license privilege in North Carolina

9 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1912–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

Case	Followed	Cited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (21)

Case	Cited	Years
Smith v. . Wilkins neutral · 1913 2 sentences 1947Smith v. Wilkins , 164 N.C. 136 , 80 S.E. 168 . 1947Smith v. Wilkins , 164 N.C. 136 , 80 S.E. 168 .	3	1939–1947
State v. . French neutral nc · 1891 2 sentences 1939Tea Co. v. Maxwell, 199 N. C., 433 , 154 S. E., 838 , affirmed 284 U. S., 575 ; Lacy v. Packing Co., 134 N. C., 567 , 47 S. E., 53 , affirmed 200 U. S., 227 ; S. v. French, 109 N. C., 722 , 14 S. E., 383 , 26 A. S. R., 590; Gatlin v. Tarboro, 78 N. C., 122 . 2. 1939Tea Co. v. Maxwell, 199 N. C., 433 , 154 S. E., 838 , affirmed 284 U. S., 575 ; Lacy v. Packing Co., 134 N. C., 567 , 47 S. E., 53 , affirmed 200 U. S., 227 ; S. v. French, 109 N. C., 722 , 14 S. E., 383 , 26 A. S. R., 590; Gatlin v. Tarboro, 78 N. C., 122 . 2.	2	1939–1939
Tea Co. v. . Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue neutral nc · 1930 2 sentences 1939Tea Co. v. Maxwell, 199 N. C., 433 , 154 S. E., 838 , affirmed 284 U. S., 575 ; Lacy v. Packing Co., 134 N. C., 567 , 47 S. E., 53 , affirmed 200 U. S., 227 ; S. v. French, 109 N. C., 722 , 14 S. E., 383 , 26 A. S. R., 590; Gatlin v. Tarboro, 78 N. C., 122 . 2. 1939Tea Co. v. Maxwell, 199 N. C., 433 , 154 S. E., 838 , affirmed 284 U. S., 575 ; Lacy v. Packing Co., 134 N. C., 567 , 47 S. E., 53 , affirmed 200 U. S., 227 ; S. v. French, 109 N. C., 722 , 14 S. E., 383 , 26 A. S. R., 590; Gatlin v. Tarboro, 78 N. C., 122 . 2.	2	1939–1939
Lacy v. . Packing Co. green nc · 1904 2 sentences 1939Tea Co. v. Maxwell, 199 N. C., 433 , 154 S. E., 838 , affirmed 284 U. S., 575 ; Lacy v. Packing Co., 134 N. C., 567 , 47 S. E., 53 , affirmed 200 U. S., 227 ; S. v. French, 109 N. C., 722 , 14 S. E., 383 , 26 A. S. R., 590; Gatlin v. Tarboro, 78 N. C., 122 . 2. 1939Tea Co. v. Maxwell, 199 N. C., 433 , 154 S. E., 838 , affirmed 284 U. S., 575 ; Lacy v. Packing Co., 134 N. C., 567 , 47 S. E., 53 , affirmed 200 U. S., 227 ; S. v. French, 109 N. C., 722 , 14 S. E., 383 , 26 A. S. R., 590; Gatlin v. Tarboro, 78 N. C., 122 . 2.	2	1939–1939
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Maxwell neutral scotus · 1931 2 sentences 1939Tea Co. v. Maxwell , 199 N.C. 433 , 154 S.E. 838 , affirmed 284 U.S. 575 ; Lacy v. Packing Co. , 134 N.C. 567 , 47 S.E. 53 , affirmed 200 U.S. 227 ; S. v. French , 109 N.C. 722 , 14 S.E. 383 , 26 A.S.R., 590; Gatlin v. Tarboro , 78 N.C. 122 . 2. 1939Tea Co. v. Maxwell, 199 N. C., 433 , 154 S. E., 838 , affirmed 284 U. S., 575 ; Lacy v. Packing Co., 134 N. C., 567 , 47 S. E., 53 , affirmed 200 U. S., 227 ; S. v. French, 109 N. C., 722 , 14 S. E., 383 , 26 A. S. R., 590; Gatlin v. Tarboro, 78 N. C., 122 . 2.	2	1939–1939
Fulton Housing Authority v. Dailey green moctapp · 2015 2 sentences 2018In other words, the defendant argued, much as defendant does in the instant case, that "because Wal-Mart was open to the public, [he] generally had a license or privilege to enter, regardless of his purpose." Id. 2018The Missouri Court of Appeals disagreed, stating "that license or privilege was revoked on [the date] when Wal-Mart 'personally communicated' to [the defendant] (through the 'Notification of Restriction from Property') that he was no longer allowed to enter onto Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. property, unless and until the notice of restriction was rescinded." Id.	1	2018–2018
