Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Leshergreen2 sentences1997In order to understand this third element and clarify our holding, we will briefly discuss the evolution of the state-of-mind requirement. 9 In State v. Lesher, 66 Haw. at 536-37 , 669 P.2d at 147-48 , the Hawai'i Supreme Court held that pursuant to HRS § 702-204 (1993), 10 an insurance violation required, at least, the driver of a borrowed vehicle to possess a knowing or reckless state of mind. 1997In order to understand this third element and clarify our holding, we will briefly discuss the evolution of the state-of-mind requirement. 9 In State v. Lesher, 66 Haw. at 536-37 , 669 P.2d at 147-48 , the Hawai'i Supreme Court held that pursuant to HRS § 702-204 (1993), 10 an insurance violation required, at least, the driver of a borrowed vehicle to possess a knowing or reckless state of mind. | 1 | 2 |
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences2014Ct., 153 Cal.App.3d 467, 476 , 200 Cal.Rptr. 471, 476 (1984) (holding that retention of an attorney to investigate an insurance claim and make a coverage determination under a policy “is a classic example of a client seeking legal advice from an attorney”); 20 Hartford Fin. 2014Ct., 153 Cal.App.3d 467, 476 , 200 Cal.Rptr. 471, 476 (1984) (holding that retention of an attorney to investigate an insurance claim and make a coverage determination under a policy “is a classic example of a client seeking legal advice from an attorney”); 20 Hartford Fin. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Pierregreen2 sentences2007See generally Pierre, 484 F.3d at 84 (reasoning that the fact that (1) the officer had personal knowledge that the defendant's license had been suspended for the entire previous year and (2) the officer had not been informed by fellow officers that the defendant's license status had changed where such information would be of interest in the on-going investigation lent credence to the officer's assumption that the defendant's license remained suspended and holding, therefore, that reasonable suspicion justified the stop of defendant for driving without a valid license five months later); St 2007See generally Pierre, 484 F.3d at 84 (reasoning that the fact that (1) the officer had personal knowledge that the defendant’s license had been suspended for the entire previous year and (2) the officer had not been informed by fellow officers that the defendant’s license status had changed—where such information would be of interest in the on-going investigation—lent credence to the officer’s assumption that the defendant’s license remained suspended and holding, therefore, that reasonable suspicion justified the stop of defendant for driving without a valid license five months later); State | 1 | 1 |
State v. Carrsgreen2 sentences2007See generally Pierre, 484 F.3d at 84 (reasoning that the fact that (1) the officer had personal knowledge that the defendant's license had been suspended for the entire previous year and (2) the officer had not been informed by fellow officers that the defendant's license status had changed where such information would be of interest in the on-going investigation lent credence to the officer's assumption that the defendant's license remained suspended and holding, therefore, that reasonable suspicion justified the stop of defendant for driving without a valid license five months later); St 2007See generally Pierre, 484 F.3d at 84 (reasoning that the fact that (1) the officer had personal knowledge that the defendant’s license had been suspended for the entire previous year and (2) the officer had not been informed by fellow officers that the defendant’s license status had changed—where such information would be of interest in the on-going investigation—lent credence to the officer’s assumption that the defendant’s license remained suspended and holding, therefore, that reasonable suspicion justified the stop of defendant for driving without a valid license five months later); State | 1 | 1 |
State v. DeCoteaugreen2 sentences2007See generally Pierre, 484 F.3d at 84 (reasoning that the fact that (1) the officer had personal knowledge that the defendant's license had been suspended for the entire previous year and (2) the officer had not been informed by fellow officers that the defendant's license status had changed where such information would be of interest in the on-going investigation lent credence to the officer's assumption that the defendant's license remained suspended and holding, therefore, that reasonable suspicion justified the stop of defendant for driving without a valid license five months later); St 2007See generally Pierre, 484 F.3d at 84 (reasoning that the fact that (1) the officer had personal knowledge that the defendant’s license had been suspended for the entire previous year and (2) the officer had not been informed by fellow officers that the defendant’s license status had changed—where such information would be of interest in the on-going investigation—lent credence to the officer’s assumption that the defendant’s license remained suspended and holding, therefore, that reasonable suspicion justified the stop of defendant for driving without a valid license five months later); State | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wadegreen2 sentences2007See generally Pierre, 484 F.3d at 84 (reasoning that the fact that (1) the officer had personal knowledge that the defendant's license had been suspended for the entire previous year and (2) the officer had not been informed by fellow officers that the defendant's license status had changed where such information would be of interest in the on-going investigation lent credence to the officer's assumption that the defendant's license remained suspended and holding, therefore, that reasonable suspicion justified the stop of defendant for driving without a valid license five months later); St 2007See generally Pierre, 484 F.3d at 84 (reasoning that the fact that (1) the officer had personal knowledge that the defendant’s license had been suspended for the entire previous year and (2) the officer had not been informed by fellow officers that the defendant’s license status had changed—where such information would be of interest in the on-going investigation—lent credence to the officer’s assumption that the defendant’s license remained suspended and holding, therefore, that reasonable suspicion justified the stop of defendant for driving without a valid license five months later); State | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Manuelgreen2 sentences1998Miller v. Manuel, 9 Haw.App. 56, 65 , 828 P.2d 286, 292 (1991), cert. denied, 72 Haw. 618 , 841 P.2d 1075 (1992). 