22 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Robinson v. Wilson Concrete Co.green2 sentences2001Robinson v. Wilson Concrete Co., 913 F. Supp. 1476, 1483 (D. 2000O’Connor of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas has concluded that Kansas would utilize the burden-shifting analysis in workers compensation discharge cases. *110 Robinson v. Wilson Concrete Co., 913 F. Supp. 1476, 1483 (D. | 3 | 3 |
Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.green2 sentences2019See Jones, 433 U.S. at 125 . 2019See Jones, 433 U.S. at 125 . | 2 | 2 |
Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.green1 sentence2004In Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp., 252 F.3d 1111, 1115 (10th Cir. 2001) (applying Kansas law), the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals applied the burden-shifting analysis to a retaliatory discharge claim and considered the meaning of Coleman in that context. | 1 | 1 |
Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdinegreen2 sentences2004Ed. 2d 105 (2000) (citations omitted) (quoting Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 255, n. 10 , 101 S. Ct. 1089 , 67 L. 2004Ed. 2d 105 (2000) (citations omitted) (quoting Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 255, n. 10 , 101 S. Ct. 1089 , 67 L. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Ronald Robinsongreen1 sentence1979The Second Circuit in United States v. Robinson, 545 F.2d 301, 306 (2d Cir. 1976), examined a “natural and probable consequence” instruction that contained the phrase “unless the contrary appears from the evidence” and held it to be a burden-shifting instruction and reversed the conviction because it was unable to say the instruction was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sandstrom v. Montana
green
2 sentences1986The court reasoned that this instruction might be interpreted by the jury as creating either a conclusive presumption or a burden-shifting presumption. 442 U.S. at 524 . 1981This presumption is overcome if you are persuaded by the evidence that the contrary is true.” The latter instruction was approved in State v. Egbert, 227 Kan. 266, 267 , 606 P.2d 1022 , cert denied 449 U.S. 965 (1980), amid claims similar to those presented here that the instruction created “either a conclusive presumption on the issue of intent, or as a burden-shifting presumption, in violation of the rationale of Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 (1979).” That instruction was later revised pursuant to the call for improvement voiced by the Court of Appeals in | 4 | 1980–1986 |
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2021Finally, Brown argues Kansas' criminal restitution scheme violates his jury trial rights under section 5 and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution because the scheme authorizes a district court judge to determine restitution damages. 4 After a thorough review of these issues, we conclude that Brown failed to carry his burden to prove intentional discrimination in the State's exercise of peremptory challenges, as required under the burden-shifting framework established in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S. Ct. 1712 , 90 L. 2021Finally, Brown argues Kansas' criminal restitution scheme violates his jury trial rights under section 5 and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution because the scheme authorizes a district court judge to determine restitution damages. 4 After a thorough review of these issues, we conclude that Brown failed to carry his burden to prove intentional discrimination in the State's exercise of peremptory challenges, as required under the burden-shifting framework established in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S. Ct. 1712 , 90 L. | 2 | 2017–2021 |
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
green
2 sentences2003The Kansas Supreme Court has adopted the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 36 L. 2003The Kansas Supreme Court has adopted the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 36 L. | 2 | 1994–2003 |
State v. Egbert
green
2 sentences1981This presumption is overcome if you are persuaded by the evidence that the contrary is true.” The latter instruction was approved in State v. Egbert, 227 Kan. 266, 267 , 606 P.2d 1022 , cert denied 449 U.S. 965 (1980), amid claims similar to those presented here that the instruction created “either a conclusive presumption on the issue of intent, or as a burden-shifting presumption, in violation of the rationale of Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 (1979).” That instruction was later revised pursuant to the call for improvement voiced by the Court of Appeals in 1981This presumption is overcome if you are persuaded by the evidence that the contrary is true.” The latter instruction was approved in State v. Egbert, 227 Kan. 266, 267 , 606 P.2d 1022 , cert denied 449 U.S. 965 (1980), amid claims similar to those presented here that the instruction created “either a conclusive presumption on the issue of intent, or as a burden-shifting presumption, in violation of the rationale of Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 (1979).” That instruction was later revised pursuant to the call for improvement voiced by the Court of Appeals in | 2 | 1981–1984 |
Egbert v. Kansas
green
2 sentences1984State v. Robinson, Lloyd & Clark, 229 Kan. 301, 309 , 624 P.2d 964 (1981); State v. Egbert, 227 Kan. 266, 267 , 606 P.2d 1022 , cert. denied 449 U.S. 965 (1980). 1981This presumption is overcome if you are persuaded by the evidence that the contrary is true.” The latter instruction was approved in State v. Egbert, 227 Kan. 266, 267 , 606 P.2d 1022 , cert denied 449 U.S. 965 (1980), amid claims similar to those presented here that the instruction created “either a conclusive presumption on the issue of intent, or as a burden-shifting presumption, in violation of the rationale of Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 (1979).” That instruction was later revised pursuant to the call for improvement voiced by the Court of Appeals in | 2 | 1981–1984 |
State v. Ward
green
2 sentences2024Supporting their contention, the State cites State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 568-69 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011), where our Supreme Court modified the burden shifting rule. 2024Supporting their contention, the State cites State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 568-69 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011), where our Supreme Court modified the burden shifting rule. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Greer ex rel. Farbo v. Greer
green
1 sentence2023App. 2d 180 , 324 P.3d 310 (2014)." The court's findings, to which the parties agreed, resolved the first two steps of the KPA's burden-shifting framework. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Menaker v. Hofstra Univ.
