state constitutional challenge (Minnesota) · Go Syfert
← Minnesota issues

state constitutional challenge in Minnesota

11 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (11)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Oldenkampgreen
minn · 1987 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
1 sentence

1997The Uniformity Clause found in Article Ten, Section One of the Minnesota Constitution provides that “[t]axes shall be uniform upon the same class of subjects.” “We have determined that the state [U]niformity [C]lause is no more restrictive upon the state legislature’s power to tax or classify than the federal [E]qual [P]ro-tection [C]lause, and that an analysis under equal protection is applicable to the state constitutional challenge.” Lund v. County of Hennepin, 403 N.W.2d 617, 619 (Minn.1987).

11
Matter of Personal Restraint of Youngred
wash · 1993 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting "an utter lack of control" as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (rejecting *318 the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individu

1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals

11
State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Courtgreen
minn · 1939 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals

1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals

11
Foucha v. Louisianagreen
scotus · 1992 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals

1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals

11
Call v. Gomezgreen
minn · 1995 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting "an utter lack of control" as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (rejecting *318 the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individu

1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals

11
In Re Blodgettgreen
minn · 1994 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting "an utter lack of control" as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (rejecting *318 the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individu

1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals

11
State v. Nordstromgreen
minn · 1983 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990
2 sentences

1990See State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901, 904-05 (Minn.1983); Hepfel v. Bashaw, 279 N.W.2d 342, 348 (Minn.1979).

1990See State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901, 904-05 (Minn.1983); Hepfel v. Bashaw, 279 N.W.2d 342, 348 (Minn.1979).

11
Hepfel v. Bashawgreen
minn · 1979 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990
2 sentences

1990See State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901, 904-05 (Minn.1983); Hepfel v. Bashaw, 279 N.W.2d 342, 348 (Minn.1979).

1990See State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901, 904-05 (Minn.1983); Hepfel v. Bashaw, 279 N.W.2d 342, 348 (Minn.1979).

11
Hegenes v. Stategreen
minn · 1983 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Hegenes v. State, 328 N.W.2d 719, 720-21 (Minn.1983); Matter of McCannell, 301 N.W.2d 910 , 916 n. 4 (Minn.1980).

1987See, e.g., Hegenes v. State, 328 N.W.2d 719, 720-21 (Minn.1983); Matter of McCannell, 301 N.W.2d 910 , 916 n. 4 (Minn.1980).

11
State v. Oppermangreen
sd · 1976 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986See State v. Opperman, 247 N.W.2d 673, 674-75 (S.Dak.1976).

1986See State v. Opperman, 247 N.W.2d 673, 674-75 (S.Dak. 1976).

11
State v. Falconegreen
minn · 1972 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986See State v. Falcone, 292 Minn. 365 , 195 N.W.2d 572 (1972); State v. Ioseu, 220 Minn. 283 , 19 N.W.2d 735 (1945).

1986See State v. Falcone, 292 Minn. 365 , 195 N.W.2d 572 (1972); State v. Ioseu, 220 Minn. 283 , 19 N.W.2d 735 (1945).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (18)

CaseCitedYears
Raley v. Ohio green
scotus · 1959
1 sentence

2025The Commission, acting on behalf of the State, had mistakenly informed the witnesses that they had the right to rely on a state constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, even though a state statute negated the privilege by granting immunity from criminal prosecution to any person testifying before a legislative committee regarding the matter to which the witnesses testified. 360 U.S. 423, 431 , 437–39 (1959).

12025–2025
State v. Davis green
minn · 2007
1 sentence

2016Davis, 732 N.W.2d at 178-79 .

12016–2016
State v. Barsness green
minn · 1990
1 sentence

2002Friedman, 473 N.W.2d at 835 .

12002–2002
Branzburg v. Hayes green
scotus · 1972
2 sentences

1999Likewise in State v. Turner, 550 N.W.2d 622 (Minn.1996), we applied the Supreme Court’s analysis in Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 , 92 S.Ct. 2646 , 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972), under the Federal Constitution to reject the argument that a newspaper photographer who witnessed criminal activity enjoyed a state constitutional privilege to refuse to testify at trial.

