list factors in Iowa

2019See Iowa Code § 600B.40(2) (directing the court to apply the provisions of section 598.41 in determining custody in paternity actions); In re Marriage of Hansen, 733 N.W.2d 683, 696 (Iowa 2007).

2019See In re Marriage of Hansen, 733 N.W.2d 683, 696 (Iowa 2007).

2022At the time, the district court determined the statutory rate based on a variety of factors, id. (citing Iowa Code § 815.7 (1981)); see Parrish v. Denato, 262 N.W.2d 281, 285 (Iowa 1978) (providing a list of factors to determine an appropriate statutory rate), and only defendants whose attorneys exhausted the retainer fees under the statutory rate could access investigative services at state expense, Missildine, 311 N.W.2d at 295 .

2022At the time, the district court determined the statutory rate based on a variety of factors, id. (citing Iowa Code § 815.7 (1981)); see Parrish v. Denato, 262 N.W.2d 281, 285 (Iowa 1978) (providing a list of factors to determine an appropriate statutory rate), and only defendants whose attorneys exhausted the retainer fees under the statutory rate could access investigative services at state expense, Missildine, 311 N.W.2d at 295 .

2022At the time, the district court determined the statutory rate based on a variety of factors, id. (citing Iowa Code § 815.7 (1981)); see Parrish v. Denato, 262 N.W.2d 281, 285 (Iowa 1978) (providing a list of factors to determine an appropriate statutory rate), and only defendants whose attorneys exhausted the retainer fees under the statutory rate could access investigative services at state expense, Missildine, 311 N.W.2d at 295 .

2022At the time, the district court determined the statutory rate based on a variety of factors, id. (citing Iowa Code § 815.7 (1981)); see Parrish v. Denato, 262 N.W.2d 281, 285 (Iowa 1978) (providing a list of factors to determine an appropriate statutory rate), and only defendants whose attorneys exhausted the retainer fees under the statutory rate could access investigative services at state expense, Missildine, 311 N.W.2d at 295 .

2016See Hemingway, 293 N.E.2d at 843-44 .

2016See Hemingway, 293 N.E.2d at 843–44.

2026See In re Marriage of Liebich, 547 N.W.2d 844, 848 (Iowa Ct. App. 1996); In re Marriage of Gensley, 777 N.W.2d 705, 714 (Iowa Ct. App. 2009).

2026See In re Marriage of Liebich, 547 N.W.2d 844, 848 (Iowa Ct. App. 1996); In re Marriage of Gensley, 777 N.W.2d 705, 714 (Iowa Ct. App. 2009).

2025See Pearson, 514 N.W.2d at 455 (designating a list of factors to determine whether contact is considered “sexual in nature”).

2019See Iowa Code § 600B.40; Hansen, 733 N.W.2d at 696 ; see also Ruden v. Peach, 904 N.W.2d 410, 414 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017).

2019See Garwick v. Iowa Dep’t of Transp., 611 N.W.2d 286, 288 (Iowa 2000) (finding an issue not preserved for review when the plaintiff failed to raise the issue with enough specificity to the district court on judicial review and noting, “[Plaintiff’s] allegation in his petition for judicial review is far too unspecific to preserve a . . . challenge”). 3 her assigned shifts.2 Leach was advised that checking the list was in violation the hospital’s information security policies that prevented remote access into the hospital’s system without authorization—which Leach did not have—and when not neces

2014See Winter, 223 N.W.2d at 166 (including the characteristics and needs of each child, the characteristics of each parent, the capacity and interest of each parent to provide for the needs of the child, the relationship between the child and each parent, the effect on the child of continuing or disrupting an existing custodial status, the nature of each proposed environment, and any other relevant matter the evidence in a particular case may disclose).

2013In reviewing an earlier version of this provision, which enumerated substantially the same list of factors, we explained that we examine the factors in conjunction with several “other well-established principles governing modification.” See In re Marriage of McCumin, 681 N.W.2d 322, 329 (Iowa 2004).

1992See Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., 424 N.W.2d at 247 ; Iowa has adopted from the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 222A the following list of factors to be considered in determining whether the interference was sufficiently serious to give rise to a conversion: (a) the extent and duration of the actor’s exercise of dominion or control; (b) the actor’s intent to assert a right in fact inconsistent with the other’s right of control; (c) the actor’s good faith; (d) the extent and duration of the resulting interference with the other’s right of control; (e) the harm done to the chattel; (f) the inconv

1992Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., 424 N.W.2d at 247 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 222A(2) (1965)).