter who originally brought the legal malpractice action); and see Beal, 134 Wn.2d at 781 (allowing a plaintiff to bring a wrongful death claim in the capacity of a personal representative of a decedent, rather than in the capacity of a guardian ad litem for children of the decedent as in the original filing); Miller, 164 Wn.2d at 536 (allowing a bankruptcy debtor to substitute the bankruptcy trustee as the r

2015FILED: November 9, 2015 Verellen, J. — "Every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest."1 The real party in interest for a wrongful death claim is the personal representative of the estate, not a child of the decedent.2 The lack of a real party in interest is a basis to dismiss an action unless, within a reasonable time after an objection to the lack of a real party in interest, there is a motion to substitute the real party in interest.3 If the substitution is a change only in representative capacity and the 1CR 17(a). 2 Beal v. City of Seattle. 134 Wn.2d 769, 776

12
Dennick v. Scheiwergreen
pa · 1955 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
2 sentences

2023In Dennick v. Scheiwer, 381 Pa. 200 , 113 A.2d 318, 319 (1955), the plaintiff sued under a death statute and brought a survival action, and the court held he was “a competent witness generally.” The trial court had observed, “‘To tell the jury to listen to the defendant in one claim and close its ear in the other might possibly be technically correct but practically senseless.’” Id. 22 No. 37545-5-III Murphy v. Medical Oncology Assoc., PS loss of enjoyment of life until her death.

2023In Dennick v. Scheiwer, 381 Pa. 200 , 113 A.2d 318, 319 (1955), the plaintiff sued under a death statute and brought a survival action, and the court held he was “a competent witness generally.” The trial court had observed, “‘To tell the jury to listen to the defendant in one claim and close its ear in the other might possibly be technically correct but practically senseless.’” Id. 22 No. 37545-5-III Murphy v. Medical Oncology Assoc., PS loss of enjoyment of life until her death.

11
Fite v. Leegreen
washctapp · 1974 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018Fite v. Lee, 11 Wn.

11
Kommavongsa v. Haskellgreen
wash · 2003 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017Kommavongsa, 149 Wn.2d at 317 (substituting a motorist as the real party plaintiff in interest in legal malpractice action rather than the guardians ad litem for a motorist’s wife and daughter who originally brought the legal malpractice action); and see Beal, 134 Wn.2d at 781 (allowing a plaintiff to bring a wrongful death claim in the capacity of a personal representative of a decedent, rather than in the capacity of a guardian ad litem for children of the decedent as in the original filing); Miller, 164 Wn.2d at 536 (allowing a bankruptcy debtor to substitute the bankruptcy trustee as the r

11
Miller v. Campbellgreen
wash · 2008 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017Kommavongsa, 149 Wn.2d at 317 (substituting a motorist as the real party plaintiff in interest in legal malpractice action rather than the guardians ad litem for a motorist’s wife and daughter who originally brought the legal malpractice action); and see Beal, 134 Wn.2d at 781 (allowing a plaintiff to bring a wrongful death claim in the capacity of a personal representative of a decedent, rather than in the capacity of a guardian ad litem for children of the decedent as in the original filing); Miller, 164 Wn.2d at 536 (allowing a bankruptcy debtor to substitute the bankruptcy trustee as the r

11
Moore v. New York Cotton Exchangegreen
scotus · 1926 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (33)

CaseCitedYears
Wills v. Kirkpatrick green
washctapp · 1990
2 sentences

2016Instead, it analyzed the question of “whether ‘damages for injury’ should be interpreted broadly to apply to injury to statutory beneficiaries in a wrongful death claim or should be limited to injury suffered by the patient.” Id. at 761 .

2015Id. ¶22 On appeal, the Wills court identified the issue before it as “whether the medical malpractice statute of limitations, RCW 4.16.350, which measures the period from the act or omission causing the injury, embraces a wrongful death claim based on medical malpractice.” 56 Wn.

32015–2016
Johnson v. Spider Staging Corp. green
wash · 1976
2 sentences

2025In the 1976 tort case Johnson, we rejected the lex loci delicti rule in favor of applying Restatement (Second) to determine whether Washington or Kansas law provided the applicable law on damages in a wrongful death claim. 87 Wn.2d at 580 .

