Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ross v. Olsongreen2 sentences1990As was aptly stated by the Supreme Court of Idaho in a case with virtually identical facts, "[a]lthough the rule may be different with regard to a description which is merely loose, vague, or ambiguous, where the real property description in a mechanic's lien claim notice is `unambiguously erroneous' and describes with exactitude the wrong parcel of real property, substantial compliance is not achieved, and the claim of lien is invalid." Ross v. Olson, 95 Idaho 915, 917 , 523 P.2d 518, 520 (1974). 1990As was aptly stated by the Supreme Court of Idaho in a case with virtually identical facts, "[a]lthough the rule may be different with regard to a description which is merely loose, vague, or ambiguous, where the real property description in a mechanic's lien claim notice is `unambiguously erroneous' and describes with exactitude the wrong parcel of real property, substantial compliance is not achieved, and the claim of lien is invalid." Ross v. Olson, 95 Idaho 915, 917 , 523 P.2d 518, 520 (1974). | 2 | 2 |
Hanson Aggregates Arizona, Inc. v. Rissling Construction Group, Inc.green2 sentences2012Hanson Aggregates Ariz., Inc. v. Rissling Const. Group, Inc., 212 Ariz. 92, 94, ¶ 7 , 127 P.3d 910, 912 (App.2006). 2012Hanson Aggregates Ariz., Inc. v. Rissling Const. Group, Inc., 212 Ariz. 92, 94, ¶ 7 , 127 P.3d 910, 912 (App.2006). | 1 | 1 |
Old Adobe Office Properties, Ltd. v. Gingreen2 sentences2004See Old Adobe Office Props., Ltd. v. Gin, 151 Ariz. 248, 253 , 727 P.2d 26, 31 (App.1986) (stating whether a party knew or had reason to know that a lien claim was invalid was a disputed issue to be determined by the trier of fact). 2004See Old Adobe Office Props., Ltd. v. Gin, 151 Ariz. 248, 253 , 727 P.2d 26, 31 (App.1986) (stating whether a party knew or had reason to know that a lien claim was invalid was a disputed issue to be determined by the trier of fact). | 1 | 1 |
Northwest Federal Savings & Loan v. Tiffany Construction Co.green2 sentences1990See generally Northwest Federal, 158 Ariz. 100 , 761 P.2d 174 . 1990See generally Northwest Federal, 158 Ariz. 100 , 761 P.2d 174 . | 1 | 1 |
Allison v. Schulergreen2 sentences1968The New Mexico Court had opportunity to examine the question of abandonment in Allison v. Schuler, 38 N.M. 506 , 36 P.2d 519, 523 (1934) : “We indicated in the Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. case, supra, that any{thing short of permanent abandonment would not start the running of the time within which a lien claim must be filed, and that suspension of work must be accompanied by an intention to cease work or cease furnishing materials permanently, or at least indefinitely, would be necessary to constitute abandonment. 1968The New Mexico Court had opportunity to examine the question of abandonment in Allison v. Schuler, 38 N.M. 506 , 36 P.2d 519, 523 (1934) : “We indicated in the Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. case, supra, that any{thing short of permanent abandonment would not start the running of the time within which a lien claim must be filed, and that suspension of work must be accompanied by an intention to cease work or cease furnishing materials permanently, or at least indefinitely, would be necessary to constitute abandonment. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Agency for Health Care Administration
green
2 sentences2011In any event, at issue in Matey were settlement amounts representing paid medical expenses, not, as here, components of a settlement attributable to billed but not paid medical expenses. ¶ 24 AHCCCS's reliance on Smith v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 24 So.3d 590 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2009), likewise is misplaced. 2011In any event, at issue in Matey were settlement amounts representing paid medical expenses, not, as here, components of a settlement attributable to billed but not paid medical expenses. ¶ 24 AHCCCS’s reliance on Smith v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 24 So.3d 590 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2009), likewise is misplaced. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Blake v. Crystalline Lime Co.
green
2 sentences1980As stated in the supreme court’s opinion in Wahl v. Southwest Savings and Loan Ass’n, 106 Ariz. 381 , 476 P.2d 836 (1970), quoting with approval Blake v. Crystaline Lime Co., 37 Idaho 637 , 221 P. 1100 (1923) modified on rehearing, 37 Idaho 643 , 221 P. 1101 (1924): “The very foundation of a lien claim under our statute is the performance of labor upon or the furnishing of materials for the construction or improvement of the property upon which the lien is claimed. 1980As stated in the supreme court’s opinion in Wahl v. Southwest Savings and Loan Ass’n, 106 Ariz. 381 , 476 P.2d 836 (1970), quoting with approval Blake v. Crystaline Lime Co., 37 Idaho 637 , 221 P. 1100 (1923) modified on rehearing, 37 Idaho 643 , 221 P. 1101 (1924): “The very foundation of a lien claim under our statute is the performance of labor upon or the furnishing of materials for the construction or improvement of the property upon which the lien is claimed. | 2 | 1970–1980 |
Mountain Stone Co. v. HW Hammond Co.
