11 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Oldenkampgreen1 sentence1997The Uniformity Clause found in Article Ten, Section One of the Minnesota Constitution provides that “[t]axes shall be uniform upon the same class of subjects.” “We have determined that the state [U]niformity [C]lause is no more restrictive upon the state legislature’s power to tax or classify than the federal [E]qual [P]ro-tection [C]lause, and that an analysis under equal protection is applicable to the state constitutional challenge.” Lund v. County of Hennepin, 403 N.W.2d 617, 619 (Minn.1987). | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Personal Restraint of Youngred2 sentences1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting "an utter lack of control" as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (rejecting *318 the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individu 1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals | 1 | 1 |
State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Courtgreen2 sentences1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals 1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals | 1 | 1 |
Foucha v. Louisianagreen2 sentences1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals 1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals | 1 | 1 |
Call v. Gomezgreen2 sentences1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting "an utter lack of control" as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (rejecting *318 the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individu 1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals | 1 | 1 |
In Re Blodgettgreen2 sentences1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting "an utter lack of control" as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (rejecting *318 the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individu 1996See Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312 , 318 n. 4, 319 (Minn.1995) (recognizing that mental illness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment, but rejecting “an utter lack of control” as the dividing line between acceptable confinement and mandatory release); see also Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 914-15 (reject ing the argument that the United States Constitution requires mental illness, as defined by the medical profession, for involuntary commitment); Pearson, 205 Minn. at 550 , 287 N.W. at 300 (rejecting a state constitutional challenge of a law providing for the commitment of individuals | 1 | 1 |
State v. Nordstromgreen2 sentences1990See State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901, 904-05 (Minn.1983); Hepfel v. Bashaw, 279 N.W.2d 342, 348 (Minn.1979). 1990See State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901, 904-05 (Minn.1983); Hepfel v. Bashaw, 279 N.W.2d 342, 348 (Minn.1979). | 1 | 1 |
Hepfel v. Bashawgreen2 sentences1990See State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901, 904-05 (Minn.1983); Hepfel v. Bashaw, 279 N.W.2d 342, 348 (Minn.1979). 1990See State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901, 904-05 (Minn.1983); Hepfel v. Bashaw, 279 N.W.2d 342, 348 (Minn.1979). | 1 | 1 |
Hegenes v. Stategreen2 sentences1987See, e.g., Hegenes v. State, 328 N.W.2d 719, 720-21 (Minn.1983); Matter of McCannell, 301 N.W.2d 910 , 916 n. 4 (Minn.1980). 1987See, e.g., Hegenes v. State, 328 N.W.2d 719, 720-21 (Minn.1983); Matter of McCannell, 301 N.W.2d 910 , 916 n. 4 (Minn.1980). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Oppermangreen2 sentences1986See State v. Opperman, 247 N.W.2d 673, 674-75 (S.Dak.1976). 1986See State v. Opperman, 247 N.W.2d 673, 674-75 (S.Dak. 1976). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Falconegreen2 sentences1986See State v. Falcone, 292 Minn. 365 , 195 N.W.2d 572 (1972); State v. Ioseu, 220 Minn. 283 , 19 N.W.2d 735 (1945). 1986See State v. Falcone, 292 Minn. 365 , 195 N.W.2d 572 (1972); State v. Ioseu, 220 Minn. 283 , 19 N.W.2d 735 (1945). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Raley v. Ohio
green
1 sentence2025The Commission, acting on behalf of the State, had mistakenly informed the witnesses that they had the right to rely on a state constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, even though a state statute negated the privilege by granting immunity from criminal prosecution to any person testifying before a legislative committee regarding the matter to which the witnesses testified. 360 U.S. 423, 431 , 437–39 (1959). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Davis
green
1 sentence2016Davis, 732 N.W.2d at 178-79 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Barsness
green
1 sentence2002Friedman, 473 N.W.2d at 835 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Branzburg v. Hayes
green
2 sentences1999Likewise in State v. Turner, 550 N.W.2d 622 (Minn.1996), we applied the Supreme Court’s analysis in Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 , 92 S.Ct. 2646 , 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972), under the Federal Constitution to reject the argument that a newspaper photographer who witnessed criminal activity enjoyed a state constitutional privilege to refuse to testify at trial. 1999Likewise in State v. Turner, 550 N.W.2d 622 (Minn.1996), we applied the Supreme Court’s analysis in Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 , 92 S.Ct. 2646 , 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972), under the Federal Constitution to reject the argument that a newspaper photographer who witnessed criminal activity enjoyed a state constitutional privilege to refuse to testify at trial. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Turner
green
1 sentence1999Likewise in State v. Turner, 550 N.W.2d 622 (Minn.1996), we applied the Supreme Court’s analysis in Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 , 92 S.Ct. 2646 , 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972), under the Federal Constitution to reject the argument that a newspaper photographer who witnessed criminal activity enjoyed a state constitutional privilege to refuse to testify at trial. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Edgewood Independent School District v. Kirby
green
2 sentences1993This system, not surprisingly, was held to violate the state constitutional requirement of “an efficient system of public free schools.” Id. at 393 . 1993This system, not surprisingly, was held to violate the state constitutional requirement of "an efficient system of public free schools." Id. at 393 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Village of Burnsville v. Onischuk
green
2 sentences1987Id. at 153-54, 222 N.W.2d at 532-33 . 1987Id. at 153-54, 222 N.W.2d at 532-33 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
McCannel v. County of Hennepin
green
2 sentences1987See, e.g., Hegenes v. State, 328 N.W.2d 719, 720-21 (Minn.1983); Matter of McCannell, 301 N.W.2d 910 , 916 n. 4 (Minn.1980). 1987See, e.g., Hegenes v. State, 328 N.W.2d 719, 720-21 (Minn.1983); Matter of McCannell, 301 N.W.2d 910 , 916 n. 4 (Minn.1980). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Iosue
green
2 sentences1986See State v. Falcone, 292 Minn. 365 , 195 N.W.2d 572 (1972); State v. Ioseu, 220 Minn. 283 , 19 N.W.2d 735 (1945). 1986See State v. Falcone, 292 Minn. 365 , 195 N.W.2d 572 (1972); State v. Ioseu, 220 Minn. 283 , 19 N.W.2d 735 (1945). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Stilson v. United States
green
1 sentence1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield
green
2 sentences1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat 1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Cumberland Coal Co. v. Board of Revision of Tax Assessments in Greene Cty.
green
2 sentences1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat 1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County
green
2 sentences1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat 1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat | 1 | 1980–1980 |
In RE PETITION OF HAMM v. State
green
1 sentence1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Johnson v. County of Ramsey
green
2 sentences1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat 1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Bethke v. County of Brown
green
1 sentence1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Ploetz v. County of Hennepin
green
2 sentences1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat 1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State
green
2 sentences1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat 1980Cumberland Coal Co. v, Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 43 S.Ct. 190 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923); Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 63 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Ploetz v. County of Hennepin, 301 Minn. 410 , 223 N.W.2d 761 (1974); Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 382 , 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1 , 132 N.W.2d 394 (1964); In re Petition of Hamm v. Stat | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.