31 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1938–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cupitgreen2 sentences2020The Taylor Court stated: “This court has recognized the principle that where the element of intent is regarded as an essential ingredient of the crime charged, it is proper to admit proof of similar but disconnected crimes to show the intent with which the act charged was committed.” State v. Jackson, 625 So.2d 146, 150 (La. 1993) (quoting State v. Cupit, 189 La. 509 , 179 So. 837, 839 (1938)). 2020The Taylor Court stated: “This court has recognized the principle that where the element of intent is regarded as an essential ingredient of the crime charged, it is proper to admit proof of similar but disconnected crimes to show the intent with which the act charged was committed.” State v. Jackson, 625 So.2d 146, 150 (La. 1993) (quoting State v. Cupit, 189 La. 509 , 179 So. 837, 839 (1938)). | 3 | 5 |
Stewart v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co.green2 sentences2018Stewart v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. , 657 So.2d 1327 , 1330 (La. 2018Stewart v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. , 657 So.2d 1327 , 1330 (La.App. 4 Cir.1995) ; Gurley v. Schwegmann Supermarkets, Inc. , 617 So.2d 41 , 44 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993). | 2 | 5 |
State v. Jacksongreen2 sentences2020The Taylor Court stated: “This court has recognized the principle that where the element of intent is regarded as an essential ingredient of the crime charged, it is proper to admit proof of similar but disconnected crimes to show the intent with which the act charged was committed.” State v. Jackson, 625 So.2d 146, 150 (La. 1993) (quoting State v. Cupit, 189 La. 509 , 179 So. 837, 839 (1938)). 2016Further, even if intent was a genuine issue in this case, defendant argues the prior act is not sufficiently similar to the current charges to be relevant. “‘This court has recognized the principle that where the element of intent is regarded as an essential ingredient of the crime charged, it is proper to admit proof of similar but disconnected crimes to show the intent with which the act charged was committed.’” State v. Jackson, 625 So. 2d 146, 150 (La. 1993) (quoting State v. Cupit, 179 So. 837, 839 (La. 1938)). | 2 | 3 |
Gurley v. Schwegmann Supermarkets, Inc.green2 sentences2018Stewart v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. , 657 So.2d 1327 , 1330 (La.App. 4 Cir.1995) ; Gurley v. Schwegmann Supermarkets, Inc. , 617 So.2d 41 , 44 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993). 2008Stewart v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., 657 So.2d 1327, 1330 (La.App. 4 Cir.1995); Gurley v. Schwegmann Supermarkets, Inc., 617 So.2d 41, 44 (La.App. 4 Cir.1993). | 2 | 3 |
Oakes v. Walthergreen2 sentences2014Oakes v. Walther, 179 La. 365 , 154 So. 26, 27 (1934); Burke v. Ryan, 36 La.Ann. 951 (1884); Terry v. Fellows, 21 La.Ann. 375 (1869). 2014Oakes v. Walther, 179 La. 365 , 154 So. 26, 27 (1934); Burke v. Ryan, 36 La.Ann. 951 (1884); Terry v. Fellows, 21 La.Ann. 375 (1869). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Thomasgreen2 sentences2014See State v. Gibson, 08-0647, p. 7 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/4/04), 867 So.2d 793, 798 (noting that double jeopardy has been recognized as a patent error, but addressing it as an assignment of error because the defendant raised it as such, apparently for the first Lntime on appeal); State v. Thomas, 99-2219, p. 4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/17/00), 764 So.2d 1104, 1108 (reviewing double jeopardy issue as a patent error). 2004State v. Thomas, 99-2219, p. 4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/17/00), 764 So.2d 1104, 1108 ; State v. Harris, 98-2932 (La. 4 Cir. 5/3/00), 761 So.2d 662 . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Harringtongreen2 sentences1982State v. Batiste, supra ; State v. Harrington, 332 So.2d 764 (La.1976); State v. Kelly, 263 La. 545 , 268 So.2d 650 (1972); State v. Turner, 241 La. 94 , 127 So.2d 512 (1961). 1978See, e. g., State v. Harrington, 332 So.2d 764 (La.1976); State v. Kelly, 263 La. 545 , 268 So.2d 650 (1972); State v. Turner, 241 La. 94 , 127 So.2d 512 (1961). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Gibsongreen1 sentence2014See State v. Gibson, 08-0647, p. 7 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/4/04), 867 So.2d 793, 798 (noting that double jeopardy has been recognized as a patent error, but addressing it as an assignment of error because the defendant raised it as such, apparently for the first Lntime on appeal); State v. Thomas, 99-2219, p. 4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/17/00), 764 So.2d 1104, 1108 (reviewing double jeopardy issue as a patent error). | 1 | 1 |
