17 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1895–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Richards v. Midland Brick Sales Co.green2 sentences2010The economic loss doctrine has been characterized as “a generally recognized principle of law that plaintiffs cannot recover in tort when they have suffered only economic harm.” 5 Richards v. Midland *693 Brick Sales Co., 551 N.W.2d 649, 650 (Iowa Ct.App.1996). 2010The economic loss doctrine has been characterized as “a generally recognized principle of law that plaintiffs cannot recover in tort when they have suffered only economic harm.” 5 Richards v. Midland Brick Sales Co., 551 N.W.2d 649, 650 (Iowa Ct. App. 1996). | 2 | 2 |
State of Iowa v. Spauldinggreen2 sentences2009L.Q. 43 , 56 (2000))); State v. Spaulding, 313 N.W.2d 878, 880 (Iowa 1981) ("The prior acts with the victim were admissible under a generally recognized exception to the above `exclusionary rule' in order `to show a passion or propensity for illicit sexual relations with the particular person concerned in the crime on trial.'" (quoting McCormick's Handbook on the Law of Evidence, § 190, at 449 (2d ed. E. 2009L.Q. 43 , 56 (2000))); State v. Spaulding, 313 N.W.2d 878, 880 (Iowa 1981) (“The prior acts with the victim were admissible under a generally recognized exception to the above ‘exclusionary rule’ in order ‘to show a passion or propensity for illicit sexual relations with the particular person concerned in the crime on trial.’ ” (quoting McCormick’s Handbook on the Law of Evidence, § 190, at 449 (2d ed. E. | 2 | 2 |
Powell v. Khodari-Intergreen Co.green1 sentence2016“It is a generally recognized principle that a statute of one state has no extraterritorial effect beyond its borders.” Powell v. Khodari-Intergreen Co., 334 N.W.2d 127, 131 (Iowa 1983). | 1 | 1 |
Nebraska Innkeepers, Inc. v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corp.green1 sentence1996Nelson v. Todd’s Ltd., 426 N.W.2d 120, 123 (Iowa 1988); Nebraska Innkeepers Inc. v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corp., 345 N.W.2d 124, 126 (Iowa 1984). | 1 | 1 |
Nelson v. Todd's Ltd.green1 sentence1996Nelson v. Todd’s Ltd., 426 N.W.2d 120, 123 (Iowa 1988); Nebraska Innkeepers Inc. v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corp., 345 N.W.2d 124, 126 (Iowa 1984). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.green2 sentences1983United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 , 57 S.Ct. 216, 220 , 81 L.Ed. 255, 261 (1936); Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgan, 415 F.Supp. 319, 321 (S.D.Ga.1976); Singer v. Magnavox Co., 380 A.2d'969, 981 (Del.1977); State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 199 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; National Bank of Topeka v. Mitchell, 154 Kan. 276, 281 , 118 P.2d 519, 522 (1941); Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gonzalez, 48 Ariz. 260, 273 , 61 P.2d 377, 382 (1936). 1983United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 , 57 S.Ct. 216, 220 , 81 L.Ed. 255, 261 (1936); Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgan, 415 F.Supp. 319, 321 (S.D.Ga.1976); Singer v. Magnavox Co., 380 A.2d'969, 981 (Del.1977); State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 199 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; National Bank of Topeka v. Mitchell, 154 Kan. 276, 281 , 118 P.2d 519, 522 (1941); Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gonzalez, 48 Ariz. 260, 273 , 61 P.2d 377, 382 (1936). | 1 | 1 |
Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgangreen1 sentence1983United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 , 57 S.Ct. 216, 220 , 81 L.Ed. 255, 261 (1936); Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgan, 415 F.Supp. 319, 321 (S.D.Ga.1976); Singer v. Magnavox Co., 380 A.2d'969, 981 (Del.1977); State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 199 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; National Bank of Topeka v. Mitchell, 154 Kan. 276, 281 , 118 P.2d 519, 522 (1941); Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gonzalez, 48 Ariz. 260, 273 , 61 P.2d 377, 382 (1936). | 1 | 1 |
