Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
33 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1874–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Boyce v. Grand Rapids Asphalt Paving Co.green2 sentences2009Id. [86] Watkins v. Chrysler Corp., 167 Mich.App. 122 , 421 N.W.2d 597 (1988). [87] Id. at 132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 . [88] Id. at 131-132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 , citing Boyce, supra at 551-552 n. 45, 324 N.W.2d 28 . [89] See id. at 132, 421 N.W.2d 597 . [90] Harvlie v. Jack Post Corp., 280 Mich.App. 439 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (2008). [91] Id. at 445-446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (citations omitted). [92] Id. at 446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 . [93] Haliw v. Sterling Hts., 471 Mich. 700, 706 , 691 N.W.2d 753 (2005). [94] Id. at 707 , 691 N.W.2d 753 . [95] The American rule stands in contrast to the English rule. 2009Id. [86] Watkins v. Chrysler Corp., 167 Mich.App. 122 , 421 N.W.2d 597 (1988). [87] Id. at 132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 . [88] Id. at 131-132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 , citing Boyce, supra at 551-552 n. 45, 324 N.W.2d 28 . [89] See id. at 132, 421 N.W.2d 597 . [90] Harvlie v. Jack Post Corp., 280 Mich.App. 439 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (2008). [91] Id. at 445-446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (citations omitted). [92] Id. at 446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 . [93] Haliw v. Sterling Hts., 471 Mich. 700, 706 , 691 N.W.2d 753 (2005). [94] Id. at 707 , 691 N.W.2d 753 . [95] The American rule stands in contrast to the English rule. | 1 | 1 |
Upjohn v. Board of Healthgreen2 sentences2006See Upjohn v Richland Twp Bd of Health, 46 Mich 542, 549 ; 9 NW 845 (1881) (noting that “the rule of law has become established that owners of the soil have no rights in sub-surface waters ... as against their neighbors who may withdraw them by wells or other excavations”). 2006See Upjohn v Richland Twp Bd of Health, 46 Mich 542, 549 ; 9 NW 845 (1881) (noting that “the rule of law has become established that owners of the soil have no rights in sub-surface waters ... as against their neighbors who may withdraw them by wells or other excavations”). | 1 | 1 |
Sipriano v. Great Spring Waters of America, Inc.green2 sentences2006See Sipriano v. Great Spring Waters of America, Inc., 1 S.W.3d 75 (Tex., 1999); Maddocks v. Giles, 728 A.2d 150, 153 (Me., 1999). [37] Before Schenk , Michigan might have followed the English rule of absolute capture. 2006See Sipriano v. Great Spring Waters of America, Inc., 1 S.W.3d 75 (Tex., 1999); Maddocks v. Giles, 728 A.2d 150, 153 (Me., 1999). [37] Before Schenk , Michigan might have followed the English rule of absolute capture. | 1 | 1 |
Maddocks v. Gilesgreen2 sentences2006See Sipriano v. Great Spring Waters of America, Inc., 1 S.W.3d 75 (Tex., 1999); Maddocks v. Giles, 728 A.2d 150, 153 (Me., 1999). [37] Before Schenk , Michigan might have followed the English rule of absolute capture. 2006See Sipriano v. Great Spring Waters of America, Inc., 1 S.W.3d 75 (Tex., 1999); Maddocks v. Giles, 728 A.2d 150, 153 (Me., 1999). [37] Before Schenk , Michigan might have followed the English rule of absolute capture. | 1 | 1 |
Ammerman v. Newmangreen2 sentences1981Otherwise litigation would lead, not to an end of disputing, but to its beginning, and rights violated would go unredressed for fear of the danger of asserting them.' Melvin v Pence, 76 US App DC 154, 157; 130 F2d 423, 426 (1942)." Ammerman v Newman, 384 A2d 637, 641 (DC App, 1978). [39] Gem Trading Co, Inc v Cudahy Corp, 92 Wash 2d 956, 965; 603 P2d 828 (1979). [40] Berlin v Nathan, 64 Ill App 3d 940; 381 NE2d 1367 (1978). [41] Jacques v McLaughlin, ___ RI ___; 401 A2d 430 (1979). [42] The sources cited in fn 23, supra, agree that New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Ohio, Wisconsin 1981Otherwise litigation would lead, not to an end of disputing, but to its beginning, and rights violated would go unredressed for fear of the danger of asserting them.' Melvin v Pence, 76 US App DC 154, 157; 130 F2d 423, 426 (1942)." Ammerman v Newman, 384 A2d 637, 641 (DC App, 1978). [39] Gem Trading Co, Inc v Cudahy Corp, 92 Wash 2d 956, 965; 603 P2d 828 (1979). [40] Berlin v Nathan, 64 Ill App 3d 940; 381 NE2d 1367 (1978). [41] Jacques v McLaughlin, ___ RI ___; 401 A2d 430 (1979). [42] The sources cited in fn 23, supra, agree that New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Ohio, Wisconsin | 1 | 1 |
