104 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2026 28 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Eddings v. Oklahomagreen2 sentences2019“During a postconviction sentencing hearing, a trial court should scrutinize the following factors before sentencing a juvenile offender: (a) the character and history of the juvenile offender and the specific circumstances of the crime; (b) the background and emotional and mental development of the juvenile offender; (c) the offender’s age and characteristics that go along with it including 27 No. 1-11-0580 immaturity and ability to appreciate risks; (d) the juvenile’s family and home environment; (e) the circumstances of the crime, the extent to which the juvenile was involved, and the exten 2019“During a postconviction sentencing hearing, a trial court should scrutinize the following factors before sentencing a juvenile offender: (a) the character and history of the juvenile offender and the specific circumstances of the crime; (b) the background and emotional and mental development of the juvenile offender; (c) the offender’s age and characteristics that go along with it including 27 No. 1-11-0580 immaturity and ability to appreciate risks; (d) the juvenile’s family and home environment; (e) the circumstances of the crime, the extent to which the juvenile was involved, and the exten | 4 | 4 |
In Re Marriage of Diehlgreen2 sentences2017In re Marriage of Diehl, 221 Ill. 2017In re Marriage of Diehl, 221 Ill. | 3 | 3 |
La Salle National Bank v. County of Cookgreen2 sentences2001Our supreme court has developed a list of factors to be considered in determining the validity of a municipal ordinance: (1) the existing uses and zoning of nearby property; (2) the extent to which property values are diminished by the zoning restrictions; (3) the extent to which the destruction of property values promotes the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the public; (4) the relative gain to the public as compared to the hardship imposed on the plaintiff; (5) the suitability of the property for the zoned purposes; (6) the length of time the property has remained vacant as zone 1994App. 3d at 872 ; see also La Salle, 12 Ill. 2d at 46-47 ; Sinclair, 19 Ill. 2d at 378 .) The list of factors is not exclusive; no one factor controls, and validity is to be determined on the facts and circumstances of each case. | 2 | 7 |
Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Village of Richton Parkgreen2 sentences2021These factors are from two cases—Sinclair Pipe Line Co., 19 Ill. 2d at 378 , and La Salle National Bank of Chicago, 12 Ill. 2d at 46 -47—and are as follows: (1) the existing uses and zoning of nearby property; (2) the extent to which property values are diminished by the particular zoning restrictions; (3) the extent to which the destruction of property values of the plaintiff promotes the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the public; (4) the relative gain to the public as compared to the hardship imposed on the individual property owner; (5) the suitability of the subject property 1993App. 3d at 976 ; see also La Salle, 12 Ill. 2d at 46-47 (reciting factors 1 to 6); Sinclair, 19 Ill. 2d at 378 (recognizing factors 7 to 8).) The list of factors is not exclusive; no one factor controls, and validity is to be determined on the facts and circumstances of each ordinance. | 2 | 4 |
Chesler v. Peoplegreen2 sentences2014“The factors include: the strength of the State’s case against the petitioner; the State’s reasons for wishing to retain the records; the petitioner’s age, criminal record and employment history; the length of time between the arrest and the expungement petition; and the adverse consequences the petitioner may suffer if expungement is not granted.” Chesler v. People, 309 Ill. 2014“The factors include: the strength of the State’s case against the petitioner; the State’s reasons for wishing to retain the records; the petitioner’s age, criminal record and employment history; the length of time between the arrest and the expungement petition; and the adverse consequences the petitioner may suffer if expungement is not granted.” Chesler v. People, 309 Ill. | 2 | 3 |
In re Marriage of Johnsongreen2 sentences2018See *982 In re Marriage of Johnson , 2016 IL App (5th) 140479 , ¶ 94, 400 Ill.Dec. 96 , 47 N.E.3d 1061 (citing 750 ILCS 5/504(a) (West 2012) ). 2018See *982 In re Marriage of Johnson , 2016 IL App (5th) 140479 , ¶ 94, 400 Ill.Dec. 96 , 47 N.E.3d 1061 (citing 750 ILCS 5/504(a) (West 2012) ). | 2 | 2 |
