list factors (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

list factors in New Jersey

20 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2025 6 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (11)

CaseFollowedCited
Cesare v. Cesaregreen
nj · 1998 · cited in 3 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
2 sentences

2024A. We defer to a trial court’s factual findings “when supported by adequate, substantial, credible evidence.” Cesare, 154 N.J. at 411-12 (1998).

2024A. We defer to a trial court’s factual findings “when supported by adequate, substantial, credible evidence.” Cesare, 154 N.J. at 411-12 (1998).

33
Idaho v. Wrightgreen
scotus · 1990 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025In Wright, the United States Supreme Court provided a list of factors to be considered by a trial judge in making such a determination. 497 U.S. at 821-22 .

2025The non-exhaustive list includes "spontaneity, consistency of repetition, lack of motive to fabricate, the mental state of the declarant, use of terminology unexpected of a child of a similar age, [the] interrogation and manipulation by adults." D.G., 157 N.J. at 125 (citing Wright, 497 U.S. at 821-22, 827 ).

11
State v. Yarboughred
nj · 1985 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020The New Jersey Supreme Court has provided a list of factors that should be considered by the sentencing court when determining if the sentences should be consecutive, including whether: (a) the crimes and their objectives were predominantly independent of each other; (b) the crimes involved separate acts of violence or threats of violence; (c) the crimes were committed at different times or separate places, rather than being committed so closely in time and place as to indicate a single period of aberrant behavior; (d) any of the crimes involved multiple victims; A-4456-17T4 19 (e) the convict

11
Kiken v. Kikengreen
nj · 1997 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Kiken v. Kiken, 149 N.J. 441, 449-50 (1997).

11
State v. K.S.green
nj · 2015 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017See K.S., supra, 220 N.J. at 198 . 5 A-4896-14T3 As in State v. Caliguiri, 158 N.J. 28 (1999), such a one- sided evaluation of the PTI application warrants a remand: The school zone statute creates the presumption against PTI, and cannot also provide the reason Caliguiri fails to overcome that presumption.

2017See K.S., supra, 220 N.J. at 198 . 5 A-4896-14T3 As in State v. Caliguiri, 158 N.J. 28 (1999), such a one- sided evaluation of the PTI application warrants a remand: The school zone statute creates the presumption against PTI, and cannot also provide the reason Caliguiri fails to overcome that presumption.

11
State v. Caliguirigreen
nj · 1999 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017See K.S., supra, 220 N.J. at 198 . 5 A-4896-14T3 As in State v. Caliguiri, 158 N.J. 28 (1999), such a one- sided evaluation of the PTI application warrants a remand: The school zone statute creates the presumption against PTI, and cannot also provide the reason Caliguiri fails to overcome that presumption.

11
State v. RTgreen
nj · 2011 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016Id. at 510, 16 A.3d 365 .

2016Id. at 510, 16 A.3d 365 .

11
State v. Coopergreen
nj · 1997 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009Reviewing the list of factors that the jury considered, the judge noted the FAS evidence seemed to fit within the third mitigating factor found by two members of the jury, "that drinking by his mother during pregnancy had contributed to defendant's physical and developmental disabilities." Id. at 346, 700 A. 2d 306 .

2009Reviewing the list of factors that the jury considered, the judge noted the FAS evidence seemed to fit within the third mitigating factor found by two members of the jury, "that drinking by his mother during pregnancy had contributed to defendant's physical and developmental disabilities." Id. at 346, 700 A. 2d 306 .

11
Terry v. Terrygreen
njsuperctappdiv · 1994 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
2 sentences

1998See Terry, supra, 270 N.J.

1998See Terry, supra, 270 N.J.Super. at 119 , 636 A.2d 579 (holding in custody proceeding the court “must reference the pertinent statutory criteria with some specificity”).

11
Trimble v. Stategreen
md · 1984 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992See Trimble v. State, 300 Md. 387 , 478 A. 2d 1143, 1167 (1984) ("We see no bright line by which this Court can say when death shall be imposed.

1992See Trimble v. State, 300 Md. 387 , 478 A. 2d 1143, 1167 (1984) ("We see no bright line by which this Court can say when death shall be imposed.

11
cluster 386072green
ca6 · 1980 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
1 sentence

1983N.J.S.A. 24:21-46, second paragraph, g. 9 Also in reliance on this District Court decision, the Legislature added a severability clause and eliminated from the list of factors which can be considered in determining whether an item is drug paraphernalia, the reference to whether the person in control of the object “is a legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community.” 10 As indicated above, we differ with Parma in this regard only to the extent of confining the question of defendant’s intent to the elements of the crime, as distinguished from literally following the Model Act, wh

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Baures v. Lewis green
nj · 2001
2 sentences

2017Id. at 116—17. *325 In Baures , the Court displaced the burden, imposed under Holder on the parent seeking relocation, to demonstrate that the move would not adversely affect the visitation rights of the noncustodial parent.

2017Id. at 116-17 .

22017–2017
State v. DG green
nj · 1999
1 sentence

2025The non-exhaustive list includes "spontaneity, consistency of repetition, lack of motive to fabricate, the mental state of the declarant, use of terminology unexpected of a child of a similar age, [the] interrogation and manipulation by adults." D.G., 157 N.J. at 125 (citing Wright, 497 U.S. at 821-22, 827 ).

