Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1860–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Steelegreen2 sentences2018See State v. Martinez , 95 Conn. App. 162 , 166 n.3, 896 A.2d 109 (2006) (concluding that even if new jury instruction rule announced in State v. Patterson , 276 Conn. 452 , 886 A.2d 777 [2005], which was not of constitutional dimension, was retroactive, this court would decline to review defendant's unpreserved evidentiary claim that trial court failed to give jury instruction regarding credibility of jailhouse informants), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006) ; cf. State v. Steele , supra, 176 Conn. App. at 24, 27, 31 , 169 A.3d 797 (reviewing preserved claim that court imprope 2018See State v. Martinez , 95 Conn. App. 162 , 166 n.3, 896 A.2d 109 (2006) (concluding that even if new jury instruction rule announced in State v. Patterson , 276 Conn. 452 , 886 A.2d 777 [2005], which was not of constitutional dimension, was retroactive, this court would decline to review defendant's unpreserved evidentiary claim that trial court failed to give jury instruction regarding credibility of jailhouse informants), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006) ; cf. State v. Steele , supra, 176 Conn. App. at 24, 27, 31 , 169 A.3d 797 (reviewing preserved claim that court imprope | 1 | 1 |
State v. Pattersongreen2 sentences2018See State v. Martinez , 95 Conn. App. 162 , 166 n.3, 896 A.2d 109 (2006) (concluding that even if new jury instruction rule announced in State v. Patterson , 276 Conn. 452 , 886 A.2d 777 [2005], which was not of constitutional dimension, was retroactive, this court would decline to review defendant's unpreserved evidentiary claim that trial court failed to give jury instruction regarding credibility of jailhouse informants), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006) ; cf. State v. Steele , supra, 176 Conn. App. at 24, 27, 31 , 169 A.3d 797 (reviewing preserved claim that court imprope 2018See State v. Martinez , 95 Conn. App. 162 , 166 n.3, 896 A.2d 109 (2006) (concluding that even if new jury instruction rule announced in State v. Patterson , 276 Conn. 452 , 886 A.2d 777 [2005], which was not of constitutional dimension, was retroactive, this court would decline to review defendant's unpreserved evidentiary claim that trial court failed to give jury instruction regarding credibility of jailhouse informants), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006) ; cf. State v. Steele , supra, 176 Conn. App. at 24, 27, 31 , 169 A.3d 797 (reviewing preserved claim that court imprope | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2018See State v. Martinez , 95 Conn. App. 162 , 166 n.3, 896 A.2d 109 (2006) (concluding that even if new jury instruction rule announced in State v. Patterson , 276 Conn. 452 , 886 A.2d 777 [2005], which was not of constitutional dimension, was retroactive, this court would decline to review defendant's unpreserved evidentiary claim that trial court failed to give jury instruction regarding credibility of jailhouse informants), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006) ; cf. State v. Steele , supra, 176 Conn. App. at 24, 27, 31 , 169 A.3d 797 (reviewing preserved claim that court imprope | 1 | 1 |
Santana v. City of Hartfordgreen1 sentence2018See State v. Martinez , 95 Conn. App. 162 , 166 n.3, 896 A.2d 109 (2006) (concluding that even if new jury instruction rule announced in State v. Patterson , 276 Conn. 452 , 886 A.2d 777 [2005], which was not of constitutional dimension, was retroactive, this court would decline to review defendant's unpreserved evidentiary claim that trial court failed to give jury instruction regarding credibility of jailhouse informants), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006) ; cf. State v. Steele , supra, 176 Conn. App. at 24, 27, 31 , 169 A.3d 797 (reviewing preserved claim that court imprope | 1 | 1 |
State v. Martinezgreen2 sentences2018See State v. Martinez , 95 Conn. App. 162 , 166 n.3, 896 A.2d 109 (2006) (concluding that even if new jury instruction rule announced in State v. Patterson , 276 Conn. 452 , 886 A.2d 777 [2005], which was not of constitutional dimension, was retroactive, this court would decline to review defendant's unpreserved evidentiary claim that trial court failed to give jury instruction regarding credibility of jailhouse informants), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006) ; cf. State v. Steele , supra, 176 Conn. App. at 24, 27, 31 , 169 A.3d 797 (reviewing preserved claim that court imprope 2018See State v. Martinez , 95 Conn. App. 162 , 166 n.3, 896 A.2d 109 (2006) (concluding that even if new jury instruction rule announced in State v. Patterson , 276 Conn. 452 , 886 A.2d 777 [2005], which was not of constitutional dimension, was retroactive, this court would decline to review defendant's unpreserved evidentiary claim that trial court failed to give jury instruction regarding credibility of jailhouse informants), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006) ; cf. State v. Steele , supra, 176 Conn. App. at 24, 27, 31 , 169 A.3d 797 (reviewing preserved claim that court imprope | 1 | 1 |