Starnes v. Caddo Parish School Bd.green1 sentence2005See Starnes v. Caddo Parish School Bd., 598 So.2d 472, 477 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992); Seegers v. State Farm Mutual Auto. | 1 | 1 |
Ward v. Tenneco Oil Co.green1 sentence1992Bordelon v. Cochrane, 533 So.2d 82 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1988), writ denied, 536 So.2d 1255 (La.1989).” Ward v. Tenneco Oil Co., 564 So.2d 814, 820 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Pickron v. Krebsgreen1 sentence1991Pickron v. Krebs, 441 So.2d 272, 274 (La. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Copelandgreen1 sentence1984State v. Copeland, 419 So.2d 899 at 910 (La. 1982). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rochegreen1 sentence1981See State v. Roche, 341 So.2d 348 (La.1976). | 1 | 1 |
Long v. Chailangreen2 sentences1976See, e. g., Long v. Chailan, 187 La. 507 , 175 So. 42 (1937); Knighten v. Ruffin, La.App., 255 So.2d 388 (1971). 1976See, e. g., Long v. Chailan, 187 La. 507 , 175 So. 42 (1937); Knighten v. Ruffin, La.App., 255 So.2d 388 (1971). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. DT
green
2 sentences2019Nevertheless, this court has recognized this error as an error patent and applied the harmless error analysis. [ State v. Schrader , 518 So.2d 1024 (La.1988) ]; [ State v. Marcantel , 98-825 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/22/99) , 756 So.2d 366 ]; State v. D.T. , 08-814 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/08) , 998 So.2d 1258 . 2019Nevertheless, this court has recognized this error as an error patent and applied the harmless error analysis. [ State v. Schrader , 518 So.2d 1024 (La.1988) ]; [ State v. Marcantel , 98-825 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/22/99) , 756 So.2d 366 ]; State v. D.T. , 08-814 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/08) , 998 So.2d 1258 . | 2 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Schrader
green
2 sentences2019Nevertheless, this court has recognized this error as an error patent and applied the harmless error analysis. [ State v. Schrader , 518 So.2d 1024 (La.1988) ]; [ State v. Marcantel , 98-825 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/22/99) , 756 So.2d 366 ]; State v. D.T. , 08-814 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/08) , 998 So.2d 1258 . 2019Nevertheless, this court has recognized this error as an error patent and applied the harmless error analysis. [ State v. Schrader , 518 So.2d 1024 (La.1988) ]; [ State v. Marcantel , 98-825 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/22/99) , 756 So.2d 366 ]; State v. D.T. , 08-814 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/08) , 998 So.2d 1258 . | 2 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Marcantel
green
2 sentences2019Nevertheless, this court has recognized this error as an error patent and applied the harmless error analysis. [ State v. Schrader , 518 So.2d 1024 (La.1988) ]; [ State v. Marcantel , 98-825 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/22/99) , 756 So.2d 366 ]; State v. D.T. , 08-814 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/08) , 998 So.2d 1258 . 2019Nevertheless, this court has recognized this error as an error patent and applied the harmless error analysis. [ State v. Schrader , 518 So.2d 1024 (La.1988) ]; [ State v. Marcantel , 98-825 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/22/99) , 756 So.2d 366 ]; State v. D.T. , 08-814 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/08) , 998 So.2d 1258 . | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Burke v. Ryan
green
2 sentences2014Oakes v. Walther, 179 La. 365 , 154 So. 26, 27 (1934); Burke v. Ryan, 36 La.Ann. 951 (1884); Terry v. Fellows, 21 La.Ann. 375 (1869). 2002Oakes v. Walther, 179 La. 365 , 154 So. 26, 27 (1934); Burke v. Ryan, 36 La. | 2 | 2002–2014 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences2007This Court has recognized that defense counsel's failure to file a Motion to Reconsider Sentence cannot "automatically be considered deficient performance." State v. Williams, 98-1146 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/1/99) , 738 So.2d 640 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/7/00), 752 So.2d 176 . 2001However, this Court has recognized that defense counsel's failure to do so cannot "automatically be considered deficient performance." State v. Williams, 98-1146 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/1/99) , 738 So.2d 640 . | 2 | 2001–2007 |
Bordelon v. Cochrane
green
2 sentences1992Bordelon v. Cochrane, 533 So.2d 82 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1988), writ denied, 536 So.2d 1255 (La.1989).” Ward v. Tenneco Oil Co., 564 So.2d 814, 820 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1990). 1990Bordelon v. Cochrane, 533 So.2d 82 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1988), writ denied, 536 So.2d 1255 (La. *821 1989). | 2 | 1990–1992 |
Streeter v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. INC.
