Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
22 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bartosz v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2026This list of factors is by no means exhaustive, and the trial court is “free to consider other factors that may be relevant.” Bartosz v. Jones, 146 Idaho 449, 454 , 197 P.3d 310, 315 (2008) (citing Nelson v. Nelson, 144 Idaho 710, 715 , 170 P.3d 375, 380 (2007)); accord Raber, 175 Idaho at ___, 565 P.3d at 812 (citing Searle v. Searle, 162 Idaho 839, 844 , 405 P.3d 1180, 1185 (2017)). 2026This list of factors is by no means exhaustive, and the trial court is “free to consider other factors that may be relevant.” Bartosz v. Jones, 146 Idaho 449, 454 , 197 P.3d 310, 315 (2008) (citing Nelson v. Nelson, 144 Idaho 710, 715 , 170 P.3d 375, 380 (2007)); accord Raber, 175 Idaho at ___, 565 P.3d at 812 (citing Searle v. Searle, 162 Idaho 839, 844 , 405 P.3d 1180, 1185 (2017)). | 6 | 7 |
Nelson v. Nelsongreen2 sentences2026This list of factors is by no means exhaustive, and the trial court is “free to consider other factors that may be relevant.” Bartosz v. Jones, 146 Idaho 449, 454 , 197 P.3d 310, 315 (2008) (citing Nelson v. Nelson, 144 Idaho 710, 715 , 170 P.3d 375, 380 (2007)); accord Raber, 175 Idaho at ___, 565 P.3d at 812 (citing Searle v. Searle, 162 Idaho 839, 844 , 405 P.3d 1180, 1185 (2017)). 2026This list of factors is by no means exhaustive, and the trial court is “free to consider other factors that may be relevant.” Bartosz v. Jones, 146 Idaho 449, 454 , 197 P.3d 310, 315 (2008) (citing Nelson v. Nelson, 144 Idaho 710, 715 , 170 P.3d 375, 380 (2007)); accord Raber, 175 Idaho at ___, 565 P.3d at 812 (citing Searle v. Searle, 162 Idaho 839, 844 , 405 P.3d 1180, 1185 (2017)). | 3 | 3 |
Searle v. Searlegreen2 sentences2026This list of factors is by no means exhaustive, and the trial court is “free to consider other factors that may be relevant.” Bartosz v. Jones, 146 Idaho 449, 454 , 197 P.3d 310, 315 (2008) (citing Nelson v. Nelson, 144 Idaho 710, 715 , 170 P.3d 375, 380 (2007)); accord Raber, 175 Idaho at ___, 565 P.3d at 812 (citing Searle v. Searle, 162 Idaho 839, 844 , 405 P.3d 1180, 1185 (2017)). 2026This list of factors is by no means exhaustive, and the trial court is “free to consider other factors that may be relevant.” Bartosz v. Jones, 146 Idaho 449, 454 , 197 P.3d 310, 315 (2008) (citing Nelson v. Nelson, 144 Idaho 710, 715 , 170 P.3d 375, 380 (2007)); accord Raber, 175 Idaho at ___, 565 P.3d at 812 (citing Searle v. Searle, 162 Idaho 839, 844 , 405 P.3d 1180, 1185 (2017)). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Saldivargreen2 sentences2024Bishop, 146 Idaho at 819 , 203 P.3d at 1218 ; see State v. Saldivar, 165 Idaho 388, 392 , 446 P.3d 446, 450 (2019). 2024Bishop, 146 Idaho at 819 , 203 P.3d at 1218 ; see State v. Saldivar, 165 Idaho 388, 392 , 446 P.3d 446, 450 (2019). | 2 | 2 |
Russell Peterson v. Laura Knight Petersongreen2 sentences2015“This list of factors is not exhaustive or mandatory and courts are free to consider other factors that may be relevant.” Peterson v. Peterson, 153 Idaho 318, 322 , 281 P.3d 1096, 1100 (2012) (quoting Bartosz v. Jones, 146 Idaho 449, 454 , 197 P.3d 310, 315 (2008)). 2015“This list of factors is not exhaustive or mandatory and courts are free to consider other factors that may be relevant.” Peterson v. Peterson, 153 Idaho 318, 322 , 281 P.3d 1096, 1100 (2012) (quoting Bartosz v. Jones, 146 Idaho 449, 454 , 197 P.3d 310, 315 (2008)). | 2 | 2 |
Raber v. Rabergreen2 sentences2026This list of factors is by no means exhaustive, and the trial court is “free to consider other factors that may be relevant.” Bartosz v. Jones, 146 Idaho 449, 454 , 197 P.3d 310, 315 (2008) (citing Nelson v. Nelson, 144 Idaho 710, 715 , 170 P.3d 375, 380 (2007)); accord Raber, 175 Idaho at ___, 565 P.3d at 812 (citing Searle v. Searle, 162 Idaho 839, 844 , 405 P.3d 1180, 1185 (2017)). 2026For example, in relocation cases such as this one, other factors the court may consider include: The parents’ motives for relocating or opposing relocation; the quality of relationship between both parents and the child; the child’s attachment to both parents; the negative impact of the child’s exposure to continued hostility between the parents; the extent the move would enhance the economic, emotional, and educational well-being of the custodial parent and the child; the quality of the child’s lifestyle if the relocation was allowed or denied; the effect of the move on the child’s relationsh | 1 | 1 |
State v. Sheahangreen2 sentences2020State v. Sheahan, 139 Idaho 267, 279 , 77 P.3d 956, 968 (2003) . . . . 2020State v. Sheahan, 139 Idaho 267, 279 , 77 P.3d 956, 968 (2003) . . . . | 1 | 1 |
