13 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1924–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
OCONEE COUNTY v. CANNONgreen2 sentences2023In order to invoke the relation-back provisions of this Code section, the moving party must show that each of the following three conditions is met: (1) 11 (Emphasis supplied.) See generally Oconee County v. Cannon, 310 Ga. 728, 733 (2) ( 854 SE2d 531 (2021) (“[OCGA § 9-22-15 (c)] allows a plaintiff to substitute one defendant for another after the claim would otherwise be barred by the statute of limitations, provided that [the conditions in OCGA § 9-11-15 (c)] are met. . . .”); Langley v. Travelers Insurance Thru GEICO, 364 Ga. App. 294 , 296 ( 874 SE2d 487 ) (2022) (“Under OCGA § 9-11-21, p 2023In order to invoke the relation-back provisions of this Code section, the moving party must show that each of the following three conditions is met: (1) 11 (Emphasis supplied.) See generally Oconee County v. Cannon, 310 Ga. 728, 733 (2) ( 854 SE2d 531 (2021) (“[OCGA § 9-22-15 (c)] allows a plaintiff to substitute one defendant for another after the claim would otherwise be barred by the statute of limitations, provided that [the conditions in OCGA § 9-11-15 (c)] are met. . . .”); Langley v. Travelers Insurance Thru GEICO, 364 Ga. App. 294 , 296 ( 874 SE2d 487 ) (2022) (“Under OCGA § 9-11-21, p | 1 | 1 |
Curtis v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgiagreen1 sentence2009See Curtis v. Bd. of Regents, 262 Ga. at 228 (the 1991 amendment to the Georgia Constitution and the Tort Claims Act enacted under its authority redrew and redefined the terms of the State’s waiver of its sovereign immunity but did not withdraw the existing waiver). 14 The Act requires a claimant to give written notice of the claim, within 12 months of the date the loss was discovered or should have been discovered, to the Risk Management Division of the Department of Administrative Services and to the state government entity alleged to have committed the tort. | 1 | 1 |
Central Railroad v. Searsgreen1 sentence1985See Central R. v. Sears, 66 Ga. 499 (1881); Western &c. | 1 | 1 |
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Browngreen2 sentences1985Co. v. Brown, 102 Ga. 13, 14-15 ( 29 SE 130 ) (1897), this contract Code section was cited to support, by analogy, the existing rule that, in a suit in tort, the jury could award interest not as such but as part of the damages. 1985Co. v. Brown, 102 Ga. 13, 14-15 ( 29 SE 130 ) (1897), this contract Code section was cited to support, by analogy, the existing rule that, in a suit in tort, the jury could award interest not as such but as part of the damages. | 1 | 1 |
Hoard v. Wileygreen2 sentences1985Hoard v. Wiley, 113 Ga. App. 328, 334 ( 147 SE2d 782 ) (1966); Cunningham v. Hodges, 150 Ga. App. 827 (1) (4) ( 258 SE2d 631 ) (1979), and cases cited. 1985Hoard v. Wiley, 113 Ga. App. 328, 334 ( 147 SE2d 782 ) (1966); Cunningham v. Hodges, 150 Ga. App. 827 (1) (4) ( 258 SE2d 631 ) (1979), and cases cited. | 1 | 1 |
Worthen v. Jonesgreen2 sentences1984See Worthen v. Jones, 240 Ga. 388 ( 240 SE2d 842 ) (1977); OCGA § 9-11-41 (a). 1984See Worthen v. Jones, 240 Ga. 388 ( 240 SE2d 842 ) (1977); OCGA § 9-11-41 (a). | 1 | 1 |
Sellers v. Stategreen2 sentences1980Under this rule, "[o]nly slight evidence is required to authorize revocation, Sellers v. State, 107 Ga. App. 516, 518 ( 130 SE2d 790 ), and where there is even slight evidence of misconduct, the appellate court will not interfere with revocation unless there has been manifest abuse of discretion. 1980Under this rule, "[o]nly slight evidence is required to authorize revocation, Sellers v. State, 107 Ga. App. 516, 518 ( 130 SE2d 790 ), and where there is even slight evidence of misconduct, the appellate court will not interfere with revocation unless there has been manifest abuse of discretion. | 1 | 1 |
