Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reynolds v. American Hardware Mutual Insurancegreen2 sentences2000See Reynolds, 115 Idaho at 365 , 766 P.2d at 1246 . 2000See Reynolds, 115 Idaho at 365 , 766 P.2d at 1246 . | 1 | 2 |
Garnett v. Transamerica Insurance Servicesgreen2 sentences2010Sens., 118 Idaho 769, 781 , 800 P.2d 656, 668 (1990) (noting an expert’s testimony, that the insurance company’s treatment of the insurance claim at issue was an extreme deviation from the standard of care, supported the trial court’s decision to submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury). 2010Sens., 118 Idaho 769, 781 , 800 P.2d 656, 668 (1990) (noting an expert’s testimony, that the insurance company’s treatment of the insurance claim at issue was an extreme deviation from the standard of care, supported the trial court’s decision to submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury). | 1 | 1 |
Stevens v. Fleminggreen2 sentences1994Stevens v. Fleming, 116 Idaho 523, 530-31 , 777 P.2d 1196, 2003-04 (1989) (“At best, this letter informed the City of Buhl of an insurance claim made by the plaintiffs against Ranger Insurance Company.”) (emphasis in original). 1994Stevens v. Fleming, 116 Idaho 523, 530-31 , 777 P.2d 1196, 2003-04 (1989) (“At best, this letter informed the City of Buhl of an insurance claim made by the plaintiffs against Ranger Insurance Company.”) (emphasis in original). | 1 | 1 |
Dullenty v. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co.green2 sentences1989In Dullenty v. Rocky Mountain Fire and Casualty Co., 111 Idaho 98, 104 , 721 P.2d 198, 204 (1986), our Supreme Court described the insurance requirement of I.C. § 49-233: [S]uch liability insurance is couched in terms of protecting the owner-operator of a vehicle from claims of damage suffered by others who have been injured by the operation of the vehicle ... 1989In Dullenty v. Rocky Mountain Fire and Casualty Co., 111 Idaho 98, 104 , 721 P.2d 198, 204 (1986), our Supreme Court described the insurance requirement of I.C. § 49-233: [S]uch liability insurance is couched in terms of protecting the owner-operator of a vehicle from claims of damage suffered by others who have been injured by the operation of the vehicle ... | 1 | 1 |
San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmongreen2 sentences1986The Wisconsin court's conclusion was based upon application of the balancing test enunciated in San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236, 244, 245 , 79 S.Ct. 773, 779 (1959). 1986The Wisconsin court's conclusion was based upon application of the balancing test enunciated in San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236, 244, 245 , 79 S.Ct. 773, 779 (1959). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Steel Farms, Inc. v. Croft & Reed, Inc.
green
2 sentences2021To this point, Walker contends that when determining whether the pivots are an improvement, the pivots should be considered separately from the irrigation system as a whole, based on the holding in Steel Farms, Inc. v. Croft & Reed, Inc., 154 Idaho 259 , 297 P.3d 222 (2012). 2021To this point, Walker contends that when determining whether the pivots are an improvement, the pivots should be considered separately from the irrigation system as a whole, based on the holding in Steel Farms, Inc. v. Croft & Reed, Inc., 154 Idaho 259 , 297 P.3d 222 (2012). | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Robinson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
green
2 sentences2012Co., 137 Idaho 173 , 45 P.3d 829 (2002): In an insurance claim, the ball starts rolling with the insured making a claim upon the insurer, putting the insurer on notice of the claim. 2012Co., 137 Idaho 173 , 45 P.3d 829 (2002): In an insurance claim, the ball starts rolling with the insured making a claim upon the insurer, putting the insurer on notice of the claim. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Inland Group of Companies, Inc. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences2010Liberty Mutual reasonably relied on counsel’s advice in declining to pay individual medical bills to the Weinsteins. 11 The Court’s opinion states that the Weinsteins’ claim was not fairly debatable because, under Inland Group of Companies, Inc. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co., 133 Idaho 249 , 985 P.2d 674 (1999), the insurer cannot refuse to pay undisputed components of an insurance claim. 2010Liberty Mutual reasonably relied on counsel’s advice in declining to pay individual medical bills to the Weinsteins. 11 The Court’s opinion states that the Weinsteins’ claim was not fairly debatable because, under Inland Group of Companies, Inc. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co., 133 Idaho 249 , 985 P.2d 674 (1999), the insurer cannot refuse to pay undisputed components of an insurance claim. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Sublimity Insurance v. Shaw
