Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1893–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2017See Stein, 776 N.W.2d at 715 (reaffirming the standard of review applied in State v. Johnson, 173 Minn. 543 , 217 N.W. 683 (1928)); Tscheu, 758 N.W.2d at 858 n.9 ("We apply here the standard we have applied for decades. ...”). . 2017See Stein, 776 N.W.2d at 715 (reaffirming the standard of review applied in State v. Johnson, 173 Minn. 543 , 217 N.W. 683 (1928)); Tscheu, 758 N.W.2d at 858 n.9 ("We apply here the standard we have applied for decades. ...”). . | 1 | 1 |
Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.green2 sentences2017As such, we do not need to address Berglund’s argument that a warrantless search of his farm would have been unconstitutional. 11 reasonable legislative or administrative standards for conducting an . . . inspection are satisfied with respect to a particular [establishment].” Marshall v. Barlow’s, Inc., 436 U.S. 307, 320 , 98 S. Ct. 1816, 1824 (1978) (footnote omitted) (quoting Camara v. Mun. 2017As such, we do not need to address Berglund’s argument that a warrantless search of his farm would have been unconstitutional. 11 reasonable legislative or administrative standards for conducting an . . . inspection are satisfied with respect to a particular [establishment].” Marshall v. Barlow’s, Inc., 436 U.S. 307, 320 , 98 S. Ct. 1816, 1824 (1978) (footnote omitted) (quoting Camara v. Mun. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Steingreen1 sentence2017See Stein, 776 N.W.2d at 715 (reaffirming the standard of review applied in State v. Johnson, 173 Minn. 543 , 217 N.W. 683 (1928)); Tscheu, 758 N.W.2d at 858 n.9 ("We apply here the standard we have applied for decades. ...”). . | 1 | 1 |
Campos v. Stategreen1 sentence2016“Old rules of federal constitutional criminal procedure apply both on direct and collateral review.” Campos v. State, 816 N.W.2d 480, 488 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Danforth v. Stategreen1 sentence2016But “[w]hen a decision merely interprets and clarifies an existing rule and does not announce an altogether new rule of law, the court’s interpretation is merely a restatement of existing law.” Danforth v. State, 761 N.W.2d 493, 501 (Minn. 2009) (quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUT.green1 sentence1993Co., 463 N.W.2d 750, 755 (Minn.1990) (an assignment of an insured’s interest in an existing claim for benefits pursuant to a contract of insurance is not an assignment prohibited by law). | 1 | 1 |
Don Kral Incorporated v. Lindstromgreen2 sentences1987Don Kral Inc. v. Lindstrom, 286 Minn. 37, 39 , 173 N.W.2d 921, 923 (1970) (citations omitted). 1987Don Kral Inc. v. Lindstrom, 286 Minn. 37, 39 , 173 N.W.2d 921, 923 (1970) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Tscheu
green
1 sentence2017See Stein, 776 N.W.2d at 715 (reaffirming the standard of review applied in State v. Johnson, 173 Minn. 543 , 217 N.W. 683 (1928)); Tscheu, 758 N.W.2d at 858 n.9 ("We apply here the standard we have applied for decades. ...”). . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights
green
2 sentences2016In County of Washington, we addressed “whether certiorari review” was the “exclusive method” to review a city council’s denial of a request for a refund of an alleged overpayment for sewer and water services. 818 N.W.2d at 536 . 2016In County of Washington, we addressed “whether cer-tiorari reviéw” was the “exclusive method” to review a city council’s denial of a request for a refund of an alleged overpayment for sewer and water services. 818 N.W.2d at 536 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Peggy Rose Revocable Trust v. Eppich
green
1 sentence2014The supreme court explained, “Although we maintain that parties may agree to a shorter limitations period than provided by statute, there is a difference between merely shortening the time within which an existing claim may be brought and altering the date on which a cause of action accrues.” Id. at 608-09 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Frankle v. Twedt
green
2 sentences1966In Frankie v. Twedt, 234 Minn. 42, 45 , 47 N. W. (2d) 482, 486 , we said: “* * * On the basis of an agency relationship, the negligence of an agent is imputed to his principal as a bar to the latter’s right of recovery, in an action which he brings against a third party, only when the *485 nature of the agency relationship is such that the principal would be subject to a vicarious liability as a defendant to another who may have been injured by the agent’s negligence.” While plaintiff does not seriously dispute the existing rule, he argues that the rule is unjust and ought to be abandoned. 1966In Frankie v. Twedt, 234 Minn. 42, 45 , 47 N. W. (2d) 482, 486 , we said: “* * * On the basis of an agency relationship, the negligence of an agent is imputed to his principal as a bar to the latter’s right of recovery, in an action which he brings against a third party, only when the *485 nature of the agency relationship is such that the principal would be subject to a vicarious liability as a defendant to another who may have been injured by the agent’s negligence.” While plaintiff does not seriously dispute the existing rule, he argues that the rule is unjust and ought to be abandoned. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Gale v. Commissioner of Taxation
green
2 sentences1964Minn. St. 645.26, subds. 2, 4; Gale v. Commr. of Taxation, 228 Minn. 345 , 37 N. W. (2d) 711 . 1964Minn. St. 645.26, subds. 2, 4; Gale v. Commr. of Taxation, 228 Minn. 345 , 37 N. W. (2d) 711 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Christenson v. American Express Co.
green
1 sentence1893The right of the common carrier to limit his common-law liability by special contract was fully recognized by this court as long ago as Christenson v. American Express Co., 15 Minn. 270 , ( Gil. 208 ;) but, in accord with the great weight of authority in this country, we have held that he cannot contract for exemption, either in whole or in part, from liability for the negligence of himself or his servants; that such an exemption is against public policy, because it would enable him to put off the essential duties of his public employment. | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.