In Re JJCgreen2 sentences2011This court has described a station adjustment as "a verbal warning from the police." People v. Clark, 119 Ill.2d 1, 9 , 115 Ill.Dec. 613 , 518 N.E.2d 138 (1987); see also In re J.J.C., 294 Ill.App.3d 227, 238 , 228 Ill.Dec. 751 , 689 N.E.2d 1172 (1998) ("[S]tation adjustments are merely verbal warnings from the police, occurring when a juvenile is brought into the police station, but later released when the police have decided not to refer the matter to juvenile court."). "`Station adjustments' involve situations where the police, after taking the juvenile to the police station, decide that th 2011This court has described a station adjustment as "a verbal warning from the police." People v. Clark, 119 Ill.2d 1, 9 , 115 Ill.Dec. 613 , 518 N.E.2d 138 (1987); see also In re J.J.C., 294 Ill.App.3d 227, 238 , 228 Ill.Dec. 751 , 689 N.E.2d 1172 (1998) ("[S]tation adjustments are merely verbal warnings from the police, occurring when a juvenile is brought into the police station, but later released when the police have decided not to refer the matter to juvenile court."). "`Station adjustments' involve situations where the police, after taking the juvenile to the police station, decide that th | 2 | 2 |
State v. Sousagreen2 sentences2007The Supreme Court of New Hampshire in State v. Sousa, 151 N.H. 297, 303-04 , 855 A.2d 1284, 1290 (2004), recently provided a list of factors to be considered when evaluating whether an anonymous tip gives rise to reasonable suspicion and wrote as follows: “First, whether there is a ‘sufficient quantity of information’ such as the vehicle’s make, model, license plate number, location and bearing, and ‘similar innocent details’ so that the officer may be certain that the vehicle stopped is the one the tipster identified. [Citation.] Second, the time interval between the police receiving the tip 2007The Supreme Court of New Hampshire in State v. Sousa, 151 N.H. 297, 303-04 , 855 A.2d 1284, 1290 (2004), recently provided a list of factors to be considered when evaluating whether an anonymous tip gives rise to reasonable suspicion and wrote as follows: “First, whether there is a ‘sufficient quantity of information’ such as the vehicle’s make, model, license plate number, location and bearing, and ‘similar innocent details’ so that the officer may be certain that the vehicle stopped is the one the tipster identified. [Citation.] Second, the time interval between the police receiving the tip | 2 | 2 |
People v. Howardgreen2 sentences2007Howard, 372 Ill. 2007Howard, 372 Ill.App.3d at 511-12 , 310 Ill.Dec. 148 , 865 N.E.2d 472 (Fitzgerald Smith, J., dissenting), citing People v. Wells, 294 Ill.App.3d 405 , 228 Ill.Dec. 886 , 690 N.E.2d 645 (1998); Chesler, 309 Ill.App.3d at 152-53 , 242 Ill.Dec. 884 , 722 N.E.2d 668 . | 2 | 2 |
People v. Murraygreen2 sentences2005See Murray, 137 Ill.2d at 390 , 148 Ill.Dec. 7 , 560 N.E.2d 309 . 2005See Murray, 137 Ill. 2d at 390 . | 2 | 2 |
| Baker v. Millergreen | 2 | 2 |
| People v. Cobbgreen | 2 | 2 |
Wyatt L. Bear Cloud v. The State of Wyominggreen2 sentences2019“During a postconviction sentencing hearing, a trial court should scrutinize the following factors before sentencing a juvenile offender: (a) the character and history of the juvenile offender and the specific circumstances of the crime; (b) the background and emotional and mental development of the juvenile offender; (c) the offender’s age and characteristics that go along with it including 27 No. 1-11-0580 immaturity and ability to appreciate risks; (d) the juvenile’s family and home environment; (e) the circumstances of the crime, the extent to which the juvenile was involved, and the exten 2019“During a postconviction sentencing hearing, a trial court should scrutinize the following factors before sentencing a juvenile offender: (a) the character and history of the juvenile offender and the specific circumstances of the crime; (b) the background and emotional and mental development of the juvenile offender; (c) the offender’s age and characteristics that go along with it including 27 No. 1-11-0580 immaturity and ability to appreciate risks; (d) the juvenile’s family and home environment; (e) the circumstances of the crime, the extent to which the juvenile was involved, and the exten | 1 | 4 |