City of Atlanta v. Wrightgreen2 sentences1938See, in this connection, Maddox v. Anchor Duck Mills, 167 Ga. 695 ( 146 S. E. 551 ); Cox v. Board of Com'rs, 65 Ga. 741 ; Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co., 169 Ga. 70 (5) ( 149 S. E. 776 ); City of Atlanta v. Wright, 119 Ga. 207, 211 ( 45 S. E. 994 ); Harris v. Garner, 160 Ga. 752 ( 128 S. E. 913 ). (a) Upon the special issues of fact submitted to the jury in this, case, the evidence can be taken to authorize the finding as made, that the amount of 50 cents a day for each prisoner, allowed by the commissioners, was inadequate, and that the sheriff was entitled to receive an additional 1938See, in this connection, Maddox v. Anchor Duck Mills, 167 Ga. 695 ( 146 S. E. 551 ); Cox v. Board of Com'rs, 65 Ga. 741 ; Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co., 169 Ga. 70 (5) ( 149 S. E. 776 ); City of Atlanta v. Wright, 119 Ga. 207, 211 ( 45 S. E. 994 ); Harris v. Garner, 160 Ga. 752 ( 128 S. E. 913 ). (a) Upon the special issues of fact submitted to the jury in this, case, the evidence can be taken to authorize the finding as made, that the amount of 50 cents a day for each prisoner, allowed by the commissioners, was inadequate, and that the sheriff was entitled to receive an additional | 1 | 1 |
Maddox v. Anchor Duck Millsgreen2 sentences1938See, in this connection, Maddox v. Anchor Duck Mills, 167 Ga. 695 ( 146 S. E. 551 ); Cox v. Board of Com'rs, 65 Ga. 741 ; Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co., 169 Ga. 70 (5) ( 149 S. E. 776 ); City of Atlanta v. Wright, 119 Ga. 207, 211 ( 45 S. E. 994 ); Harris v. Garner, 160 Ga. 752 ( 128 S. E. 913 ). (a) Upon the special issues of fact submitted to the jury in this, case, the evidence can be taken to authorize the finding as made, that the amount of 50 cents a day for each prisoner, allowed by the commissioners, was inadequate, and that the sheriff was entitled to receive an additional 1938See, in this connection, Maddox v. Anchor Duck Mills, 167 Ga. 695 ( 146 S. E. 551 ); Cox v. Board of Com'rs, 65 Ga. 741 ; Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co., 169 Ga. 70 (5) ( 149 S. E. 776 ); City of Atlanta v. Wright, 119 Ga. 207, 211 ( 45 S. E. 994 ); Harris v. Garner, 160 Ga. 752 ( 128 S. E. 913 ). (a) Upon the special issues of fact submitted to the jury in this, case, the evidence can be taken to authorize the finding as made, that the amount of 50 cents a day for each prisoner, allowed by the commissioners, was inadequate, and that the sheriff was entitled to receive an additional | 1 | 1 |
City of Atlanta v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.green2 sentences1935It is legislative to make a rule for future conduct, and judicial to punish for infraction of, or to enforce, an existing rule.” See also, in this connection, Daniels v. Commissioners of Pilotage, 147 Ga. 295 (supra), City of Atlanta v. Georgia Railway & Power Co., 149 Ga. 411, 415 ( 100 S. E. 442 ); City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort, 153 Ga. 499, 508 (supra); Ruff v. Phillips, 50 Ga. 130 . 1935It is legislative to make a rule for future conduct, and judicial to punish for infraction of, or to enforce, an existing rule.” See also, in this connection, Daniels v. Commissioners of Pilotage, 147 Ga. 295 (supra), City of Atlanta v. Georgia Railway & Power Co., 149 Ga. 411, 415 ( 100 S. E. 442 ); City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort, 153 Ga. 499, 508 (supra); Ruff v. Phillips, 50 Ga. 130 . | 1 | 1 |
City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort Inc.green1 sentence1935It is legislative to make a rule for future conduct, and judicial to punish for infraction of, or to enforce, an existing rule.” See also, in this connection, Daniels v. Commissioners of Pilotage, 147 Ga. 295 (supra), City of Atlanta v. Georgia Railway & Power Co., 149 Ga. 411, 415 ( 100 S. E. 442 ); City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort, 153 Ga. 499, 508 (supra); Ruff v. Phillips, 50 Ga. 130 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Craig Woods v. A.R.E. Accessories, LLC
green
1 sentence2020Accessories, 345 Ga. App. 887 , 891 ( 815 SE2d 205 ) (2018) (emphasis added). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Southern Trust Insurance v. Braner
neutral
2 sentences1985Co. v. Braner, 174 Ga. App. 247 ( 329 SE2d 569 ) (1985), are whether it is error for a jury to make a separate award of prejudgment interest upon unliquidated claims of loss under the policy, and whether the existing rule as to proof of damage to personal property destroyed by fire should be relaxed. 1985Co. v. Braner, 174 Ga. App. 247 ( 329 SE2d 569 ) (1985), are whether it is error for a jury to make a separate award of prejudgment interest upon unliquidated claims of loss under the policy, and whether the existing rule as to proof of damage to personal property destroyed by fire should be relaxed. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Cunningham v. Hodges
