payment claim (Wyoming) · Go Syfert
← Wyoming issues

payment claim in Wyoming

7 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1905–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Houtz v. Board of Commissionersgreen
· 1902 · cited in 1 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011Admittedly, this analysis seems to be novel as there was no precedent discovered which would support the Court's findings. (emphasis in original). [¶ 15] In Houtz v. Board of Comm'rs of Uinta County, 11 Wyo. 152, 168 , 70 P. 840, 842 (Wyo.1902), this Court said in essence that the purposes of requiring a full itemized statement were twofold: to give governmental entities the information they need to intelligently consider claims made against them and to provide taxpayers a means of assessing governmental expenditures.

2011Admittedly, this analysis seems to be novel as there was no precedent discovered which would support the Court's findings. (emphasis in original). [¶ 15] In Houtz v. Board of Comm'rs of Uinta County, 11 Wyo. 152, 168 , 70 P. 840, 842 (Wyo.1902), this Court said in essence that the purposes of requiring a full itemized statement were twofold: to give governmental entities the information they need to intelligently consider claims made against them and to provide taxpayers a means of assessing governmental expenditures.

11
Gray v. Littlegreen
calctapp · 1929 · cited in 1 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 1960–1960
2 sentences

1960And yet this could be done in a large proportion of cases if mere grounds of suspicion of their solvency were sufficient for the purpose.” In Gray v. Little, 97 Cal.App. 442 , 275 P. 870, 871, 872 , the court succinctly stated some of the principles applicable as follows : “The fact alone that a creditor knows his debtor to be financially embarrassed and is pressing for a payment of his claim is not sufficient to charge him with having reasonable cause to believe his debtor to be insolvent.

1960And yet this could be done in a large proportion of cases if mere grounds of suspicion of their solvency were sufficient for the purpose.” In Gray v. Little, 97 Cal.App. 442 , 275 P. 870, 871, 872 , the court succinctly stated some of the principles applicable as follows : “The fact alone that a creditor knows his debtor to be financially embarrassed and is pressing for a payment of his claim is not sufficient to charge him with having reasonable cause to believe his debtor to be insolvent.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Boyle v. Boyle green
wyo · 2006
1 sentence

2021If the husband could not pay by the deadline, he was required “to continue spousal support of $2,500 per month, not to be credited against the judgment, until the debt was paid.” Boyle, ¶ 23, 143 P.3d at 374-75 .

12021–2021
Sharpe v. Allender neutral
ca3 · 1909
1 sentence

1960Sharpe v. Allender (C.C.A.) 170 F. 589 ; Page v. Moore, (D.C.), 179 F. 988 .

11960–1960
Page v. Moore neutral
paed · 1910
1 sentence

1960Sharpe v. Allender (C.C.A.) 170 F. 589 ; Page v. Moore, (D.C.), 179 F. 988 .

11960–1960
Modern Woodmen of America v. Headle neutral
vt · 1914
2 sentences

1939But, where the rights of others have become vested by a member’s death, the society cannot and does not waive such rights by paying the fund into court.” In similar vein the Supreme Court of Vermont, citing many authorities, in Modern Woodmen of America v. Headle, 88 Vt. 37 , 90 Atl. 893 , remarked: “It is also said that it waived the provisions of the by-laws by paying the fund into court and asking that the adverse claimants be required to interplead.

1939But, where the rights of others have become vested by a member’s death, the society cannot and does not waive such rights by paying the fund into court.” In similar vein the Supreme Court of Vermont, citing many authorities, in Modern Woodmen of America v. Headle, 88 Vt. 37 , 90 Atl. 893 , remarked: “It is also said that it waived the provisions of the by-laws by paying the fund into court and asking that the adverse claimants be required to interplead.

11939–1939
Hamblin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society green
neb · 1933
1 sentence

1935Soc., 124 Nebr. 841, 248 N. W. 397 , which arose under the identical policy here involved, and in which the insurer must have made an exhaustive investigation in the state of the residence of the insured in connection with the payment of the claim.

11935–1935
State ex rel. Norfolk Beet-Sugar Co. v. Moore green
· 1896
1 sentence

1924Restine v. State, 20 Ind. 328 ; State v. Moore, 50 Nebr. 88, 69 N. W. 373 , 61 Am.

11924–1924
Ristine v. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners of the Sinking Fund green
ind · 1863
1 sentence

1924Restine v. State, 20 Ind. 328 ; State v. Moore, 50 Nebr. 88, 69 N. W. 373 , 61 Am.

11924–1924
People Ex Rel. Cooke v. . Wood green
ny · 1877
1 sentence

1905Wood, 71 N. Y., 371 , was a suit in mandamus to compel the payment of a claim against a village.

11905–1905

Where else courts name it

NY 128 (1848–2026) CA 72 (1860–2026) IL 69 (1885–2024) FL 58 (1922–2024) TX 54 (1873–2023) GA 36 (1895–2017) OR 34 (1897–2024) IN 32 (1875–2023) PA 31 (1842–2022) CT 30 (1913–2025) AL 30 (1856–2011) OH 25 (1886–2024) WA 19 (1901–2017) LA 19 (1855–2021) MI 18 (1898–2025) MD 18 (1847–2025) IA 18 (1873–2004) KS 17 (1889–1981) NJ 17 (1889–2022) KY 16 (1865–2024) AZ 15 (1906–2021) WV 15 (1900–2022) OK 15 (1892–2010) AR 14 (1909–2004) TN 14 (1921–2014) MO 14 (1868–2014) NE 14 (1882–1980) CO 13 (1885–2014) MA 10 (1873–2004) VA 10 (1884–2024) NC 9 (1902–1993) SD 7 (1905–1959) WY 7 (1905–2021) NM 7 (1885–2024) WI 6 (1881–2013) MT 6 (1897–1952) UT 6 (1926–2021) MN 5 (1864–1993) VT 5 (1861–1990) ID 5 (1915–2014) RI 4 (1895–2014) MS 4 (1922–1961) HI 4 (1922–2010) NV 3 (1986–2014) ND 3 (1919–1985) SC 2 (1960–1960) DE 2 (1934–2022) NH 2 (1869–1882)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check