7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1890–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Alford v. Citizens & Southern National Bankgreen2 sentences1996Bank, 237 Ga. 194, 197-198 ( 226 SE2d 905 ) (1976). 1996Bank, 237 Ga. 194, 197-198 ( 226 SE2d 905 ) (1976). | 1 | 1 |
Ewing v. First Nat. Bank of Atlantagreen2 sentences1976Bank of Atlanta, 209 Ga. 932, 933 ( 76 SE2d 791 ) (1953). 1976Bank of Atlanta, 209 Ga. 932, 933 ( 76 SE2d 791 ) (1953). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miller-DuPont, Inc. v. Service
green
2 sentences1963"It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants." Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and *433 authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt. 1963"It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants." Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and *433 authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Hirschler v. BRIARCLIFF MGMT. CORP.
green
2 sentences1963Corp., 89 NYS2d 744 , aff. 300 NY 680 ( 91 NE2d 331 ); May v. Hexter, 226 SW2d 383 . 1963Corp., 89 NYS2d 744 , aff. 300 NY 680 ( 91 NE2d 331 ); May v. Hexter, 226 SW2d 383 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
May v. Hexter
green
2 sentences1963Corp., 89 NYS2d 744 , aff. 300 NY 680 ( 91 NE2d 331 ); May v. Hexter, 226 SW2d 383 . 1963Corp., 89 NYS2d 744 , aff. 300 NY 680 ( 91 NE2d 331 ); May v. Hexter, 226 SW2d 383 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Landes v. Barone
neutral
2 sentences1963"It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants." Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and *433 authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt. 1963“It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways' used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants.” Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Tuxedo Park Ass'n v. Jackson
neutral
2 sentences1963"It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants." Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and *433 authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt. 1963“It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways' used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants.” Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Landes v. Barone
neutral
2 sentences1963"It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants." Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and *433 authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt. 1963“It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways' used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants.” Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Hobbs v. McLean
green
1 sentence1953Trustees v. Greenough, 105 U. S. 527 (26 L. ed. 1157); Hobbs v. McLean, 117 U. S. 567 (6 Sup. Ct. 870, 29 L. ed. 940). | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Trustees v. Greenough
green
1 sentence1953Trustees v. Greenough, 105 U. S. 527 (26 L. ed. 1157); Hobbs v. McLean, 117 U. S. 567 (6 Sup. Ct. 870, 29 L. ed. 940). | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Ellis v. Lindmark
green
2 sentences1950In Ellis v. Lindmark, 177 Minn. 390 ( 225 N. W. 395 ), the plaintiffs, who were engaged in a poultry and egg business, sued a retailer and a wholesaler for damages, based on negligence. 1950In Ellis v. Lindmark, 177 Minn. 390 ( 225 N. W. 395 ), the plaintiffs, who were engaged in a poultry and egg business, sued a retailer and a wholesaler for damages, based on negligence. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Summers v. State
green
1 sentence1905In the case of Reese v. Reese, 89 Ga. 645 , the question arose whether or not, under any circumstances, a suit could be brought in behalf of one non compos mentis by any one save a duly appointed guardian, and this court decided, in view of the provisions of the Civil Code, § 4843, and the generally recognized rule obtaining in other jurisdictions, that where no guardian has been legally appointed to represent an insane person, the courts, whether of .law or of equity, have jurisdiction to entertain suits brought by one as -next friend of the insane person. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Hix v. Gully
green
1 sentence1905This decision was approved and followed in Dent v. Merriam, 113 Ga. 83 ; and in LaGrange Mills v. Kener, 121 Ga. 429 , it was held that “A suit by a next friend for a lunatic, who has been adjudged insane, which fails to allege that the lunatic has no guardian, or any sufficient reason why she does not appear by her guardian if she has one, is maintainable, unless the failure to make allegations of this character is made ground of objection in a special demurrer, or by plea in abatement.” In the latter case the demurrer did not raise the proper objection to the maintenance of the action; so th | 1 | 1905–1905 |
LaGrange Mills v. Kener
green
1 sentence1905This decision was approved and followed in Dent v. Merriam, 113 Ga. 83 ; and in LaGrange Mills v. Kener, 121 Ga. 429 , it was held that “A suit by a next friend for a lunatic, who has been adjudged insane, which fails to allege that the lunatic has no guardian, or any sufficient reason why she does not appear by her guardian if she has one, is maintainable, unless the failure to make allegations of this character is made ground of objection in a special demurrer, or by plea in abatement.” In the latter case the demurrer did not raise the proper objection to the maintenance of the action; so th | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Roberts v. State
green
1 sentence1890Roberts v. State, 14 Ga. 8 ; 1 Herman on Est. and Res Aclj. §422; 1 Wharton on Ev. §787; 2 Taylor on Ev. §1705 et seq. | 1 | 1890–1890 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.