Westport Bank & Trust Co. v. Corcorangreen1 sentence2003See id. | 1 | 1 |
Shore v. Town of Stoningtongreen1 sentence1995See Shore v. Stonington , 187 Conn. 147 , 153 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. Duryea
green
2 sentences1967Although this court has not had occasion directly to approve the common-law rule, it has given strong intimation of a recognition of the rule in Pierce v. Albanese, supra, 249 , and London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. Duryea, 143 Conn. 53, 59 , 119 A.2d 325 . 1967Although this court has not had occasion directly to approve the common-law rule, it has given strong intimation of a recognition of the rule in Pierce v. Albanese, supra, 249 , and London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. Duryea, 143 Conn. 53, 59 , 119 A.2d 325 . | 2 | 1967–1976 |
State v. Rutan
green
2 sentences2004Put another way, "the prosecution must introduce sufficient evidence to justify a conviction before the defendant may be required to respond." State v. Rutan, supra, 194 Conn. at 442-43 , 479 A.2d 1209 . 2004Put another way, "the prosecution must introduce sufficient evidence to justify a conviction before the defendant may be required to respond." State v. Rutan, supra, 194 Conn. at 442-43 , 479 A.2d 1209 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Allen
green
2 sentences2004Implicit in งง 42-40 and 42-41 of the rules of practice is a recognition of the principle that "[a] criminal defendant has the right to put the state to its burden and need not defend until and unless the state has presented a prima facie case." State v. Allen, supra, 205 Conn. at 376 , 533 A.2d 559 . 2004Implicit in งง 42-40 and 42-41 of the rules of practice is a recognition of the principle that "[a] criminal defendant has the right to put the state to its burden and need not defend until and unless the state has presented a prima facie case." State v. Allen, supra, 205 Conn. at 376 , 533 A.2d 559 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Mendillo v. Board of Education
red
2 sentences2000Id. 477 . ". . . we conclude that on balance, the wiser judicial policy is not to recognize the claim for loss of consortium by a minor child." Id. 480 . 2000Id. 477 . ". . . we conclude that on balance, the wiser judicial policy is not to recognize the claim for loss of consortium by a minor child." Id. 480 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Picketts v. International Playtex, Inc.
green
1 sentence1994IV Although plaintiffs' motion to vacate the award must be dismissed for lack of venue, the court nevertheless addresses the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also raised by Recognition. "[T]he doctrine of forum non conveniens vests discretion in the trial court to decide `where trial will best serve the convenience of the parties and the ends of justice.'" (Citations omitted.) Picketts v. International Playtex, Inc., 215 Conn. 490 , 500 (1990). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Pokorny v. Getta's Garage
green
1 sentence1992Second, the court’s recognition of the error must be ‘in the interests of justice.’ Practice Book § 4185.” Sciola v. Shernow, 22 Conn. App. 351, 360 , 577 A.2d 1081 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 815 , 580 A.2d 60 (1990). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Smith v. Liburdi
green
1 sentence1992Second, the court’s recognition of the error must be ‘in the interests of justice.’ Practice Book § 4185.” Sciola v. Shernow, 22 Conn. App. 351, 360 , 577 A.2d 1081 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 815 , 580 A.2d 60 (1990). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Connecticut State Board of Labor Relations v. Board of Education
green
1 sentence1992No. 1980 (1981), the SBLR, applying the MERA, held that "the parties are bound by the terms (including the recognition clause) of an existing contract unless they can make a showing (1) that would relieve them of the obligation of the provision under prevailing legal or equitable principles, or (2) that would reveal a conflict between a contractual provision and the policies of the Act, or (3) that would indicate a change of circumstances which would render the contract provision substantially less compatible with the policies of the Act than it was initially." Id. (emphasis added). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Sciola v. Shernow
green