National Bank v. Mitchellgreen2 sentences1983United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 , 57 S.Ct. 216, 220 , 81 L.Ed. 255, 261 (1936); Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgan, 415 F.Supp. 319, 321 (S.D.Ga.1976); Singer v. Magnavox Co., 380 A.2d'969, 981 (Del.1977); State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 199 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; National Bank of Topeka v. Mitchell, 154 Kan. 276, 281 , 118 P.2d 519, 522 (1941); Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gonzalez, 48 Ariz. 260, 273 , 61 P.2d 377, 382 (1936). 1983United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 , 57 S.Ct. 216, 220 , 81 L.Ed. 255, 261 (1936); Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgan, 415 F.Supp. 319, 321 (S.D.Ga.1976); Singer v. Magnavox Co., 380 A.2d'969, 981 (Del.1977); State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 199 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; National Bank of Topeka v. Mitchell, 154 Kan. 276, 281 , 118 P.2d 519, 522 (1941); Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gonzalez, 48 Ariz. 260, 273 , 61 P.2d 377, 382 (1936). | 1 | 1 |
Southern Pacific Railroad Co. of Mexico v. Gonzalezgreen2 sentences1983United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 , 57 S.Ct. 216, 220 , 81 L.Ed. 255, 261 (1936); Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgan, 415 F.Supp. 319, 321 (S.D.Ga.1976); Singer v. Magnavox Co., 380 A.2d'969, 981 (Del.1977); State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 199 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; National Bank of Topeka v. Mitchell, 154 Kan. 276, 281 , 118 P.2d 519, 522 (1941); Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gonzalez, 48 Ariz. 260, 273 , 61 P.2d 377, 382 (1936). 1983United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 , 57 S.Ct. 216, 220 , 81 L.Ed. 255, 261 (1936); Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgan, 415 F.Supp. 319, 321 (S.D.Ga.1976); Singer v. Magnavox Co., 380 A.2d'969, 981 (Del.1977); State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 199 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; National Bank of Topeka v. Mitchell, 154 Kan. 276, 281 , 118 P.2d 519, 522 (1941); Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gonzalez, 48 Ariz. 260, 273 , 61 P.2d 377, 382 (1936). | 1 | 1 |
State of California, Department of Mental Hygiene v. Copusgreen2 sentences1983United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 , 57 S.Ct. 216, 220 , 81 L.Ed. 255, 261 (1936); Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgan, 415 F.Supp. 319, 321 (S.D.Ga.1976); Singer v. Magnavox Co., 380 A.2d'969, 981 (Del.1977); State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 199 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; National Bank of Topeka v. Mitchell, 154 Kan. 276, 281 , 118 P.2d 519, 522 (1941); Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gonzalez, 48 Ariz. 260, 273 , 61 P.2d 377, 382 (1936). 1983United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 , 57 S.Ct. 216, 220 , 81 L.Ed. 255, 261 (1936); Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgan, 415 F.Supp. 319, 321 (S.D.Ga.1976); Singer v. Magnavox Co., 380 A.2d'969, 981 (Del.1977); State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 199 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; National Bank of Topeka v. Mitchell, 154 Kan. 276, 281 , 118 P.2d 519, 522 (1941); Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gonzalez, 48 Ariz. 260, 273 , 61 P.2d 377, 382 (1936). | 1 | 1 |
Merry v. Stategreen2 sentences1981Cleary 1972); State v. Maestas, 224 N.W.2d 248, 250 (Iowa 1974); State v. Rankin, 181 N.W.2d 169, 171 (Iowa 1970); State v. Kinkade, 241 Iowa 1259, 1261-62 , 43 N.W.2d 736, 738 (1950); State v. Neubauer, 145 Iowa 337, 345-46 , 124 N.W. 312, 315 (1910); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 12 (1978); Annot., 77 A.L.R.2d 841 (1961); Annot., 167 A.L.R. 565 (1947); Merry v. State, 166 Ind.App. 199 , 335 N.E.2d 249, 262 (Ind.App.1975). 1981Cleary 1972); State v. Maestas, 224 N.W.2d 248, 250 (Iowa 1974); State v. Rankin, 181 N.W.2d 169, 171 (Iowa 1970); State v. Kinkade, 241 Iowa 1259, 1261-62 , 43 N.W.2d 736, 738 (1950); State v. Neubauer, 145 Iowa 337, 345-46 , 124 N.W. 312, 315 (1910); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 12 (1978); Annot., 77 A.L.R.2d 841 (1961); Annot., 167 A.L.R. 565 (1947); Merry v. State, 166 Ind.App. 199 , 335 N.E.2d 249, 262 (Ind.App.1975). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Maestasgreen2 sentences1981Cleary 1972); State v. Maestas, 224 N.W.2d 248, 250 (Iowa 1974); State v. Rankin, 181 N.W.2d 169, 171 (Iowa 1970); State v. Kinkade, 241 Iowa 1259, 1261-62 , 43 N.W.2d 736, 738 (1950); State v. Neubauer, 145 Iowa 337, 345-46 , 124 N.W. 312, 315 (1910); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 12 (1978); Annot., 77 A.L.R.2d 841 (1961); Annot., 167 A.L.R. 565 *881 (1947); Merry v. State, 166 Ind.App. 199 , 335 N.E.2d 249, 262 (Ind.App.1975). 