Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1914–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re L.M.T.green2 sentences2021This Court has recognized this principle in In re IN RE Z.G.J. 2021-NCSC-102 Barringer, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part L.M.T., 367 N.C. 165 (2013) and In re H.A.J., 377 N.C. 43 , 2021-NCSC-26. 2021This Court has recognized this principle in In re IN RE Z.G.J. 2021-NCSC-102 Barringer, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part L.M.T., 367 N.C. 165 (2013) and In re H.A.J., 377 N.C. 43 , 2021-NCSC-26. | 2 | 2 |
Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.green2 sentences1999Watts, 75 N.C.App. at 9 , 330 S.E.2d at 249 ; see N.C.G.S. § 8-53 (1986) ("Confidential information obtained in medical records shall be furnished only on the authorization of the patient."). 1999Watts, 75 N.C.App. at 9 , 330 S.E.2d at 249 ; see N.C.G.S. § 8-53 (1986) ("Confidential information obtained in medical records shall be furnished only on the authorization of the patient."). | 1 | 2 |
Lexis-Nexis v. Travishan Corp.green2 sentences2005App. at 207, 573 S.E.2d at 549 (citation omitted), this Court has recognized an exception for a corporation representing itself pro se in the Small Claims Division. 2005Id. at 208 , 573 S.E.2d at 549 . “ ‘[I]n enacting our small claims court system . . . the General Assembly apparently intended to provide our citizens, corporate, as well as individual, with an expedient, inexpensive, speedy forum in which they can process litigation involving small sums without obtaining a lawyer.’ ” Id. (quoting Duke Power Co. v. Daniels, 86 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Thompson v. Solesgreen2 sentences2004Equitable Estoppel This Court has recognized the doctrine of equitable estoppel may apply in child support arrangements: “Equitable estoppel arises when an individual by his acts, representations, admissions, or by his silence when he has a duty to speak, intentionally or through culpable negligence induces another to believe that certain facts exist, and such other person rightfully relies and acts upon that belief to his detriment.” Thompson v. Soles, 299 N.C. 484, 487 , 263 S.E.2d 599, 602 (1980). 2004Equitable Estoppel This Court has recognized the doctrine of equitable estoppel may apply in child support arrangements: “Equitable estoppel arises when an individual by his acts, representations, admissions, or by his silence when he has a duty to speak, intentionally or through culpable negligence induces another to believe that certain facts exist, and such other person rightfully relies and acts upon that belief to his detriment.” Thompson v. Soles, 299 N.C. 484, 487 , 263 S.E.2d 599, 602 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
Wallace v. Johnsongreen1 sentence1993See, Wallace v. Johnson, 11 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mercer
green
2 sentences1979State v. Mercer, 275 N.C. 108 , 165 S.E. 2d 328 (1969). 1979State v. Mercer, 275 N.C. 108 , 165 S.E. 2d 328 (1969). | 2 | 1973–1979 |
Duke Power Co. v. Daniels
green
1 sentence2005Id. at 208 , 573 S.E.2d at 549 . “ ‘[I]n enacting our small claims court system . . . the General Assembly apparently intended to provide our citizens, corporate, as well as individual, with an expedient, inexpensive, speedy forum in which they can process litigation involving small sums without obtaining a lawyer.’ ” Id. (quoting Duke Power Co. v. Daniels, 86 N.C. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Griffin v. Griffin
green
1 sentence2004“A party seeking to rely on equitable estoppel must show that, in good faith reliance on the conduct of another, he has changed his position for the worse.” Griffin v. Griffin, 96 N.C. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Beaver v. Hampton
green
1 sentence1998In support of this proposition, defendant cites this Court’s decision in Beaver v. Hampton, 106 N.C. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.