| Sutter v. Easterlygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hines v. Commonwealthgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Footegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Dation v. Ford Motor Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Knights of the Modern Maccabees v. Sharpgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Haliw v. City of Sterling Heights
green
2 sentences2023The American rule is codified at MCL 600.2405(6), which provides that among the items that may be taxed and awarded as costs are “[a]ny attorney fees authorized by statute or by court rule.” The American rule stands in stark contrast to what is commonly referred to as the “English rule,” whereby the losing party pays the prevailing party’s costs absent an express exception. [Haliw v City of Sterling Hts, 471 Mich 700, 706-707 ; 691 NW2d 753 (2005).] Defendants’ motion cited several authorities in support of their belief they were entitled to attorney fees and costs. 2023The American rule is codified at MCL 600.2405(6), which provides that among the items that may be taxed and awarded as costs are “[a]ny attorney fees authorized by statute or by court rule.” The American rule stands in stark contrast to what is commonly referred to as the “English rule,” whereby the losing party pays the prevailing party’s costs absent an express exception. [Haliw v City of Sterling Hts, 471 Mich 700, 706-707 ; 691 NW2d 753 (2005).] Defendants’ motion cited several authorities in support of their belief they were entitled to attorney fees and costs. | 2 | 2009–2023 |
Maerz v. United States Steel Corp.
green
2 sentences2006Id. at 713-714 . 2006Id. at 713-714 . | 2 | 1983–2006 |
Schenk v. City of Ann Arbor
green
2 sentences2006Id. at 717, 163 N.W. 109 . 2006Id. at 717, 163 N.W. 109 . | 2 | 1982–2006 |
Brand v. Hinchman
green
2 sentences1981Brand v Hinchman, 68 Mich 590 ; 36 NW 664 (1888), is the first decision pf this Court concerning an action for malicious prosecution of a civil, rather than criminal, proceeding. 1981Brand v Hinchman, 68 Mich 590 ; 36 NW 664 (1888), is the first decision pf this Court concerning an action for malicious prosecution of a civil, rather than criminal, proceeding. | 2 | 1910–1981 |
Barnewall v. Murrell
green
2 sentences1944Recognizing fully the high character of the authorities sustaining the contestants' position, we are inclined, as this is an open question in this State, in view of the serious consequences of the contrary view, to hold, as was held by the supreme court of Alabama in the case of Barnewall v. Murrell , 108 Ala. 366 ( 18 So. 831 ), that: "`It was, doubtless, one of the purposes of the statute, in requiring that testamentary dispositions *Page 525 of personal property should be executed with the same formalities required in devises of land, to remove them from the doubt and uncertainty in this re 1944Recognizing fully the high character of the authorities sustaining the contestants' position, we are inclined, as this is an open question in this State, in view of the serious consequences of the contrary view, to hold, as was held by the supreme court of Alabama in the case of Barnewall v. Murrell , 108 Ala. 366 ( 18 So. 831 ), that: "`It was, doubtless, one of the purposes of the statute, in requiring that testamentary dispositions *Page 525 of personal property should be executed with the same formalities required in devises of land, to remove them from the doubt and uncertainty in this re | 2 | 1944–1944 |
Buell v. Kanawha Lumber Corp.