green
2 sentences1985Hoard v. Wiley, 113 Ga. App. 328, 334 ( 147 SE2d 782 ) (1966); Cunningham v. Hodges, 150 Ga. App. 827 (1) (4) ( 258 SE2d 631 ) (1979), and cases cited. 1985Hoard v. Wiley, 113 Ga. App. 328, 334 ( 147 SE2d 782 ) (1966); Cunningham v. Hodges, 150 Ga. App. 827 (1) (4) ( 258 SE2d 631 ) (1979), and cases cited. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Edwards v. State
green
2 sentences1983Moses v. State, 245 Ga. 180 (6) ( 263 SE2d 916 ) (1980); Stevens v. State, 242 Ga. 34 (5) ( 247 SE2d 838 ) (1978); Edwards v. State, 233 Ga. 625 (3) ( 212 SE2d 802 ) (1975); Cash v. State, 224 Ga. 798 (2) ( 164 SE2d 558 ) (1968). 1983Moses v. State, 245 Ga. 180 (6) ( 263 SE2d 916 ) (1980); Stevens v. State, 242 Ga. 34 (5) ( 247 SE2d 838 ) (1978); Edwards v. State, 233 Ga. 625 (3) ( 212 SE2d 802 ) (1975); Cash v. State, 224 Ga. 798 (2) ( 164 SE2d 558 ) (1968). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Cash v. State
green
2 sentences1983Moses v. State, 245 Ga. 180 (6) ( 263 SE2d 916 ) (1980); Stevens v. State, 242 Ga. 34 (5) ( 247 SE2d 838 ) (1978); Edwards v. State, 233 Ga. 625 (3) ( 212 SE2d 802 ) (1975); Cash v. State, 224 Ga. 798 (2) ( 164 SE2d 558 ) (1968). 1983Moses v. State, 245 Ga. 180 (6) ( 263 SE2d 916 ) (1980); Stevens v. State, 242 Ga. 34 (5) ( 247 SE2d 838 ) (1978); Edwards v. State, 233 Ga. 625 (3) ( 212 SE2d 802 ) (1975); Cash v. State, 224 Ga. 798 (2) ( 164 SE2d 558 ) (1968). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Moses v. State
green
2 sentences1983Moses v. State, 245 Ga. 180 (6) ( 263 SE2d 916 ) (1980); Stevens v. State, 242 Ga. 34 (5) ( 247 SE2d 838 ) (1978); Edwards v. State, 233 Ga. 625 (3) ( 212 SE2d 802 ) (1975); Cash v. State, 224 Ga. 798 (2) ( 164 SE2d 558 ) (1968). 1983Moses v. State, 245 Ga. 180 (6) ( 263 SE2d 916 ) (1980); Stevens v. State, 242 Ga. 34 (5) ( 247 SE2d 838 ) (1978); Edwards v. State, 233 Ga. 625 (3) ( 212 SE2d 802 ) (1975); Cash v. State, 224 Ga. 798 (2) ( 164 SE2d 558 ) (1968). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Stevens v. State
green
2 sentences1983Moses v. State, 245 Ga. 180 (6) ( 263 SE2d 916 ) (1980); Stevens v. State, 242 Ga. 34 (5) ( 247 SE2d 838 ) (1978); Edwards v. State, 233 Ga. 625 (3) ( 212 SE2d 802 ) (1975); Cash v. State, 224 Ga. 798 (2) ( 164 SE2d 558 ) (1968). 1983Moses v. State, 245 Ga. 180 (6) ( 263 SE2d 916 ) (1980); Stevens v. State, 242 Ga. 34 (5) ( 247 SE2d 838 ) (1978); Edwards v. State, 233 Ga. 625 (3) ( 212 SE2d 802 ) (1975); Cash v. State, 224 Ga. 798 (2) ( 164 SE2d 558 ) (1968). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Alderman v. United States
green
1 sentence1982Such violation would occur if [the state] unlawfully overheard conversations of a petitioner himself or conversations occurring on his premises . . .” Id., 175-176 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Georgia Public-Service Commission
green
1 sentence1980It is . . . judicial to punish for infraction of, or to enforce, an existing rule.’ ” The court noted therein that "[i]t is generally held that in the exercise of public functions subordinate boards or tribunals, though not created as courts, may at times exercise powers which are judicial... 'It is clear, however, that it is the nature of the act to be performed rather than the office, board, or body which performs it, that determines whether or not it is the discharge of a judicial or a quasi-judicial function.’ ” Id. at 78 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Wilder v. Lumpkin
green
1 sentence1953If the former, it is . . . without retrospective effect, and, if the latter, it is the exercise of a power which belongs to the legislature of no free country—which most assuredly does not belong to the legislature of Georgia.” Wilder v. Lumpkin, 4 Ga. 208, 211 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Cox v. Board of Commissioners
neutral
1 sentence1938See, in this connection, Maddox v. Anchor Duck Mills, 167 Ga. 695 ( 146 S. E. 551 ); Cox v. Board of Com'rs, 65 Ga. 741 ; Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co., 169 Ga. 70 (5) ( 149 S. E. 776 ); City of Atlanta v. Wright, 119 Ga. 207, 211 ( 45 S. E. 994 ); Harris v. Garner, 160 Ga. 752 ( 128 S. E. 913 ). (a) Upon the special issues of fact submitted to the jury in this, case, the evidence can be taken to authorize the finding as made, that the amount of 50 cents a day for each prisoner, allowed by the commissioners, was inadequate, and that the sheriff was entitled to receive an additional | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Claxton v. Stanford