People v. Buffergreen2 sentences2023The list of factors “is taken from and is consistent with Miller’s discussion of a juvenile defendant’s youth and its attendant characteristics.” Buffer, 2019 IL 122327 , ¶ 36. ¶ 37 In January 2017, House Bill 531 (100th Ill. 2022See Buffer, 2019 IL 122327, ¶ 36 . | 1 | 3 |
In re Custody of G.L.green2 sentences2023See In re Custody of G.L., 2017 IL App (1st) 163171 at ¶ 42 . 2023“Although a trial court must consider all relevant factors when determining the best interests of a child, it is not required to make an explicit finding or reference to each factor.” In re Custody of G.L., 2017 IL App (1st) 163171, ¶ 43 . | 1 | 2 |
People v. Clarkgreen2 sentences2011This court has described a station adjustment as "a verbal warning from the police." People v. Clark, 119 Ill.2d 1, 9 , 115 Ill.Dec. 613 , 518 N.E.2d 138 (1987); see also In re J.J.C., 294 Ill.App.3d 227, 238 , 228 Ill.Dec. 751 , 689 N.E.2d 1172 (1998) ("[S]tation adjustments are merely verbal warnings from the police, occurring when a juvenile is brought into the police station, but later released when the police have decided not to refer the matter to juvenile court."). "`Station adjustments' involve situations where the police, after taking the juvenile to the police station, decide that th 2011This court has described a station adjustment as "a verbal warning from the police." People v. Clark, 119 Ill.2d 1, 9 , 115 Ill.Dec. 613 , 518 N.E.2d 138 (1987); see also In re J.J.C., 294 Ill.App.3d 227, 238 , 228 Ill.Dec. 751 , 689 N.E.2d 1172 (1998) ("[S]tation adjustments are merely verbal warnings from the police, occurring when a juvenile is brought into the police station, but later released when the police have decided not to refer the matter to juvenile court."). "`Station adjustments' involve situations where the police, after taking the juvenile to the police station, decide that th | 1 | 2 |
| People v. Parkergreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Johnsongreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Staceygreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Cosbygreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Rueggergreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Marriage of Eckertgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. M.D.green | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Spanngreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Herrongreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Matter of Mental Condition of Virgil D.green | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Taylor
green
2 sentences2021Our supreme court has stressed, however, that “this list of factors is nonexclusive.” People v. Taylor, 2011 IL 110067, ¶ 35 . 2021Our supreme court has stressed, however, that “this list of factors is nonexclusive.” People v. Taylor, 2011 IL 110067, ¶ 35 . | 6 | 2021–2022 |
Miller v. Alabama
green
2 sentences2020Buffer, 2019 IL 122327 , ¶ 36 (discussing Miller, 567 U.S. at 477-78 ). 2019“During a postconviction sentencing hearing, a trial court should scrutinize the following factors before sentencing a juvenile offender: (a) the character and history of the juvenile offender and the specific circumstances of the crime; (b) the background and emotional and mental development of the juvenile offender; (c) the offender’s age and characteristics that go along with it including 27 No. 1-11-0580 immaturity and ability to appreciate risks; (d) the juvenile’s family and home environment; (e) the circumstances of the crime, the extent to which the juvenile was involved, and the exten | 5 | 2015–2020 |
People v. Bush
green
2 sentences2009Our supreme court noted that “[djefendant mistakenly believes that the list of factors identified in Robinson is both exhaustive and inflexible.” Bush, 214 Ill. 2d at 327 . 2009Our supreme court noted that "[d]efendant mistakenly believes that the list of factors identified in Robinson is both exhaustive and inflexible." Bush, 214 Ill.2d at 327 , 292 Ill.Dec. 926 , 827 N.E.2d 455 . | 4 | 2006–2009 |
In Re Marriage of Susan
green
2 sentences2026Id.; In re Marriage of Susan, 367 Ill. 2024Id.; Susan, 367 Ill. | 3 | 2022–2026 |
People v. McNeal
green
