10 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1986–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McDaniel v. CSX Transportation, Inc.green2 sentences2000Id. at 262 (stating that formerly adopted Frye test for admissibility was criticized as “too restrictive of relevant evidence, particularly new or ‘cutting edge’ scientific theory”). 2000Id. at 262 (stating that formerly adopted Frye test for admissibility was criticized as “too restrictive of relevant evidence, particularly new or ‘cutting edge’ scientific theory”). | 3 | 3 |
Frye v. United Statesred2 sentences1992In order for evidence to be admissible under the Frye test, it must have "gained general acceptance in a particular field in which it belongs." Frye, 293 F. 1013, 1014 . 1992In order for evidence to be admissible under the Frye test, it must have "gained general acceptance in a particular field in which it belongs." Frye, 293 F. 1013, 1014 . | 2 | 3 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.green2 sentences1997Subsequently, however, the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 587 , 113 S.Ct. 2786, 2793 (1993), held that the Frye test, "absent from and incompatible with the Federal Rules of Evidence, should not be applied in federal trials." Daubert does not by its terms, however, apply to state court proceedings. 1997Subsequently, however, the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 587 , 113 S.Ct. 2786, 2793 (1993), held that the Frye test, "absent from and incompatible with the Federal Rules of Evidence, should not be applied in federal trials." Daubert does not by its terms, however, apply to state court proceedings. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Castrogreen2 sentences1992See Cobey v. State, 80 Md.App. 31 , 559 A.2d 391, 398 (1989); State v. Schwartz, 447 N.W.2d 422, 425 (Minn.1989); People v. Castro, 144 Misc.2d 956 , 545 N.Y.S.2d 985, 995 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1989); State v. Ford, 301 S.C. 485 , 392 S.E.2d 781, 784 (1990). 1992See Cobey v. State, 80 Md.App. 31 , 559 A.2d 391, 398 (1989); State v. Schwartz, 447 N.W.2d 422, 425 (Minn.1989); People v. Castro, 144 Misc.2d 956 , 545 N.Y.S.2d 985, 995 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1989); State v. Ford, 301 S.C. 485 , 392 S.E.2d 781, 784 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Schwartzgreen1 sentence1992See Cobey v. State, 80 Md.App. 31 , 559 A.2d 391, 398 (1989); State v. Schwartz, 447 N.W.2d 422, 425 (Minn.1989); People v. Castro, 144 Misc.2d 956 , 545 N.Y.S.2d 985, 995 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1989); State v. Ford, 301 S.C. 485 , 392 S.E.2d 781, 784 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
Cobey v. Stategreen2 sentences1992See Cobey v. State, 80 Md. 1992See Cobey v. State, 80 Md.App. 31 , 559 A.2d 391, 398 (1989); State v. Schwartz, 447 N.W.2d 422, 425 (Minn.1989); People v. Castro, 144 Misc.2d 956 , 545 N.Y.S.2d 985, 995 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1989); State v. Ford, 301 S.C. 485 , 392 S.E.2d 781, 784 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Fordgreen2 sentences1992See Cobey v. State, 80 Md.App. 31 , 559 A.2d 391, 398 (1989); State v. Schwartz, 447 N.W.2d 422, 425 (Minn.1989); People v. Castro, 144 Misc.2d 956 , 545 N.Y.S.2d 985, 995 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1989); State v. Ford, 301 S.C. 485 , 392 S.E.2d 781, 784 (1990). 1992See Cobey v. State, 80 Md.App. 31 , 559 A.2d 391, 398 (1989); State v. Schwartz, 447 N.W.2d 422, 425 (Minn.1989); People v. Castro, 144 Misc.2d 956 , 545 N.Y.S.2d 985, 995 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1989); State v. Ford, 301 S.C. 485 , 392 S.E.2d 781, 784 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Emgegreen2 sentences1989See also Commonwealth v. Emge, 381 Pa.Super. 139 , 553 A.2d 74 (1988) (testimony comparing behavior to that of known victims constitutes improper bolstering). . 1989See also Commonwealth v. Emge, 381 Pa.Super. 139 , 553 A.2d 74 (1988) (testimony comparing behavior to that of known victims constitutes improper bolstering). . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Johnsongreen2 sentences1989Rule 702, Federal Rules of Evidence, provides for the admission of evidence which “will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue_” Rule 703, Federal Rules of Evidence, requires that the data or facts be “of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field....” See State v. Johnson, 717 S.W.2d 298, 303 (Tenn.Crim.App.1986), p.t.a. denied September 8, 1986. 1989Rule 702, Federal Rules of Evidence, provides for the admission of evidence which “will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue_” Rule 703, Federal Rules of Evidence, requires that the data or facts be “of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field....” See State v. Johnson, 717 S.W.2d 298, 303 (Tenn.Crim.App.1986), p.t.a. denied September 8, 1986. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences1986State v. Williams, 388 A.2d 500, 503-504 (Me.1978). 1986State v. Williams, 388 A.2d 500, 503-504 (Me.1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Frye v. Memphis State University
green
2 sentences2000There has been no showing by Barnes that his situation was comparable to Frye, in which “the employee was a tenured professor, a highly protected employment status under the law, whose speciality was such that his professional reputation was perhaps his most valued asset.” Frye, 806 S.W.2d at 173-74 . 2000There has been no showing by Barnes that his situation was comparable to Frye, in which “the employee was a tenured professor, a highly protected employment status under the law, whose speciality was such that his professional reputation was perhaps his most valued asset.” Frye, 806 S.W.2d at 173-74 . | 2 | 1992–2000 |
Albert v. Frye
green
1 sentence2014Id. at 528-29 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.