Hutchison v. Andersongreen2 sentences2018See Hutchison v. Anderson , 130 Idaho 936 , 940, 950 P.2d 1275 , 1279 (Ct. App. 1997) (noting four non-exclusive factors to review when considering whether the corporate veil should be pierced). 2018See Hutchison v. Anderson , 130 Idaho 936 , 940, 950 P.2d 1275 , 1279 (Ct. App. 1997) (noting four non-exclusive factors to review when considering whether the corporate veil should be pierced). | 1 | 1 |
A & B Irrigation District v. Idaho Conservation Leaguegreen2 sentences2012The CM Rules “give the Director the tools by which to determine ‘how the various ground and surface water sources are interconnected, and how, when, where and to what extent the diversion and use of water from one source impacts [others].’ ” American Falls, 143 Idaho at 878 , 154 P.3d at 449 (quoting A & B Irrigation Dist. v. Idaho Conservation League, 131 Idaho 411, 422 , 958 P.2d 568, 579 (1997)). 2012The CM Rules “give the Director the tools by which to determine ‘how the various ground and surface water sources are interconnected, and how, when, where and to what extent the diversion and use of water from one source impacts [others].’ ” American Falls, 143 Idaho at 878 , 154 P.3d at 449 (quoting A & B Irrigation Dist. v. Idaho Conservation League, 131 Idaho 411, 422 , 958 P.2d 568, 579 (1997)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Konechnygreen2 sentences2003The question is, is it close.” Later the district court stated “what I have to look at is, I think, based on Daubert and — and Konechny [ 134 Idaho 410, 419 , 3 P.3d 535, 544 (Ct.App.2000)] is, you know, what is the state of the science.” Finally, the district court stated “the ultimate question that I have to decide is will it assist the jury in deciding what weight to give the evidence and — and that’s permissible if it meets the scientific standards.” In its opinion, the district court discussed the list of factors in Daubert , which include “whether the theory or technique in question can 2003The question is, is it close.” Later the district court stated “what I have to look at is, I think, based on Daubert and — and Konechny [ 134 Idaho 410, 419 , 3 P.3d 535, 544 (Ct.App.2000)] is, you know, what is the state of the science.” Finally, the district court stated “the ultimate question that I have to decide is will it assist the jury in deciding what weight to give the evidence and — and that’s permissible if it meets the scientific standards.” In its opinion, the district court discussed the list of factors in Daubert , which include “whether the theory or technique in question can | 1 | 1 |
Housing Southwest, Inc. v. Washington Countygreen2 sentences2003This is not an exclusive list of factors, and some of the factors may not apply in every ease. 128 Idaho at 338 , 913 P.2d at 71 (citations omitted). 2003This is not an exclusive list of factors, and some of the factors may not apply in every ease. 128 Idaho at 338 , 913 P.2d at 71 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Parkinsongreen2 sentences2003The question is, is it close.” Later the district court stated “what I have to look at is, I think, based on Daubert and — and Konechny [ 134 Idaho 410, 419 , 3 P.3d 535, 544 (Ct.App.2000)] is, you know, what is the state of the science.” Finally, the district court stated “the ultimate question that I have to decide is will it assist the jury in deciding what weight to give the evidence and — and that’s permissible if it meets the scientific standards.” In its opinion, the district court discussed the list of factors in Daubert , which include “whether the theory or technique in question can 2003The question is, is it close.” Later the district court stated “what I have to look at is, I think, based on Daubert and — and Konechny [ 134 Idaho 410, 419 , 3 P.3d 535, 544 (Ct.App.2000)] is, you know, what is the state of the science.” Finally, the district court stated “the ultimate question that I have to decide is will it assist the jury in deciding what weight to give the evidence and — and that’s permissible if it meets the scientific standards.” In its opinion, the district court discussed the list of factors in Daubert , which include “whether the theory or technique in question can | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bitzgreen2 sentences1985See e.g., State v. Bitz, [ 93 Idaho 239 , 460 P.2d 374 (1969)], supra. Publicity by itself does not require a change of venue. 1985See e.g., State v. Bitz, [ 93 Idaho 239 , 460 P.2d 374 (1969)], supra. Publicity by itself does not require a change of venue. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bishop
green
2 sentences2024Bishop, 146 Idaho at 819 , 203 P.3d at 1218 ; see State v. Saldivar, 165 Idaho 388, 392 , 446 P.3d 446, 450 (2019). 2024Bishop, 146 Idaho at 819 , 203 P.3d at 1218 ; see State v. Saldivar, 165 Idaho 388, 392 , 446 P.3d 446, 450 (2019). | 3 | 2013–2024 |
Canyon County v. Sunny Ridge Manor, Inc.
