Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
22 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1924–2025 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McDaniel v. Baranowskigreen2 sentences2021The specified purpose of the license requirement was “to insure the safety and habitability of the premises, namely that the dwelling is ‘clean, sanitary, fit for human occupancy, and in compliance with this title and other applicable State and County law.’” McDaniel, 419 Md. at 564-65 (footnote omitted) (quoting Anne Arundel County Code § 15-4-103). 2020The license requirement in McDaniel was “designed to insure the safety and habitability of the premises, namely that the dwelling is clean, sanitary, fit for human occupancy and in compliance with … other applicable State and County law.” Id. at 564-65 . | 1 | 2 |
Rice v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Id. (citing McCallum, 321 Md. at 458 ; Rice v. State, 136 Md. | 1 | 1 |
State v. McCallumgreen2 sentences2023App. 550, 560 (2014) (quoting State v. McCallum, 321 Md. 451, 457 (1991)). 3 Transp. § 16-303(c) provides that “[a] person may not drive a motor vehicle on any highway or on any property specified in § 21-101.1 of this article while the person’s license or privilege to drive is suspended in this State.” Section 16-303(d) states that “[a] person may not drive a motor vehicle on any highway or on any property specified in § 21- 101.1 of this article while the person’s license or privilege to drive is revoked in this State.” 6 In order to prove that an individual had the requisite mens rea at the 2023Id. (citing McCallum, 321 Md. at 458 ; Rice v. State, 136 Md. | 1 | 1 |
Fielding v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Once the license is validly revoked, the revocation remains in effect for the full period ordered, regardless of whether the originally valid license might otherwise have expired at some point during the period of revocation.” Fielding v. State, 733 P.2d 271, 273 (Alaska Ct.App.1987). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Weemsgreen1 sentence2014State v. Weems, 429 Md. *714 329, 337, 55 A.3d 921, 926 (2012). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bowiegreen1 sentence2008Id. at 952 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Citaramanis v. Hallowellgreen2 sentences2000In doing so, the Court recognized that “unenforceability of a contract because of illegality is a function of the strength of the public policy involved together with the degree of the violation of that policy under the facts of the case.” Id. at 158 , 613 A.2d 964 . *658 While the Court did not decide whether the failure to obtain the license would bar a landlord’s claim for money under the lease, it did hold that the statutory violation would not render the contract void and require restitution. 2000In doing so, the Court recognized that “unenforceability of a contract because of illegality is a function of the strength of the public policy involved together with the degree of the violation of that policy under the facts of the case.” Id. at 158 , 613 A.2d 964 . *658 While the Court did not decide whether the failure to obtain the license would bar a landlord’s claim for money under the lease, it did hold that the statutory violation would not render the contract void and require restitution. | 1 | 1 |
Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.green2 sentences1996See, e.g., Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 409-414 , 73 S.Ct. 760, 768-771 , 97 L.Ed. 1105 , 1116-1118 (1953); Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 553-554 , 37 S.Ct. 217, 222 , 61 L.Ed. 480, 490 (1917); State v. Orr, 68 Conn. 101 , 35 A. 770 (1896); Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 225 Mass. 192, 114 N.E. 287 (1916); State v. Nagle, 148 Me. 197 , 91 A.2d 397 (1952); State v. Alix, 110 R.I. 350 , 293 A.2d 298 (1972). 1996See, e.g., Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 409-414 , 73 S.Ct. 760, 768-771 , 97 L.Ed. 1105 , 1116-1118 (1953); Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 553-554 , 37 S.Ct. 217, 222 , 61 L.Ed. 480, 490 (1917); State v. Orr, 68 Conn. 101 , 35 A. 770 (1896); Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 225 Mass. 192, 114 N.E. 287 (1916); State v. Nagle, 148 Me. 197 , 91 A.2d 397 (1952); State v. Alix, 110 R.I. 350 , 293 A.2d 298 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
Poulos v. New Hampshiregreen2 sentences1996See, e.g., Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 409-414 , 73 S.Ct. 760, 768-771 , 97 L.Ed. 1105 , 1116-1118 (1953); Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 553-554 , 37 S.Ct. 217, 222 , 61 L.Ed. 480, 490 (1917); State v. Orr, 68 Conn. 101 , 35 A. 770 (1896); Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 225 Mass. 192, 114 N.E. 287 (1916); State v. Nagle, 148 Me. 197 , 91 A.2d 397 (1952); State v. Alix, 110 R.I. 350 , 293 A.2d 298 (1972). 1996See, e.g., Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 409-414 , 73 S.Ct. 760, 768-771 , 97 L.Ed. 1105 , 1116-1118 (1953); Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 553-554 , 37 S.Ct. 217, 222 , 61 L.Ed. 480, 490 (1917); State v. Orr, 68 Conn. 101 , 35 A. 770 (1896); Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 225 Mass. 192, 114 N.E. 287 (1916); State v. Nagle, 148 Me. 197 , 91 A.2d 397 (1952); State v. Alix, 110 R.I. 350 , 293 A.2d 298 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harry Berenter, Inc. v. Berman
green
2 sentences2011The contractor could not enforce a mechanic’s lien against the improved property, because the license requirement was for the benefit of the public. 258 Md. at 295-96 , 265 A.2d at 762-63 . 2011The contractor could not enforce a mechanic’s lien against the improved property, because the license requirement was for the benefit of the public. 258 Md. at 295-96 , 265 A.2d at 762-63 . | 4 | 2010–2022 |
Smirlock v. Potomac Development Corp.
