Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1958–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moon v. BD. OF TRUSTEES MUN. FIRE & POL.green2 sentences2022The dissent relies heavily on Moon v. Board of Trustees of Municipal Fire & Police Retirement System of Iowa, in which we applied Dunlavey’s causation test to a disability claim by a police officer seeking benefits under Iowa Code chapter 411. 548 N.W.2d 565, 568 (Iowa 1996). 2022The dissent relies heavily on Moon v. Board of Trustees of Municipal Fire & Police Retirement System of Iowa, in which we applied Dunlavey’s causation test to a disability claim by a police officer seeking benefits under Iowa Code chapter 411. 548 N.W.2d 565, 568 (Iowa 1996). | 2 | 2 |
Terrell v. Austin Bridge Co.green1 sentence1997App. 1 , 660 S.W.2d 941, 943 (1983); Saums v. Raleigh Community Hosp., 487 S.E.2d 746 , *19 750 (N.C.1997); see also 4 Arthur Larson, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 57.21, 57.34 at 10-121,10-239 to 10-245 (1997) (stating the ultimate objective of the disability test is to determine the wage that would have been paid in the open market under normal employment conditions to claimant as injured). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Saums v. Raleigh Community Hospital
green
1 sentence1997App. 1 , 660 S.W.2d 941, 943 (1983); Saums v. Raleigh Community Hosp., 487 S.E.2d 746 , *19 750 (N.C.1997); see also 4 Arthur Larson, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 57.21, 57.34 at 10-121,10-239 to 10-245 (1997) (stating the ultimate objective of the disability test is to determine the wage that would have been paid in the open market under normal employment conditions to claimant as injured). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Harris v. New York
green
2 sentences1985Such an extension of the Weeks doctrine would be a perversion of the Fourth Amendment. “[T]here is hardly justification for letting the defendant affirmatively resort to perjurious testimony in reliance on the Government’s disability to challenge his credibility.” 401 U.S. at 224 , [ 91 S.Ct. at 645 ] 28 L.Ed.2d at 4 . 1985Such an extension of the Weeks doctrine would be a perversion of the Fourth Amendment. “[T]here is hardly justification for letting the defendant affirmatively resort to perjurious testimony in reliance on the Government’s disability to challenge his credibility.” 401 U.S. at 224 , [ 91 S.Ct. at 645 ] 28 L.Ed.2d at 4 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Lyon v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co.
green
1 sentence1958Co., 46 Iowa 631 , perhaps the leading ease in the country upholding the literal meaning of such a disability clause. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Hurley v. Bankers Life Co.
green
1 sentence1958It is apparent from Hurley v. Bankers Life Co., 198 Iowa 1129 , 199 N.W. 343 , 37 A. L. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.