Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1903–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Winther v. Stategreen1 sentence2003See Winther v. State, 812 So.2d 527 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Hanono v. Murphygreen1 sentence2000Furthermore, this Court has recognized the principle "that *230 a party who has been guilty of fraud or misconduct in the prosecution or defense of a civil proceeding should not be permitted to continue to employ the very institution it has subverted to achieve [their] ends." Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (citing Carter v. Carter, 88 So.2d 153, 157 (Fla. 1956)("[i]t is offensive to our sense of right that a wrongdoer be allowed to exploit his wrongs to the injury of another and to the profit of himself.")); see, e.g., Cox v. Burke, 706 So.2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) | 1 | 1 |
Kornblum v. Schneidergreen1 sentence2000Furthermore, this Court has recognized the principle "that *230 a party who has been guilty of fraud or misconduct in the prosecution or defense of a civil proceeding should not be permitted to continue to employ the very institution it has subverted to achieve [their] ends." Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (citing Carter v. Carter, 88 So.2d 153, 157 (Fla. 1956)("[i]t is offensive to our sense of right that a wrongdoer be allowed to exploit his wrongs to the injury of another and to the profit of himself.")); see, e.g., Cox v. Burke, 706 So.2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) | 1 | 1 |
Horjales v. Loebgreen1 sentence2000Furthermore, this Court has recognized the principle "that *230 a party who has been guilty of fraud or misconduct in the prosecution or defense of a civil proceeding should not be permitted to continue to employ the very institution it has subverted to achieve [their] ends." Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (citing Carter v. Carter, 88 So.2d 153, 157 (Fla. 1956)("[i]t is offensive to our sense of right that a wrongdoer be allowed to exploit his wrongs to the injury of another and to the profit of himself.")); see, e.g., Cox v. Burke, 706 So.2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) | 1 | 1 |
Carter v. Cartergreen1 sentence2000Furthermore, this Court has recognized the principle "that *230 a party who has been guilty of fraud or misconduct in the prosecution or defense of a civil proceeding should not be permitted to continue to employ the very institution it has subverted to achieve [their] ends." Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (citing Carter v. Carter, 88 So.2d 153, 157 (Fla. 1956)("[i]t is offensive to our sense of right that a wrongdoer be allowed to exploit his wrongs to the injury of another and to the profit of himself.")); see, e.g., Cox v. Burke, 706 So.2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) | 1 | 1 |
O'VAHEY v. Millergreen1 sentence2000Furthermore, this Court has recognized the principle "that *230 a party who has been guilty of fraud or misconduct in the prosecution or defense of a civil proceeding should not be permitted to continue to employ the very institution it has subverted to achieve [their] ends." Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (citing Carter v. Carter, 88 So.2d 153, 157 (Fla. 1956)("[i]t is offensive to our sense of right that a wrongdoer be allowed to exploit his wrongs to the injury of another and to the profit of himself.")); see, e.g., Cox v. Burke, 706 So.2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) | 1 | 1 |
Cox v. Burkegreen1 sentence2000Furthermore, this Court has recognized the principle "that *230 a party who has been guilty of fraud or misconduct in the prosecution or defense of a civil proceeding should not be permitted to continue to employ the very institution it has subverted to achieve [their] ends." Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (citing Carter v. Carter, 88 So.2d 153, 157 (Fla. 1956)("[i]t is offensive to our sense of right that a wrongdoer be allowed to exploit his wrongs to the injury of another and to the profit of himself.")); see, e.g., Cox v. Burke, 706 So.2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) | 1 | 1 |
Lee v. Stategreen1 sentence1999See Lee v. State, 731 So.2d 71, 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). | 1 | 1 |
Faretta v. Californiagreen2 sentences1983For his technical legal knowledge, as such, was not relevant to an assessment of his knowing exercise of the right to defend himself. [ 422 U.S. at 835 , 95 S.Ct. at 2541 (footnotes omitted) ] This court has recognized the principle that when a defendant, prior to trial, requests permission to represent himself, the court must make inquiry to determine whether the defendant’s decision to represent himself is intelligently and voluntarily made and that he is knowingly waiving his right to counsel, and the trial court should also determine whether unusual circumstances exist which would preclude 1983For his technical legal knowledge, as such, was not relevant to an assessment of his knowing exercise of the right to defend himself. [ 422 U.S. at 835 , 95 S.Ct. at 2541 (footnotes omitted) ] This court has recognized the principle that when a defendant, prior to trial, requests permission to represent himself, the court must make inquiry to determine whether the defendant’s decision to represent himself is intelligently and voluntarily made and that he is knowingly waiving his right to counsel, and the trial court should also determine whether unusual circumstances exist which would preclude | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Figgie Intern., Inc. v. Alderman
green