1998Miller v. Manuel, 9 Haw.App. 56, 65 , 828 P.2d 286, 292 (1991), cert. denied, 72 Haw. 618 , 841 P.2d 1075 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1998See Prudential-LMI Comm. Ins. v. Superior Court, 51 Cal.3d 674 , 274 Cal.Rptr. 387 , 798 P.2d 1230 (1990) (holding as discussed below); Kassab v. Michigan Basic Prop. 1998See Prudential-LMI Comm. Ins. v. Superior Court, 51 Cal.3d 674 , 274 Cal.Rptr. 387 , 798 P.2d 1230 (1990) (holding as discussed below); Kassab v. Michigan Basic Prop. | 1 | 1 |
Cuba v. Fernandezgreen2 sentences1994Cuba v. Fernandez, 71 Haw. 627, 636 , 801 P.2d 1208, 1213 (1990). 1994Cuba v. Fernandez, 71 Haw. 627, 636 , 801 P.2d 1208, 1213 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Enoka v. AIG Hawaii Ins. Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences2012Willis asserts the following points of error in this appeal: (1) the circuit court erred in granting First Insurance’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the bad faith and emotional distress claims; (2) the circuit court erred in denying Willis’s motion to compel discovery as moot because discovery was critical in determining Willis’s claims against First Insurance, including the bad faith and emotional distress claims; (3) the circuit court erred in determining that the prior appeal resolved an open question of law and that Enoka v. AIG Hawaii Insurance Co., 109 Hawai'i 537 , 128 P.3d 2012Willis asserts the following points of error in this appeal: (1) the circuit court erred in granting First Insurance’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the bad faith and emotional distress claims; (2) the circuit court erred in denying Willis’s motion to compel discovery as moot because discovery was critical in determining Willis’s claims against First Insurance, including the bad faith and emotional distress claims; (3) the circuit court erred in determining that the prior appeal resolved an open question of law and that Enoka v. AIG Hawaii Insurance Co., 109 Hawai'i 537 , 128 P.3d | 2 | 2012–2013 |
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Pacific Rent-All, Inc.
green
2 sentences2025Id. at 322, 978 P.2d at 760 . 8 The circuit court preserved a count arising from an insurance claim for damage to another injured party’s automobile, which was subsequently voluntarily dismissed. 2025State Farm, 90 Hawaiʻi at 321-22, 978 P.2d at 759-60 . 12 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Two issues were presented before this court: 1) did the insured have authority to settle the other injured parties’ claims against the tortfeasor; and 2) did the insured’s settlement destroy State Farm’s subrogation claims against the tortfeasor? | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Christiansen v. First Insurance Co. of Hawaii, Ltd.
green
2 sentences2013Id. 2013Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Willis v. Swain
green
2 sentences2012Willis appeals from the circuit court’s Final Judgment filed on December 11, 2008 which entered judgment in favor of First Insurance and against Willis with respect to all claims not specifically addressed in the Hawai'i Supreme Court’s opinion in the first appeal, Willis v. Swain, 112 Hawai'i 184 , 145 P.3d 727 (2006) (Willis I). 2012Willis appeals from the circuit court’s Final Judgment filed on December 11, 2008 which entered judgment in favor of First Insurance and against Willis with respect to all claims not specifically addressed in the Hawai'i Supreme Court’s opinion in the first appeal, Willis v. Swain, 112 Hawai'i 184 , 145 P.3d 727 (2006) (Willis I). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Carroll
green
2 sentences2004Defendant argues that the negligent injury case is so closely related in time (everything occurred on the same day), place (City and County of Honolulu, State of Hawai'i), and circumstances (the accident was caused by Defendant, Defendant knew that he did not have insurance, Defendant made a false insurance claim related to the accident) that a complete account of one charge (insurance fraud) cannot be related without referring to details of the other (negligent injury). “[P]roximity in time, place, and circumstances of the offenses will necessarily enter into, the policy considerations underl 2004Defendant argues that the negligent injury case is so closely related in time (everything occurred on the same day), place (City and County of Honolulu, State of Hawai'i), and circumstances (the accident was caused by Defendant, Defendant knew that he did not have insurance, Defendant made a false insurance claim related to the accident) that a complete account of one charge (insurance fraud) cannot be related without referring to details of the other (negligent injury). “[P]roximity in time, place, and circumstances of the offenses will necessarily enter into, the policy considerations underl | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Zieba v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.
green
1 sentence1998Zieba, 549 F.Supp. at 1323 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Stratis v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.
green
1 sentence1996App. 1 , 739 P.2d 251 (1987), an insured brought an action against its insurer alleging breach of contract and bad faith settlement of the insurance claim. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.