payment claim in Maryland

18 Maryland opinions name it 3 courts 1847–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

Case	Followed	Cited
Philbin v. Thurngreen md · 1906 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1978–1998 2 sentences 1998Philbin v. Thurn, 103 Md. 342, 351 , 63 A. 571, 574 (1906); see Belcher v. Gov’t Employees Ins. 1998Philbin v. Thurn, 103 Md. 342, 351 , 63 A. 571, 574 (1906); see Belcher v. Gov’t Employees Ins.	2	2
Ricci v. DeStefanogreen scotus · 2009 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025 1 sentence 2025As discussed above in note 14, it appears that the rent for the unit Ms. Hare desired was only slightly above the Local Department’s applicable payment standard. 18 557 U.S. 557, 577 (2009) (quoting Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Tr., 487 U.S. 977, 985-86 (1988)); see also Kosereis, 331 F.3d at 214 (“To successfully allege disparate treatment, a plaintiff must show ‘that others similarly situated to him in all relevant respects were treated differently by the employer.’” (quoting Conward, 171 F.3d at 20 )).	1	1
Kosereis v. Department forgreen ca1 · 2003 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025 1 sentence 2025As discussed above in note 14, it appears that the rent for the unit Ms. Hare desired was only slightly above the Local Department’s applicable payment standard. 18 557 U.S. 557, 577 (2009) (quoting Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Tr., 487 U.S. 977, 985-86 (1988)); see also Kosereis, 331 F.3d at 214 (“To successfully allege disparate treatment, a plaintiff must show ‘that others similarly situated to him in all relevant respects were treated differently by the employer.’” (quoting Conward, 171 F.3d at 20 )).	1	1
Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trustgreen scotus · 1988 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025 1 sentence 2025As discussed above in note 14, it appears that the rent for the unit Ms. Hare desired was only slightly above the Local Department’s applicable payment standard. 18 557 U.S. 557, 577 (2009) (quoting Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Tr., 487 U.S. 977, 985-86 (1988)); see also Kosereis, 331 F.3d at 214 (“To successfully allege disparate treatment, a plaintiff must show ‘that others similarly situated to him in all relevant respects were treated differently by the employer.’” (quoting Conward, 171 F.3d at 20 )).	1	1
Thomas Conward v. The Cambridge School Committeegreen ca1 · 1999 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025 1 sentence 2025As discussed above in note 14, it appears that the rent for the unit Ms. Hare desired was only slightly above the Local Department’s applicable payment standard. 18 557 U.S. 557, 577 (2009) (quoting Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Tr., 487 U.S. 977, 985-86 (1988)); see also Kosereis, 331 F.3d at 214 (“To successfully allege disparate treatment, a plaintiff must show ‘that others similarly situated to him in all relevant respects were treated differently by the employer.’” (quoting Conward, 171 F.3d at 20 )).	1	1
Freeform Pools, Inc. v. Strawbridge Home for Boys, Inc.green md · 1962 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006 2 sentences 2006That bent of the statute in favor of subcontractors has always been subject to the caveat, however, that, as a mechanic’s lien was unknown at common law and is purely a creature of statute, it is “obtainable only if the requirements of the statute are complied with.” Freeform Pools v. Strawbridge, 228 Md. 297, 301 , 179 A.2d 683, 685 (1962); Aviles v. Eshelman Elec. 2006That bent of the statute in favor of subcontractors has always been subject to the caveat, however, that, as a mechanic’s lien was unknown at common law and is purely a creature of statute, it is “obtainable only if the requirements of the statute are complied with.” Freeform Pools v. Strawbridge, 228 Md. 297, 301 , 179 A.2d 683, 685 (1962); Aviles v. Eshelman Elec.	1	1