green
2 sentences1941In Becht v. Miller, 279 Mich. 629, 637 , we *373 quoted approvingly from Buell v. Kanawha Lumber Corp., 201 Fed. 762 , the following: “The rule is established that where one goes into a court of equity, and takes the risk of litigation on himself, and successfully creates or preserves or protects a fund to a share in which others are entitled, those others will not be allowed to lie back and share the results of these successful labors without contributing their due share, and a court of equity by an equitable extension of the English principle has required the payment out of the fund (before 1937The following statement of the rule is given in Buell v. Kanawha Lumber Corp., supra: ‘ ‘ The rule is established that where one goes into a court of equity, and takes the risk of litigation on himself, and successfully creates or preserves or protects a fund to a share in which others are entitled, those others will not be allowed to lie back and share the results of these successful labors without contributing their due share, and a court of equity by an equitable extension of the English principle has required the payment out of the fund (before distribution) of the reasonable costs and exp | 2 | 1937–1941 |
Donovan v. Barnes
green
2 sentences2016After closely analyzing Friedman and subsequent cases, we concluded that “[m]odern cases take the view . . . that ‘special injury’ must be some injury which would not necessarily occur in all suits prosecuted for similar causes of action.” Barnard, 130 Mich App at 695 , citing 52 Am Jur 2d, Malicious Prosecution, ¶ 11, pp 194-195 and Donovan v Barnes, 274 Or 701, 712 ; 548 P2d 980 (1976). 2016After closely analyzing Friedman and subsequent cases, we concluded that “[m]odern cases take the view . . . that ‘special injury’ must be some injury which would not necessarily occur in all suits prosecuted for similar causes of action.” Barnard, 130 Mich App at 695 , citing 52 Am Jur 2d, Malicious Prosecution, ¶ 11, pp 194-195 and Donovan v Barnes, 274 Or 701, 712 ; 548 P2d 980 (1976). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Barnard v. Hartman
green
2 sentences2016Several years later, we pointed out that “Friedman did not explain whether the ‘English rule’ has been modified in Michigan to eliminate the category of ‘injury to one’s fame’ or whether damage to one’s professional reputation is insufficient to meet the requirements of that category.” Barnard v Hartman, 130 Mich App 692, 694-695 ; 344 NW2d 53 (1983). 2016Several years later, we pointed out that “Friedman did not explain whether the ‘English rule’ has been modified in Michigan to eliminate the category of ‘injury to one’s fame’ or whether damage to one’s professional reputation is insufficient to meet the requirements of that category.” Barnard v Hartman, 130 Mich App 692, 694-695 ; 344 NW2d 53 (1983). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Wayne County v. Auditor General
green
2 sentences2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Bailey v. United States
red
2 sentences2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward
green
2 sentences2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Duran v. Sollitt Construction Co.
