list factors in Mississippi

2009The Court first enumerated these factors in Dodd v. City of Jackson, 238 Miss. 372, 396-97 , 118 So.2d 319, 330 (1960), and in later decisions has expanded the list.” In re Enlargement & Extension of the Municipal Boundaries v. City of Biloxi, 744 So.2d 270, 276 (Miss.1999).

2009The Court first enumerated these factors in Dodd v. City of Jackson, 238 Miss. 372, 396-97 , 118 So.2d 319, 330 (1960), and in later decisions has expanded the list.” In re Enlargement & Extension of the Municipal Boundaries v. City of Biloxi, 744 So.2d 270, 276 (Miss.1999).

2013In Albright, the Mississippi Supreme Court gave a list of factors to consider to help chancellors “navigat[e] what is usually a labyrinth of interests and emotions.” Lee, 798 So.2d at 1288 (¶ 15) (citing Albright, 437 So.2d at 1005 ).

2009In Albright v. Albright, 437 So.2d 1003, 1005 (Miss.1983), the Mississippi Supreme Court established a list of factors that chancellors must consider when determining which parent should be awarded primary custody of a child.

2009In Armstrong v. Armstrong, 618 So.2d 1278, 1280 (Miss.1993), the Mississippi Supreme Court established a list of factors to be consid *285 ered by chancellors when determining the appropriateness of an alimony award. 5 .

2009In Armstrong v. Armstrong, 618 So.2d 1278, 1280 (Miss. 1993), the Mississippi Supreme Court established a list of factors to be considered by chancellors when determining whether alimony is appropriate.

2013In Albright, the Mississippi Supreme Court gave a list of factors to consider to help chancellors “navigat[e] what is usually a labyrinth of interests and emotions.” Lee, 798 So.2d at 1288 (¶ 15) (citing Albright, 437 So.2d at 1005 ).

2012In Albright, the Mississippi Supreme Court gave a list of factors to consider to help chancellors “navigat[e] what is usually a labyrinth of interests and emotions.” Lee, 798 So.2d at 1288 (¶ 15) (citing Albright, 437 So.2d at 1005).

2014Rule 1.5(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct and McKee v. McKee, 418 So.2d 764, 767 (Miss.1982), set forth a list of factors that a court must consider in determining the reasonableness of attorney’s fees.

2012If the trial court considers attorney’s fees on remand, it should make findings of fact on the issue.15 15 Rule 1.5(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct and McKee v. McKee, 418 So. 2d 764, 767 (Miss. 1982), set forth a list of factors that a court must consider in determining the reasonableness of attorney’s fees.

2009In Ferguson, 639 So.2d at 928 , the Mississippi Supreme Court established a list of factors that should be considered when determining the equitable distribution of marital property: 1.

2009In Ferguson v. Ferguson, 639 So.2d 921, 928 (Miss. 1994), the Mississippi Supreme Court established a list of factors to be considered when determining the equitable distribution of marital property. 4 .

2002Peterson adopted the list of factors set forth in Gordon v. U.S., 383 F.2d 936 (D.C.Cir.1967) which requires review of: (1) the impeachment value of the prior crime; (2) the point in time of the conviction and the witness's subsequent history; (3) the similarity between the past crime and the charged crime; (4) the importance of the defendant's testimony; and (5) the centrality of the credibility issue.

2001A more specific list of factors to be considered by the trial judge was outlined in Gordon v. United States, 383 F.2d 936, 940 (D.C.Cir.1967) (Burger, J.); and is set forth in Weinstein's Evidence: (1) The impeachment value of the prior crime. (2) The point in time of the conviction and the witness' subsequent history. (3) The similarity between the past crime and the charged crime. (4) The importance of the defendant's testimony. (5) The centrality of the credibility issue. ¶ 61.

2011McLemore, 863 So.2d at 37 (¶ 13) (citing Daubert, 509 U.S. at 592-94 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 ).

2010Additionally, DaubeH provides a list of factors for assessing reliability, including: whether the theory or technique can be and has been tested; whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication; whether, in respect to a particular technique, there is a high known or potential rate of error; whether there are standards controlling the technique’s operation; and whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within [the] relevant scientific community- McLemore, 863 So.2d at 37 (¶ 13) (citing Daubert, 509 U.S. at 592-94 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 ).

2009The Court first enumerated these factors in Dodd v. City of Jackson, 238 Miss. 372, 396-97 , 118 So.2d 319, 330 (1960), and in later decisions has expanded the list.” In re Enlargement & Extension of the Municipal Boundaries v. City of Biloxi, 744 So.2d 270, 276 (Miss.1999).

2007The Court first enumerated these factors in Dodd v. City of Jackson, 238 Miss. 372, 396-97 , 118 So. 2d 319, 330 (1960), and in later decisions has expanded the list.” In re Enlargement & Extension of the Municipal Boundaries v. City of Biloxi, 744 So. 2d 270, 276 (Miss. 1999).

2003"These factors, however, are only indicia of reasonableness, not separate and distinct tests in and of themselves." Bassett v. Town of Taylorsville, 542 So.2d 918, 921 (Miss.1989).