green
2 sentences2022Harry Berenter, 258 Md. at 298-99 ; Thorpe, 252 Md. at 530 ; Smirlock, 235 Md. at 203 ; Snodgrass, 232 Md. at 423-24 ; Goldsmith, 132 Md. at 288-89 . 2022Harry Berenter, 258 Md. at 298-99 ; Thorpe, 252 Md. at 530 ; Smirlock, 235 Md. at 203 ; Snodgrass, 232 Md. at 423-24 ; Goldsmith, 132 Md. at 288-89 . | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Goldsmith v. Manufacturers' Liability Insurance
green
2 sentences2022Harry Berenter, 258 Md. at 298-99 ; Thorpe, 252 Md. at 530 ; Smirlock, 235 Md. at 203 ; Snodgrass, 232 Md. at 423-24 ; Goldsmith, 132 Md. at 288-89 . 2022Harry Berenter, 258 Md. at 298-99 ; Thorpe, 252 Md. at 530 ; Smirlock, 235 Md. at 203 ; Snodgrass, 232 Md. at 423-24 ; Goldsmith, 132 Md. at 288-89 . | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Snodgrass v. Immler
green
2 sentences2022Harry Berenter, 258 Md. at 298-99 ; Thorpe, 252 Md. at 530 ; Smirlock, 235 Md. at 203 ; Snodgrass, 232 Md. at 423-24 ; Goldsmith, 132 Md. at 288-89 . 2022Harry Berenter, 258 Md. at 298-99 ; Thorpe, 252 Md. at 530 ; Smirlock, 235 Md. at 203 ; Snodgrass, 232 Md. at 423-24 ; Goldsmith, 132 Md. at 288-89 . | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Thorpe v. Carte
green
2 sentences2022Harry Berenter, 258 Md. at 298-99 ; Thorpe, 252 Md. at 530 ; Smirlock, 235 Md. at 203 ; Snodgrass, 232 Md. at 423-24 ; Goldsmith, 132 Md. at 288-89 . 2022Harry Berenter, 258 Md. at 298-99 ; Thorpe, 252 Md. at 530 ; Smirlock, 235 Md. at 203 ; Snodgrass, 232 Md. at 423-24 ; Goldsmith, 132 Md. at 288-89 . | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Colorado v. Bertine
green
1 sentence2025Defense counsel cited various United States Supreme Court cases, including Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U.S. 367 (1987), for the proposition that the seizure of a vehicle under the inventory search exception is justified only if authorized pursuant to standard criteria and based on something other than suspicion of criminal activity. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Clifton
green
2 sentences2024In Clifton, id. at 574 , 10 A.2d at 704 , the defendant had been indicted and arrested on a charge of selling an alcoholic beverage without a license in violation of the State Alcoholic Beverages Act. 2024In Clifton, id. at 574 , 10 A.2d at 704 , the defendant had been indicted and arrested on a charge of selling an alcoholic beverage without a license in violation of the State Alcoholic Beverages Act. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Wallace v. State
green
1 sentence2021However, nothing in McCallum speaks directly to the statute at issue here, nor does it constitute “a showing that [Lee] has been superseded by significant changes in the law or facts.” Wallace, 452 Md. at 582 (quoting DRD Pool Serv., Inc., 416 Md. at 64). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Alcoa Concrete & Masonry, Inc. v. Stalker Bros.