green
1 sentence2020A cat's paw case is a slight variation of a Title VII vicarious liability case. 935 F.3d at 30 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc.
green
2 sentences2019Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc., 272 Kan. 1272, 1276 , 38 P.3d 679 (2002). 2019Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc., 272 Kan. 1272, 1276 , 38 P.3d 679 (2002). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Allen Realty, Inc. v. City of Lawrence
green
1 sentence2013On appeal, the Allen Realty court rejected the district court’s burden-shifting framework as inappropriate. 14 Kan. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
green
2 sentences2004Under the burden-shifting analysis, although the prima facie presumption of unlawful intent ‘ “drops out of the picture” once the defendant meets its burden of production, . . ., the trier of fact may still consider the evidence establishing the *439 plaintiffs prima facie case “and inferences properly drawn therefrom . . . on the issue of whether the defendant’s explanation is pretextual,” ’ Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 143 , 120 S. Ct. 2097, 2106 , 147 L. 2004Under the burden-shifting analysis, although the prima facie presumption of unlawful intent ‘ “drops out of the picture” once the defendant meets its burden of production, . . ., the trier of fact may still consider the evidence establishing the *439 plaintiffs prima facie case “and inferences properly drawn therefrom . . . on the issue of whether the defendant’s explanation is pretextual,” ’ Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 143 , 120 S. Ct. 2097, 2106 , 147 L. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Rebarchek v. FARMERS CO-OP ELEVATOR & MERCANTILE ASS'N OF DIGHTON
green
2 sentences2004Rebarchek v. Farmers Co-op Elevator C Mercantile Ass'n, 272 Kan. 546, 553 , 35 P.3d 892 (2001). 2004Rebarchek v. Farmers Co-op Elevator C Mercantile Ass'n, 272 Kan. 546, 553 , 35 P.3d 892 (2001). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Parke v. Raley
green
2 sentences1997Summarizing its analysis, the Court stated that “neither our precedents nor historical or contemporary practice compel the conclusion that Kentucky’s burden-shifting rule violates due process.” 506 U.S. at 34 . 1997Thus, it held “that the Due Process Clause permits a State to impose a burden of production on a recidivism defendant who challenges the validity of a prior conviction under Boykin.” 506 U.S. at 34 . *489 Justice Blackmun wrote a separate concurring opinion in Parke for the purpose of pointing out the difference between use of a burden-shifting formula in a sentencing matter and in a substantive criminal prosecution where the government would have the burden of proof and retain it throughout. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences1986We reiterated the Sandstrom requirements in State v. Johnson, 233 Kan. 981 , 666 P.2d 706 (1983), holding that: “It has long been recognized that any instruction which shifts the burden of proof or of persuasion to the defendant is unconstitutional and is clearly erroneous. 1986We reiterated the Sandstrom requirements in State v. Johnson, 233 Kan. 981 , 666 P.2d 706 (1983), holding that: “It has long been recognized that any instruction which shifts the burden of proof or of persuasion to the defendant is unconstitutional and is clearly erroneous. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Robinson, Lloyd & Clark
green
2 sentences1984State v. Robinson, Lloyd & Clark, 229 Kan. 301, 309 , 624 P.2d 964 (1981); State v. Egbert, 227 Kan. 266, 267 , 606 P.2d 1022 , cert. denied 449 U.S. 965 (1980). 1984State v. Robinson, Lloyd & Clark, 229 Kan. 301, 309 , 624 P.2d 964 (1981); State v. Egbert, 227 Kan. 266, 267 , 606 P.2d 1022 , cert. denied 449 U.S. 965 (1980). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Acheson
green
2 sentences1981This presumption is overcome if you are persuaded by the evidence that the contrary is true.” The latter instruction was approved in State v. Egbert, 227 Kan. 266, 267 , 606 P.2d 1022 , cert denied 449 U.S. 965 (1980), amid claims similar to those presented here that the instruction created “either a conclusive presumption on the issue of intent, or as a burden-shifting presumption, in violation of the rationale of Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 (1979).” That instruction was later revised pursuant to the call for improvement voiced by the Court of Appeals in 1981App. 2d 705, 716 , 601 P.2d 375 , rev. denied 227 Kan. 927 (1979). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
cluster 355284
green
1 sentence1979The Third Circuit considered a nearly identical instruction to that given in Robinson and reached the opposite conclusion in *715 United States v. Garrett, 574 F.2d 778 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 436 U.S. 919 (1978). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Woodson v. United States
green
1 sentence1979The Third Circuit considered a nearly identical instruction to that given in Robinson and reached the opposite conclusion in *715 United States v. Garrett, 574 F.2d 778 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 436 U.S. 919 (1978). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.