2 sentences2012Our supreme court has cautioned that this list of factors is not “exhaustive,” and the factors “are merely guidelines rather than cardinal maxims to be applied rigidly in each case.” Id. 2000This list of factors is not exhaustive (McNeal, 175 Ill. 2d at 345 , 677 N.E.2d at 847 ), and all factors may not be present in every case (People v. Cobb, 97 Ill. 2d 465, 484 , 455 N.E.2d 31, 39 (1983)). | 3 | 2000–2012 |
People v. Wells
green
2 sentences2007Howard, 372 Ill.App.3d at 511-12 , 310 Ill.Dec. 148 , 865 N.E.2d 472 (Fitzgerald Smith, J., dissenting), citing People v. Wells, 294 Ill.App.3d 405 , 228 Ill.Dec. 886 , 690 N.E.2d 645 (1998); Chesler, 309 Ill.App.3d at 152-53 , 242 Ill.Dec. 884 , 722 N.E.2d 668 . 2007Howard, 372 Ill.App.3d at 511-12 , 310 Ill.Dec. 148 , 865 N.E.2d 472 (Fitzgerald Smith, J., dissenting), citing People v. Wells, 294 Ill.App.3d 405 , 228 Ill.Dec. 886 , 690 N.E.2d 645 (1998); Chesler, 309 Ill.App.3d at 152-53 , 242 Ill.Dec. 884 , 722 N.E.2d 668 . | 3 | 1999–2007 |
In re Marriage of Heroy
green
2 sentences2024The court should “apply a list of factors to determine whether one party should be required to contribute to the attorney fees of the other, including the criteria used to divide marital property and award maintenance.” Id. 2024The court should “apply a list of factors to determine whether one party should be required to contribute to the attorney fees of the other, including the criteria used to divide marital property and award maintenance.” Id. | 2 | 2024–2024 |
McGrath v. Fahey
green
2 sentences2021Id. at 90 . ¶ 52 Although the employer-employee relationship can, in some cases, aggravate the nature of the defendant’s conduct, such that it might be considered extreme and outrageous, that is not always the case. 2020Id. at 90 . ¶ 52 Although the employer-employee relationship can, in some cases, aggravate the nature of the defendant’s conduct, such that it might be considered extreme and outrageous, that is not always the case. | 2 | 2020–2021 |
Whipple v. Village of North Utica
green
2 sentences2021Whipple v. Village of North Utica, 2017 IL App (3d) 150547, ¶ 22 . ¶ 40 The parties disagree about the applicability of a list of factors that courts have at times applied to determine whether an ordinance violates substantive due process. 2021Whipple v. Village of North Utica, 2017 IL App (3d) 150547, ¶ 22 . ¶ 40 The parties disagree about the applicability of a list of factors that courts have at times applied to determine whether an ordinance violates substantive due process. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Lake Environmental, Inc. v. Arnold
green
2 sentences2018Id. 2017Id. | 2 | 2017–2018 |
First Illinois Bank of Wilmette v. Valentine
green
2 sentences2017Valentine, 250 Ill. 2017Valentine, 250 Ill. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Hartney Fuel Company v. Hamer
green
2 sentences2013Instead, subsection (c)(1) continues with the certain and definitive “seller incurs” sentence: “If the purchase order is accepted at the seller’s place of business within the county or by someone who is working out of that place of business and who does not conduct the business of selling elsewhere within the meaning of subsections (g) and (h) of this Section, or if a purchase order that is an acceptance of the seller’s complete and unconditional offer to sell is received by the seller’s place of business within the home rule county or by someone working out of that place of business, the sell 2013Instead, subsection (c)(1) continues with the certain and definitive “seller incurs” sentence: “If the purchase order is accepted at the seller’s place of business within the county or by someone who is working out of that place of business and who does not conduct the -16- business of selling elsewhere within the meaning of subsections (g) and (h) of this Section, or if a purchase order that is an acceptance of the seller’s complete and unconditional offer to sell is received by the seller’s place of business within the home rule county or by someone working out of that place of business, the | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Napleton v. Village of Hinsdale
green
