list factors (Oklahoma) · Go Syfert
← Oklahoma issues

list factors in Oklahoma

13 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1986–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.green
scotus · 1993 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2003–2004
2 sentences

2004In Christian , the Oklahoma Supreme Court examined those Daubert parameters at length and restated some of the more prominent pronouncements for guidance. ¶ 23 The Christian Court, at 597, quoting Daubert , noted that “[i]n a case involving scientific evidence, evidentiary reliability will be based upon scientific validity.” The Court provided this list of factors from Daubert, 509 U.S. at 593-594 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 for trial courts to consider when determining admissibility: 1.

2004In Christian , the Oklahoma Supreme Court examined those Daubert parameters at length and restated some of the more prominent pronouncements for guidance. ¶ 23 The Christian Court, at 597, quoting Daubert , noted that “[i]n a case involving scientific evidence, evidentiary reliability will be based upon scientific validity.” The Court provided this list of factors from Daubert, 509 U.S. at 593-594 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 for trial courts to consider when determining admissibility: 1.

12
Christian v. Graygreen
okla · 2003 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023See Christian , 2003 OK 10, ¶ 8 . ¶14 Moreover, Title 12, O.S.Supp.2013, § 2702, contained in the Oklahoma Evidence Code, requires a case to present issues in which "scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue. . . ." Additionally, to be admissible as an expert witness such person must be "qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training or education" to express the opinion.

11
Davis Oil Co. v. Cloudgreen
okla · 1989 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016However, the Supreme Court did include "inconvenience suffered in actual use of the land by OPERATOR" in the list of factors for the jury to consider in Davis Oil Co. v. Cloud , 1986 OK 73, ¶ 22, 766 P.2d 1347, 1352.

2016However, the Supreme Court did include "inconvenience suffered in actual use of the land by OPERATOR" in the list of factors for the jury to consider in Davis Oil Co. v. Cloud , 1986 OK 73, ¶ 22, 766 P.2d 1347, 1352.

11
McDoulett v. Stategreen
oklacrimapp · 1984 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016The Court of Criminal Appeals stated in McDoulett , supra , 1984 OK CR 81, ¶ 12, 685 P.2d at 978, 981, that the list of factors that the jury may wish to consider in evaluating the credibility of eyewitness identifications is not exclusive.

2016The Court of Criminal Appeals stated in McDoulett , supra , 1984 OK CR 81, ¶ 12, 685 P.2d at 978, 981, that the list of factors that the jury may wish to consider in evaluating the credibility of eyewitness identifications is not exclusive.

11
Fitzgerald v. Stategreen
oklacrimapp · 1998 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012See Fitzgerald v. State, 1998 OK CR 68, 16 , 972 P.2d 1157, 1162 .

2012See Fitzgerald v. State, 1998 OK CR 68, 16 , 972 P.2d 1157, 1162 .

11
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen Murphygreen
ca9 · 1980 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
1 sentence

1986See SEC v. Murphy, 626 F.2d 633, 645 (9th Cir.1980), for a list of the factors involved in applying the doctrine of inter-gration to separate and multiple offerings.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
CHESAPEAKE OPERATING INC. v. KAST TRUST FARMS green
oklacivapp · 2013
2 sentences

2016In Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Kast Trust Farms , 2015 OK CIV APP 5, 352 P.3d 1231, the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals approved a jury instruction on temporary and permanent injuries, but it rejected a jury instruction on damages for stigma associated with the drilling operations because it was not listed as a factor in Davis .

2016In Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Kast Trust Farms , 2015 OK CIV APP 5, 352 P.3d 1231, the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals approved a jury instruction on temporary and permanent injuries, but it rejected a jury instruction on damages for stigma associated with the drilling operations because it was not listed as a factor in Davis .

12016–2016
Philip Morris USA v. Williams green
scotus · 2007
2 sentences

2014The bracketed paragraph of this Instruction that comes before the list of factors for punitive damages is based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Phillip Morris USA v. Williams , 127 S.Ct. 1057 549 U.S. 346 (2007).

2014The bracketed paragraph of this Instruction that comes before the list of factors for punitive damages is based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Phillip Morris USA v. Williams , 127 S.Ct. 1057 549 U.S. 346 (2007).

12014–2014
Edwards v. State green
oklacrimapp · 1991
2 sentences

2012Mathis fails to recognize that the law in this area has evolved in a number of ways since Coleman. 21 115 In Edwards v. State, 1991 OK CR 71, 110 , 815 P.2d 670, 678 , we noted, "This Court has not imposed a laundry list of factors which the trial court must address when accepting a waiver of counsel, and we decline to do so now." And we have more recently affirmed that we will not "impose a list of factors" or specific warnings that must be checked off by the trial court in this context.