neutral
1 sentence1999Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Sloviaczek v. Estate of Puckett
green
2 sentences1995We disagree. *719 The IMVRA does not address the efficacy of other insurance clauses in cases where more than one insurance policy is at issue. 1 That issue was directly addressed by this Court’s decision in Sloviaczek v. Estate of Puckett, 98 Idaho 371 , 565 P.2d 564 (1977). 1995We disagree. *719 The IMVRA does not address the efficacy of other insurance clauses in cases where more than one insurance policy is at issue. 1 That issue was directly addressed by this Court’s decision in Sloviaczek v. Estate of Puckett, 98 Idaho 371 , 565 P.2d 564 (1977). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Rajspic v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
green
2 sentences1990Hence, the two issues are distinct. 110 Idaho at 733-734, 718 P.2d at 1171-1172 . 1990Hence, the two issues are distinct. 110 Idaho at 733-734, 718 P.2d at 1171-1172 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Greene v. Truck Insurance Exchange
green
2 sentences1990Exchange, 114 Idaho 63 , 753 P.2d 274 (Ct.App. 1988), review den., 116 Idaho 467 , 776 P.2d 829 (1989). 1990Exchange, 114 Idaho 63 , 753 P.2d 274 (Ct.App. 1988), review den., 116 Idaho 467 , 776 P.2d 829 (1989). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Pacheco v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America
green
1 sentence1989At 799, 780 P.2d at 121 : "Even if the opinion evidence (of Olmsted) were inadmissible, [2] it is actually Pacheco who was responsible for it going before the jury." This strange twist of logic is said to result from Pacheco's resistance to a Safeco motion to dismiss Pacheco's bad faith claim, thereby causing Safeco to lay before the jury the information which Olmsted's opinion had relayed to Safeco as supposed justification for not paying the insurance claim. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Linscott v. Rainier National Life Insurance
green
2 sentences1988Linscott v. Rainier National Life Insurance Co., 100 Idaho 854 , 606 P.2d 958 (1980); see also Cheney v. Palos Verdes Inv. 1988Linscott v. Rainier National Life Insurance Co., 100 Idaho 854 , 606 P.2d 958 (1980); see also Cheney v. Palos Verdes Inv. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Farmers Group, Inc. v. Trimble
green
2 sentences1988In particular, in footnote 2 he mentions White v. Unigard, 112 Idaho 94 , 730 P.2d 1014 (1986) and thereafter in text mentions, Farmers Insurance Group, Inc. v. Trimble, 691 P.2d 1138 (Colo.1984), “where the quasi-fiduciary nature of the relationship between the insurer and the insured was acknowledged,” following which, he immediately discussed White v. Unigard in connection with an action “against an insurer which negligently fails to make a timely settlement of an insurance claim.” A settlement which is not timely made, but unreasonably delayed, shows the element of being not reasonable act 1988In particular, in footnote 2 he mentions White v. Unigard, 112 Idaho 94 , 730 P.2d 1014 (1986) and thereafter in text mentions, Farmers Insurance Group, Inc. v. Trimble, 691 P.2d 1138 (Colo. 1984), "where the quasi-fiduciary nature of the relationship between the insurer and the insured was acknowledged," following which, he immediately discussed White v. Unigard in connection with an action "against an insurer which negligently fails to make a timely settlement of an insurance claim." A settlement which is not timely made, but unreasonably delayed, shows the element of being not reasonable ac | 1 | 1988–1988 |
White v. Unigard Mutual Insurance
green