N. Hess & Brother v. Jewellgreen md · 1897 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966 2 sentences 1966In Hess v. Jewell, 85 Md. 235, 238 , 36 Atl. 758, 759 (1897), Judge Roberts, after quoting Judge McSherry, had this to say: 45 “The appellants insist that notwithstanding the Act of 1888, ch. 383 [§ 15 of Art. 47], they are entitled to priority in the payment of their claim for rent, and urge that although the Act in question was passed in 1888, yet no attempt has ever been made to place such a construction upon its provisions as that contended for by said employees, who are appellees here. 1966In Hess v. Jewell, 85 Md. 235, 238 , 36 Atl. 758, 759 (1897), Judge Roberts, after quoting Judge McSherry, had this to say: 45 “The appellants insist that notwithstanding the Act of 1888, ch. 383 [§ 15 of Art. 47], they are entitled to priority in the payment of their claim for rent, and urge that although the Act in question was passed in 1888, yet no attempt has ever been made to place such a construction upon its provisions as that contended for by said employees, who are appellees here.	1	1
New York & Baltimore Transportation Line & Southern Pacific Co. v. Lewis Baer & Co.green · 1912 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1956–1956 2 sentences 1956See New York and Baltimore Transportation Line v. Baer, 118 Md. 73 , 84 A. 251 , in which it was held that a statement by the local freight agent for a railroad of the justness of the claim of consignees of a shipment and of the willingness of his company to pay it was not admissible in evidence where it was not shown that he had the authority to pay, settle or even admit the payment of a claim by the company or that he was permitted by the company to hold himself out as 7 having such authority (and later testified that he did not have such authority); Hoffman v. Cumberland Valley R.R. 1956See New York and Baltimore Transportation Line v. Baer, 118 Md. 73 , 84 A. 251 , in which it was held that a statement by the local freight agent for a railroad of the justness of the claim of consignees of a shipment and of the willingness of his company to pay it was not admissible in evidence where it was not shown that he had the authority to pay, settle or even admit the payment of a claim by the company or that he was permitted by the company to hold himself out as 7 having such authority (and later testified that he did not have such authority); Hoffman v. Cumberland Valley R.R.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (28)

Case	Cited	Years
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green green scotus · 1973 1 sentence 2025When there is an appropriate federal analog, as is the case here, we assess disparate treatment claims involving circumstantial evidence of a discriminatory motive under the three-step framework adopted by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973).	1	2025–2025
Galloway Corp. v. S.B. Ballard Construction Co. green va · 1995 1 sentence 2018Id. at 353 .	1	2018–2018
Marr v. Marr green nj · 1908 1 sentence 2007Marr, 70 A. at 379 .	1	2007–2007
Stettner v. Twin Double TV, Inc. neutral nyappdiv · 1970 1 sentence 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini	1	1994–1994
Buffalo Cement Co. v. McNaughton green nysupct · 1895 1 sentence 1994An ordinance of the city required inclusion of the payment clause in performance bonds, and the ordinance also required “ ‘a further clause authorizing each and every such person to bring an action upon such bond, in the same manner and with the same effect as if he were specifically named in the bond.’ ” 35 N.Y.S. at 454 .	1	1994–1994
Gross v. Vogel green nyappdiv · 1981 2 sentences 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini	1	1994–1994
Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke green texapp · 1977 1 sentence 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini	1	1994–1994
Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc. green nyappdiv · 1986 2 sentences 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini	1	1994–1994
Freiberg v. Freiberg green nyappdiv · 1991 1 sentence 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini	1	1994–1994
Goldfinger v. Brown green nyappdiv · 1991 1 sentence 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini	1	1994–1994