2012Mathis fails to recognize that the law in this area has evolved in a number of ways since Coleman. 21 115 In Edwards v. State, 1991 OK CR 71, 110 , 815 P.2d 670, 678 , we noted, "This Court has not imposed a laundry list of factors which the trial court must address when accepting a waiver of counsel, and we decline to do so now." And we have more recently affirmed that we will not "impose a list of factors" or specific warnings that must be checked off by the trial court in this context.

12012–2012
State v. Vaughn green
okla · 2000
1 sentence

2008Id.

12008–2008
Sheppard v. Wright neutral
oklacivapp · 1995
2 sentences

2003James at ¶ 6 , 907 P.2d at 1100 . ¶ 11 In Re J.S.S., 1995 OK CIV APP 47 , 895 P.2d 748 , which relied on Tubbs, held that 12 O.S.1991, § 1631 (now 12 O.S.2001, § 1631): does not permit a parent to change a minor child’s last name from that of his natural father over the father’s objection.

2003James at ¶ 6 , 907 P.2d at 1100 . ¶ 11 In Re J.S.S., 1995 OK CIV APP 47 , 895 P.2d 748 , which relied on Tubbs, held that 12 O.S.1991, § 1631 (now 12 O.S.2001, § 1631): does not permit a parent to change a minor child’s last name from that of his natural father over the father’s objection.

12003–2003
James v. Hopmann green
oklacivapp · 1995
1 sentence

2003James at ¶ 6 , 907 P.2d at 1100 . ¶ 11 In Re J.S.S., 1995 OK CIV APP 47 , 895 P.2d 748 , which relied on Tubbs, held that 12 O.S.1991, § 1631 (now 12 O.S.2001, § 1631): does not permit a parent to change a minor child’s last name from that of his natural father over the father’s objection.

12003–2003
In Re Interest of Bird Head green
neb · 1983
2 sentences

2003The Court in In re Interest of Bird Head, 213 Neb. 741 , 331 N.W.2d 785 (1983), directed the trial court to consider the good cause issue keeping in mind that the Act did not override the best interest of the child test.

2003The Court in In re Interest of Bird Head, 213 Neb. 741 , 331 N.W.2d 785 (1983), directed the trial court to consider the good cause issue keeping in mind that the Act did not override the best interest of the child test.

12003–2003
State v. Buckle green
kanctapp · 1979
2 sentences

2000State v. Buckle, 4 Kan.App.2d 250 , 604 P.2d 743 (1979).

2000State v. Buckle, 4 Kan.App.2d 250 , 604 P.2d 743 (1979).

12000–2000
Hertz v. Hertz green
nm · 1983
2 sentences

1990Hertz, 657 P.2d at 1174 .

1990Hertz, 657 P.2d at 1174 .

11990–1990

Where else courts name it

TX 255 (1933–2025) TN 143 (1997–2026) CA 133 (1975–2026) IL 104 (1978–2026) OH 104 (1975–2026) MI 68 (1983–2026) PA 67 (1959–2026) MS 55 (1986–2025) LA 43 (1978–2026) WA 37 (1986–2024) UT 32 (1987–2025) OR 31 (1905–2025) MN 30 (1978–2025) MD 30 (1981–2025) IN 30 (1979–2026) WI 29 (1999–2023) CO 27 (1977–2026) NY 26 (1969–2025) AL 26 (1976–2025) KS 25 (1989–2025) FL 23 (1977–2025) MA 22 (1980–2020) ID 22 (1985–2026) IA 21 (1992–2026) NJ 20 (1983–2025) SC 16 (2008–2022) NV 16 (2009–2020) DC 16 (1980–2017) KY 15 (1968–2026) ME 15 (2004–2026) SD 15 (1990–2026) MO 14 (1975–2025) NC 14 (1984–2017) AK 13 (1972–2020) OK 13 (1986–2023) WY 12 (1989–2025) NE 12 (1999–2024) AZ 12 (1986–2025) WV 11 (1994–2024) MT 11 (1994–2010) CT 11 (1996–2025) AR 10 (1993–2015) NM 10 (1983–2024) VA 10 (1990–2017) ND 9 (1981–2021) GA 9 (1985–2024) RI 9 (1992–2023) VT 8 (1984–2016) NH 6 (2019–2023) DE 5 (1987–2025) VI 3 (2009–2025) HI 2 (2003–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check