green
2 sentences2009Id. [86] Watkins v. Chrysler Corp., 167 Mich.App. 122 , 421 N.W.2d 597 (1988). [87] Id. at 132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 . [88] Id. at 131-132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 , citing Boyce, supra at 551-552 n. 45, 324 N.W.2d 28 . [89] See id. at 132, 421 N.W.2d 597 . [90] Harvlie v. Jack Post Corp., 280 Mich.App. 439 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (2008). [91] Id. at 445-446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (citations omitted). [92] Id. at 446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 . [93] Haliw v. Sterling Hts., 471 Mich. 700, 706 , 691 N.W.2d 753 (2005). [94] Id. at 707 , 691 N.W.2d 753 . [95] The American rule stands in contrast to the English rule. 2009Id. [86] Watkins v. Chrysler Corp., 167 Mich.App. 122 , 421 N.W.2d 597 (1988). [87] Id. at 132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 . [88] Id. at 131-132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 , citing Boyce, supra at 551-552 n. 45, 324 N.W.2d 28 . [89] See id. at 132, 421 N.W.2d 597 . [90] Harvlie v. Jack Post Corp., 280 Mich.App. 439 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (2008). [91] Id. at 445-446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (citations omitted). [92] Id. at 446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 . [93] Haliw v. Sterling Hts., 471 Mich. 700, 706 , 691 N.W.2d 753 (2005). [94] Id. at 707 , 691 N.W.2d 753 . [95] The American rule stands in contrast to the English rule. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Watkins v. Chrysler Corp.
green
2 sentences2009Id. [86] Watkins v. Chrysler Corp., 167 Mich.App. 122 , 421 N.W.2d 597 (1988). [87] Id. at 132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 . [88] Id. at 131-132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 , citing Boyce, supra at 551-552 n. 45, 324 N.W.2d 28 . [89] See id. at 132, 421 N.W.2d 597 . [90] Harvlie v. Jack Post Corp., 280 Mich.App. 439 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (2008). [91] Id. at 445-446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (citations omitted). [92] Id. at 446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 . [93] Haliw v. Sterling Hts., 471 Mich. 700, 706 , 691 N.W.2d 753 (2005). [94] Id. at 707 , 691 N.W.2d 753 . [95] The American rule stands in contrast to the English rule. 2009Id. [86] Watkins v. Chrysler Corp., 167 Mich.App. 122 , 421 N.W.2d 597 (1988). [87] Id. at 132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 . [88] Id. at 131-132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 , citing Boyce, supra at 551-552 n. 45, 324 N.W.2d 28 . [89] See id. at 132, 421 N.W.2d 597 . [90] Harvlie v. Jack Post Corp., 280 Mich.App. 439 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (2008). [91] Id. at 445-446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (citations omitted). [92] Id. at 446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 . [93] Haliw v. Sterling Hts., 471 Mich. 700, 706 , 691 N.W.2d 753 (2005). [94] Id. at 707 , 691 N.W.2d 753 . [95] The American rule stands in contrast to the English rule. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Harvlie v. Jack Post Corp.
neutral
2 sentences2009Id. [86] Watkins v. Chrysler Corp., 167 Mich.App. 122 , 421 N.W.2d 597 (1988). [87] Id. at 132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 . [88] Id. at 131-132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 , citing Boyce, supra at 551-552 n. 45, 324 N.W.2d 28 . [89] See id. at 132, 421 N.W.2d 597 . [90] Harvlie v. Jack Post Corp., 280 Mich.App. 439 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (2008). [91] Id. at 445-446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (citations omitted). [92] Id. at 446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 . [93] Haliw v. Sterling Hts., 471 Mich. 700, 706 , 691 N.W.2d 753 (2005). [94] Id. at 707 , 691 N.W.2d 753 . [95] The American rule stands in contrast to the English rule. 2009Id. [86] Watkins v. Chrysler Corp., 167 Mich.App. 122 , 421 N.W.2d 597 (1988). [87] Id. at 132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 . [88] Id. at 131-132 , 421 N.W.2d 597 , citing Boyce, supra at 551-552 n. 45, 324 N.W.2d 28 . [89] See id. at 132, 421 N.W.2d 597 . [90] Harvlie v. Jack Post Corp., 280 Mich.App. 439 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (2008). [91] Id. at 445-446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 (citations omitted). [92] Id. at 446 , 760 N.W.2d 277 . [93] Haliw v. Sterling Hts., 471 Mich. 700, 706 , 691 N.W.2d 753 (2005). [94] Id. at 707 , 691 N.W.2d 753 . [95] The American rule stands in contrast to the English rule. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Herman v. Berrien County
green
2 sentences2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Estes v. Titus
green
2 sentences2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
People v. Couzens
green
2 sentences2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.