green
2 sentences1998System, 75 N.C.App. 1, 9 , 330 S.E.2d 242, 249 (1985), rev'd in part on other grounds, 317 N.C. 321 , 345 S.E.2d 201 (1986), the basis of plaintiff's claims in this action. 1998System, 75 N.C.App. 1, 9 , 330 S.E.2d 242, 249 (1985), rev'd in part on other grounds, 317 N.C. 321 , 345 S.E.2d 201 (1986), the basis of plaintiff's claims in this action. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
TA LOVING COMPANY v. Latham
green
1 sentence1987Where giving effect to the merger clause would frustrate and distort the parties’ true intentions and understanding regarding the contract, the clause will not be enforced: “. . . to permit the standardized language in the printed forms, ... to nullify the clearly understood and expressed intent of the contracting parties would lead to a patently unjust and absurd result . . . .’’ Loving Co. v. Latham, 20 N.C. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Spence v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences1973State v. Mereer, 275 N.C. 108 , 165 S.E. 2d 328 ; State v. Spence, 271 N.C. 23 , 155 S.E. 2d 802 , rev’d on other grounds 392 U.S. 649 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 1350 , 88 S.Ct. 2290 ; State v. Creech, 229 N.C. 662 , 51 S.E. 2d 348 ; State v. Potts, 100 N.C. 457 , 6 S.E. 657 ; State v. Brandon, 53 N.C. 463 . 1973State v. Mereer, 275 N.C. 108 , 165 S.E. 2d 328 ; State v. Spence, 271 N.C. 23 , 155 S.E. 2d 802 , rev’d on other grounds 392 U.S. 649 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 1350 , 88 S.Ct. 2290 ; State v. Creech, 229 N.C. 662 , 51 S.E. 2d 348 ; State v. Potts, 100 N.C. 457 , 6 S.E. 657 ; State v. Brandon, 53 N.C. 463 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
State v. Spence
green
2 sentences1973State v. Mereer, 275 N.C. 108 , 165 S.E. 2d 328 ; State v. Spence, 271 N.C. 23 , 155 S.E. 2d 802 , rev’d on other grounds 392 U.S. 649 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 1350 , 88 S.Ct. 2290 ; State v. Creech, 229 N.C. 662 , 51 S.E. 2d 348 ; State v. Potts, 100 N.C. 457 , 6 S.E. 657 ; State v. Brandon, 53 N.C. 463 . 1973State v. Mereer, 275 N.C. 108 , 165 S.E. 2d 328 ; State v. Spence, 271 N.C. 23 , 155 S.E. 2d 802 , rev’d on other grounds 392 U.S. 649 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 1350 , 88 S.Ct. 2290 ; State v. Creech, 229 N.C. 662 , 51 S.E. 2d 348 ; State v. Potts, 100 N.C. 457 , 6 S.E. 657 ; State v. Brandon, 53 N.C. 463 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
State v. . Creech
green
2 sentences1973State v. Mereer, 275 N.C. 108 , 165 S.E. 2d 328 ; State v. Spence, 271 N.C. 23 , 155 S.E. 2d 802 , rev’d on other grounds 392 U.S. 649 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 1350 , 88 S.Ct. 2290 ; State v. Creech, 229 N.C. 662 , 51 S.E. 2d 348 ; State v. Potts, 100 N.C. 457 , 6 S.E. 657 ; State v. Brandon, 53 N.C. 463 . 1973State v. Mereer, 275 N.C. 108 , 165 S.E. 2d 328 ; State v. Spence, 271 N.C. 23 , 155 S.E. 2d 802 , rev’d on other grounds 392 U.S. 649 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 1350 , 88 S.Ct. 2290 ; State v. Creech, 229 N.C. 662 , 51 S.E. 2d 348 ; State v. Potts, 100 N.C. 457 , 6 S.E. 657 ; State v. Brandon, 53 N.C. 463 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
State v. . Brandon
neutral
1 sentence1973State v. Mereer, 275 N.C. 108 , 165 S.E. 2d 328 ; State v. Spence, 271 N.C. 23 , 155 S.E. 2d 802 , rev’d on other grounds 392 U.S. 649 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 1350 , 88 S.Ct. 2290 ; State v. Creech, 229 N.C. 662 , 51 S.E. 2d 348 ; State v. Potts, 100 N.C. 457 , 6 S.E. 657 ; State v. Brandon, 53 N.C. 463 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
State v. . Potts
green
2 sentences1973State v. Mereer, 275 N.C. 108 , 165 S.E. 2d 328 ; State v. Spence, 271 N.C. 23 , 155 S.E. 2d 802 , rev’d on other grounds 392 U.S. 649 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 1350 , 88 S.Ct. 2290 ; State v. Creech, 229 N.C. 662 , 51 S.E. 2d 348 ; State v. Potts, 100 N.C. 457 , 6 S.E. 657 ; State v. Brandon, 53 N.C. 463 . 1973State v. Mereer, 275 N.C. 108 , 165 S.E. 2d 328 ; State v. Spence, 271 N.C. 23 , 155 S.E. 2d 802 , rev’d on other grounds 392 U.S. 649 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 1350 , 88 S.Ct. 2290 ; State v. Creech, 229 N.C. 662 , 51 S.E. 2d 348 ; State v. Potts, 100 N.C. 457 , 6 S.E. 657 ; State v. Brandon, 53 N.C. 463 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Russell v. Windsor Steamboat Co.
green
2 sentences1968Russell v. Steamboat Co., 126 N.C. 961 , 36 S.E. 191 . 1968Russell v. Steamboat Co., 126 N.C. 961 , 36 S.E. 191 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Morrison v. . Cornelius and Others
red
1 sentence1962If, in the ordinary use of the property, harm befalls them, their owner, by permitting them to roam at large, is held to have assumed the risk of such injury, and so is denied any right of action on that account.” This Court has recognized the rule and followed it in Morrison v. Cornelius, 63 N.C. 346 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Davis v. . Commissioners of Stokes
neutral
1 sentence1914This Court has recognized that rule and held that “Consequential damage, to be recoverable in an action of tort, must be *382 the proximate consequence of the act complained of, and not the secondary result.” Sledge v. Reid, 73 N. C., 441 , and cases cited. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.