disability claim in Michigan

1996The economic necessity of a claimant securing a means of support pending resolution of a disability claim was noted by this Court in Paschke, supra at 517 , and in Bower, supra at 193 . [I]t is important to recognize that if the employer does not pay compensation voluntarily, the employee may be without any means of support until an award of benefits is made by the referee at the hearing, [id.] We do recognize, however, that if Mr. Derr has permanently removed himself from the job market, he may no longer be available for a reasonable-employment position.

1996The economic necessity of a claimant securing a means of support pending resolution of a disability claim was noted by this Court in Paschke, supra at 517 , 519 N.W.2d 441 , and in Bower, supra at 193 , 312 N.W.2d 640 . [I]t is important to recognize that if the employer does not pay compensation voluntarily, the employee may be without any means of support until an award of benefits is made by the referee at the hearing. [ Id. ] We do recognize, however, that if Mr. Derr has permanently removed himself from the job market, he may no longer be available for a reasonable-employment position.

2000The Court further concluded that, whenever an employer sought to assert the total disability requirement of MCL 417.4; MSA 17.223, “such employer shall bear the burden of proving that such disease is so common and widespread as to present a threat to the industry comparable to silicosis, phthisis, or pneumoconiosis.” Felcoskie, supra at 446 .

1996The economic necessity of a claimant securing a means of support pending resolution of a disability claim was noted by this Court in Paschke, supra at 517 , and in Bower, supra at 193 . [I]t is important to recognize that if the employer does not pay compensation voluntarily, the employee may be without any means of support until an award of benefits is made by the referee at the hearing, [id.] We do recognize, however, that if Mr. Derr has permanently removed himself from the job market, he may no longer be available for a reasonable-employment position.

1996The economic necessity of a claimant securing a means of support pending resolution of a disability claim was noted by this Court in Paschke, supra at 517 , 519 N.W.2d 441 , and in Bower, supra at 193 , 312 N.W.2d 640 . [I]t is important to recognize that if the employer does not pay compensation voluntarily, the employee may be without any means of support until an award of benefits is made by the referee at the hearing. [ Id. ] We do recognize, however, that if Mr. Derr has permanently removed himself from the job market, he may no longer be available for a reasonable-employment position.

1993A copy of Kostamo, supra, was even attached to the task force report discussing the issue.

1993A copy of Kostamo, supra, was even attached to the task force report discussing the issue.

1988See Kaarto, supra; Adair v Metropolitan Building Co, 38 Mich App 393 ; 196 NW2d 335 (1972). 5 Consistent with the holding in Hurd, supra, I conclude that § 373 is substantive as well as procedural in nature.

1988See Kaarto, supra; Adair v Metropolitan Building Co, 38 Mich App 393 ; 196 NW2d 335 (1972). 5 Consistent with the holding in Hurd, supra, I conclude that § 373 is substantive as well as procedural in nature.

1988See Kaarto, supra; Adair v Metropolitan Building Co, 38 Mich App 393 ; 196 NW2d 335 (1972). [5] Consistent with the holding in Hurd, supra, I conclude that § 373 is substantive as well as procedural in nature.

1988See Kaarto, supra; Adair v Metropolitan Building Co, 38 Mich App 393 ; 196 NW2d 335 (1972). 5 Consistent with the holding in Hurd, supra, I conclude that § 373 is substantive as well as procedural in nature.

1987See Mowery, supra, pp 969-970; Kirk v Secretary of Health & Human Services, 667 F2d 524, 528 (CA 6, 1981), cert den 461 US 957 ; 103 S Ct 2428 ; 77 L Ed 2d 1315 (1983).

1987See Mowery, supra, pp 969-970; Kirk v Secretary of Health & Human Services, 667 F2d 524, 528 (CA 6, 1981), cert den 461 US 957 ; 103 S Ct 2428 ; 77 L Ed 2d 1315 (1983).

1987See Mowery, supra, pp 969-970; Kirk v Secretary of Health & Human Services, 667 F2d 524, 528 (CA 6, 1981), cert den 461 US 957 ; 103 S Ct 2428 ; 77 L Ed 2d 1315 (1983).

1970Beyond that, however, there is hardly justification for letting the defendant affirmatively resort to perjurious testimony in reliance on the government’s disability to challenge his credibility.” In this Court’s recent case of People v. Marsh (1968), 14 Mich App 518 , rev (1970), 383 Mich 495 , 13 *611 we were faced with the attempted use by the prosecution of * * * an illegally obtained confession for cross-examination purposes.

1970Beyond that, however, there is hardly justification for letting the defendant affirmatively resort to perjurious testimony in reliance on the government’s disability to challenge his credibility.” In this Court’s recent case of People v. Marsh (1968), 14 Mich App 518 , rev (1970), 383 Mich 495 , 13 *611 we were faced with the attempted use by the prosecution of * * * an illegally obtained confession for cross-examination purposes.

1969“The situation here involved is to be sharply contrasted with that presented by Agnello v. United States, 269 US 20 ( 46 S Ct 4 , 70 L Ed 145 ).

1969“The situation here involved is to be sharply contrasted with that presented by Agnello v. United States, 269 US 20 ( 46 S Ct 4 , 70 L Ed 145 ).

1914As the will spoke from the date of the testator’s death, there was then no statute which would relieve the bequest from the disability of the rule against perpetuities, and this court could not sustain the validity of the bequest of the $100 involved without overruling the case of Palms v. Palms, 68 Mich. 379 ( 36 N. W. 419 ).