1994In Johnson , the Washington Supreme Court addressed whether Kansas’s limitation on damages in wrongful death *246 actions should be applied by a Washington court hearing a Kansas resident’s wrongful death claim arising out of the collapse of scaffolding alleged to have been negligently manufactured by a Washington corporation. 87 Wn.2d at 580 .

21994–2025
Deggs v. Asbestos Corp. green
wash · 2016
2 sentences

2020The court noted that it had reached this very result—barring a wrongful death claim under the statute of limitations because the underlying claim lapsed during the deceased’s life—in Deggs v. Asbestos Corp., 186 Wn.2d 716, 732 , 381 P.3d 32 (2016).

2020The court noted that it had reached this very result—barring a wrongful death claim under the statute of limitations because the underlying claim lapsed during the deceased’s life—in Deggs v. Asbestos Corp., 186 Wn.2d 716, 732 , 381 P.3d 32 (2016).

22018–2020
Deggs v. Asbestos Corp. green
washctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2018Deqqs, 188 Wn.

2015But in Deggs v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd., this court recently held that a decedent must have "a valid subsisting cause of action" at the time of death for a wrongful death claim to accrue.5 In that case, Roy Sundberg had "successfully sued several defendants for injuries related to asbestos exposure."6 After his death, his personal representative "filed a wrongful death action against one of the same defendants from [the previous] lawsuit and several new defendants."7 This court determined that Sundberg could not have brought another personal injury claim during his lifetime.8 To the extent that re

22015–2018
Mohr v. Grantham green
wash · 2011
2 sentences

2013See RCW 4.20.010; Herskovits, 99 Wn.2d at 631-32,634-35 (Pearson, J., concurring); Mohr, 172 Wn.2d at 857 .

2013See RCW 4.20.010; Herskovits, 99 Wn.2d at 631-32, 634-35 (Pearson, J., concurring); Mohr, 172 Wn.2d at 857 .

22013–2013
Daugert v. Pappas green
wash · 1985
2 sentences

2013Our Supreme Court soon called the loss of a chance an "analysis." Daugert, 104 Wn.2d at 262 .

2013Our Supreme Court soon called the loss of a chance an “analysis.” Daugert, 104 Wn.2d at 262 .

22013–2013
Newell-Blais Post 443, Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, Inc. v. Shelby Mutual Insurance green
mass · 1986
2 sentences

1990Co., 396 Mass. 633 , 487 N.E.2d 1371 (1986), the insurer denied coverage for a wrongful death claim alleging a veterans' organization was negligent in serving alcohol.

1990Co., 396 Mass. 633 , 487 N.E.2d 1371 (1986), the insurer denied coverage for a wrongful death claim alleging a veterans' organization was negligent in serving alcohol.

21990–1990
Orcutt v. Spokane County green
wash · 1961
2 sentences

2026The Arsnow rule was reaffirmed 30 years later in Orcutt v. Spokane County, 58 Wn.2d 846 , 364 P.2d 1102 (1961) (holding that plaintiff could use medical witness testimony to establish decedent’s “uncontrollable impulse” to commit suicide in a wrongful death claim).

2026The Arsnow rule was reaffirmed 30 years later in Orcutt v. Spokane County, 58 Wn.2d 846 , 364 P.2d 1102 (1961) (holding that plaintiff could use medical witness testimony to establish decedent’s “uncontrollable impulse” to commit suicide in a wrongful death claim).

12026–2026
Hunt v. King County green
washctapp · 1971
2 sentences

2026Webstad’s adult son sued Stortini for a wrongful death claim, and the court granted summary judgment to Stortini. 13 Ruth Scott et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 103730-9 In Hunt v. King County, 4 Wn.

2026App. 14 , 481 P.2d 593 (1971), Division One provides a helpful discussion of Arsnow’s limits.

12026–2026
Huntington v. Samaritan Hospital green
wash · 1984
2 sentences

2025App. 357 , 666 P.2d 405 (1983), aff’d, 101 Wn.2d 466 , 680 P.2d 58 (1984); and (2) the correct categorization of a creditor’s claim, Bartlett v. Estate of Parman, No. 56536-6-II (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 15, 2022) (unpublished), https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/D2%2056536-6-II%20Unpublished%20 Opinion.pdf.