2 sentences1988In particular, in footnote 2 he mentions White v. Unigard, 112 Idaho 94 , 730 P.2d 1014 (1986) and thereafter in text mentions, Farmers Insurance Group, Inc. v. Trimble, 691 P.2d 1138 (Colo. 1984), "where the quasi-fiduciary nature of the relationship between the insurer and the insured was acknowledged," following which, he immediately discussed White v. Unigard in connection with an action "against an insurer which negligently fails to make a timely settlement of an insurance claim." A settlement which is not timely made, but unreasonably delayed, shows the element of being not reasonable ac 1988In particular, in footnote 2 he mentions White v. Unigard, 112 Idaho 94 , 730 P.2d 1014 (1986) and thereafter in text mentions, Farmers Insurance Group, Inc. v. Trimble, 691 P.2d 1138 (Colo. 1984), "where the quasi-fiduciary nature of the relationship between the insurer and the insured was acknowledged," following which, he immediately discussed White v. Unigard in connection with an action "against an insurer which negligently fails to make a timely settlement of an insurance claim." A settlement which is not timely made, but unreasonably delayed, shows the element of being not reasonable ac | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Hechler v. International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers
green
2 sentences1986Workers, AFL-CIO, 772 F.2d 788 (11th Cir.1985) the court correctly analyzed the *753 non-applicability of the preemption doctrine to cases of this nature. [1] In Hechler , the court held the employee's state law action does not run afoul of the recent pronouncement in Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck, in which the Court found preempted a state action for bad-faith handling of an insurance claim arising out of a disability insurance plan included in a collective bargaining agreement. 1986Workers, AFL-CIO, 772 F.2d 788 (11th Cir.1985) the court correctly analyzed the non-applicability of the preemption doctrine to cases of this nature. 1 In Hechler , the court held the employee’s state law action does not run afoul of the recent pronouncement in Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck, in which the Court found preempted a state action for bad-faith handling of an insurance claim arising out of a disability insurance plan included in a collective bargaining agreement. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Reed
green
1 sentence1985State v. Reed, 107 Idaho 62 , 686 P.2d 842 (Ct.App.1984). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State Ex Rel. Kidwell v. US Marketing, Inc.
green
2 sentences1984Kidwell v. U.S. Marketing, Inc., 102 Idaho 451 , 631 P.2d 622 (1981) (interpreting the moral nuisance abatement statute, I.C. § 52-415); Mayo v. Safeway Stores, Inc., supra (interpreting the former workmen’s compensation claim statute, I.C. § 72-611); Halliday v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, supra (interpreting the insurance claim statute, I.C. § 41-1839). 1984Kidwell v. U.S. Marketing, Inc., 102 Idaho 451 , 631 P.2d 622 (1981) (interpreting the moral nuisance abatement statute, I.C. § 52-415); Mayo v. Safeway Stores, Inc., supra (interpreting the former workmen’s compensation claim statute, I.C. § 72-611); Halliday v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, supra (interpreting the insurance claim statute, I.C. § 41-1839). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Casey v. Highlands Insurance
green
2 sentences1983Co., 100 Idaho 505 , 600 P.2d 1387 (1979), rejected the insurance doctrine of reasonable expectations, the principle of construction adopted by the court in Erikson is no longer valid. 1983Co., 100 Idaho 505 , 600 P.2d 1387 (1979), rejected the insurance doctrine of reasonable expectations, the principle of construction adopted by the court in Erikson is no longer valid. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Boise Ass'n of Credit Men, Ltd. v. United States Fire Insurance
green
2 sentences1969The question of admissibility of evidence of prior fires in an insurance claim action has been before this Court in Boise Association of Credit Men, Ltd. v. United States Fire Insurance Co., 44 Idaho 249 , 256 P. 523 (1927). 1969The question of admissibility of evidence of prior fires in an insurance claim action has been before this Court in Boise Association of Credit Men, Ltd. v. United States Fire Insurance Co., 44 Idaho 249 , 256 P. 523 (1927). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.