Renfroe v. Ladd green kyctapp · 1985 1 sentence 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini	1	1994–1994
Mildfelt v. Lair green kan · 1977 2 sentences 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini	1	1994–1994
Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee green texapp · 1992 1 sentence 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini	1	1994–1994
Quinn v. Beverages of W. Va., Inc. green wva · 1976 1 sentence 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini	1	1994–1994
Quinn v. Beverages of West Virginia, Inc. green wva · 1976 1 sentence 1994Section 8-319 has been applied to employment contracts in Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557 , 561 P.2d 805 (1977); Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky.Ct.App.1985); Goldfinger v. Brown, 169 A.D.2d 702 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 738 , 501 N.Y.S.2d 398 (1986); Gross v. Vogel, 81 A.D.2d 576 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 431 (1981); Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 924 , 311 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1970); Beta Drilling, Inc. v. Durkee, 821 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Ct.App.1992); Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrooke, 557 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Ct.App.1977); and Quinn v. Beverages of West Virgini	1	1994–1994
Pentz v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance green · 1901 2 sentences 1980Co., 92 Md. 444, 448 , 48 A. 139 (1901), the Court said, “The word settlement, as ordinarily used, may mean a compromise for peace’s sake of a claim, the validity of which is denied or it may signify the payment of a claim to the extent to which it is conceded to be due.” This was a settlement agreement which should have been disclosed pursuant to the pretrial order. b. 1980Co., 92 Md. 444, 448 , 48 A. 139 (1901), the Court said, “The word settlement, as ordinarily used, may mean a compromise for peace’s sake of a claim, the validity of which is denied or it may signify the payment of a claim to the extent to which it is conceded to be due.” This was a settlement agreement which should have been disclosed pursuant to the pretrial order. b.	1	1980–1980
Bogart v. Willis green md · 1930 2 sentences 1959This Court decided for the creditor, saying: "This language of the statute has been held to be a statutory bar, and not a statute of limitations which may be waived. * * * "The use of the term `waived' is not intended to express the meaning that the executor or administrator may not later bind the estate to a payment of the claim either in whole or in part." The Court cited Bogart v. Willis, supra , in support of this statement and said that in that case "the court held and established the construction that the meaning of the language of the statute is not to preclude the operation of other pr 1959This Court decided for the creditor, saying: “This language of the statute has been held to be a statutory bar, and not a statute of limitations which may be waived. * * * “The use of the term ‘waived’ is not intended to express the meaning that the executor or administrator may not later bind the estate to a payment of the claim either in whole or in part.” The Court cited Bogart v. Willis, supra, in support of this statement and said that in that case "the court held and established the construction that the meaning of the language of the statute is not to preclude the operation of other pri	1	1959–1959
American Towing & Lightering Co. v. Baker-Whiteley Coal Co. green · 1909 1 sentence 1956Co., 85 Md. 391 , 37 A. 214 , cited in the New York and Baltimore Transportation Case, which held proof of authority of a station agent to make a contract involving liability beyond the carrier's own line to be necessary; American Towing Co. v. Baker-Whiteley Coal Co., 111 Md. 504 , 75 A. 341 , in which a statement by the secretary of a corporation that a hawser used by the corporation in towing certain scows was an improper one and that the loss was due to its use, was held inadmissible; Potts v. Armour & Co., 183 Md. 483 , 39 A.2d 552 (cited by both parties), in which it was held that statem	1	1956–1956