green
1 sentence1938See, in this connection, Maddox v. Anchor Duck Mills, 167 Ga. 695 ( 146 S. E. 551 ); Cox v. Board of Com'rs, 65 Ga. 741 ; Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co., 169 Ga. 70 (5) ( 149 S. E. 776 ); City of Atlanta v. Wright, 119 Ga. 207, 211 ( 45 S. E. 994 ); Harris v. Garner, 160 Ga. 752 ( 128 S. E. 913 ). (a) Upon the special issues of fact submitted to the jury in this, case, the evidence can be taken to authorize the finding as made, that the amount of 50 cents a day for each prisoner, allowed by the commissioners, was inadequate, and that the sheriff was entitled to receive an additional | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Harris v. Garner
neutral
1 sentence1938See, in this connection, Maddox v. Anchor Duck Mills, 167 Ga. 695 ( 146 S. E. 551 ); Cox v. Board of Com'rs, 65 Ga. 741 ; Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co., 169 Ga. 70 (5) ( 149 S. E. 776 ); City of Atlanta v. Wright, 119 Ga. 207, 211 ( 45 S. E. 994 ); Harris v. Garner, 160 Ga. 752 ( 128 S. E. 913 ). (a) Upon the special issues of fact submitted to the jury in this, case, the evidence can be taken to authorize the finding as made, that the amount of 50 cents a day for each prisoner, allowed by the commissioners, was inadequate, and that the sheriff was entitled to receive an additional | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co.
green
2 sentences1938See, in this connection, Maddox v. Anchor Duck Mills, 167 Ga. 695 ( 146 S. E. 551 ); Cox v. Board of Com'rs, 65 Ga. 741 ; Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co., 169 Ga. 70 (5) ( 149 S. E. 776 ); City of Atlanta v. Wright, 119 Ga. 207, 211 ( 45 S. E. 994 ); Harris v. Garner, 160 Ga. 752 ( 128 S. E. 913 ). (a) Upon the special issues of fact submitted to the jury in this, case, the evidence can be taken to authorize the finding as made, that the amount of 50 cents a day for each prisoner, allowed by the commissioners, was inadequate, and that the sheriff was entitled to receive an additional 1938See, in this connection, Maddox v. Anchor Duck Mills, 167 Ga. 695 ( 146 S. E. 551 ); Cox v. Board of Com'rs, 65 Ga. 741 ; Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co., 169 Ga. 70 (5) ( 149 S. E. 776 ); City of Atlanta v. Wright, 119 Ga. 207, 211 ( 45 S. E. 994 ); Harris v. Garner, 160 Ga. 752 ( 128 S. E. 913 ). (a) Upon the special issues of fact submitted to the jury in this, case, the evidence can be taken to authorize the finding as made, that the amount of 50 cents a day for each prisoner, allowed by the commissioners, was inadequate, and that the sheriff was entitled to receive an additional | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Ruff v. Phillips
green
1 sentence1935It is legislative to make a rule for future conduct, and judicial to punish for infraction of, or to enforce, an existing rule.” See also, in this connection, Daniels v. Commissioners of Pilotage, 147 Ga. 295 (supra), City of Atlanta v. Georgia Railway & Power Co., 149 Ga. 411, 415 ( 100 S. E. 442 ); City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort, 153 Ga. 499, 508 (supra); Ruff v. Phillips, 50 Ga. 130 . | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Daniels v. Commissioners of Pilotage for the Bar of Tybee & River
green
1 sentence1935It is legislative to make a rule for future conduct, and judicial to punish for infraction of, or to enforce, an existing rule.” See also, in this connection, Daniels v. Commissioners of Pilotage, 147 Ga. 295 (supra), City of Atlanta v. Georgia Railway & Power Co., 149 Ga. 411, 415 ( 100 S. E. 442 ); City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort, 153 Ga. 499, 508 (supra); Ruff v. Phillips, 50 Ga. 130 . | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Robert R. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Company
green
1 sentence1924In the case of Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line, 211 U. S. 210 (3, 4) (29 Sup. Ct. 67, 53 L. ed. 150), it was held: “The making of a rate by a legislative body, after hearing the interested parties, is not res judicata upon the validity of the rate when questioned by those parties in a suit in a court. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.