10 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1896–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kirchoffner Ex Rel. Kirchoffner v. Quamgreen2 sentences2012See Johnson, 2005 ND 112, ¶ 17 , 699 N.W.2d 45 ; Rummel v. Rummel, 265 N.W.2d 230, 232 (N.D.1978); Kirchoffner v. Quam, 264 N.W.2d 203, 207 (N.D.1978). 1991See Farmers Elevator & Mercantile Co. v. Farm Builders, Inc., 432 N.W.2d 864 (N.D.1988) [trial court may refuse to consider alleged unconscionability of contract where the issue was first raised in a post-trial brief]; see also Kirchoffner v. Quam, 264 N.W.2d 203 (N.D.1978) [issues presented to the trial court for the first time in a post-trial motion are too late to be considered to make a new rule of law or to refine an existing rule]. | 4 | 5 |
Rummel v. Rummelgreen2 sentences2012See Johnson, 2005 ND 112, ¶ 17 , 699 N.W.2d 45 ; Rummel v. Rummel, 265 N.W.2d 230, 232 (N.D.1978); Kirchoffner v. Quam, 264 N.W.2d 203, 207 (N.D.1978). 2012See Johnson , 2005 ND 112, ¶ 17 , 699 N.W.2d 45 ; Rummel v. Rummel , 265 N.W.2d 230, 232 (N.D. 1978); Kirchoffner v. Quam , 264 N.W.2d 203, 207 (N.D. 1978). | 3 | 3 |
Johnson v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.green2 sentences2012See Johnson, 2005 ND 112, ¶ 17 , 699 N.W.2d 45 ; Rummel v. Rummel, 265 N.W.2d 230, 232 (N.D.1978); Kirchoffner v. Quam, 264 N.W.2d 203, 207 (N.D.1978). 2012See Johnson, 2005 ND 112, ¶ 17 , 699 N.W.2d 45 ; Rummel v. Rummel, 265 N.W.2d 230, 232 (N.D.1978); Kirchoffner v. Quam, 264 N.W.2d 203, 207 (N.D.1978). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Forslandgreen2 sentences1984However, it may be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” Rule 404(b) is basically a formal recitation of the prior existing rule we discussed in State v. Stevens, supra, at 257, “that evidence of prior acts or crimes cannot be received as evidence unless it is substantially relevant for some other purpose than to show a probability that a defendant committed a crime charged because he is a man of criminal character.” State v. Forsland, 326 N.W.2d 688, 691-92 (N.D.1982). 1983See, State v. Forsland, 326 N.W.2d 688 (N.D.1982). | 2 | 2 |
Farmers Elevator & Mercantile Co. v. Farm Builders, Inc.green1 sentence1991See Farmers Elevator & Mercantile Co. v. Farm Builders, Inc., 432 N.W.2d 864 (N.D.1988) [trial court may refuse to consider alleged unconscionability of contract where the issue was first raised in a post-trial brief]; see also Kirchoffner v. Quam, 264 N.W.2d 203 (N.D.1978) [issues presented to the trial court for the first time in a post-trial motion are too late to be considered to make a new rule of law or to refine an existing rule]. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Schnell v. Schnell
green
1 sentence1979City of Wahpeton v. Drake-Henne, Inc., 228 N.W.2d 324 (N.D. 1975); Schnell v. Schnell, 252 N.W.2d 14 (N.D.1977); and Rummel, supra. In King, supra, 219 N.W.2d 836 , this court held, in paragraphs 5 and 6 of the syllabus: “5. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
King v. Montz
green
2 sentences1979City of Wahpeton v. Drake-Henne, Inc., 228 N.W.2d 324 (N.D. 1975); Schnell v. Schnell, 252 N.W.2d 14 (N.D.1977); and Rummel, supra. In King, supra, 219 N.W.2d 836 , this court held, in paragraphs 5 and 6 of the syllabus: “5. 1979City of Wahpeton v. Drake-Henne, Inc., 228 N.W.2d 324 (N.D. 1975); Schnell v. Schnell, 252 N.W.2d 14 (N.D.1977); and Rummel, supra. In King, supra, 219 N.W.2d 836 , this court held, in paragraphs 5 and 6 of the syllabus: “5. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
City of Wahpeton v. Drake-Henne, Inc.
green
1 sentence1979City of Wahpeton v. Drake-Henne, Inc., 228 N.W.2d 324 (N.D. 1975); Schnell v. Schnell, 252 N.W.2d 14 (N.D.1977); and Rummel, supra. In King, supra, 219 N.W.2d 836 , this court held, in paragraphs 5 and 6 of the syllabus: “5. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Jordana v. Corley
green
1 sentence1978The means suggested by the authors of reaching this goal contain many ideas which may be applied within the existing framework of law and many which represent such a shift in policy that they are better left to the Legislature.” 220 N.W.2d at 523 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Prouty v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1896Prouty v. Railroad Co., 85 N. Y. 272 -275; Buchanan v. Comstock, 57 Barb. 583 ; Wattson v. Thibou, 17 Abb. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.