Maggett v. . Roberts green nc · 1893 2 sentences 2016Gen.Stat. § 51-6 : C.S., 2498, 2 emphasizes the requirement that the license must be first delivered to the officer before the solemnization of the marriage: 195 "No minister or officer shall perform a ceremony of marriage between any two persons, or shall declare them to be man and wife, until there is delivered to him a license for the marriage of the said persons, signed by the register of deeds of the county in which the marriage is intended to take place, or by his lawful deputy." It is true that the marriage is not invalid because solemnized without a marriage license; Maggett v. Robert 2016Gen.Stat. § 51-6 : C.S., 2498, 2 emphasizes the requirement that the license must be first delivered to the officer before the solemnization of the marriage: 195 "No minister or officer shall perform a ceremony of marriage between any two persons, or shall declare them to be man and wife, until there is delivered to him a license for the marriage of the said persons, signed by the register of deeds of the county in which the marriage is intended to take place, or by his lawful deputy." It is true that the marriage is not invalid because solemnized without a marriage license; Maggett v. Robert	1	2016–2016
State v. . Parker neutral · 1890 2 sentences 2016Gen.Stat. § 51-6 : C.S., 2498, 2 emphasizes the requirement that the license must be first delivered to the officer before the solemnization of the marriage: 195 "No minister or officer shall perform a ceremony of marriage between any two persons, or shall declare them to be man and wife, until there is delivered to him a license for the marriage of the said persons, signed by the register of deeds of the county in which the marriage is intended to take place, or by his lawful deputy." It is true that the marriage is not invalid because solemnized without a marriage license; Maggett v. Robert 2016Gen.Stat. § 51-6 : C.S., 2498, 2 emphasizes the requirement that the license must be first delivered to the officer before the solemnization of the marriage: 195 "No minister or officer shall perform a ceremony of marriage between any two persons, or shall declare them to be man and wife, until there is delivered to him a license for the marriage of the said persons, signed by the register of deeds of the county in which the marriage is intended to take place, or by his lawful deputy." It is true that the marriage is not invalid because solemnized without a marriage license; Maggett v. Robert	1	2016–2016
State v. . Robbins green nc · 1845 1 sentence 2016Gen.Stat. § 51-6 : C.S., 2498, 2 emphasizes the requirement that the license must be first delivered to the officer before the solemnization of the marriage: *195 "No minister or officer shall perform a ceremony of marriage between any two persons, or shall declare them to be man and wife, until there is delivered to him a license for the marriage of the said persons, signed by the register of deeds of the county in which the marriage is intended to take place, or by his lawful deputy." It is true that the marriage is not invalid because solemnized without a marriage license; Maggett v. Robert	1	2016–2016
State v. Pledger green nc · 1962 2 sentences 2014The State asserts that “administrative license hearings before [the] DMV are not by law an ‘action or proceeding’ ” under N.C.G.S. § 84-4 and that, under State v. Pledger, 257 N.C. 634 , 127 S.E.2d 337 (1962), a nonlawyer agent is allowed to perform a legal act on behalf of a corporation without violating section 84-4 if the act is in “the primary interest of the corporation.” See Gardner v. N.C. 2014The State asserts that “administrative license hearings before [the] DMV are not by law an ‘action or proceeding’ ” under N.C.G.S. § 84-4 and that, under State v. Pledger, 257 N.C. 634 , 127 S.E.2d 337 (1962), a nonlawyer agent is allowed to perform a legal act on behalf of a corporation without violating section 84-4 if the act is in “the primary interest of the corporation.” See Gardner v. N.C.	1	2014–2014
State v. Loesch green nc · 1953 2 sentences 1992In State v. Loesch, 237 N.C. 611 , 75 S.E.2d 654 (1953), defendant was prosecuted for practicing medicine without a license in violation of N.C. 1992In State v. Loesch, 237 N.C. 611 , 75 S.E.2d 654 (1953), defendant was prosecuted for practicing medicine without a license in violation of N.C.	1	1992–1992