2025App. 357 , 666 P.2d 405 (1983), aff’d, 101 Wn.2d 466 , 680 P.2d 58 (1984); and (2) the correct categorization of a creditor’s claim, Bartlett v. Estate of Parman, No. 56536-6-II (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 15, 2022) (unpublished), https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/D2%2056536-6-II%20Unpublished%20 Opinion.pdf.

12025–2025
Huntington v. Samaritan Hospital green
washctapp · 1983
2 sentences

2025But the appellate issues addressed in two of the cases involved: (1) the authority 4 No. 39941-9-III In re Est. of West of a PR to bring a wrongful death claim on behalf of the estate, Huntington v. Samaritan Hospital, 35 Wn.

2025App. 357 , 666 P.2d 405 (1983), aff’d, 101 Wn.2d 466 , 680 P.2d 58 (1984); and (2) the correct categorization of a creditor’s claim, Bartlett v. Estate of Parman, No. 56536-6-II (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 15, 2022) (unpublished), https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/D2%2056536-6-II%20Unpublished%20 Opinion.pdf.

12025–2025
Fast v. Kennewick Public Hospital District green
wash · 2016
2 sentences

2020Fast, 187 Wn.2d at 39 .

2020Id.

12020–2020
Paetsch v. Spokane Dermatology Clinic, PS green
wash · 2015
2 sentences

2019“We review judgments as a matter of law de novo.”®> A motion for judgment as a matter of law admits the truth of the evidence and reasonable inferences favoring the nonmoving party.5® Statutory interpretation is also a matter of law reviewed de novo.°” In its damages instructions, the court told the jury to consider economic damages, such as medical costs, and noneconomic damages, such as “pain, suffering, anxiety, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life experienced,” when calculating the extent of Leren’s injury.6° The court also told the jury to “consider what Marvin Leren reasonab

2019“We review judgments as a matter of law de novo.”®> A motion for judgment as a matter of law admits the truth of the evidence and reasonable inferences favoring the nonmoving party.5® Statutory interpretation is also a matter of law reviewed de novo.°” In its damages instructions, the court told the jury to consider economic damages, such as medical costs, and noneconomic damages, such as “pain, suffering, anxiety, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life experienced,” when calculating the extent of Leren’s injury.6° The court also told the jury to “consider what Marvin Leren reasonab

12019–2019
Bowers v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION green
washctapp · 1992
2 sentences

2018While we agree that the language of the wrongful -5- No. 74554-9-1/6 death act creates a separate cause of action on behalf of the statutory beneficiaries, we cannot agree that the judgment in the estate's survival action against Brandes had no effect on the estate's wrongful death claim.3 Washington's special survival statute, RCW 4.20.060, allows the executor or administrator of an estate "to recover for the decedent's damages, including any pain and suffering between the time of the injury and the time of death." Bowers v. Fibreboard Corp., 66 Wn.

2018App. 454,460 , 832 P.2d 523 (1992).

12018–2018
Estate of Otani v. Broudy green
wash · 2004
1 sentence

2018The distinguishing characteristic between a wrongful death claim and a survival action is "that the wrongful death statutes govern postdeath damages of the deceased and the survival statutes govern predeath damages." Broudv, 151 Wn.2d at 755 .

12018–2018
Long v. Dugan green
washctapp · 1990
1 sentence

2018“Loss of consortium is not, in and of itself, a cause of action but rather an element of damages.” Long v. Dugan, 57 Wn.

12018–2018
Fast v. Kennewick Public Hospital District green
washctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2018Regarding the wrongful death claim, the trial court granted summary judgment due to a violation of the statute of limitations, relying on Fast v. Kennewick Public Hospital District, 188 Wash.App. 43 , 354 P.3d 858 (2015), which held that the applicable statute of limitations for a wrongful death claim stemming from alleged medical malpractice is the general three-year period in RCW 4.16.080. ¶ 7 Ms. Reyes timely appealed the grant of summary judgment.

2018Regarding the wrongful death claim, the trial court granted summary judgment due to a violation of the statute of limitations, relying on Fast v. Kennewick Public Hospital District, 188 Wash.App. 43 , 354 P.3d 858 (2015), which held that the applicable statute of limitations for a wrongful death claim stemming from alleged medical malpractice is the general three-year period in RCW 4.16.080. ¶ 7 Ms. Reyes timely appealed the grant of summary judgment.

