Frye standard (Hawaii) · Go Syfert
← Hawaii issues

Frye standard in Hawaii

6 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.green
scotus · 1993 · cited in 3 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 1995–2008
2 sentences

2008Analogously, the United States Supreme Court (the Court), in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), held that the FRE, enacted in 1975, superseded the common law of evidence which, by implication, included "the Frye test." Id. at 587 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 .

2008Analogously, the United States Supreme Court (the Court), in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), held that the FRE, enacted in 1975, superseded the common law of evidence which, by implication, included "the Frye test." Id. at 587 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 .

13
Frye v. United Statesred
cadc · 1923 · cited in 3 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 1992–2008
2 sentences

2008The Daubert Court stated: The Frye test has its origin in a short and citation-free 1923 decision[, Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.1923),] concerning the admissibility of evidence derived from a systolic blood pressure deception test, a crude precursor to the polygraph machine.

2008The Daubert Court stated: The Frye test has its origin in a short and citation-free 1923 decision[, Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.1923),] concerning the admissibility of evidence derived from a systolic blood pressure deception test, a crude precursor to the polygraph machine.

13
People v. Mendiblesgreen
calctapp · 1988 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See People v. Mendibles, 199 Cal.App.3d 1277 , 245 Cal.Rptr. 553, 563 (1988) (stating that a Frye hearing is not required with respect to a colposcope, which the court characterized as “a weak microscope”).

2006See People v. Mendibles, 199 Cal.App.3d 1277 , 245 Cal.Rptr. 553, 563 (1988) (stating that a Frye hearing is not required with respect to a colposcope, which the court characterized as “a weak microscope”).

11
State v. Griergreen
alaskactapp · 1990 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11
Ballard v. Stategreen
alaskactapp · 1998 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., Ballard v. State, 955 P.2d 931 (Alaska Ct.App.1998), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the Daubert standard over the Frye standard); State ex rel.

1999See, e.g., Ballard v. State, 955 P.2d 931 (Alaska Ct.App.1998), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the Daubert standard over the Frye standard); State ex rel.

11
State v. Coongreen
alaska · 1999 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
11
United States v. Roland Addison, United States of America v. Albert Henry Raymondgreen
cadc · 1974 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (28)

CaseCitedYears
Missouri v. Frye green
scotus · 2012
2 sentences

2020Pre-trial hearing regarding State’s plea offer At a May 4, 2016 hearing regarding other matters, the circuit court indicated it would be conducting what it called a “Frye hearing.” The circuit court was apparently referring to Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012), in which the United States Supreme Court held that, “as a general rule, defense counsel has the duty to communicate formal offers from the prosecution to accept a plea on terms and conditions that may be favorable to the accused.” Frye, 566 U.S. at 145 .6 The State 4 “Criminal property damage in the second degree. (1) A person commi

2020Pre-trial hearing regarding State’s plea offer At a May 4, 2016 hearing regarding other matters, the circuit court indicated it would be conducting what it called a “Frye hearing.” The circuit court was apparently referring to Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012), in which the United States Supreme Court held that, “as a general rule, defense counsel has the duty to communicate formal offers from the prosecution to accept a plea on terms and conditions that may be favorable to the accused.” Frye, 566 U.S. at 145 .6 The State 4 “Criminal property damage in the second degree. (1) A person commi

12020–2020
State v. Garrett green
idaho · 1991
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
Young v. City of Brookhaven green
miss · 1997
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
People v. Buening green
illappct · 1992
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
State v. Clark green
mont · 1988
2 sentences

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

11999–1999
State v. Murphy green
iowa · 1990
2 sentences

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

11999–1999
State v. Armstrong green
la · 1990
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
State v. Superior Court green
ariz · 1986
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
Zimmerman v. State green
del · 1997
2 sentences

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

11999–1999
Schultz v. State green
mdctspecapp · 1995
2 sentences

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

11999–1999
State v. Armstrong green
lactapp · 1990
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
State v. Montalbo green
haw · 1992
2 sentences

1999This is the holding of State v. Montalbo, 73 H[aw], 130, 828 P.2d 1274 (1992), observing that Rule 702's assistance requirement contemplates expert testimony based upon "a sound factual foundation ... an explicable and reliable system of analysis ... [and having the capacity to] add to the common understanding of the jury." The reliability determination "could include the Frye test,” id., but is not so limited: "[I]t is possible that a court could also consider the scientific procedure itself, - as well as other evidence of the procedure's reliability.” Id.