green
1 sentence2000Id. *485 ¶ 31 San Xavier effectively executed a partial release, giving up its rights upon the execution of that release only as to the invoices specified. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Industrial Asphalt, Inc. v. Garrett Corp.
green
2 sentences1992Observing that California’s prelimi *229 nary twenty day notice statute is similar to Arizona’s statute, MLM cites Industrial Asphalt, Inc. v. Garrett Corp., 180 Cal.App.3d 1001 , 226 Cal.Rptr. 17 (1986) as sustaining a lien after substantial compliance with that statute. 1992Observing that California’s prelimi *229 nary twenty day notice statute is similar to Arizona’s statute, MLM cites Industrial Asphalt, Inc. v. Garrett Corp., 180 Cal.App.3d 1001 , 226 Cal.Rptr. 17 (1986) as sustaining a lien after substantial compliance with that statute. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
James Weller, Inc. v. Hansen
green
2 sentences1981Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Western Seed Production Corp., 119 Ariz. 377 , 580 P.2d 1231 (App.1978); James Weller, Inc. v. Hansen, 21 Ariz.App. 217 , 517 P.2d 1110 (1973). 1981Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Western Seed Production Corp., 119 Ariz. 377 , 580 P.2d 1231 (App.1978); James Weller, Inc. v. Hansen, 21 Ariz.App. 217 , 517 P.2d 1110 (1973). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Western Seed Production Corp.
green
2 sentences1981Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Western Seed Production Corp., 119 Ariz. 377 , 580 P.2d 1231 (App.1978); James Weller, Inc. v. Hansen, 21 Ariz.App. 217 , 517 P.2d 1110 (1973). 1981Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Western Seed Production Corp., 119 Ariz. 377 , 580 P.2d 1231 (App.1978); James Weller, Inc. v. Hansen, 21 Ariz.App. 217 , 517 P.2d 1110 (1973). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Wahl v. Southwest Savings and Loan Association
green
2 sentences1980As stated in the supreme court’s opinion in Wahl v. Southwest Savings and Loan Ass’n, 106 Ariz. 381 , 476 P.2d 836 (1970), quoting with approval Blake v. Crystaline Lime Co., 37 Idaho 637 , 221 P. 1100 (1923) modified on rehearing, 37 Idaho 643 , 221 P. 1101 (1924): “The very foundation of a lien claim under our statute is the performance of labor upon or the furnishing of materials for the construction or improvement of the property upon which the lien is claimed. 1980As stated in the supreme court’s opinion in Wahl v. Southwest Savings and Loan Ass’n, 106 Ariz. 381 , 476 P.2d 836 (1970), quoting with approval Blake v. Crystaline Lime Co., 37 Idaho 637 , 221 P. 1100 (1923) modified on rehearing, 37 Idaho 643 , 221 P. 1101 (1924): “The very foundation of a lien claim under our statute is the performance of labor upon or the furnishing of materials for the construction or improvement of the property upon which the lien is claimed. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Morgan v. O'Malley Lumber Co.
green
2 sentences1977Morgan v. O’Malley Lumber Co., 39 Ariz. 400, 404 , 7 P.2d 252 (1932). 1977Morgan v. O’Malley Lumber Co., 39 Ariz. 400, 404 , 7 P.2d 252 (1932). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Stark-Davis Co. v. Fellows
green
2 sentences1968In Stark-Davis Company v. Fellows, 129 Or. 281 , 277 P. 110 , 64 A.L.R. 271 (1929), the Oregon Court, construing a statute substantially comparable to Arizona’s, held that: “In order to constitute a permanent abandonment of the construction of the building, so that the same would take the place of the completion mentioned in the statutes, there should be a cessation of operation, and an intent on the part of the owner and contractor to cease operations permanently, or at least for an indefinite period, or some fair notice to or knowledge of the abandonment by a lien claimant, either actual or 1968In Stark-Davis Company v. Fellows, 129 Or. 281 , 277 P. 110 , 64 A.L.R. 271 (1929), the Oregon Court, construing a statute substantially comparable to Arizona’s, held that: “In order to constitute a permanent abandonment of the construction of the building, so that the same would take the place of the completion mentioned in the statutes, there should be a cessation of operation, and an intent on the part of the owner and contractor to cease operations permanently, or at least for an indefinite period, or some fair notice to or knowledge of the abandonment by a lien claimant, either actual or | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Eastern & Western Lumber Co. v. Williams
green
2 sentences1968We there displayed a leaning toward the Oregon rule, and cited Eastern & Western Lumber Co. v. Williams, 129 Or. 1 , 276 P. 257 . 1968We there displayed a leaning toward the Oregon rule, and cited Eastern & Western Lumber Co. v. Williams, 129 Or. 1 , 276 P. 257 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.