green
2 sentences1996Id. 1993Id. | 2 | 1993–1996 |
Danti v. Danti
green
2 sentences2026For example, in relocation cases such as this one, other factors the court may consider include: The parents’ motives for relocating or opposing relocation; the quality of relationship between both parents and the child; the child’s attachment to both parents; the negative impact of the child’s exposure to continued hostility between the parents; the extent the move would enhance the economic, emotional, and educational well-being of the custodial parent and the child; the quality of the child’s lifestyle if the relocation was allowed or denied; the effect of the move on the child’s relationsh 2026For example, in relocation cases such as this one, other factors the court may consider include: The parents’ motives for relocating or opposing relocation; the quality of relationship between both parents and the child; the child’s attachment to both parents; the negative impact of the child’s exposure to continued hostility between the parents; the extent the move would enhance the economic, emotional, and educational well-being of the custodial parent and the child; the quality of the child’s lifestyle if the relocation was allowed or denied; the effect of the move on the child’s relationsh | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Reynolds v. Board of Commissioners
neutral
2 sentences2025While the Board was not required by law to consider a specific list of factors, the Board must have based its decision on some facts or circumstances such that it does not act “arbitrarily, through mere whim or caprice.” See Reynolds, 6 Idaho at 791 , 59 P. at 732 . 2025While the Board was not required by law to consider a specific list of factors, the Board must have based its decision on some facts or circumstances such that it does not act “arbitrarily, through mere whim or caprice.” See Reynolds, 6 Idaho at 791 , 59 P. at 732 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 v. Idaho Department of Water Resources
green
2 sentences2012The CM Rules “give the Director the tools by which to determine ‘how the various ground and surface water sources are interconnected, and how, when, where and to what extent the diversion and use of water from one source impacts [others].’ ” American Falls, 143 Idaho at 878 , 154 P.3d at 449 (quoting A & B Irrigation Dist. v. Idaho Conservation League, 131 Idaho 411, 422 , 958 P.2d 568, 579 (1997)). 2012The CM Rules “give the Director the tools by which to determine ‘how the various ground and surface water sources are interconnected, and how, when, where and to what extent the diversion and use of water from one source impacts [others].’ ” American Falls, 143 Idaho at 878 , 154 P.3d at 449 (quoting A & B Irrigation Dist. v. Idaho Conservation League, 131 Idaho 411, 422 , 958 P.2d 568, 579 (1997)). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences2003The question is, is it close.” Later the district court stated “what I have to look at is, I think, based on Daubert and — and Konechny [ 134 Idaho 410, 419 , 3 P.3d 535, 544 (Ct.App.2000)] is, you know, what is the state of the science.” Finally, the district court stated “the ultimate question that I have to decide is will it assist the jury in deciding what weight to give the evidence and — and that’s permissible if it meets the scientific standards.” In its opinion, the district court discussed the list of factors in Daubert , which include “whether the theory or technique in question can 2003The question is, is it close.” Later the district court stated “what I have to look at is, I think, based on Daubert and — and Konechny [ 134 Idaho 410, 419 , 3 P.3d 535, 544 (Ct.App.2000)] is, you know, what is the state of the science.” Finally, the district court stated “the ultimate question that I have to decide is will it assist the jury in deciding what weight to give the evidence and — and that’s permissible if it meets the scientific standards.” In its opinion, the district court discussed the list of factors in Daubert , which include “whether the theory or technique in question can | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.