1981Cleary 1972); State v. Maestas, 224 N.W.2d 248, 250 (Iowa 1974); State v. Rankin, 181 N.W.2d 169, 171 (Iowa 1970); State v. Kinkade, 241 Iowa 1259, 1261-62 , 43 N.W.2d 736, 738 (1950); State v. Neubauer, 145 Iowa 337, 345-46 , 124 N.W. 312, 315 (1910); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 12 (1978); Annot., 77 A.L.R.2d 841 (1961); Annot., 167 A.L.R. 565 (1947); Merry v. State, 166 Ind.App. 199 , 335 N.E.2d 249, 262 (Ind.App.1975). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kinkadegreen2 sentences1981Cleary 1972); State v. Maestas, 224 N.W.2d 248, 250 (Iowa 1974); State v. Rankin, 181 N.W.2d 169, 171 (Iowa 1970); State v. Kinkade, 241 Iowa 1259, 1261-62 , 43 N.W.2d 736, 738 (1950); State v. Neubauer, 145 Iowa 337, 345-46 , 124 N.W. 312, 315 (1910); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 12 (1978); Annot., 77 A.L.R.2d 841 (1961); Annot., 167 A.L.R. 565 (1947); Merry v. State, 166 Ind.App. 199 , 335 N.E.2d 249, 262 (Ind.App.1975). 1981Cleary 1972); State v. Maestas, 224 N.W.2d 248, 250 (Iowa 1974); State v. Rankin, 181 N.W.2d 169, 171 (Iowa 1970); State v. Kinkade, 241 Iowa 1259, 1261-62 , 43 N.W.2d 736, 738 (1950); State v. Neubauer, 145 Iowa 337, 345-46 , 124 N.W. 312, 315 (1910); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 12 (1978); Annot., 77 A.L.R.2d 841 (1961); Annot., 167 A.L.R. 565 (1947); Merry v. State, 166 Ind.App. 199 , 335 N.E.2d 249, 262 (Ind.App.1975). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rankingreen2 sentences1981Cleary 1972); State v. Maestas, 224 N.W.2d 248, 250 (Iowa 1974); State v. Rankin, 181 N.W.2d 169, 171 (Iowa 1970); State v. Kinkade, 241 Iowa 1259, 1261-62 , 43 N.W.2d 736, 738 (1950); State v. Neubauer, 145 Iowa 337, 345-46 , 124 N.W. 312, 315 (1910); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 12 (1978); Annot., 77 A.L.R.2d 841 (1961); Annot., 167 A.L.R. 565 *881 (1947); Merry v. State, 166 Ind.App. 199 , 335 N.E.2d 249, 262 (Ind.App.1975). 1981Cleary 1972); State v. Maestas, 224 N.W.2d 248, 250 (Iowa 1974); State v. Rankin, 181 N.W.2d 169, 171 (Iowa 1970); State v. Kinkade, 241 Iowa 1259, 1261-62 , 43 N.W.2d 736, 738 (1950); State v. Neubauer, 145 Iowa 337, 345-46 , 124 N.W. 312, 315 (1910); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 12 (1978); Annot., 77 A.L.R.2d 841 (1961); Annot., 167 A.L.R. 565 (1947); Merry v. State, 166 Ind.App. 199 , 335 N.E.2d 249, 262 (Ind.App.1975). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Neubauergreen2 sentences1981Cleary 1972); State v. Maestas, 224 N.W.2d 248, 250 (Iowa 1974); State v. Rankin, 181 N.W.2d 169, 171 (Iowa 1970); State v. Kinkade, 241 Iowa 1259, 1261-62 , 43 N.W.2d 736, 738 (1950); State v. Neubauer, 145 Iowa 337, 345-46 , 124 N.W. 312, 315 (1910); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 12 (1978); Annot., 77 A.L.R.2d 841 (1961); Annot., 167 A.L.R. 565 (1947); Merry v. State, 166 Ind.App. 199 , 335 N.E.2d 249, 262 (Ind.App.1975). 1981Cleary 1972); State v. Maestas, 224 N.W.2d 248, 250 (Iowa 1974); State v. Rankin, 181 N.W.2d 169, 171 (Iowa 1970); State v. Kinkade, 241 Iowa 1259, 1261-62 , 43 N.W.2d 736, 738 (1950); State v. Neubauer, 145 Iowa 337, 345-46 , 124 N.W. 312, 315 (1910); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 12 (1978); Annot., 77 A.L.R.2d 841 (1961); Annot., 167 A.L.R. 565 (1947); Merry v. State, 166 Ind.App. 199 , 335 N.E.2d 249, 262 (Ind.App.1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bagnall v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1996Id. (emphasis added). 1993Bagnall, 238 Iowa at 935 , 29 N.W.2d at 612 . | 2 | 1993–1996 |
State v. Liggins
green
1 sentence2016“Traditionally, at least under the common law, jurisdiction to subject an accused to criminal prosecution rests in the courts of the state in which the crime was committed.” Liggins, 524 N.W.2d at 184 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Railroad Retirement Board
green
1 sentence1983United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 , 57 S.Ct. 216, 220 , 81 L.Ed. 255, 261 (1936); Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgan, 415 F.Supp. 319, 321 (S.D.Ga.1976); Singer v. Magnavox Co., 380 A.2d'969, 981 (Del.1977); State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 199 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; National Bank of Topeka v. Mitchell, 154 Kan. 276, 281 , 118 P.2d 519, 522 (1941); Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gonzalez, 48 Ariz. 260, 273 , 61 P.2d 377, 382 (1936). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Dessi v. Pennsylvania Railroad