12025–2025
Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Board of Review green
njsuperctappdiv · 2007
1 sentence

2021Ibid.

12021–2021
Jev v. Kv green
njsuperctappdiv · 2012
1 sentence

2021One of those required subject matters is "the preference of the child when of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent decision." Ibid.

12021–2021
New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. L.L. green
nj · 2010
1 sentence

2020L.L., 201 N.J. at 228 .

12020–2020
Newburgh v. Arrigo green
nj · 1982
2 sentences

2013While the Supreme Court case of Newburgh v. Arrigo, 88 N.J. 529 [ 443 A.2d 1031 ] (1982) sets forth a list of factors for a court to consider on the issue of college contribution, a case may present additional equitable factors for consideration as well.

2013While the Supreme Court case of Newburgh v. Arrigo, 88 N.J. 529 [ 443 A.2d 1031 ] (1982) sets forth a list of factors for a court to consider on the issue of college contribution, a case may present additional equitable factors for consideration as well.

12013–2013
State v. Peace green
nj · 1973
2 sentences

2008These factors include the following: (a) whether the applicant is a commercial bondsman; (b) the bondsman’s supervision, if any, of defendant during the time of his release; (c) the bondsman’s efforts to insure the return of the fugitive; (d) the time elapsed between the date ordered for the appearance of defendant and his return to court; (e) the prejudice, if any, to the State because of the absence of defendant; (f) the expenses incurred by the State by reason of the default in appearance, the recapture of the fugitive and the enforcement of the forfeiture; [and] (g) whether reimbursement o

2008These factors include the following: (a) whether the applicant is a commercial bondsman; (b) the bondsman’s supervision, if any, of defendant during the time of his release; (c) the bondsman’s efforts to insure the return of the fugitive; (d) the time elapsed between the date ordered for the appearance of defendant and his return to court; (e) the prejudice, if any, to the State because of the absence of defendant; (f) the expenses incurred by the State by reason of the default in appearance, the recapture of the fugitive and the enforcement of the forfeiture; [and] (g) whether reimbursement o

12008–2008
State v. Hyers green
njsuperctappdiv · 1973
2 sentences

2008In Hyers, supra, an appellate panel delineated a list of factors that the trial court should consider before granting or denying remission. 122 N.J.Super. at 180 , 299 A.2d 748 .

2008In Hyers, supra, an appellate panel delineated a list of factors that the trial court should consider before granting or denying remission. 122 N.J.Super. at 180 , 299 A.2d 748 .

12008–2008
State v. Cameron green
nj · 1986
2 sentences

1994Id. at 56 , 514 A. 2d 1302 .

1994Id. at 56 , 514 A. 2d 1302 .

11994–1994
Record Revolution No. 6 v. City of Parma, Ohio green
ohnd · 1980
1 sentence

1983N.J.S.A. 24:21-46, second paragraph, g. 9 Also in reliance on this District Court decision, the Legislature added a severability clause and eliminated from the list of factors which can be considered in determining whether an item is drug paraphernalia, the reference to whether the person in control of the object “is a legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community.” 10 As indicated above, we differ with Parma in this regard only to the extent of confining the question of defendant’s intent to the elements of the crime, as distinguished from literally following the Model Act, wh

11983–1983

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NJ § N.J. Stat. § 2C:25-17 (3) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 2C:25-19 (3) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 2C:25-29 (3) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 9:2-2 (3) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 9:2-4 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 255 (1933–2025) TN 143 (1997–2026) CA 133 (1975–2026) IL 104 (1978–2026) OH 104 (1975–2026) MI 68 (1983–2026) PA 67 (1959–2026) MS 55 (1986–2025) LA 43 (1978–2026) WA 37 (1986–2024) UT 32 (1987–2025) OR 31 (1905–2025) MN 30 (1978–2025) MD 30 (1981–2025) IN 30 (1979–2026) WI 29 (1999–2023) CO 27 (1977–2026) NY 26 (1969–2025) AL 26 (1976–2025) KS 25 (1989–2025) FL 23 (1977–2025) MA 22 (1980–2020) ID 22 (1985–2026) IA 21 (1992–2026) NJ 20 (1983–2025) SC 16 (2008–2022) NV 16 (2009–2020) DC 16 (1980–2017) KY 15 (1968–2026) ME 15 (2004–2026) SD 15 (1990–2026) MO 14 (1975–2025) NC 14 (1984–2017) AK 13 (1972–2020) OK 13 (1986–2023) WY 12 (1989–2025) NE 12 (1999–2024) AZ 12 (1986–2025) WV 11 (1994–2024) MT 11 (1994–2010) CT 11 (1996–2025) AR 10 (1993–2015) NM 10 (1983–2024) VA 10 (1990–2017) ND 9 (1981–2021) GA 9 (1985–2024) RI 9 (1992–2023) VT 8 (1984–2016) NH 6 (2019–2023) DE 5 (1987–2025) VI 3 (2009–2025) HI 2 (2003–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check