1999Likewise in State v. Turner, 550 N.W.2d 622 (Minn.1996), we applied the Supreme Court’s analysis in Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 , 92 S.Ct. 2646 , 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972), under the Federal Constitution to reject the argument that a newspaper photographer who witnessed criminal activity enjoyed a state constitutional privilege to refuse to testify at trial.

11999–1999
State v. Turner green
minn · 1996
1 sentence

1999Likewise in State v. Turner, 550 N.W.2d 622 (Minn.1996), we applied the Supreme Court’s analysis in Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 , 92 S.Ct. 2646 , 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972), under the Federal Constitution to reject the argument that a newspaper photographer who witnessed criminal activity enjoyed a state constitutional privilege to refuse to testify at trial.

11999–1999
Edgewood Independent School District v. Kirby green
tex · 1989
2 sentences

1993This system, not surprisingly, was held to violate the state constitutional requirement of “an efficient system of public free schools.” Id. at 393 .

1993This system, not surprisingly, was held to violate the state constitutional requirement of "an efficient system of public free schools." Id. at 393 .

11993–1993
Village of Burnsville v. Onischuk green
minn · 1974
2 sentences

1987Id. at 153-54, 222 N.W.2d at 532-33 .

1987Id. at 153-54, 222 N.W.2d at 532-33 .

11987–1987
McCannel v. County of Hennepin green
minn · 1980
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Hegenes v. State, 328 N.W.2d 719, 720-21 (Minn.1983); Matter of McCannell, 301 N.W.2d 910 , 916 n. 4 (Minn.1980).

1987See, e.g., Hegenes v. State, 328 N.W.2d 719, 720-21 (Minn.1983); Matter of McCannell, 301 N.W.2d 910 , 916 n. 4 (Minn.1980).

11987–1987
State v. Iosue green
minn · 1945
2 sentences

1986See State v. Falcone, 292 Minn. 365 , 195 N.W.2d 572 (1972); State v. Ioseu, 220 Minn. 283 , 19 N.W.2d 735 (1945).

1986See State v. Falcone, 292 Minn. 365 , 195 N.W.2d 572 (1972); State v. Ioseu, 220 Minn. 283 , 19 N.W.2d 735 (1945).

11986–1986
Stilson v. United States green
scotus · 1919
1 sentence

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

11980–1980
Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield green
scotus · 1918
2 sentences

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

11980–1980
Cumberland Coal Co. v. Board of Revision of Tax Assessments in Greene Cty. green
scotus · 1931
2 sentences

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

11980–1980
Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County green
scotus · 1923
2 sentences

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

11980–1980
In RE PETITION OF HAMM v. State green
minn · 1959
1 sentence

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

11980–1980
Johnson v. County of Ramsey green
minn · 1971
2 sentences

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

11980–1980
Bethke v. County of Brown green
minn · 1974
1 sentence

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

11980–1980
Ploetz v. County of Hennepin green
minn · 1974
2 sentences

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

11980–1980
Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State green
minn · 1964
2 sentences

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat

11980–1980

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MN § Minn. Stat. § 273.13 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CT 256 (1984–2026) WA 153 (1980–2026) NM 93 (1988–2025) CA 90 (1969–2024) NH 90 (1982–2025) PA 70 (1985–2025) UT 61 (1988–2025) OR 60 (1983–2025) TX 56 (1973–2024) IA 50 (1995–2026) WY 48 (1991–2025) NY 46 (1981–2026) IN 45 (1980–2025) TN 26 (1993–2017) MD 22 (1967–2025) ID 19 (1980–2025) NC 16 (1985–2022) MI 15 (1984–2025) NJ 15 (1975–2026) GA 14 (1982–2025) MA 13 (1981–2018) VT 12 (1985–2020) MN 11 (1980–2025) AZ 10 (1986–2024) OK 10 (1985–2013) WI 9 (1998–2019) ME 9 (1985–2025) HI 9 (2004–2024) DE 9 (1971–2024) FL 8 (1995–2025) AK 8 (1979–2024) IL 6 (2003–2026) RI 5 (1980–2007) KS 5 (1998–2026) ND 4 (1999–2005) CO 3 (1992–2020) MT 3 (1980–2017) MO 2 (1979–2016) OH 2 (1995–1995)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check