generally recognized rule (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

generally recognized rule in Georgia

7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1890–1996 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Alford v. Citizens & Southern National Bankgreen
ga · 1976 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996Bank, 237 Ga. 194, 197-198 ( 226 SE2d 905 ) (1976).

1996Bank, 237 Ga. 194, 197-198 ( 226 SE2d 905 ) (1976).

11
Ewing v. First Nat. Bank of Atlantagreen
ga · 1953 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976
2 sentences

1976Bank of Atlanta, 209 Ga. 932, 933 ( 76 SE2d 791 ) (1953).

1976Bank of Atlanta, 209 Ga. 932, 933 ( 76 SE2d 791 ) (1953).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

CaseCitedYears
Miller-DuPont, Inc. v. Service green
colo · 1949
2 sentences

1963"It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants." Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and *433 authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt.

1963"It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants." Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and *433 authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt.

11963–1963
Hirschler v. BRIARCLIFF MGMT. CORP. green
ny · 1950
2 sentences

1963Corp., 89 NYS2d 744 , aff. 300 NY 680 ( 91 NE2d 331 ); May v. Hexter, 226 SW2d 383 .

1963Corp., 89 NYS2d 744 , aff. 300 NY 680 ( 91 NE2d 331 ); May v. Hexter, 226 SW2d 383 .

11963–1963
May v. Hexter green
moctapp · 1950
2 sentences

1963Corp., 89 NYS2d 744 , aff. 300 NY 680 ( 91 NE2d 331 ); May v. Hexter, 226 SW2d 383 .

1963Corp., 89 NYS2d 744 , aff. 300 NY 680 ( 91 NE2d 331 ); May v. Hexter, 226 SW2d 383 .

11963–1963
Landes v. Barone neutral
nyappdiv · 1954
2 sentences

1963"It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants." Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and *433 authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt.

1963“It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways' used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants.” Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt.

11963–1963
Tuxedo Park Ass'n v. Jackson neutral
ny · 1954
2 sentences

1963"It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants." Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and *433 authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt.

1963“It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways' used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants.” Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt.

11963–1963
Landes v. Barone neutral
ny · 1954
2 sentences

1963"It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants." Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and *433 authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt.

1963“It is a generally recognized rule at common law that a landlord does not owe any obligation or duty to provide stairways and hallways' used in common by tenants with artificial lights unless there is some unusual and dangerous condition existing which necessitates special warning to his tenants.” Miller-Dupont, Inc. v. Service, 120 Colo. 131 ( 208 P2d 87 ) and authorities there listed; also, Landes v. Barone, 127 NYS2d 112 , aff. 307 NY 867 ( 122 NE2d 750 ); Hirschler v. Briarcliff Mgt.

11963–1963
Hobbs v. McLean green
· 1886
1 sentence

1953Trustees v. Greenough, 105 U. S. 527 (26 L. ed. 1157); Hobbs v. McLean, 117 U. S. 567 (6 Sup. Ct. 870, 29 L. ed. 940).

11953–1953
Trustees v. Greenough green
scotus · 1882
1 sentence

1953Trustees v. Greenough, 105 U. S. 527 (26 L. ed. 1157); Hobbs v. McLean, 117 U. S. 567 (6 Sup. Ct. 870, 29 L. ed. 940).

11953–1953
Ellis v. Lindmark green
minn · 1929
2 sentences

1950In Ellis v. Lindmark, 177 Minn. 390 ( 225 N. W. 395 ), the plaintiffs, who were engaged in a poultry and egg business, sued a retailer and a wholesaler for damages, based on negligence.

1950In Ellis v. Lindmark, 177 Minn. 390 ( 225 N. W. 395 ), the plaintiffs, who were engaged in a poultry and egg business, sued a retailer and a wholesaler for damages, based on negligence.

11950–1950
Summers v. State green
ga · 1892
1 sentence

1905In the case of Reese v. Reese, 89 Ga. 645 , the question arose whether or not, under any circumstances, a suit could be brought in behalf of one non compos mentis by any one save a duly appointed guardian, and this court decided, in view of the provisions of the Civil Code, § 4843, and the generally recognized rule obtaining in other jurisdictions, that where no guardian has been legally appointed to represent an insane person, the courts, whether of .law or of equity, have jurisdiction to entertain suits brought by one as -next friend of the insane person.

11905–1905
Hix v. Gully green
ga · 1901
1 sentence

1905This decision was approved and followed in Dent v. Merriam, 113 Ga. 83 ; and in LaGrange Mills v. Kener, 121 Ga. 429 , it was held that “A suit by a next friend for a lunatic, who has been adjudged insane, which fails to allege that the lunatic has no guardian, or any sufficient reason why she does not appear by her guardian if she has one, is maintainable, unless the failure to make allegations of this character is made ground of objection in a special demurrer, or by plea in abatement.” In the latter case the demurrer did not raise the proper objection to the maintenance of the action; so th

11905–1905
LaGrange Mills v. Kener green
ga · 1904
1 sentence

1905This decision was approved and followed in Dent v. Merriam, 113 Ga. 83 ; and in LaGrange Mills v. Kener, 121 Ga. 429 , it was held that “A suit by a next friend for a lunatic, who has been adjudged insane, which fails to allege that the lunatic has no guardian, or any sufficient reason why she does not appear by her guardian if she has one, is maintainable, unless the failure to make allegations of this character is made ground of objection in a special demurrer, or by plea in abatement.” In the latter case the demurrer did not raise the proper objection to the maintenance of the action; so th

11905–1905
Roberts v. State green
ga · 1853
1 sentence

1890Roberts v. State, 14 Ga. 8 ; 1 Herman on Est. and Res Aclj. §422; 1 Wharton on Ev. §787; 2 Taylor on Ev. §1705 et seq.

11890–1890

Where else courts name it

KY 27 (1922–2023) CA 25 (1916–2019) TX 23 (1915–2016) IL 23 (1881–2019) FL 20 (1947–2015) MO 18 (1894–2018) AL 18 (1882–1999) IA 17 (1895–2016) MI 16 (1893–2023) OR 15 (1910–2013) CO 12 (1905–2008) VA 12 (1986–2020) MD 12 (1973–2023) WV 11 (1916–1999) ID 10 (1920–2025) NY 10 (1890–2016) WA 10 (1917–1995) OK 10 (1924–2017) LA 9 (1925–2002) CT 8 (1932–2017) NC 8 (1908–1986) SD 8 (1979–2006) SC 8 (1912–2010) MN 8 (1885–1999) NJ 8 (1952–2019) OH 7 (1937–2004) GA 7 (1890–1996) PA 7 (1926–2021) MT 6 (1919–2022) WI 6 (1977–2000) KS 6 (1935–2010) RI 6 (1933–2001) MS 6 (1922–2012) AZ 5 (1939–1982) NV 5 (1865–1999) UT 4 (1927–2020) IN 4 (1893–2013) WY 4 (1941–2026) MA 4 (1909–2024) ND 4 (1925–2000) HI 3 (1932–1970) NM 3 (1903–1979) VT 3 (1858–1991) NE 3 (1981–2000) TN 3 (1937–1958)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check