2 sentences2009The supreme court explained: "The difference between a facial and an as-applied zoning challenge is significant: a zoning ordinance that may be valid in its general aspects may nevertheless be invalid as to a specific parcel of property because the balance of hardships--the gain to the public in general against the detriment to the individual owner--overwhelmingly burdens the -35- No. 2--08--0105 individual owner. [Citation.] In light of this possibility, the La Salle opinion set forth a list of factors that may be relevant in an as-applied challenge to assist in balancing the gain to the publ 2009The supreme court explained: “The difference between a facial and an as-applied zoning challenge is significant: a zoning ordinance that may be valid in its general aspects may nevertheless be invalid as to a specific parcel of property because the balance of hardships—the gain to the public in general against the detriment to the individual owner— overwhelmingly burdens the individual owner. [Citation.] In light of this possibility, the La Salle opinion set forth a list of factors that may be relevant in an as-applied challenge to assist in balancing the gain to the public against the specifi | 2 | 2009–2009 |
United States v. Mendenhall
green
2 sentences2005Mendenhall, 446 U.S. at 554 , 64 L. 2005Mendenhall, 446 U.S. at 554 , 64 L. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Rozny v. Marnul
green
2 sentences2005The complete list of factors mentioned by the Rozny court is as follows: "As is apparent from the foregoing discussion, the factors we consider relevant to our holding are: (1) The express, unrestricted and wholly voluntary 'absolute guarantee for accuracy' appearing on the face of the inaccurate plat; (2) Defendant's knowledge that this plat would be used and relied on by others than the person ordering it, including plaintiffs; (3) The fact that potential liability in this case is restricted to a comparatively small group, and that, ordinarily, only one member of that group will suffer loss; 2005The complete list of factors mentioned by the Rozny court is as follows: “As is apparent from the foregoing discussion, the factors we consider relevant to our holding are: (1) The express, unrestricted and wholly voluntary ‘absolute guarantee for accuracy’ appearing on the face of the inaccurate plat; (2) Defendant’s knowledge that this plat would be used and relied on by others than the person ordering it, including plaintiffs; (3) The fact that potential liability in this case is restricted to a comparatively small group, and that, ordinarily, only one member of that group will suffer loss; | 2 | 2005–2005 |
People v. Williams
green
2 sentences2004Williams, 161 Ill. 2d at 26 , 641 N.E.2d at 306 . 2004Williams, 161 Ill. 2d at 26 , 641 N.E.2d at 306 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
| City of Highland Park v. Lee green | 2 | 2003–2003 |
| Stanton v. Republic Bank of S. Chicago green | 2 | 1996–1997 |
| Rodriguez v. Henderson green | 2 | 1993–1994 |
| In Re DT green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| People v. Stock green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| People v. Roberts green | 1 | 2023–2023 |
| First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp. green | 1 | 2022–2022 |
| In re J.C. green | 1 | 2022–2022 |
| In Re Marriage of Herrin green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| State v. Henderson green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| Horlacher v. Cohen green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| In re Marriage of Kavchak green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| In re Marriage of Fatkin green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| In re Marriage of Micheli green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| City of Chicago v. Korshak green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| People v. Boose green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Racich v. County of Boone green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Com. v. WP green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| In re Custody of Townsend green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Phelps v. Chicago Transit Authority green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| People v. Doe neutral | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| In Re Marriage of Fahy green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Country Squire Homeowners Ass'n v. Crest Hill Development Corp. green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Herbster v. North American Co. for Life & Health Insurance green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.