green
1 sentence1983United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 , 57 S.Ct. 216, 220 , 81 L.Ed. 255, 261 (1936); Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgan, 415 F.Supp. 319, 321 (S.D.Ga.1976); Singer v. Magnavox Co., 380 A.2d'969, 981 (Del.1977); State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 199 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; National Bank of Topeka v. Mitchell, 154 Kan. 276, 281 , 118 P.2d 519, 522 (1941); Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gonzalez, 48 Ariz. 260, 273 , 61 P.2d 377, 382 (1936). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Orleans Parish School Board v. Bush
green
1 sentence1983United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 , 57 S.Ct. 216, 220 , 81 L.Ed. 255, 261 (1936); Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. Morgan, 415 F.Supp. 319, 321 (S.D.Ga.1976); Singer v. Magnavox Co., 380 A.2d'969, 981 (Del.1977); State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 199 , 309 S.W.2d 227, 229 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; National Bank of Topeka v. Mitchell, 154 Kan. 276, 281 , 118 P.2d 519, 522 (1941); Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gonzalez, 48 Ariz. 260, 273 , 61 P.2d 377, 382 (1936). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Zwingmann v. Zwingmann
green
2 sentences1947We note some of these decisions: Zwingmann v. Zwingmann, 1912, 150 App. Div, 358, 359 , 134 N. Y. 1947We note some of these decisions: Zwingmann v. Zwingmann, 1912, 150 App. Div, 358, 359 , 134 N. Y. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Hiles v. Dunn
neutral
1 sentence1931Hiles v. Dunn, 48 Atl., 315 (N. J.); Wallace v. Milligan, 110 Ind. 498 , 11 N. E. 599 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Wallace v. Milligan
neutral
2 sentences1931Hiles v. Dunn, 48 Atl., 315 (N. J.); Wallace v. Milligan, 110 Ind. 498 , 11 N. E. 599 . 1931Hiles v. Dunn, 48 Atl., 315 (N. J.); Wallace v. Milligan, 110 Ind. 498 , 11 N. E. 599 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
State v. Hoshaw
green
1 sentence1929A “presumption of law” establishes a certainty, or, in other words, it is generally synonymous with “conclusively presumed.” See State v. Hoshaw, 89 Minn. 307 ( 94 N. E. 873 ); State v. Ivey, 196 Iowa 270 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Dyer v. State
green
2 sentences1929It is a generally recognized rule that “presumptions of law” are “conclusions and inferences which the law draws from given facts.” As bearing on the question, see Dyer v. State, 6 Ga. App. 390 ( 65 S. E. 42 ). 1929It is a generally recognized rule that “presumptions of law” are “conclusions and inferences which the law draws from given facts.” As bearing on the question, see Dyer v. State, 6 Ga. App. 390 ( 65 S. E. 42 ). | 1 | 1929–1929 |
State v. Ivey
green
1 sentence1929A “presumption of law” establishes a certainty, or, in other words, it is generally synonymous with “conclusively presumed.” See State v. Hoshaw, 89 Minn. 307 ( 94 N. E. 873 ); State v. Ivey, 196 Iowa 270 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Michigan Leather Co. v. Foyer
neutral
1 sentence1928Michigan Leather Co. v. Foyer, 104 Ill. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Insurance Co. v. Eggleston
green
1 sentence1918Any agreement, declaration, or course of action on the part of an insurance company which leads a party insured honestly to believe that, by conforming thereto, a forfeiture of his policy will not be incurred, * * * will and ought to estop the company from insisting upon the forfeiture, though it might be claimed under the express letter of the contract.” Insurance Co. v. Eggleston, 96 U. S. 572 . | 1 | 1918–1918 |
O'Herron v. Gray
green
2 sentences1907O’Herron v. Gray, 168 Mass. 573 ( 47 N. E. 429 , 40 L. 1907O’Herron v. Gray, 168 Mass. 573 ( 47 N. E. 429 , 40 L. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Henry McShane Co. v. Padian
neutral
1 sentence1895And it will be found in most, .if not all, of the cases we have cited, as supporting the rule in McShane Co. v. Padian, supra, that the language of the guaranty construed was different from, and more conclusive in its effect than, that involved in this case. | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.