Newell v. . Green green nc · 1915 2 sentences 1967A levy of a license or privilege tax on dogs has been held valid in many decisions of this Court: Mowery v. Salisbury, 82 N.C. 175 ; Newell v. Green, 169 N.C. 462 , 86 S.E. 291 ; Board of Commissioners v. George, 182 N.C. 414 , 109 S.E. 77 ; McAlister v. Yancey County, 212 N.C. 208 , 193 S.E. 141 ; White v. Commissioners of Johnston County, 217 N.C. 329 , 7 S.E. 2d 825 . 1967A levy of a license or privilege tax on dogs has been held valid in many decisions of this Court: Mowery v. Salisbury, 82 N.C. 175 ; Newell v. Green, 169 N.C. 462 , 86 S.E. 291 ; Board of Commissioners v. George, 182 N.C. 414 , 109 S.E. 77 ; McAlister v. Yancey County, 212 N.C. 208 , 193 S.E. 141 ; White v. Commissioners of Johnston County, 217 N.C. 329 , 7 S.E. 2d 825 .	1	1967–1967
Mowery v. Town of Salisbury neutral nc · 1880 1 sentence 1967A levy of a license or privilege tax on dogs has been held valid in many decisions of this Court: Mowery v. Salisbury, 82 N.C. 175 ; Newell v. Green, 169 N.C. 462 , 86 S.E. 291 ; Board of Commissioners v. George, 182 N.C. 414 , 109 S.E. 77 ; McAlister v. Yancey County, 212 N.C. 208 , 193 S.E. 141 ; White v. Commissioners of Johnston County, 217 N.C. 329 , 7 S.E. 2d 825 .	1	1967–1967
McAlister v. . Yancey County neutral nc · 1937 2 sentences 1967A levy of a license or privilege tax on dogs has been held valid in many decisions of this Court: Mowery v. Salisbury, 82 N.C. 175 ; Newell v. Green, 169 N.C. 462 , 86 S.E. 291 ; Board of Commissioners v. George, 182 N.C. 414 , 109 S.E. 77 ; McAlister v. Yancey County, 212 N.C. 208 , 193 S.E. 141 ; White v. Commissioners of Johnston County, 217 N.C. 329 , 7 S.E. 2d 825 . 1967A levy of a license or privilege tax on dogs has been held valid in many decisions of this Court: Mowery v. Salisbury, 82 N.C. 175 ; Newell v. Green, 169 N.C. 462 , 86 S.E. 291 ; Board of Commissioners v. George, 182 N.C. 414 , 109 S.E. 77 ; McAlister v. Yancey County, 212 N.C. 208 , 193 S.E. 141 ; White v. Commissioners of Johnston County, 217 N.C. 329 , 7 S.E. 2d 825 .	1	1967–1967
Board of County Commissioners v. George green nc · 1921 2 sentences 1967A levy of a license or privilege tax on dogs has been held valid in many decisions of this Court: Mowery v. Salisbury, 82 N.C. 175 ; Newell v. Green, 169 N.C. 462 , 86 S.E. 291 ; Board of Commissioners v. George, 182 N.C. 414 , 109 S.E. 77 ; McAlister v. Yancey County, 212 N.C. 208 , 193 S.E. 141 ; White v. Commissioners of Johnston County, 217 N.C. 329 , 7 S.E. 2d 825 . 1967A levy of a license or privilege tax on dogs has been held valid in many decisions of this Court: Mowery v. Salisbury, 82 N.C. 175 ; Newell v. Green, 169 N.C. 462 , 86 S.E. 291 ; Board of Commissioners v. George, 182 N.C. 414 , 109 S.E. 77 ; McAlister v. Yancey County, 212 N.C. 208 , 193 S.E. 141 ; White v. Commissioners of Johnston County, 217 N.C. 329 , 7 S.E. 2d 825 .	1	1967–1967
White v. . Comrs. of Johnston green nc · 1940 2 sentences 1967A levy of a license or privilege tax on dogs has been held valid in many decisions of this Court: Mowery v. Salisbury, 82 N.C. 175 ; Newell v. Green, 169 N.C. 462 , 86 S.E. 291 ; Board of Commissioners v. George, 182 N.C. 414 , 109 S.E. 77 ; McAlister v. Yancey County, 212 N.C. 208 , 193 S.E. 141 ; White v. Commissioners of Johnston County, 217 N.C. 329 , 7 S.E. 2d 825 . 1967A levy of a license or privilege tax on dogs has been held valid in many decisions of this Court: Mowery v. Salisbury, 82 N.C. 175 ; Newell v. Green, 169 N.C. 462 , 86 S.E. 291 ; Board of Commissioners v. George, 182 N.C. 414 , 109 S.E. 77 ; McAlister v. Yancey County, 212 N.C. 208 , 193 S.E. 141 ; White v. Commissioners of Johnston County, 217 N.C. 329 , 7 S.E. 2d 825 .	1	1967–1967
Maine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. green · 1891 1 sentence 1947Cudahy Packing Co. v. Minnesota , 246 U.S. 450 , 62 L.Ed.., 827; Maine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. , 142 U.S. 217 , 35 L.Ed.., 994; Powell v. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue , 210 N.C. 211 , 186 S.E. 326 ; Johnston v. Gill, Comr. of Rev. , 224 N.C. 638 , 32 S.E.2d 30 .	1	1947–1947