green
2 sentences2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 2009Id. [1] Estes v. Titus, 481 Mich. 573, 578-579 , 751 N.W.2d 493 (2008). [2] Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 460 Mich. 230, 236 , 596 N.W.2d 119 (1999). [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] Id. at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [6] Herman v. Berrien Co., 481 Mich. 352, 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 (2008). [7] Sun Valley, supra at 237 , 596 N.W.2d 119 . [8] Herman, supra at 366 , 750 N.W.2d 570 . [9] Id., quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). [10] Wayne Co. v. Auditor General, 250 Mich. 227, 233 , 229 N.W. 911 (1930). [11] Id. at 234, 229 N.W. 911 . [12] People v. Couzens, 48 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Heckman v. United States
green
2 sentences1991The history of the law and the arguments against the English doctrine are so well and fully stated by Mr. Wigmore that there is no need to set them forth at greater length. 2 Wigmore, Evidence, §§ 1476, 1477. [Donnelly v United States, 228 US 243, 277-278 ; 33 S Ct 449 ; 56 L Ed 820 (1913) (Holmes, J., dissenting). 1991The history of the law and the arguments against the English doctrine are so well and fully *688 stated by Mr. Wigmore that there is no need to set them forth at greater length. 2 Wigmore, Evidence, §§ 1476, 1477. [ Donnelly v United States, 228 US 243, 277-278 ; 33 S Ct 449 ; 56 L Ed 820 (1913) (Holmes, J., dissenting). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Donnelly v. United States
green
2 sentences1991The history of the law and the arguments against the English doctrine are so well and fully stated by Mr. Wigmore that there is no need to set them forth at greater length. 2 Wigmore, Evidence, §§ 1476, 1477. [Donnelly v United States, 228 US 243, 277-278 ; 33 S Ct 449 ; 56 L Ed 820 (1913) (Holmes, J., dissenting). 1991The history of the law and the arguments against the English doctrine are so well and fully stated by Mr. Wigmore that there is no need to set them forth at greater length. 2 Wigmore, Evidence, §§ 1476, 1477. [Donnelly v United States, 228 US 243, 277-278 ; 33 S Ct 449 ; 56 L Ed 820 (1913) (Holmes, J., dissenting). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Friedman v. Dozorc
green
2 sentences1988In Friedman v Dozorc, 412 Mich 1, 33-34 ; 312 NW2d 585 (1981), our Supreme Court declared that Michigan follows the so-called "English rule” with respect to the special injury requirement in a malicious prosecution action. 1988In Friedman v Dozorc, 412 Mich 1, 33-34 ; 312 NW2d 585 (1981), our Supreme Court declared that Michigan follows the so-called "English rule” with respect to the special injury requirement in a malicious prosecution action. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Hammond v. Hannin
green
2 sentences1981The English rule was recognized in Michigan in Hammond v Hannin, 21 Mich 374, 384-390 ; 4 Am Rep 490 (1870). 1 The early cases generally involved the breach of a contract for the sale of land due to the inability of the seller to convey good title. 1981The English rule was recognized in Michigan in Hammond v Hannin, 21 Mich 374, 384-390 ; 4 Am Rep 490 (1870). 1 The early cases generally involved the breach of a contract for the sale of land due to the inability of the seller to convey good title. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| Berlin v. Nathan green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Gem Trading Co. v. Cudahy Corp.