Potts v. Armour & Co. green md · 1944 2 sentences 1956Co., 85 Md. 391 , 37 A. 214 , cited in the New York and Baltimore Transportation Case, which held proof of authority of a station agent to make a contract involving liability beyond the carrier's own line to be necessary; American Towing Co. v. Baker-Whiteley Coal Co., 111 Md. 504 , 75 A. 341 , in which a statement by the secretary of a corporation that a hawser used by the corporation in towing certain scows was an improper one and that the loss was due to its use, was held inadmissible; Potts v. Armour & Co., 183 Md. 483 , 39 A.2d 552 (cited by both parties), in which it was held that statem 1956Co., 85 Md. 391 , 37 A. 214 , cited in the New York and Baltimore Transportation Case, which held proof of authority of a station agent to make a contract involving liability beyond the carrier's own line to be necessary; American Towing Co. v. Baker-Whiteley Coal Co., 111 Md. 504 , 75 A. 341 , in which a statement by the secretary of a corporation that a hawser used by the corporation in towing certain scows was an improper one and that the loss was due to its use, was held inadmissible; Potts v. Armour & Co., 183 Md. 483 , 39 A.2d 552 (cited by both parties), in which it was held that statem	1	1956–1956
McCubbin v. Stanford green md · 1897 1 sentence 1956Co., 85 Md. 391 , 37 A. 214 , cited in the New York and Baltimore Transportation Case, which held proof of authority of a station agent to make a contract involving liability beyond the carrier's own line to be necessary; American Towing Co. v. Baker-Whiteley Coal Co., 111 Md. 504 , 75 A. 341 , in which a statement by the secretary of a corporation that a hawser used by the corporation in towing certain scows was an improper one and that the loss was due to its use, was held inadmissible; Potts v. Armour & Co., 183 Md. 483 , 39 A.2d 552 (cited by both parties), in which it was held that statem	1	1956–1956
Hoffman & Thomas v. Cumberland Valley Railroad neutral md · 1897 1 sentence 1956Co., 85 Md. 391 , 37 A. 214 , cited in the New York and Baltimore Transportation Case, which held proof of authority of a station agent to make a contract involving liability beyond the carrier's own line to be necessary; American Towing Co. v. Baker-Whiteley Coal Co., 111 Md. 504 , 75 A. 341 , in which a statement by the secretary of a corporation that a hawser used by the corporation in towing certain scows was an improper one and that the loss was due to its use, was held inadmissible; Potts v. Armour & Co., 183 Md. 483 , 39 A.2d 552 (cited by both parties), in which it was held that statem	1	1956–1956
Wilmer v. Placide neutral md · 1917 2 sentences 1932Schaferman v. O’Brien, 28 Md. 565, 575 ; Wilmer v. Placide, 131 Md. 399, 406 , 102 A. 541 . 1932Schaferman v. O’Brien, 28 Md. 565, 575 ; Wilmer v. Placide, 131 Md. 399, 406 , 102 A. 541 .	1	1932–1932
Schaferman v. O'Brien green · 1868	1	1932–1932
Dixon v. Clayville green md · 1876	1	1931–1931
Rankin v. Crane green mich · 1895	1	1922–1922
Treusch v. Shryock green · 1879	1	1916–1916
Lewis v. Fisher green md · 1894	1	1897–1897
Astor v. Miller green · 1830	1	1847–1847

Where else courts name it

NY 128 (1848–2026) CA 72 (1860–2026) IL 69 (1885–2024) FL 58 (1922–2024) TX 54 (1873–2023) GA 36 (1895–2017) OR 34 (1897–2024) IN 32 (1875–2023) PA 31 (1842–2022) CT 30 (1913–2025) AL 30 (1856–2011) OH 25 (1886–2024) WA 19 (1901–2017) LA 19 (1855–2021) MI 18 (1898–2025) MD 18 (1847–2025) IA 18 (1873–2004) KS 17 (1889–1981) NJ 17 (1889–2022) KY 16 (1865–2024) AZ 15 (1906–2021) WV 15 (1900–2022) OK 15 (1892–2010) AR 14 (1909–2004) TN 14 (1921–2014) MO 14 (1868–2014) NE 14 (1882–1980) CO 13 (1885–2014) MA 10 (1873–2004) VA 10 (1884–2024) NC 9 (1902–1993) SD 7 (1905–1959) WY 7 (1905–2021) NM 7 (1885–2024) WI 6 (1881–2013) MT 6 (1897–1952) UT 6 (1926–2021) MN 5 (1864–1993) VT 5 (1861–1990) ID 5 (1915–2014) RI 4 (1895–2014) MS 4 (1922–1961) HI 4 (1922–2010) NV 3 (1986–2014) ND 3 (1919–1985) SC 2 (1960–1960) DE 2 (1934–2022) NH 2 (1869–1882)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check