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Minnesota green scotus · 1918 1 sentence 1947Cudahy Packing Co. v. Minnesota , 246 U.S. 450 , 62 L.Ed.., 827; Maine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. , 142 U.S. 217 , 35 L.Ed.., 994; Powell v. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue , 210 N.C. 211 , 186 S.E. 326 ; Johnston v. Gill, Comr. of Rev. , 224 N.C. 638 , 32 S.E.2d 30 .	1	1947–1947
Johnston v. . Gill, Comr. of Revenue green nc · 1944 2 sentences 1947Cudahy Packing Co. v. Minnesota , 246 U.S. 450 , 62 L.Ed.., 827; Maine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. , 142 U.S. 217 , 35 L.Ed.., 994; Powell v. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue , 210 N.C. 211 , 186 S.E. 326 ; Johnston v. Gill, Comr. of Rev. , 224 N.C. 638 , 32 S.E.2d 30 . 1947Cudahy Packing Co. v. Minnesota , 246 U.S. 450 , 62 L.Ed.., 827; Maine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. , 142 U.S. 217 , 35 L.Ed.., 994; Powell v. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue , 210 N.C. 211 , 186 S.E. 326 ; Johnston v. Gill, Comr. of Rev. , 224 N.C. 638 , 32 S.E.2d 30 .	1	1947–1947
Powell v. . Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue neutral nc · 1936 2 sentences 1947Cudahy Packing Co. v. Minnesota , 246 U.S. 450 , 62 L.Ed.., 827; Maine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. , 142 U.S. 217 , 35 L.Ed.., 994; Powell v. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue , 210 N.C. 211 , 186 S.E. 326 ; Johnston v. Gill, Comr. of Rev. , 224 N.C. 638 , 32 S.E.2d 30 . 1947Cudahy Packing Co. v. Minnesota , 246 U.S. 450 , 62 L.Ed.., 827; Maine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. , 142 U.S. 217 , 35 L.Ed.., 994; Powell v. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue , 210 N.C. 211 , 186 S.E. 326 ; Johnston v. Gill, Comr. of Rev. , 224 N.C. 638 , 32 S.E.2d 30 .	1	1947–1947
State v. Holloman. neutral nc · 1905 2 sentences 1912As is said in S. v. Holloman, supra , 646: "This license tax is simply a mode of regulating the use of the public roads and requiring that those desirous of using them for extraordinary purposes, as hauling heavy lumber and logs over the road in unusually heavy vehicles, shall not do so without taking out a license for such unusual and extraordinary and injurious use of the public highway and paying a license for the privilege." The reports required to be filed monthly of the quantity of lumber hauled is no hardship on defendants. 1912As is said in S. v. Holloman, supra, 646: “This license tax is simply a mode of regulating the use of - the public roads and requiring that those desirous of using them for extraordinary purposes, as hauling heavy lumber and logs over the road in unusually heavy vehicles, shall not do so without taking out a license for such unusual and extraordinary and injurious use of the public highway and paying a license for the privilege.” The reports required to be filed monthly of the quantity of lumber hauled is no hardship on defendants.	1	1912–1912

Where else courts name it

NY 83 (1889–2025) PA 82 (1846–2025) IL 76 (1894–2025) CA 61 (1862–2026) AL 38 (1906–2014) TX 33 (1907–2024) MO 26 (1913–2024) GA 24 (1891–2025) FL 23 (1934–2017) MD 22 (1924–2025) OH 21 (1922–2025) KS 20 (1927–2020) IN 19 (1904–2019) MN 19 (1909–2017) WA 18 (1916–2024) NJ 17 (1924–2024) DC 16 (1910–2013) CT 15 (1981–2022) MA 15 (1902–2024) OR 15 (1916–2019) NM 14 (1913–2017) UT 13 (1922–2024) HI 12 (1998–2025) AZ 12 (1927–2009) VA 11 (1914–2013) AR 10 (1989–2025) CO 10 (1897–2020) ID 9 (1915–2020) NC 9 (1912–2018) MI 9 (1895–2025) KY 8 (1912–2013) WY 8 (1986–2021) TN 7 (1897–2003) IA 7 (1879–2018) SD 6 (1945–2013) NE 5 (1952–1996) WV 5 (1892–1953) ME 5 (1983–2021) WI 4 (1926–1999) LA 4 (1960–2003) NH 4 (1980–2016) AK 4 (1984–2021) NV 4 (2016–2016) RI 4 (1939–2024) ND 3 (1995–2021) PR 2 (1947–1967) DE 2 (1984–1995) OK 2 (1961–1968)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check