1 sentence2000Furthermore, this Court has recognized the principle "that *230 a party who has been guilty of fraud or misconduct in the prosecution or defense of a civil proceeding should not be permitted to continue to employ the very institution it has subverted to achieve [their] ends." Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (citing Carter v. Carter, 88 So.2d 153, 157 (Fla. 1956)("[i]t is offensive to our sense of right that a wrongdoer be allowed to exploit his wrongs to the injury of another and to the profit of himself.")); see, e.g., Cox v. Burke, 706 So.2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Mendez v. Blanco
green
1 sentence2000Furthermore, this Court has recognized the principle "that *230 a party who has been guilty of fraud or misconduct in the prosecution or defense of a civil proceeding should not be permitted to continue to employ the very institution it has subverted to achieve [their] ends." Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (citing Carter v. Carter, 88 So.2d 153, 157 (Fla. 1956)("[i]t is offensive to our sense of right that a wrongdoer be allowed to exploit his wrongs to the injury of another and to the profit of himself.")); see, e.g., Cox v. Burke, 706 So.2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Clark v. Diamond Restaurant
neutral
1 sentence1991This court has recognized that principle in the context of settlement agreements under Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, recognized as "binding as of the date of hearing” with retrospective effectiveness when fully articulated on the record "and approved by the judge ... at hearing.” See Clark v. Diamond Restaurant, 564 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), concluding against such effectiveness when particular terminology of the requisite written agreement remained executory because it was to be "worked up" after the hearing, and therefore was not fully set out orally on the record at hearing. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Parker v. State
green
1 sentence1983Robinson v. State, 368 So.2d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Ausby v. State, 358 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Parker v. State, 423 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Robinson v. State
green
1 sentence1983Robinson v. State, 368 So.2d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Ausby v. State, 358 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Parker v. State, 423 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Ausby v. State
green
1 sentence1983Robinson v. State, 368 So.2d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Ausby v. State, 358 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Parker v. State, 423 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Brust v. Brust
green
1 sentence1974Our attention has been called to Brust v. Brust, Fla.App., 1972, 266 So.2d 400 [by the First District], wherein the appellant contends that everything else being equal mothers of infants of tender years should receive prime consideration for custody. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Flink v. City of Titusville
green
1 sentence1974This court has recognized this rule in Cardillo v. Cardillo, Fla.App. 1972, 269 So.2d 773 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Rivers Body Factory, Inc. v. Lufkin Foundry & Machine Co.
neutral
1 sentence1967This court has recognized that doctrine in many cases, including our decision in Rivers Body Factory, Inc. v. Lufkin Foundry, Fla.App., 146 So.2d 774 (1964). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Blanton v. the Cudahy Packing Company
green
2 sentences1953One of the opinions used as basis for this pronouncement is found in Blanton v. Cudahy Packing Company, 154 Fla. 872 , 19 So.2d 313 , where it was written that the liability attached regardless of privity of contract. 1953One of the opinions used as basis for this pronouncement is found in Blanton v. Cudahy Packing Company, 154 Fla. 872 , 19 So.2d 313 , where it was written that the liability attached regardless of privity of contract. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Cliett v. Lauderdale Biltmore Corporation
green
1 sentence1953For instance, this court has recognized the principle "that as to items of foods or other products in the original package which are offered for sale for human consumption or use generally, a person who *515 purchases such items in reliance upon the express or implied condition or assurance that they are wholesome and fit for the uses or purposes for which they are advertised or sold, and who is injured as the result of unwholesome or deleterious substances therein which are unknown to the buyer, may hold either the manufacturer or the retailer liable * * *." Cliett v. Lauderdale Biltmore Corp | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Segars v. State of Florida
green
2 sentences1938Rep. 825 ; Segars *581 v. State, 94 Fla. 1128 , 115 South. 1938Rep. 825 ; Segars *581 v. State, 94 Fla. 1128 , 115 South. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Oglesby v. State
neutral
2 sentences1938This Court has recognized this principle in Oglesby v. State, 83 Fla. 132 , 90 South. 1938This Court has recognized this principle in Oglesby v. State, 83 Fla. 132 , 90 South. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Wilensky v. Perell
neutral
1 sentence1933This Court has recognized the doctrine that all parties are free to make what contracts they please, so long as no fraud or deception is practiced and the contracts are legal in all respects (Continental Casualty Co. v. Bows, 72 Fla. 17 , 72 So.2d 278 ; Mizell Life Stock Co. v. J. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Continental Casualty Co. v. Bows
green
1 sentence1933This Court has recognized the doctrine that all parties are free to make what contracts they please, so long as no fraud or deception is practiced and the contracts are legal in all respects (Continental Casualty Co. v. Bows, 72 Fla. 17 , 72 So.2d 278 ; Mizell Life Stock Co. v. J. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Taylor v. Glens Falls Insurance
neutral
1 sentence1903Co., 44 Fla. 273 , 32 South. | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.