12018–2018
Upchurch v. Hubbard green
wash · 1947
2 sentences

2016See Criscuola v. Andrews, 82 Wn.2d 68, 70-71 , 507 P.2d 149 (1973) (refusing to disallow overlapping survival and wrongful death actions, and instead avoiding double recovery by limiting lost income in survival action to net accumulations); WPI 31.01 cmt. at 336 (recognizing that same recovery may be allowed under survival and wrongful death statutes and "[c]are must be talcen to avoid allowing a double recovery"). -4- Deggs v. Asbestos Corp. Limited, et al., 91969-1 (Stephens, J., dissenting) wrongful act or default must be of such character as would have entitled the injured person to mainta

2016See Criscuola v. Andrews, 82 Wn.2d 68, 70-71 , 507 P.2d 149 (1973) (refusing to disallow overlapping survival and wrongful death actions, and instead avoiding double recovery by limiting lost income in survival action to net accumulations); WPI 31.01 cmt. at 336 (recognizing that same recovery may be allowed under survival and wrongful death statutes and "[c]are must be talcen to avoid allowing a double recovery"). -4- Deggs v. Asbestos Corp. Limited, et al., 91969-1 (Stephens, J., dissenting) wrongful act or default must be of such character as would have entitled the injured person to mainta

12016–2016
Ryan v. Poole green
wash · 1935
12016–2016
Atchison v. Great Western Malting Co. green
wash · 2007
12015–2015
Shaw v. Rogers & Rogers neutral
wash · 1921
12015–2015
Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co. green
wash · 1975
12015–2015
Atchison v. Great Western Malting Co. green
wash · 2007
12015–2015
Beal for Martinez v. City of Seattle green
wash · 1998
12015–2015
James S. Black & Co. v. F. W. Woolworth Co. green
washctapp · 1975
12013–2013
Faust v. Albertson green
wash · 2009
12013–2013
Faust v. Albertson green
wash · 2009
12013–2013
Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co. green
wash · 2007
12007–2007
Allen v. State green
wash · 1992
12000–2000
Benton v. Associated Indemnity Corp. neutral
wash · 1938
11998–1998
Hartley v. State green
wash · 1985
11994–1994
State Ex Rel. Patchett v. SUP. CT. FOR FRANKLIN CTY. neutral
wash · 1962
11989–1989
Gray v. Goodson green
wash · 1963
11974–1974

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.20.010 (16) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.16.080 (15) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.20.020 (9) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (7) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 7.70.010 (7) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.16.350 (6) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.20.046 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.20.060 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.24.010 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.22.015 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 7.70.110 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 157 (1959–2025) IL 127 (1962–2026) TX 117 (1973–2026) CA 103 (1958–2026) NY 91 (1949–2025) LA 71 (1964–2024) MS 68 (1984–2026) GA 62 (1967–2024) MO 60 (1973–2024) FL 60 (1967–2025) AL 58 (1984–2025) MD 53 (1981–2025) PA 52 (1983–2025) IN 52 (1982–2025) AZ 38 (1965–2025) NM 37 (1970–2025) KY 36 (1990–2026) WA 34 (1974–2026) NC 33 (1971–2022) MI 32 (1969–2022) WI 32 (1979–2026) NJ 31 (1978–2024) TN 30 (1996–2026) OR 28 (1986–2026) WV 26 (1973–2021) CO 25 (1977–2026) IA 25 (1983–2026) MN 23 (1982–2024) MA 21 (1962–2024) CT 19 (1992–2022) KS 17 (1969–2026) AR 16 (1997–2022) VA 15 (1980–2024) SC 14 (2010–2025) UT 14 (1983–2025) MT 13 (1968–2013) OK 13 (1975–2024) SD 10 (1974–2022) ID 9 (1980–2024) WY 8 (1989–2021) ME 8 (1999–2025) HI 7 (1998–2025) AK 6 (1986–2020) DC 6 (1980–2006) RI 5 (1991–2019) ND 5 (1988–2019) NE 5 (1988–2024) NV 5 (1991–2023) DE 5 (1984–2021) VI 2 (2014–2016) VT 2 (2005–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check