green
2 sentences1992Bordelon v. Cochrane, 533 So.2d 82 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1988), writ denied, 536 So.2d 1255 (La.1989).” Ward v. Tenneco Oil Co., 564 So.2d 814, 820 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1990). 1990Bordelon v. Cochrane, 533 So.2d 82 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1988), writ denied, 536 So.2d 1255 (La. *821 1989). | 2 | 1990–1992 |
State v. Kelly
green
2 sentences1982State v. Batiste, supra ; State v. Harrington, 332 So.2d 764 (La.1976); State v. Kelly, 263 La. 545 , 268 So.2d 650 (1972); State v. Turner, 241 La. 94 , 127 So.2d 512 (1961). 1982State v. Batiste, supra ; State v. Harrington, 332 So.2d 764 (La.1976); State v. Kelly, 263 La. 545 , 268 So.2d 650 (1972); State v. Turner, 241 La. 94 , 127 So.2d 512 (1961). | 2 | 1978–1982 |
State v. Turner
green
2 sentences1982State v. Batiste, supra ; State v. Harrington, 332 So.2d 764 (La.1976); State v. Kelly, 263 La. 545 , 268 So.2d 650 (1972); State v. Turner, 241 La. 94 , 127 So.2d 512 (1961). 1982State v. Batiste, supra ; State v. Harrington, 332 So.2d 764 (La.1976); State v. Kelly, 263 La. 545 , 268 So.2d 650 (1972); State v. Turner, 241 La. 94 , 127 So.2d 512 (1961). | 2 | 1978–1982 |
Terry v. Fellows
green
1 sentence2014Oakes v. Walther, 179 La. 365 , 154 So. 26, 27 (1934); Burke v. Ryan, 36 La.Ann. 951 (1884); Terry v. Fellows, 21 La.Ann. 375 (1869). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Williams
green
1 sentence2007This Court has recognized that defense counsel's failure to file a Motion to Reconsider Sentence cannot "automatically be considered deficient performance." State v. Williams, 98-1146 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/1/99) , 738 So.2d 640 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/7/00), 752 So.2d 176 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Harris
neutral
1 sentence2004State v. Thomas, 99-2219, p. 4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/17/00), 764 So.2d 1104, 1108 ; State v. Harris, 98-2932 (La. 4 Cir. 5/3/00), 761 So.2d 662 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Dammeron
neutral
1 sentence2001Moreover, in State v. Dammeron, 98-378 (La.App. 5 Cir. 9/29/98) , 719 So.2d 1151 , this Court held that the failure to file a motion to reconsider sentence does not prejudice a defendant when the court reviews the sentence for constitutional excessiveness. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Batiste
green
1 sentence1982State v. Batiste, supra ; State v. Harrington, 332 So.2d 764 (La.1976); State v. Kelly, 263 La. 545 , 268 So.2d 650 (1972); State v. Turner, 241 La. 94 , 127 So.2d 512 (1961). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Knighten v. Ruffin
neutral
1 sentence1976See, e. g., Long v. Chailan, 187 La. 507 , 175 So. 42 (1937); Knighten v. Ruffin, La.App., 255 So.2d 388 (1971). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Gigand v. City of New Orleans
green
1 sentence1961The Court said [ 52 La.Ann. 1259 , 27 So. 795 ]: “ * * * It is undoubtedly true that this court has recognized the doctrine of waiver in respect to dismissals of appeals, in a proper class of cases. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
| Norton v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co. green | 1 | 1946–1946 |
| Shreveport Long Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilson green | 1 | 1946–1946 |
| Berry v. Bass green | 1 | 1941–1941 |
| Factors & Traders' Insurance v. City of New Orleans neutral | 1 | 1941–1941 |
| State v. Cole green | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.