green
2 sentences2011Nor could the contractor recover on the basis that the homeowner was unjustly enriched. 191 Md.App. at 600 , 993 A.2d at 138 . 2011Nor could the contractor recover on the basis that the homeowner was unjustly enriched. 191 Md.App. at 600 , 993 A.2d at 138 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Sullivan v. State
green
2 sentences2009Sullivan, 180 Md.App. at 47 , 948 A.2d at 128 . 2009Sullivan, 180 Md.App. at 47 , 948 A.2d at 128 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Tederick v. State
green
2 sentences1999The court concluded that Tederick was convicted and sentenced twice for the same offense in violation of both the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution as well as Maryland’s common law against double jeopardy, id. at 41 , 723 A.2d at 919 , not because one offense is a lesser included offense of the other but because driving while suspended is “redundant.” 4 The essence of the court’s conclusion was that § 16-303(a) through (g) creates one offense making it unlawful to drive while one’s license or privilege is suspended *152 or revoked and those subsections are simply differe 1999The court concluded that Tederick was convicted and sentenced twice for the same offense in violation of both the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution as well as Maryland’s common law against double jeopardy, id. at 41 , 723 A.2d at 919 , not because one offense is a lesser included offense of the other but because driving while suspended is “redundant.” 4 The essence of the court’s conclusion was that § 16-303(a) through (g) creates one offense making it unlawful to drive while one’s license or privilege is suspended *152 or revoked and those subsections are simply differe | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Commonwealth v. McCarthy
green
2 sentences1996See, e.g., Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 409-414 , 73 S.Ct. 760, 768-771 , 97 L.Ed. 1105 , 1116-1118 (1953); Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 553-554 , 37 S.Ct. 217, 222 , 61 L.Ed. 480, 490 (1917); State v. Orr, 68 Conn. 101 , 35 A. 770 (1896); Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 225 Mass. 192, 114 N.E. 287 (1916); State v. Nagle, 148 Me. 197 , 91 A.2d 397 (1952); State v. Alix, 110 R.I. 350 , 293 A.2d 298 (1972). 1996See, e.g., Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 409-414 , 73 S.Ct. 760, 768-771 , 97 L.Ed. 1105 , 1116-1118 (1953); Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 553-554 , 37 S.Ct. 217, 222 , 61 L.Ed. 480, 490 (1917); State v. Orr, 68 Conn. 101 , 35 A. 770 (1896); Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 225 Mass. 192, 114 N.E. 287 (1916); State v. Nagle, 148 Me. 197 , 91 A.2d 397 (1952); State v. Alix, 110 R.I. 350 , 293 A.2d 298 (1972). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Alix
green
2 sentences1996See, e.g., Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 409-414 , 73 S.Ct. 760, 768-771 , 97 L.Ed. 1105 , 1116-1118 (1953); Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 553-554 , 37 S.Ct. 217, 222 , 61 L.Ed. 480, 490 (1917); State v. Orr, 68 Conn. 101 , 35 A. 770 (1896); Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 225 Mass. 192, 114 N.E. 287 (1916); State v. Nagle, 148 Me. 197 , 91 A.2d 397 (1952); State v. Alix, 110 R.I. 350 , 293 A.2d 298 (1972). 1996See, e.g., Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 409-414 , 73 S.Ct. 760, 768-771 , 97 L.Ed. 1105 , 1116-1118 (1953); Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 553-554 , 37 S.Ct. 217, 222 , 61 L.Ed. 480, 490 (1917); State v. Orr, 68 Conn. 101 , 35 A. 770 (1896); Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 225 Mass. 192, 114 N.E. 287 (1916); State v. Nagle, 148 Me. 197 , 91 A.2d 397 (1952); State v. Alix, 110 R.I. 350 , 293 A.2d 298 (1972). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Orr
green
2 sentences1996See, e.g., Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 409-414 , 73 S.Ct. 760, 768-771 , 97 L.Ed. 1105 , 1116-1118 (1953); Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 553-554 , 37 S.Ct. 217, 222 , 61 L.Ed. 480, 490 (1917); State v. Orr, 68 Conn. 101 , 35 A. 770 (1896); Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 225 Mass. 192, 114 N.E. 287 (1916); State v. Nagle, 148 Me. 197 , 91 A.2d 397 (1952); State v. Alix, 110 R.I. 350 , 293 A.2d 298 (1972). 1996See, e.g., Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 409-414 , 73 S.Ct. 760, 768-771 , 97 L.Ed. 1105 , 1116-1118 (1953); Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 553-554 , 37 S.Ct. 217, 222 , 61 L.Ed. 480, 490 (1917); State v. Orr, 68 Conn. 101 , 35 A. 770 (1896); Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 225 Mass. 192, 114 N.E. 287 (1916); State v. Nagle, 148 Me. 197 , 91 A.2d 397 (1952); State v. Alix, 110 R.I. 350 , 293 A.2d 298 (1972). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Nagle
green
