license privilege (Arkansas) · Go Syfert
← Arkansas issues

license privilege in Arkansas

10 Arkansas opinions name it 3 courts 1989–2025 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Rose v. Stategreen
arkctapp · 2015 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017See id.; see also Rose v. State, 2015 Ark.

11
Holt v. Stategreen
ark · 2011 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017See Holt v. State, 2011 Ark. 391 , 384 S.W.3d 498 ; Young v. State, 371 Ark. 393 , 266 S.W.3d 744 (2007).

2017See Holt v. State, 2011 Ark. 391 , 384 S.W.3d 498 ; Young v. State, 371 Ark. 393 , 266 S.W.3d 744 (2007).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Holland v. State green
arkctapp · 2017
2 sentences

2025This court has previously held that “a person’s license or privilege to enter a home is revoked once that person inflicts injury upon the owner.” Holland v. State, 2017 Ark.

2025App. 49, at 5 , 510 S.W.3d 311, 314 .

22021–2025
LeFlore v. State green
arkctapp · 1986
2 sentences

2022App. 117 , 704 S.W.2d 641 (1986) (a defendant’s license or privilege to go into one section of the courthouse for the purpose of retrieving his tools did not authorize him to go into other unauthorized areas for the purpose of committing theft).

2022App. 117 , 704 S.W.2d 641 (1986) (a defendant’s license or privilege to go into one section of the courthouse for the purpose of retrieving his tools did not authorize him to go into other unauthorized areas for the purpose of committing theft).

22022–2022
Baker v. State neutral
arkctapp · 2016
1 sentence

2025App. 385 , 555 S.W.3d 413 . 4 Baker, supra. 5 Id. 6 (Repl. 2022). 3 (a)(1) Any person whose driver’s license or driving privilege as a resident or nonresident has been cancelled, suspended, or revoked as provided in this chapter and who drives any motor vehicle upon the highways of this state while the license or privilege is cancelled, suspended, or revoked is guilty of a misdemeanor. (2) Upon conviction, an offender shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two (2) days not more than six (6) months, and there may be imposed in addition thereto a fine of not more than five hundred d

12025–2025
Vangilder v. State neutral
arkctapp · 2018
1 sentence

2025App. 385 , 555 S.W.3d 413 . 4 Baker, supra. 5 Id. 6 (Repl. 2022). 3 (a)(1) Any person whose driver’s license or driving privilege as a resident or nonresident has been cancelled, suspended, or revoked as provided in this chapter and who drives any motor vehicle upon the highways of this state while the license or privilege is cancelled, suspended, or revoked is guilty of a misdemeanor. (2) Upon conviction, an offender shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two (2) days not more than six (6) months, and there may be imposed in addition thereto a fine of not more than five hundred d

12025–2025
Young v. State green
ark · 2007
2 sentences

2017See Holt v. State, 2011 Ark. 391 , 384 S.W.3d 498 ; Young v. State, 371 Ark. 393 , 266 S.W.3d 744 (2007).

2017See Holt v. State, 2011 Ark. 391 , 384 S.W.3d 498 ; Young v. State, 371 Ark. 393 , 266 S.W.3d 744 (2007).

12017–2017
Bird v. Pan Western Corp. green
ark · 1977
2 sentences

1999The applicability of the statute to subcontractors was established beyond question in Bird v. Pan Western Corp., 261 Ark. 56 , 62 , 546 S.W.2d 417 (1989), in which the Supreme Court offered the following reading of the materially indistinguishable predecessor statute: The cases cited by appellant cannot be read to support the position that subcontracting for construction of a portion of a building or of an integral part thereof is not included in the general term "construction" as used in the act.

1999The applicability of the statute to subcontractors was established beyond question in Bird v. Pan Western Corp., 261 Ark. 56 , 62 , 546 S.W.2d 417 (1989), in which the Supreme Court offered the following reading of the materially indistinguishable predecessor statute: The cases cited by appellant cannot be read to support the position that subcontracting for construction of a portion of a building or of an integral part thereof is not included in the general term "construction" as used in the act.

11999–1999
Blockburger v. United States green
scotus · 1931
2 sentences

1996Appellant argues that under the test enunciated in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), reckless driving contains the same elements as do aggravated assault and first-degree battery.

1996Appellant argues that under the test enunciated in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), reckless driving contains the same elements as do aggravated assault and first-degree battery.

11996–1996
Examining Bd. of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors v. Flores De Otero green
scotus · 1976
2 sentences

1989The United States Supreme Court held in Examining Board v. Flores de Otero, 426 U.S. 572 (1976), that Puerto Rico could not condition the grant of an engineer's license on a requirement of U.S. citizenship.

1989The Court there stated: It is with respect to this kind of discrimination that the States have had the greatest difficulty in persuading this Court that their interests are substantial and constitutionally permissible, and that the discrimination is necessary for the safeguarding of those interests. 426 U.S. at 603 .

11989–1989

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AR § Ark. Code Ann. § 5-39-101 (3) AR § Ark. Code Ann. § 5-39-201 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 83 (1889–2025) PA 82 (1846–2025) IL 76 (1894–2025) CA 61 (1862–2026) AL 38 (1906–2014) TX 33 (1907–2024) MO 26 (1913–2024) GA 24 (1891–2025) FL 23 (1934–2017) MD 22 (1924–2025) OH 21 (1922–2025) KS 20 (1927–2020) IN 19 (1904–2019) MN 19 (1909–2017) WA 18 (1916–2024) NJ 17 (1924–2024) DC 16 (1910–2013) CT 15 (1981–2022) MA 15 (1902–2024) OR 15 (1916–2019) NM 14 (1913–2017) UT 13 (1922–2024) HI 12 (1998–2025) AZ 12 (1927–2009) VA 11 (1914–2013) AR 10 (1989–2025) CO 10 (1897–2020) ID 9 (1915–2020) NC 9 (1912–2018) MI 9 (1895–2025) KY 8 (1912–2013) WY 8 (1986–2021) TN 7 (1897–2003) IA 7 (1879–2018) SD 6 (1945–2013) NE 5 (1952–1996) WV 5 (1892–1953) ME 5 (1983–2021) WI 4 (1926–1999) LA 4 (1960–2003) NH 4 (1980–2016) AK 4 (1984–2021) NV 4 (2016–2016) RI 4 (1939–2024) ND 3 (1995–2021) PR 2 (1947–1967) DE 2 (1984–1995) OK 2 (1961–1968)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check