1999This is the holding of State v. Montalbo, 73 H[aw], 130, 828 P.2d 1274 (1992), observing that Rule 702's assistance requirement contemplates expert testimony based upon "a sound factual foundation ... an explicable and reliable system of analysis ... [and having the capacity to] add to the common understanding of the jury." The reliability determination "could include the Frye test,” id., but is not so limited: "[I]t is possible that a court could also consider the scientific procedure itself, - as well as other evidence of the procedure's reliability.” Id.

11999–1999
Emerson v. State green
texcrimapp · 1994
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
City of Fargo v. McLaughlin green
nd · 1994
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
State v. Carson green
mo · 1997
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
Whitson v. State green
ark · 1993
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
State v. Taylor green
me · 1997
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
State v. Hill green
moctapp · 1993
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. City Court of City of Mesa green
ariz · 1990
2 sentences

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

11999–1999
Hawkins v. State green
gactapp · 1996
2 sentences

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

11999–1999
State v. Bresson green
ohio · 1990
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
People v. Berger green
michctapp · 1996
2 sentences

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

1999Hamilton v. City Court, 165 Ariz. 514 , 799 P.2d 855 (1990); Zimmerman v. State, 693 A.2d 311 (Del.1997); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga.App. 34 , 476 S.E.2d 803 (1996); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170 Ill.Dec. 542 , 592 N.E.2d 1222 (1992), appeal denied, 146 Ill.2d 634 , 176 Ill.Dec. 806 , 602 N.E.2d 460 (1992); State v. Murphy, 451 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1990); State v. Armstrong, 561 So.2d 883 (La.Ct.App.1990), writ denied, 568 So.2d 1077 (La.1990); State v. Taylor, 694 A.2d 907 (Me.1997); Schultz v. State, 106 Md.App. 145 , 664 A.2d 60 (1995); People v. Berger, 217 Mich.App. 213 , 551 N.W.

11999–1999
Hurley v. United States green
scotus · 1994
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
Mount v. El Dorado County Superior Court green
scotus · 1994
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
State v. Sullivan green
sc · 1993
2 sentences

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

1999See, e.g., State v. Grier, 791 P.2d 627 (Alaska Ct.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999) (adopting the standard articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (the Daubert standard) over the one in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) (the Frye standard)); State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 (1986); Whitson v. State, 314 Ark. 458 , 863 S.W.2d 794 (1993); State v. Garrett, 119 Idaho 878 , 811 P.2d 488 (1991); People v. Buening, 229 Ill.App.3d 538 , 170

11999–1999
State v. Kim green
haw · 1982
11992–1992
State v. Chang green
haw · 1962
11992–1992
State v. Batangan green
haw · 1990
11992–1992

Where else courts name it

NY 396 (1979–2026) IL 308 (1983–2026) PA 240 (1977–2026) WA 219 (1978–2026) FL 180 (1983–2026) CA 138 (1976–2026) MD 60 (1978–2025) AZ 59 (1982–2016) NJ 52 (1978–2026) KS 48 (1981–2020) MO 47 (1985–2024) TX 38 (1984–2026) MA 33 (1975–2024) AL 32 (1984–2017) CO 30 (1982–2021) MN 29 (1980–2026) CT 29 (1984–2005) NE 25 (1992–2017) MS 25 (1990–2008) AK 23 (1983–2019) DC 23 (1979–2026) MI 22 (1977–2024) OH 19 (1975–2023) VA 17 (1988–2010) IN 17 (1984–2023) SD 15 (1985–2026) WV 14 (1980–2015) DE 10 (1985–2025) NM 10 (1993–2016) KY 10 (1991–2015) TN 10 (1986–2014) WI 10 (1981–2021) ID 10 (1984–2013) GA 9 (1982–2020) NH 9 (1992–2004) IA 8 (1986–2025) AR 8 (1989–1996) UT 8 (1980–2019) OR 7 (1984–2024) LA 7 (1982–2018) RI 7 (1985–2020) WY 6 (1983–2025) VT 6 (1993–2009) HI 6 (1992–2020) NC 6 (1984–2004) OK 6 (1994–2025) MT 6 (1991–2013) SC 5 (1990–2026) ND 4 (1983–2005) ME 3 (1978–2011)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check