license privilege in Massachusetts

1994Rosenfeld v. Board of Health of Chilmark, supra at 627-628. “[T]he ordinary state administrative proceeding involving land use or zoning does not present [a violation of a Federal constitutional right], regardless of how disappointed the license or privilege seeker may feel at being . . . turned down.” Id. at 628 , quoting from Creative Envts., Inc. v. Estabrook, 680 F.2d 822 , 832 n.9 (1st Cir 1981), cert denied, 459 U.S. 989 (1982).

1994Massachusetts law is fully equipped to provide plaintiffs with any remedy to which they may ultimately be entitled. “[T]he ordinary state administrative proceeding involving land use or zoning does not present [a violation of a federal constitutional right], regardless of how disappointed the license or privilege seeker may feel at being . .. turned down.” Rosenfeld, supra at 628 , quoting Creative Environments, supra at 832 n. 9 (1982).

2024L. c. 269, § 10 (n). 2See, e.g., Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. 296 , 301 (2018) ("Each time [a] phone connects to a cell site, it generates a time-stamped record known as cell-site location information [CSLI]"). driving on public roads.

2023See also Chicas, 481 Mass. at 321 ("judge was permitted to limit the defendant's cross-examination of the witnesses to prevent embarrassment and harassment" [citation omitted]). 15 a firearm without a license in violation of G.

2016See Capuano, Inc., 330 Mass. 496 .

2015L. c. 269, § 10 (a). 2 The defendant does not challenge his conviction on the firearm indictment on appeal. 3 In evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, we also must consider, in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, “the evidence at the close of all the evidence to determine whether the Commonwealth’s position as to proof had deteriorated since it had closed its case.” Commonwealth v. Brown, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 702, 709 (2001), quoting Commonwealth v. Basch, 386 Mass. 620 , 622 n.2 (1982).

2013See id. at 789 (common law of bailment may be modified by “contract, statute, or an agency relationship”).

2012See Commonwealth v. Loadholt, 460 Mass. 723, 726 (2011).

2005The Board’s effort to fashion an arbitrary alternative sanction not delineated by the applicable statute does not “provide a plaintiff relief from uncertainty and insecurity with respect to rights, duties, status, and other legal relations.” Sahli v. Bull HN Information Systems, Inc., supra, at 705.

1994See Miller v. Town of Hull, Mass., 878 F.2d 523, 529 (1st Cir. 1989) (in interpreting Creative Environments, court stated: “We held that such claims, [disputes between developers and local planning boards,] do not state a due process violation”).

1994Rosenfeld v. Board of Health of Chilmark, supra at 627-628. “[T]he ordinary state administrative proceeding involving land use or zoning does not present [a violation of a Federal constitutional right], regardless of how disappointed the license or privilege seeker may feel at being . . . turned down.” Id. at 628 , quoting from Creative Envts., Inc. v. Estabrook, 680 F.2d 822 , 832 n.9 (1st Cir 1981), cert denied, 459 U.S. 989 (1982).

1992Control Commn., 401 Mass. 347, 352 (1987); Oznemoc, Inc. v. Alcoholic Bevs.

1989Chiplin Enterprises, Inc. v. Lebanon, 712 F.2d at 1527, 1528 .

1989Court Dept., 395 Mass. 117, 130-131 (1985). “[T]he ordinary state administrative proceeding involving land use or zoning does not present [a violation of a Federal constitutional right], regardless of how disappointed the license or privilege seeker may feel at being . . . turned down.” Creative Environments, Inc. v. Estabrook, 680 F.2d at 832 n.9.

1986Commonwealth v. Jackson, 369 Mass. 904, 916-917 (1976).

1973See Smith v. Arbaugh's Restaurant, Inc. 469 F.2d 97, 101 (D.C.

1949The closest case seems to be Fuller v. Andrew, 230 Mass. 139, 146, 147 , in which Rugg, C.J., said in substance that the maintenance of a wharf erected without a license in violation of R.