green
2 sentences1981Otherwise litigation would lead, not to an end of disputing, but to its beginning, and rights violated would go unredressed for fear of the danger of asserting them.' Melvin v Pence, 76 US App DC 154, 157; 130 F2d 423, 426 (1942)." Ammerman v Newman, 384 A2d 637, 641 (DC App, 1978). [39] Gem Trading Co, Inc v Cudahy Corp, 92 Wash 2d 956, 965; 603 P2d 828 (1979). [40] Berlin v Nathan, 64 Ill App 3d 940; 381 NE2d 1367 (1978). [41] Jacques v McLaughlin, ___ RI ___; 401 A2d 430 (1979). [42] The sources cited in fn 23, supra, agree that New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Ohio, Wisconsin 1981Otherwise litigation would lead, not to an end of disputing, but to its beginning, and rights violated would go unredressed for fear of the danger of asserting them.' Melvin v Pence, 76 US App DC 154, 157; 130 F2d 423, 426 (1942)." Ammerman v Newman, 384 A2d 637, 641 (DC App, 1978). [39] Gem Trading Co, Inc v Cudahy Corp, 92 Wash 2d 956, 965; 603 P2d 828 (1979). [40] Berlin v Nathan, 64 Ill App 3d 940; 381 NE2d 1367 (1978). [41] Jacques v McLaughlin, ___ RI ___; 401 A2d 430 (1979). [42] The sources cited in fn 23, supra, agree that New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Ohio, Wisconsin | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Jacques v. McLaughlin
green
2 sentences1981Otherwise litigation would lead, not to an end of disputing, but to its beginning, and rights violated would go unredressed for fear of the danger of asserting them.' Melvin v Pence, 76 US App DC 154, 157; 130 F2d 423, 426 (1942)." Ammerman v Newman, 384 A2d 637, 641 (DC App, 1978). [39] Gem Trading Co, Inc v Cudahy Corp, 92 Wash 2d 956, 965; 603 P2d 828 (1979). [40] Berlin v Nathan, 64 Ill App 3d 940; 381 NE2d 1367 (1978). [41] Jacques v McLaughlin, ___ RI ___; 401 A2d 430 (1979). [42] The sources cited in fn 23, supra, agree that New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Ohio, Wisconsin 1981Otherwise litigation would lead, not to an end of disputing, but to its beginning, and rights violated would go unredressed for fear of the danger of asserting them.' Melvin v Pence, 76 US App DC 154, 157; 130 F2d 423, 426 (1942)." Ammerman v Newman, 384 A2d 637, 641 (DC App, 1978). [39] Gem Trading Co, Inc v Cudahy Corp, 92 Wash 2d 956, 965; 603 P2d 828 (1979). [40] Berlin v Nathan, 64 Ill App 3d 940; 381 NE2d 1367 (1978). [41] Jacques v McLaughlin, ___ RI ___; 401 A2d 430 (1979). [42] The sources cited in fn 23, supra, agree that New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Ohio, Wisconsin | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Powers v. Houghton
green
2 sentences1981In Powers v Houghton, 159 Mich 372 ; 123 NW 1108 (1909), this Court recognized that the "English rule” had been modified and the definition of special injury was broadened in American jurisdictions. 1981In Powers v Houghton, 159 Mich 372 ; 123 NW 1108 (1909), this Court recognized that the "English rule” had been modified and the definition of special injury was broadened in American jurisdictions. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| Newberry v. Commonwealth green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Wilbur v. Flood green | 1 | 1973–1973 |
| Thomas v. Morton Salt Co. neutral | 1 | 1960–1960 |
| Thomas v. Morton Salt Co. green | 1 | 1960–1960 |
| Becht v. Miller green | 1 | 1941–1941 |
| Cole v. Cole Realty Co. green | 1 | 1927–1927 |
| The Livingstone green | 1 | 1919–1919 |
| Hathorn v. . Natural Carbonic Gas Co. green | 1 | 1917–1917 |
| Buchanan v. . Tilden neutral | 1 | 1910–1910 |
| Hunt v. Strew green | 1 | 1910–1910 |
| Hicks v. McGarry neutral | 1 | 1910–1910 |
| Hidden v. Chappel neutral | 1 | 1910–1910 |
| Pipp v. Reynolds neutral | 1 | 1910–1910 |
| Turner v. McCarty green | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.