2 sentences1996See, e.g., Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 409-414 , 73 S.Ct. 760, 768-771 , 97 L.Ed. 1105 , 1116-1118 (1953); Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 553-554 , 37 S.Ct. 217, 222 , 61 L.Ed. 480, 490 (1917); State v. Orr, 68 Conn. 101 , 35 A. 770 (1896); Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 225 Mass. 192, 114 N.E. 287 (1916); State v. Nagle, 148 Me. 197 , 91 A.2d 397 (1952); State v. Alix, 110 R.I. 350 , 293 A.2d 298 (1972). 1996See, e.g., Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 409-414 , 73 S.Ct. 760, 768-771 , 97 L.Ed. 1105 , 1116-1118 (1953); Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 553-554 , 37 S.Ct. 217, 222 , 61 L.Ed. 480, 490 (1917); State v. Orr, 68 Conn. 101 , 35 A. 770 (1896); Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 225 Mass. 192, 114 N.E. 287 (1916); State v. Nagle, 148 Me. 197 , 91 A.2d 397 (1952); State v. Alix, 110 R.I. 350 , 293 A.2d 298 (1972). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Texas Transport & Terminal Co. v. City of New Orleans
green
2 sentences1988Co. case, the Supreme Court, invalidating a license requirement imposed upon a corporation employed by the owners of vessels engaged exclusively in interstate or foreign commerce, described these activities as follows ( 264 U.S. at 151-152 , 44 S.Ct. at 242 ): “Defendant was regularly employed as agent for four steamship lines, under a contract fixing its compensation on the basis of commissions, calculated upon the gross amount of freight charges collected by it for each company. 1988Co. case, the Supreme Court, invalidating a license requirement imposed upon a corporation employed by the owners of vessels engaged exclusively in interstate or foreign commerce, described these activities as follows ( 264 U.S. at 151-152 , 44 S.Ct. at 242 ): “Defendant was regularly employed as agent for four steamship lines, under a contract fixing its compensation on the basis of commissions, calculated upon the gross amount of freight charges collected by it for each company. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Ex Rel. Castranda
green
2 sentences1971Transit Co. v. Castranda, 194 Md. 421 , 71 A. 2d 442 (1950): “The question of contributory negligence must be considered in the light of all the inferences favorable to the plaintiff’s case that may be fairly deduced from the evidence. 1971Transit Co. v. Castranda, 194 Md. 421 , 71 A. 2d 442 (1950): “The question of contributory negligence must be considered in the light of all the inferences favorable to the plaintiff’s case that may be fairly deduced from the evidence. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Clark v. Kansas City
green
2 sentences1939In State v. Case, 132 Md. 269, 272 , 103 A. 569, 570 , objection to a license requirement was made by a resident on the ground that the license tax law discriminated against non-residents and was therefore unconstitutional and unenforceable, but the court said, “being a resident and a party not discriminated against, he cannot take advantage in this court of that point, for his rights are not affected.” See cases there cited, and Clark v. Kansas City, 176 U. S. 114, 118 , 20 S. Ct. 284 , *328 44 L. 1939In State v. Case, 132 Md. 269, 272 , 103 A. 569, 570 , objection to a license requirement was made by a resident on the ground that the license tax law discriminated against non-residents and was therefore unconstitutional and unenforceable, but the court said, “being a resident and a party not discriminated against, he cannot take advantage in this court of that point, for his rights are not affected.” See cases there cited, and Clark v. Kansas City, 176 U. S. 114, 118 , 20 S. Ct. 284 , *328 44 L. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
State v. Case
green
2 sentences1939In State v. Case, 132 Md. 269, 272 , 103 A. 569, 570 , objection to a license requirement was made by a resident on the ground that the license tax law discriminated against non-residents and was therefore unconstitutional and unenforceable, but the court said, “being a resident and a party not discriminated against, he cannot take advantage in this court of that point, for his rights are not affected.” See cases there cited, and Clark v. Kansas City, 176 U. S. 114, 118 , 20 S. Ct. 284 , *328 44 L. 1939In State v. Case, 132 Md. 269, 272 , 103 A. 569, 570 , objection to a license requirement was made by a resident on the ground that the license tax law discriminated against non-residents and was therefore unconstitutional and unenforceable, but the court said, “being a resident and a party not discriminated against, he cannot take advantage in this court of that point, for his rights are not affected.” See cases there cited, and Clark v. Kansas City, 176 U. S. 114, 118 , 20 S. Ct. 284 , *328 44 L. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Winter v. Barrett
green
2 sentences1939Ed. 392 ; Winter v. Barrett, 352 Ill. 441 , 186 N. E. 113 . 1939Ed. 392 ; Winter v. Barrett, 352 Ill. 441 , 186 N. E. 113 . | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Hatch v. Pendergast
neutral
1 sentence1936Hatch v. Pendergast, 15 Md. 251 ; Rose v. Baltimore, 51 Md. 256 ; Border State Sav. | 1 | 1936–1936 |
| Rose v. Mayor of Baltimore green | 1 | 1936–1936 |
| Mayor of Baltimore v. White green | 1 | 1928–1928 |
| Phipps v. State green | 1 | 1924–1924 |
| Powell v. Wilson neutral | 1 | 1924–1924 |
| Handy v. Maddox neutral | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.