2 sentences1992Second, the court’s recognition of the error must be ‘in the interests of justice.’ Practice Book § 4185.” Sciola v. Shernow, 22 Conn. App. 351, 360 , 577 A.2d 1081 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 815 , 580 A.2d 60 (1990). 1992Second, the court’s recognition of the error must be ‘in the interests of justice.’ Practice Book § 4185.” Sciola v. Shernow, 22 Conn. App. 351, 360 , 577 A.2d 1081 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 815 , 580 A.2d 60 (1990). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Kavanewsky v. Zoning Board of Appeals
green
2 sentences1992A determination of plain error derives “not by reason of the appellant’s right to have it determined but because, in our opinion, in the interest of . . . justice between the parties it ought to be done.” Kavanewsky v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 160 Conn. 397, 401 , 279 A.2d 567 (1971). 1992A determination of plain error derives “not by reason of the appellant’s right to have it determined but because, in our opinion, in the interest of . . . justice between the parties it ought to be done.” Kavanewsky v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 160 Conn. 397, 401 , 279 A.2d 567 (1971). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Krasnov v. United States
green
2 sentences1976Although this court has not had occasion directly to approve the common-law rule, it has given strong intimation of a recognition of the rule in Pierce v. Albanese, . . . [ 144 Conn. 241, 249 , 129 A.2d 606 , appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15 , 78 S. Ct. 36 , 2 L. 1976Although this court has not had occasion directly to approve the common-law rule, it has given strong intimation of a recognition of the rule in Pierce v. Albanese, ... [ 144 Conn. 241, 249 , 129 A.2d 606 , appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15 , 78 S. Ct. 36 , 2 L. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Albanese v. Pierce
green
2 sentences1976Although this court has not had occasion directly to approve the common-law rule, it has given strong intimation of a recognition of the rule in Pierce v. Albanese, . . . [ 144 Conn. 241, 249 , 129 A.2d 606 , appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15 , 78 S. Ct. 36 , 2 L. 1976Although this court has not had occasion directly to approve the common-law rule, it has given strong intimation of a recognition of the rule in Pierce v. Albanese, ... [ 144 Conn. 241, 249 , 129 A.2d 606 , appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15 , 78 S. Ct. 36 , 2 L. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Bryan v. Atwater
neutral
1 sentence1976Camp v. Camp, 5 Conn. 291, 303 ; Bryan v. Atwater, supra, 191 ; 3 Am. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Camp v. Camp
green
1 sentence1976Camp v. Camp, 5 Conn. 291, 303 ; Bryan v. Atwater, supra, 191 ; 3 Am. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Pierce v. Albanese
green
2 sentences1976Although this court has not had occasion directly to approve the common-law rule, it has given strong intimation of a recognition of the rule in Pierce v. Albanese, . . . [ 144 Conn. 241, 249 , 129 A.2d 606 , appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15 , 78 S. Ct. 36 , 2 L. 1976Although this court has not had occasion directly to approve the common-law rule, it has given strong intimation of a recognition of the rule in Pierce v. Albanese, . . . [ 144 Conn. 241, 249 , 129 A.2d 606 , appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15 , 78 S. Ct. 36 , 2 L. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Charles v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.
green
2 sentences1976Although this court has not had occasion directly to approve the common-law rule, it has given strong intimation of a recognition of the rule in Pierce v. Albanese, . . . [ 144 Conn. 241, 249 , 129 A.2d 606 , appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15 , 78 S. Ct. 36 , 2 L. 1976Although this court has not had occasion directly to approve the common-law rule, it has given strong intimation of a recognition of the rule in Pierce v. Albanese, ... [ 144 Conn. 241, 249 , 129 A.2d 606 , appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15 , 78 S. Ct. 36 , 2 L. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Noonan v. Galick
green
2 sentences1967And the Superior Court directly adopted the common-law rule in Noonan v. Galick, 19 Conn. Sup. 308, 310 , 112 A.2d 892 . 1967And the Superior Court directly adopted the common-law rule in Noonan v. Galick, 19 Conn. Sup. 308, 310 , 112 A.2d 892 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Buckingham v. Smith
neutral
1 sentence1860That was the course pursued by the superior court, and sanctioned by this court, in the case of Buckingham v. Smith, 23 Conn., 453 . | 1 | 1860–1860 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.