2002"These factors, however, are only indicia of reasonableness, not separate and distinct tests in and of themselves." Bassett v. Town of Taylorsville, 542 So. 2d 918, 921 (Miss. 1989).

1998In Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. A Mississippi Attorney, 489 So.2d 1081, 1083-84 (Miss. 1986), this Court announced a list of factors which should be considered when imposing discipline including but not limited to the following: (1) the nature of the misconduct involved; (2) the need to deter similar misconduct; (3) the preservation of the dignity and reputation of the legal profession; (4) the protection of the public; and (5) sanctions imposed in similar cases.

1990In the case of Mississippi State Bar v. A Mississippi Attorney, 489 So.2d 1081, 1083-84 (Miss. 1986), we announced a list of factors which should be considered when imposing discipline including but not limited to the following: (A) Nature of the misconduct involved; (B) Need to deter similar misconduct; (C) Preservation of dignity and reputation of the legal profession; (D) Protection of the public; and (E) Sanctions imposed in similar cases.

2002The Court stated that in order to determine what a claimant's usual employment was, we should look to the list of factors used by the court in McGowan v. Orleans Furniture, Inc., 586 So.2d 163, 167 (Miss.1991), for determining wage earning capacity.

2002Such factors include "the amount of education and training which the claimant has had, his inability to work, his failure to be hired elsewhere, the continuance of pain, and any other related circumstances." Meridian Professional Baseball Club v. Jensen, 1999-WC-02093-COA at (¶ 11); McGowan, 586 So.2d at 167 . ¶ 16.

1993LAW Recently, in Matter of Enlargement of Corp. Limits of Hattiesburg, 588 So.2d 814 , 818 (Miss. 1991), we noted: This Court has set forth a list of factors or so called indicia of reasonableness to guide the chancellor in his determination of the reasonableness of a city's annexation request.

1993LAW Recently, in Matter of Enlargement of Corp. Limits of Hattiesburg, 588 So.2d 814, 818 (Miss. 1991), we noted: This Court has set forth a list of factors or so called indicia of reasonableness to guide the chancellor in his determination of the reasonableness of a city's annexation request.

2014Palmer v. State, 939 So.2d 792, 794-95 (Miss.2006). .

2012There is no particular factor in instruction D-6 that is not covered by instruction S-3 or encompassed within one of the factors outlined in S-3. “[T]rial judges are not required to grant repetitious instructions.” Davis v. State, 568 So.2d 277, 280 (Miss.1990) (quotations omitted).

2012In Albright, the Mississippi Supreme Court gave a list of factors to consider to help chancellors “navigat[e] what is usually a labyrinth of interests and emotions.” Lee, 798 So.2d at 1288 (¶ 15) (citing Albright, 437 So.2d at 1005).

2011Withers v. State, 907 So.2d 342, 350 (¶ 23) (Miss.2005).

2001In Johnson v. State, 655 So.2d 37, 41 (Miss.1995), we stated, "[T]here are several ways to impeach a witness' credibility including the showing of bias or prejudice of the witness ... as long as the impeaching material is relevant to the issue at hand." We have held that the scope of cross-examination, though ordinarily broad, is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and the trial court possesses inherent power to limit cross-examination to relevant matters.

1999NOTES [1] See Ferguson v. Ferguson, 639 So.2d 921 (Miss.1994). [2] See Ethridge v. Ethridge, 648 So.2d 1143, 1146 (Miss.1995) for a list of factors considered in determining an award of permanent periodic alimony. [3] See Cheatham v. Cheatham, 537 So.2d 435 (Miss.1988) for a list of factors considered in determining an award of lump sum alimony.

1998See also Alexander, 669 So.2d at 42 ; Attorney R., 649 So.2d at 824-25 .

1995This Court in Sellers v. Sellers, 638 So. 2d 481, 485 (Miss. 1994), reiterated its earlier holding in Smith v. Todd, 464 So. 2d 1155 (Miss. 1985), stating that the list of factors in Albright was not to be exhaustive, but a beginning point.

1987In Brabham v. Brabham, 226 Miss. 165 , 84 So.2d 147, 153 (1955), the Court set forth a list of factors to be considered in making alimony awards: (1) the health of the husband and his earning capacity; (2) the health of the wife and her earning capacity; (3) the entire sources of income of both parties; (4) the reasonable needs of the wife; (5) the reasonable needs of the child; (6) the necessary living expenses of the husband; (7) the estimated amount of income taxes the respective parties must pay on their incomes; (8) the fact that the wife has the free use of the home, furnishings, and aut

1987In Brabham v. Brabham, 226 Miss. 165 , 84 So.2d 147, 153 (1955), the Court set forth a list of factors to be considered in making alimony awards: (1) the health of the husband and his earning capacity; (2) the health of the wife and her earning capacity; (3) the entire sources of income of both parties; (4) the reasonable needs of the wife; (5) the reasonable needs of the child; (6) the necessary living expenses of the husband; (7) the estimated amount of income taxes the respective parties must pay on their incomes; (8) the fact that the wife has the free use of the home, furnishings, and aut